UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.            )

Filed by the Registrant  

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material under§240.14a-12

Seagate Technology Public Limited Companypublic limited company

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

  No fee required.

 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1)and 0-11.
 (1)  

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 (2)  

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 (3)  

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 (4)  

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 (5)  

Total fee paid:

 

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange ActRule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1)  

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 (2)  

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 (3)  

Filing Party:

 

 (4)  

Date Filed:

 


LOGO

August 30, 201731, 2020

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 20172020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Seagate Technology plc, which will be held at 9:30 a.m. local time5:00 p.m. Irish Standard Time on Wednesday,Thursday, October 18, 2017,22, 2020, at 10 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, D02 T380, Ireland. Due to public health concerns and continuing uncertainty in connection with COVID-19, this year we also are offering you the opportunity to virtually join the Annual General Meeting via live webcast over the Internet at 5:00 p.m. Irish Standard Time (12:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time). You may virtually join the Annual General Meeting and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/STX2020. In accordance with Irish law, we are required to have a principal meeting place, which is a physical location, where shareholders may attend the Annual General Meeting in person and vote. However, in light of public health concerns and travel recommendations and restrictions, we strongly advise shareholders not to attend in person at the InterContinental Hotel, Simmonscourt Road, Dublin 4, Ireland.principal meeting place, and ask that shareholders join the Annual General Meeting virtually instead. Shareholders joining virtually will not be able to vote at the meeting. Your vote is important. We encourage shareholders to cast their votes in advance of the Annual General Meeting, whether they plan to attend in person or join virtually.

We continue to monitor COVID-19 developments and other circumstances. Should we determine that alternate Annual General Meeting arrangements may be advisable or required, such as changing the date, time or location of the Annual General Meeting, we will announce our decision by press release, post additional information at investors.seagate.com, and make a public filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Please monitor the “Events” tab of investors.seagate.com regularly, as circumstances may change upon short notice.

Details of the business to be presented at the meeting may be found in the Notice of 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement accompanying this letter.

We hopeurge you are planning to attendread the meeting. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan Proxy Statement carefully and use one of the specified methods of voting to attend the meeting, please submit your proxy as soon as possible soensure that your shares maywill be representedvoted at the 20172020 Annual General Meeting.Meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Seagate Technology plc, Iwe thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

Stephen J. Luczo

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

LOGO

LOGO

Michael R. Cannon

William D. Mosley

Chair of the BoardChief Executive Officer and Director


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

LOGO

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

NOTICE OF 20172020 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

The 20172020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “2020 AGM”) of Seagate Technology plc (“Seagate” or the “Company”), a company incorporated under the laws of Ireland with its principal executive offices at 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, D02 NX53, Ireland, will be held on Wednesday,Thursday, October 18, 2017,22, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. local time,5:00 p.m. Irish Standard Time, at 10 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, D02 T380, Ireland. Due to public health concerns and continuing uncertainty in connection with COVID-19, this year we are also offering you the opportunity to join the 2020 AGM virtually via live webcast over the Internet. We encourage you to use this feature rather than attending the 2020 AGM in person. Those participating virtually can join and submit questions via the Internet during the 2020 AGM by accessing www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/STX2020. However, shareholders joining virtually will not be able to vote at the InterContinental Hotel, Simmonscourt Road, Dublin 4, Ireland.meeting. We encourage shareholders to cast their votes prior to the 2020 AGM by one of the methods described in the accompanying Proxy Statement to ensure that your shares will be voted at the 2020 AGM, even if you plan to attend in person or join virtually.

The Company is monitoring COVID-19 developments and other circumstances, as well as guidance issued by the Irish Health Service Executive (“HSE”), the Irish government, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization. We have implemented, and will continue to implement, the measures advised by the HSE to minimize the spread of COVID-19, including in respect of the 2020 AGM. Should we determine that alternative 2020 AGM arrangements may be advisable or required, such as changing the date, time or location of the 2020 AGM, we will announce our decision by press release, post additional information at investors.seagate.com, and make a public filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); such notifications will be in accordance with Irish and other applicable laws, rules and regulations. Please monitor the “Events” tab of investors.seagate.com regularly, as circumstances may change upon short notice.

The purposes of the 2017 Annual General Meeting2020 AGM, which are more completely described in the accompanying Proxy Statement, are:

General Proposals:

 

 1.

By separate resolutions, to elect as directors the following incumbent directors who shall retire in accordance with the Articles of AssociationConstitution and, being eligible, offer themselves for election and to elect as a director (the “Director Nominees”):

 

(a) Stephen J. LuczoMark W. Adams  (b) Mark W. AdamsJudy Bruner  (c) Michael R. Cannon
(d)Mei-Wei Cheng(e) William T. Coleman  (f)(e) Jay L. Geldmacher(f) Dylan Haggart
(g) William D. MosleyStephen J. Luczo  (h) Dr. Chong Sup ParkWilliam D. Mosley  (i) Stephanie Tilenius
(j) Edward J. Zander    

 

 2.

Approve, in an advisory,non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers(“Say-on-Pay”).

 

 3.Approve, in an advisory,non-binding vote, the frequency of futureSay-on-Pay votes (“Frequency ofSay-on-Pay”).

4.Approve an amendment and restatement of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESP Plan”) to increase the number of shares available for issuance.

5.Ratify, in anon-binding vote, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending July 2, 2021 (“fiscal year 2021”), and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) to set the auditors’ remuneration.

Irish Law Proposals:

6.Grant the Board the authority to allot and/or issue shares under Irish law.

7Grant the Board the authority toopt-out of statutorypre-emption rights under Irish law.

8.Determine the price range at which the Company canre-allot shares that it acquires as treasury shares under Irish law.

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

       20172020 Proxy Statement


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

vote, the Audit Committee (“Audit Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) to set the auditors’ remuneration.

Irish Law Proposal:

The Irish Companies Act 2014, as amended (the “Irish Companies Act”) obligates us to propose certain matters to shareholders for approval that would generally not be subject to periodic approval by shareholders of companies incorporated in the United States but are considered routine items for approval by shareholders of companies incorporated in Ireland.

 

4.

Determine the price range at which the Company can re-allot shares that it acquires as treasury shares.

Other:

 

 9.5.

Conduct such other business properly brought before the meeting.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” each director nominee included in Proposal 1 and “FOR” each of Proposals 2 and 4 through 8. For Proposal 3, the Board recommends you vote “FOR one year.”4. The full text of these proposals is set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

Proposals 1, 2, 4, 5 and 63 are ordinary resolutions, requiring the approval of a simple majority of the votes cast at the meeting. Proposal 3 requires an affirmative vote of4 is a plurality of all votes cast at the meeting. Proposals 7 and 8 are special resolutions,resolution, requiring the approval of not less than 75% of the votes cast.cast at the meeting.

Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 21, 201724, 2020 (“Record Date”) are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the 2017 Annual General Meeting.Please provide2020 AGM. If you are a shareholder as of the close of business on the Record Date, you may attend, speak and vote at the 2020 AGM or you may appoint a proxy or proxies to attend, speak and vote on your behalf. A proxy need not be a shareholder. If you wish to appoint as proxy any person other than the individuals specified on the proxy card, please contact the Company Secretary at our registered office and also note your nominated proxy must attend the 2020 AGM in Dublin in person in order for your votes to be cast.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting or join virtually, we encourage you to please read the accompanying Proxy Statement and submit your proxy evenas soon as possible, so that your shares may be represented at the 2020 AGM in Dublin. You may vote by proxy by using the Internet, calling by telephone, or completing, signing and returning your proxy card by mail by no later than 6:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (11:59 p.m. Irish Standard Time) on October 21, 2020 (or, if you plan on attending the meeting.are a beneficial owner, such earlier time as your bank, broker-dealer, brokerage firm, or nominee may require). Instructions on how to votesubmit your proxy are set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

If you have any questions about the meeting or require assistance, please call Georgeson LLC, our proxy solicitor, at +1 781 575 2137 or at + 1 800 891 3214 (toll-free within the United States).

During the meeting, following a review of Seagate’s business andthe Company’s affairs, management will also present Seagate’s Irish statutory financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017July 3, 2020 and the reports of the directors and auditors thereon.

By order of the Board,

 

 

LOGO

Katherine E. Schuelke

Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary

August 30, 2017

31, 2020

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

       20172020 Proxy Statement


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 18, 201722, 2020

We will be relyingrely on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)SEC rule that allows companies to furnish Proxy Materialsproxy materials over the Internet instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. As a result, we are sending our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) instead of a paper copy of our Proxy Statement, including our Irish statutory financial statements for the Company’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2017July 3, 2020 (“fiscal year 2017”2020”), and any other appendices thereto, the proxy card and our Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal year 20172020 (collectively, the “Proxy Materials”). The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper or email copy of the Proxy Materials. If you have previously elected to receive our Proxy Materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials via email unless you elect otherwise. A full printed set of our Proxy Materials will be mailed to you automatically only if you have previously made a permanent election to receive our Proxy Materials in printed form.

IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER WHO IS ENTITLED TO ATTEND, SPEAK AND VOTE, THEN YOU ARE ENTITLED TO APPOINT A PROXY OR PROXIES TO ATTEND, SPEAK AND VOTE ON YOUR BEHALF. A PROXY IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A SHAREHOLDER IN THE COMPANY. IF YOU WISH TO APPOINT AS PROXY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN THE INDIVIDUALS SPECIFIED ON THE PROXY CARD, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMPANY SECRETARY AT OUR REGISTERED OFFICE AND ALSO NOTE THAT YOUR NOMINATED PROXY MUST ATTEND THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING IN PERSON IN ORDER FOR YOUR VOTES TO BE CAST.

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

SUMMARY INFORMATION

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. For more complete information about the topics summarized below, please review Seagate Technology plc’s Annual Report onForm 10-K and the entire Proxy Statement.

2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

Date and Time:Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. local time
Place:InterContinental Hotel
Simmonscourt Road
Dublin 4, Ireland
Record Date:August 21, 2017
Voting:Shareholders as of close of business on August 21, 2017 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote on the proxy proposals. Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and each of the other proposals.
Attendance:All shareholders as of the close of business on the Record Date may attend the 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “2017 AGM”). You can attend, speak and vote at the meeting even if you have completed and submitted a form of proxy. Your nominated proxy must attend the 2017 AGM in person in order for your votes to be cast.
Proxy Materials:The Proxy Materials were first made available to shareholders on or about August 30, 2017.

1

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Proposals, voting recommendations and vote required:

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the proposals that will be submitted for shareholder approval at the 2017 AGM.

 Proposals:                                                                                                          Vote required:                 Board    
Recommendation    

 1.

Election of each of the 10 Director Nominees Majority of Votes CastFOR each
nominee

 2.

Advisory Vote onSay-on-Pay Majority of Votes CastFOR

 3.

Advisory Vote on the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay Affirmative Plurality of

 Votes Cast

FOR one year

 4.

Amendment and Restatement of the ESP Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance Majority of Votes CastFOR

 5.

Ratification of the Appointment and Remuneration of Auditors Majority of Votes CastFOR

 6.

Grant Board Authority to Allot and/or Issue Shares Majority of Votes CastFOR

 7.

Grant Board Authority toOpt-out of StatutoryPre-emption Rights 75% of Votes CastFOR

 8.

Determine the Price Range for theRe-Allotment of Treasury Shares 75% of Votes CastFOR

During the meeting, following a review of Seagate’s business and affairs, management will also present Seagate’s Irish financial statements for the fiscal year 2017 and the reports of the directors and statutory auditors thereon.

Seagate’s Corporate Governance Highlights

•       The Board consists of a substantial majority of independent directors.

•       The Board has a lead independent director (“Lead Independent Director”).

•       Directors must receive a majority of shareholder votes cast to be elected.

•       Thenon-executive directors meet regularly in executive sessions.

•       Directors and executive officers are subject to share ownership guidelines.

•       Executive officers are subject to a “clawback” policy.

•       All directors are elected annually by shareholders.

•       The Company maintains ananti-hedging policy for all directors and employees.

•       The Board and each committee perform a periodicself-evaluation.

•       The Board oversees enterprise risk management.

•       The Board undertakes succession planning for all executive levels, including the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and the Board.

2

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Director Nominees.

We are asking our shareholders to elect, by separate resolutions, each of the Director Nominees described below:

  Nominee                    Age    

 

Director

     Since     

 Principal Occupation     Independent     

Current Committee

Membership

 

Stephen J. Luczo

 

LOGO

 60 2000 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Seagate Technology plc No 

•     None

 

Mark W. Adams

 

LOGO

 53 2017 Chief Executive Officer of Lumileds, Inc. Yes 

•     Audit

 

Michael R. Cannon

 

LOGO

 64 2011 Former President, Global Operations, Dell, Inc. Yes 

•     Compensation

•     Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

 

Mei-Wei Cheng

 

LOGO

 67 2012 FormerNon-Executive Chairman
of Pactera Technology International Ltd.
 Yes 

•     Audit

•     Finance

3

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

  Nominee                    Age    

 

Director

     Since     

 Principal Occupation     Independent     

Current Committee

Membership

 

William T. Coleman

 

LOGO

 69 2012 Chief Executive Officer of Veritas Technologies LLC Yes 

•     Finance

•     Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

Jay L. Geldmacher

 

LOGO

 61 2012 Chief Executive Officer of Artesyn Embedded Technologies Yes 

•     Compensation

 

William D. Mosley

 

LOGO

 51 2017 President and Chief Operating Officer of Seagate Technology plc No 

•     None

 

Dr. Chong Sup Park

 

LOGO

 69 2006 Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Maxtor Corp. Yes 

•     Audit (Chair)

•     Nominating and Corporate Governance

4

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

  Nominee                    Age    

 

Director

     Since     

 Principal Occupation     Independent     

Current Committee

Membership

 

Stephanie Tilenius

 

LOGO

 50 2014 Chief Executive Officer andCo-Founder of Vida Health, Inc. Yes 

•     Finance

•     Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

Edward J. Zander

 

LOGO

 70 2009 Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Motorola, Inc. Yes 

•     Compensation (Chair)

For further information about our Director Nominees, see biographical information starting on page 15 of this Proxy Statement.

Advisory Approval of theSay-on-Pay Proposal.

We are asking for your advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (our “NEOs”) as required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the related rules of the SEC. While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.

Before considering this proposal, please read our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” starting on page 36, which explains our executive compensation programs and the Compensation Committee’s compensation decisions.

Advisory Approval of the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay Proposal.

We are asking you to indicate how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs. This proposal is also referred to as the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay proposal. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) requires that we solicit your advisory vote with respect to the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay every six years. At our 2011 Annual General Meeting, our shareholders indicated that they would preferSay-on-Pay votes to occur annually and we have heldSay-on-Pay votes every year since that time. You may indicate whether you would prefer aSay-on-Pay vote every one year, two years, or three years, or you may abstain from voting on this proposal. The Board believes that continuing to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation annually is aligned with our policy of seeking feedback from you on corporate governance, our compensation policies, practices and philosophy for our NEOs.

5

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing any of the following four options with respect to this proposal: “every one year,” “two years,” “three years,” or “abstain.” We are asking you to vote for a frequency of “every one year.”

While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.

Before considering this proposal, please read our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” starting on page 36, which explains our executive compensation programs and the Compensation Committee’s compensation decisions.

Approval of our Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

We are asking you to approve the amendment and restatement of our ESP Plan, which increases the number of shares reserved for issuance under the current plan by 10,000,000 and to make certain administrative updates. A detailed discussion about the amendments is included in Proposal 4, starting on page 70.

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, and authorization to set auditors’ remuneration.

We are asking you to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our auditors, and to authorize the Audit Committee to set their remuneration.

Grant the Board authority to allot and/or issue shares.

We are asking you to grant our Board authority to allot and/or issue shares under Irish law. This authority is fundamental to our business and granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland. Under Irish law, this proposal must be approved by ordinary resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast.

Grant the Board authority toopt-out of statutorypre-emption rights.

We are asking you to grant the Board authority to allot and/or issue shares for cash without first offering them to existing shareholders. This authority is fundamental to our business and granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland. Under Irish law, this proposal must be approved by special resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.

Determine the price range at which the Company canre-allot shares held as treasury shares.

We are asking you to determine the price range at which the Company canre-allot shares held as treasury shares. From time to time, the Company may acquire ordinary shares and hold them as treasury shares. The Company mayre-allot such treasury shares, and under Irish law, our shareholders must authorize the price range at which we mayre-allot any shares held in treasury. Under Irish law this proposal must be approved by special resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.

Executive Compensation

Pay-for-Performance

The general philosophy and structure of our executive compensation programs emphasize strong alignment between executive pay and corporate financial performance. In addition, our compensation

6

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

philosophy is designed to align our executive compensation programs with long term shareholder interests. In the Company’s fiscal year 2017, a majority of our long term equity incentive awards were granted in the form of performance-based restricted share units, which vest dependent upon the achievement ofpre-established performance objectives, including return on invested capital, relative total shareholder return and adjusted earnings per share, reflecting a strong emphasis onpay-for-performance and the alignment of interests between our NEOs and our shareholders. In addition, at least 86% of our NEO total annual targeted compensation is at risk.

Please review our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information and definitions of financial metrics.

2018 AGM

Deadline for shareholder proposals for inclusion in the Proxy Statement:

May 2, 2018

Period for shareholder nomination of directors:

April 2, 2018 to May 2, 2018

Deadline for all other proposals:

July 16, 2018

For further information, see the section entitled “Shareholder Proposals and Nominations” on page 82 of this Proxy Statement.

7

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION

10

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

15

PROPOSALS 1(a) – 1(j) – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

15

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

21

Code of Ethics

25

Securities Trading Policy and Other Restrictions

25

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

26

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

27

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

30

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

33

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

33

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

36

Executive Summary

36

Named Executive Officers

38

Our Executive Compensation Strategy

38

Our Executive Compensation Programs

38

Role of Our Compensation Committee

39

Role of the Compensation Consultant

39

Role of our CEO and Management in the Decision-Making Process

40

Prior Year’s Shareholder Advisory Vote

40

Executive Market Comparison Peer Group

40

Base Salary

43

Annual Bonus Plan

44

Long-Term Equity Incentives

46

Share Ownership Guidelines

50

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

50

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

51

Other Company Policies and Compensation Considerations

52

Compensation Committee Report

53

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

54

Summary Compensation Table

54

All Other Compensation Table

55

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Fiscal Year 2017

56

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2017

57

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2017

60

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

60

Potential Payments Upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control

61

PROPOSAL 2 – AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION –SAY-ON-PAY VOTE

68

PROPOSAL 3 – AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE VOTE ON COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION – FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY

69

PROPOSAL 4 – APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

70

8

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

9

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

LOGO

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

In this Proxy Statement, “Seagate Technology,” “Seagate,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Seagate Technology plc, an Irish public limited company. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, are first being mailed on or about September 2, 2020 to shareholders as of record at the close of business on the Record DateDate.

SUMMARY INFORMATION

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. For more complete information about the topics summarized below, please review the entire Proxy Statement and Seagate’s Annual Report on or about August 30, 2017.Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020.

LOGO

2020 AGM

Date and Time:Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. Irish Standard Time
Place:

10 Earlsfort Terrace
Dublin 2

D02 T380, Ireland

Record Date:August 24, 2020
Voting:Shareholders as of the close of business on the Record Date may vote on the proxy proposals. Each ordinary share that you own entitles you to one vote on each matter to be voted on at the 2020 AGM. Please note that shareholders joining the 2020 AGM virtually will not be able to vote at the meeting. We encourage you to vote your shares prior to the 2020 AGM.
Attendance:All shareholders as of the close of business on the Record Date may attend the 2020 AGM. If present in person, you may attend, speak and vote at the meeting even if you have completed and submitted a form of proxy. You or your nominated proxy must attend the 2020 AGM in person in Dublin in order for your votes to be cast. Shareholders as of the close of business on the Record Date may virtually join the 2020 AGM on the Internet via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/STX2020. Instructions on how to join and submit questions at the meeting will be posted on that website. Voting will not be permitted at the 2020 AGM for shareholders joining virtually. Participants joining virtually should ensure that they have a strong Wi-Fi

i

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

connection at the location where they intend to be while virtually joining the 2020 AGM. Participants should also give themselves plenty of time to log in prior to the 2020 AGM. Participants intending to join and submit questions virtually will need to demonstrate proof of share ownership by entering the 16-digit control number included on their notices, proxy cards or voting instruction forms received with their Notice or Proxy Materials.

We are monitoring guidance issued by the HSE, the Irish government, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization and we have implemented, and will continue to implement, the measures advised by the HSE to minimize the spread of COVID-19, including in respect of the 2020 AGM. In light of public health concerns, travel recommendations and restrictions, we strongly advise shareholders wishing to attend the 2020 AGM to virtually join instead of attending in person in Dublin. The meeting will be as brief as possible and, other than the shareholder business items outlined in the Proxy Materials, will not include presentations. Also, in order to comply with suggested COVID-19 social distancing guidelines, we will limit the number of shareholders who may attend the meeting in person, and will require compliance with any then applicable governmental requirements or recommendations or facility requirements, such as the use of face coverings and maintaining appropriate social distancing.

Proxy Materials:The Proxy Materials were first made available to shareholders on or about September 2, 2020.

ii

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Proposals, Voting Recommendations and Vote Required

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the proposals that will be submitted for shareholder approval at the 2020 AGM.

 Proposals:Vote Required:Board Recommendation:
 1.Election of each of the 10 Director Nominees Majority of Votes CastFOR each nominee
We are asking our shareholders to elect, by separate resolutions, each of the Director Nominees identified in the Proxy Statement
 2.Advisory Vote on Say-on-Pay Majority of Votes CastFOR
We are asking for your approval, on an advisory, non-binding basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”). While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote is advisory and will not be binding on us.
 3.Ratification of the Appointment and Authorization to Set Remuneration of Auditors Majority of Votes CastFOR
We are asking you to ratify, in a nonbinding vote, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2021, and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee of the Board to set the auditors’ remuneration
 4.Determine the Price Range for the Re-Allotment of Treasury Shares 75% of Votes CastFOR
We are asking you to determine the price range at which we can re-allot shares held as treasury shares. From time to time, we may acquire ordinary shares and hold them as treasury shares. We may re-allot such treasury shares, and, under Irish law, our shareholders must authorize the price range at which we may re-allot any shares held in treasury. Granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland.

During the meeting, following a review of Seagate’s affairs, management will also present Seagate’s Irish statutory financial statements for fiscal year 2020 and the reports of the directors and statutory auditors thereon.

iii

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Seagate’s Corporate Governance Highlights

•  The Board consists of a substantial majority (80%) of independent directors.

•  The Chair of the Board is an independent director.

•  Directors must receive a majority of shareholder votes cast to be elected.

•  All directors are elected annually by shareholders.

•  All Board committees are composed exclusively of independent directors.

•  The independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions.

•  Directors and executive officers are subject to share ownership requirements.

•  Executive officers are subject to a “clawback” policy.

•  The Board and each Board committee perform periodic self-evaluations.

•  The Board oversees the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

•  The Board oversees succession planning for all executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, and also undertakes succession planning for members of the Board.

•  The Company maintains an anti-hedging policy for all directors and employees.

•  The Company maintains a policy prohibiting the pledging of Company securities by directors, executive officers and certain other employees.

2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

  Deadline for shareholder proposals for inclusion in the Proxy Statement:

May 5, 2021

  Period for shareholder nomination of directors:

April 5, 2021 to May 5, 2021

  Deadline for all other proposals:

July 22, 2021

For further information, see the section entitled “Shareholder Proposals and Nominations” on page 70 of this Proxy Statement.

iv

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL INFORMATION

1

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

6

PROPOSALS 1(a) – 1(j) – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

14

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

22

PROPOSAL 2 – AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION – SAY-ON- PAY VOTE

25

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

26

Fiscal Year 2020 Company Highlights

26

Executive Summary

27

Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Highlights

27

Our Executive Compensation Strategy

28

Our Executive Compensation Programs

29

Role of Our Compensation Committee

29

Role of the Compensation Consultant

30

Role of our CEO and Management in the Compensation Process

30

Fiscal Year 2019 Shareholder Advisory Vote Results

30

Executive Market Comparison Peer Group and Benchmark Philosophy

31

How We Determine Individual Compensation Amounts for the NEOs

32

Annual Base Salary

34

Annual Incentive Plan – Executive Officer Performance Bonus

34

Long-Term Equity Incentives

36

Share Ownership Requirements

39

Benefits and Perquisites

40

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

40

Long Term International (Expatriate) Assignment Policy

41

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

41

Other Company Policies and Compensation Considerations

42

Compensation Committee Report

44

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

44

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

45

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2020

45

All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2020

46

Grants of Plan Based Awards Table for Fiscal Year 2020

47

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End

49

Option Exercises and Shares Vested for Fiscal Year 2020

51

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

51

Potential Payments Upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control

52

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIO

58

PROPOSAL 3 – A NON-BINDING RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AND BINDING AUTHORIZATION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE TO SET AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION

59

Audit Committee Report

60

Fees to Independent Auditors

61

Pre-Approval of Services by Independent Auditors

61

PROPOSAL 4 – DETERMINE THE PRICE RANGE AT WHICH THE COMPANY CAN RE-ALLOT SHARES HELD AS TREASURY SHARES

63

v

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

64

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

67

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTS

68

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

69

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

70

DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS

71

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

71

ANNUAL REPORT

71

HOUSEHOLDING

71

APPENDIX A: DIRECTOR’S REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 3 JULY 2020

A-1

vi

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

LOGO

GENERAL INFORMATION

FollowingThe following are questions and answers concerning voting and solicitation and other general information. You should read this entire Proxy Statement carefully.

 

Why did I receive this Proxy Statement?

  We sent you this Proxy Statement or a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”(the “Notice”) on or around August 30, 2017September 2, 2020 because our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Company’s 20172020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (“20172020 AGM”). This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote on an informed basis. If you have received a Notice, it contains a control number that will allow you to access the Notice, our Proxy Statement, including our Irish statutory financial statements for fiscal year 2020, the proxy card and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020 (collectively, the “Proxy Materials”) online.

Why are there two sets of financial statements covering the same fiscal period?

  U.S. securities laws require us to send you our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2017Form 10-K,2020, which includes our financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). These financial statements are included in the mailing of this Proxy Statement. Irish law also requires us to provide you with our Irish statutory financial statements for our fiscal year 20172020, including the reports of our directors and statutory auditors thereon, which accounts have been prepared in accordance withthereon. The Irish law. The Irishstatutory financial statements are included as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement, are available online at www.proxyvote.com, and, as required as a matter ofunder Irish law, will be laid beforeavailable at the 2017 AGM.2020 AGM in Dublin.

What do I need to do to attend the 20172020 AGM?

  All shareholders as of the Record Date are invited to attend the 2017 AGM. In order to be admitted, you must present a form of personal identification and evidence of share ownership. Shareholders of record may vote in advance by proxy or if they wish to be present in person at the 2017 AGM, provide identification matching that of a shareholder appearing on the Company’s register, a copy of a share certificate or other evidence of share ownership. If your(“record holders”) and beneficial owners (i.e., those whose shares are held beneficially in the name ofvia a bank, broker-dealer, brokerage firm, trust other similar organization, other holder of record or nominee (i.e., in street name), you may vote in advance by proxy or if you wish to be present in person at the 2017 AGM, you must bring a bank or brokerage account statement as your proof of ownership of such Seagate shares in addition to a legal proxy obtained from your bank, broker-dealer, brokerage firm, trust, other similar organization or other nominee record holder (each referred to herein as a “broker”)) as of recordthe close of business on the Record Date may attend the 2020 AGM in person or nominee.join virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/STX2020. Shareholders joining virtually will not be able to vote at the meeting. We encourage you to vote your shares prior to the 2020 AGM. Participants intending to join and submit questions virtually will need to demonstrate proof of share ownership by entering the 16-digit control number included on their notices, proxy cards or voting instruction forms received with their Notice or Proxy Materials. In light of public health concerns, travel recommendations and restrictions, we strongly advise shareholders wishing to attend the 2020 AGM to join virtually instead of attending in person in Dublin. The meeting will be as brief as possible and, other than the shareholder business items outlined in the Proxy Materials, will not include presentations. Also, in order to comply with suggested COVID-19 social distancing guidelines, we will limit the number of shareholders who may attend the meeting in

 

101

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

person, and will require compliance with any then applicable governmental requirements or recommendations or facility requirements, such as the use of face coverings and maintaining appropriate social distancing.

To attend the 2020 AGM in person, if you are a record holder, you must present valid photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, matching that of a shareholder appearing on the Company’s register as of close of business on the Record Date and a copy of a share certificate or other evidence of share ownership. If you are a beneficial owner, you also must present a letter from your broker showing that you were the beneficial owner of the shares as of the close of business on the Record Date together with a legal proxy from your broker entitling you to vote your shares in person at the 2020 AGM.

Who may vote?

  You are entitled tomay vote if you are a shareholder of record of the Company’sour ordinary shares at the close of business on the Record Date. At that time,As of the Record Date, there were 287,830,331 of the Company’s256,536,957 ordinary shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Each ordinary share that you own entitles you to one vote on all matters to be voted at the 2017 AGM.

How do I vote?

  Shareholders

We encourage you to vote your shares in advance by submitting your proxy or following the instructions provided by your broker, even if you plan to attend the 2020 AGM in Dublin.

Record Holders

If you are the record holder, meaning that you own your shares in your own name and not through a broker, you may vote in one of record can cast their votes by proxy by:four ways:

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

  

•  Via the Internet. To vote using the Internet go to www.proxyvote.com and voting at www.proxyvote.com;use the control number you were provided on your proxy card or Notice. You will need to follow the instructions on the website.

•  calling 1.800.690.6903By Telephone. To vote via telephone, call +1.800.690.6903 and followingfollow the telephone prompts; orprompts.

•  completing, signing and returningBy Mail. If you received a paper copy of the Proxy Materials in the mail, a printed proxy card byhas been enclosed. You may mark, sign, date and mail your proxy card to the address indicated on the proxy card, which will then be forwarded to Seagate’s registered office in Ireland electronically.

If you have received a Notice, it contains a control number that will allow you to access the Proxy Materials online. If you have received a paper copy of our Proxy Materials, a printed proxy card has been enclosed. If you have not received a paper copy of our Proxy Materials and wish to vote by mail, please follow the instructions included in the Notice to obtain a paper proxy card. A full printed set of our Proxy Materials will be mailed to you automatically only if you have previously made a permanent election to receive our Proxy Materials in printed form.

LOGO

  

The Notice is not a proxy card and it cannot be used to vote your shares.

Shareholders of record may also vote their shares directly by attending•  In Person. Attend the 20172020 AGM and casting their vote in person in Dublin, Ireland, or by appointing one or more proxies (who do not have to be shareholders) to attend the 20172020 AGM in person and cast votes on theiryour behalf in accordance with your instructions. If you wish to appoint as your proxy any person other than the shareholder’s instructions.individuals specified in the proxy card, please contact the Company Secretary at our registered office. For information on how to attend the 2020 AGM, please see “What do I need to do to attend the 2020 AGM?” above.

2

  

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Beneficial owners

Beneficial owners must vote their shares in the manner prescribed by their bank, broker-dealer, brokerage firm, trust or other similar organization or nominee.broker. If you do not receive the voting instructions, please contact your bank, brokerage firm, trust or other similar organization or nomineebroker directly. Beneficial owners who wish to vote in person at the 2017 AGM must obtain a legal proxy from their bank, broker-dealer, brokerage firm, trust or other similar organization or nominee. BeneficialAs noted above, beneficial owners wishing to vote in person at the 20172020 AGM will need to bring theobtain a legal proxy from their broker and bring it with them to the 20172020 AGM. For information on how to attend the 2020 AGM and hand it in with a signed ballot that is available upon request atperson, please see “What do I need to do to attend the meeting. Beneficial owners will not be able to vote their shares at the 2017 AGM without a legal proxy and a signed ballot.2020 AGM?” above.

  In order to be timely processed, your votevotes must be received by 6:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (11:59 p.m. local time in Ireland) on October 17, 201721, 2020 (or, if you are a beneficial owner, such earlier time as your bank, brokerage firm or nomineebroker may require).

May I revoke my proxy?

  

If you are a registeredrecord holder of the Company’s shares you may change or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the 20172020 AGM by:

•  notifying the Company Secretary in writing: c/o Seagate Technology plc at 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, D02 NX53, Ireland, Attention: Company Secretary;

•  submitting another properly signed proxy card with a later date or another Internet or telephone proxy at a later date but prior to the close of voting deadline described above; or

•  by voting in person at the 2017 AGM.2020 AGM in Dublin.

11

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

  Merely attending the 20172020 AGM in person does not revoke your proxy. To revoke a proxy, you must take one of the actions described above.
  If you are not a registered holder but your shares are registered in the name of a nominee,

For beneficial owners, you must contact the nomineeyour broker to revoke your proxy. MerelyIf you are a beneficial owner, merely attending or attempting to vote in person at the 20172020 AGM in Dublin will not revoke your proxy if your shares are held inproxy.

See “What do I need to do to attend the name of a nominee.2020 AGM?” above for information on how to attend the 2020 AGM.

How will my proxy get voted?

  If your proxy is properly submitted, you are legally designating the person or persons named inon the proxy card to vote your shares as you have directed. Unless you name a different person or persons to act as your proxy, Michael R. Cannon andand/or Katherine E. Schuelke (the “Company Designees”) shallor their substitutes will act as your proxies. If you sign and return your proxy without indicating how your shares are to be voted and name anyone other than a Company Designee as your proxy, that person may vote your shares at their discretion. If you name a Company Designee as your proxy without indicating how your shares are to be voted, the Company Designee shallwill vote your shares as the Board recommends on each proposal in this Proxy Statement and at their discretion regarding any other matter properly presented for a vote at the 20172020 AGM. The Board currently does not know of any matters to be raised at the 20172020 AGM other than the proposals contained in this Proxy Statement.

If you are a beneficial owner, the rules of NASDAQ permit your bank, broker-dealer, brokerage firm, trust or other similar organization or nominee tobroker may vote your shares at their discretion on “routine” matters if ityour broker does not receive instructions from you.

3

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

The following proposals areroutine matters:

•   Proposal 53 (Ratification of the Appointment and Authorization to Set Remuneration of Auditors)

•   Proposal 6 (Grant Board Authority to Allot and/or Issue Shares)

•    Proposal 7 (Grant Board Authority toOpt-out of StatutoryPre-emption Rights)

•    Proposal 84 (Determine Price Range for theRe-allotment of Treasury Shares)

 

However, your bank, broker-dealer brokerage firm, trust or other similar organization or nomineebroker may not vote your shares on“non-routine” matters if ityour broker does not receive instructions from you (“brokernon-votes”). Brokernon-votes will be counted for the purposes of a quorum, but will not be counted as votes for or against thenon-routine matters, but rather will be regarded as votes withheld and will not be counted in the calculation of votes for or against the resolution.

 

The following proposals arenon-routine matters:

•   Proposal 1 (Election of each of the 10 Director Nominees)

•   Proposal 2 (Advisory Vote onSay-on-Pay)

•    Proposal 3 (Advisory Vote on the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay)

•    Proposal 4 (Amendment and Restatement of the ESP Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance)

12

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

What constitutes a quorum?

  A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the 2020 AGM to properly hold an annual meeting and conduct business. The presence (in person or by proxy) of shareholders entitled, as of the Record Date, to exercise a majority of the voting power of the Company onat the Record Datemeeting in Dublin is necessary to constitute a quorum to conduct business forat the Company’s annual general meeting of shareholders.2020 AGM. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are treated as “shares present” for the purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.

What vote is required to approve each of the proposals?

  

Majority of Votes Cast Required to Approve:

•   Proposal 1 (Election of each of the 10 Director Nominees)

•   Proposal 2 (Advisory Vote onSay-on-Pay)

•   Proposal 4 (Amendment and Restatement of the ESP Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance)

•    Proposal 53 (Ratification of the Appointment and Authorization to Set Remuneration of Auditors)

•    Proposal 6 (Grant the Board the Authority to Allot and/or Issue Shares)

 

75% of Votes Cast Required to Approve:

•   Proposal 7 (Grant the Board the Authority toOpt-out of StatutoryPre-emption Rights)

•    Proposal 84 (Determine the Price Range for theRe-allotment of Treasury Shares)

Affirmative Plurality of Votes Cast Required to Approve:

•    Proposal 3 (Advisory Vote on the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay)

  Although abstentions and brokernon-votes are counted as “shares present” at the 20172020 AGM for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists, they are not counted as votes cast either “for” or “against” the proposal and, accordingly, do not affect the outcome of the vote.

Who pays the expenses of this Proxy Statement?

  We have hired Morrow Sodaliengaged Georgeson LLC (“Morrow”Georgeson”) to assist in the distribution of Proxy Materials and the solicitation of proxies. We expect to pay MorrowGeorgeson a fee for these services estimated at $10,000 plusout-of-pocket expenses. Proxies will be solicited on behalf of our Board by mail, in person, by telephone and throughvia the Internet. We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. We will also reimburse brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses for forwarding Proxy Materials to the personsbeneficial owners for whom they hold shares.

How will voting be countedproxy holders vote on any other matters that may be presented at the 20172020 AGM?

  Although we do not know of any matters to be presented or acted upon at the 20172020 AGM other than the items described in this Proxy Statement, if any other matter is proposed and properly and validly presented at the 20172020 AGM, the proxy holders will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

Board recommendations.

The Board recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” each of the proposals in this Proxy Statement.

 

134

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

The Board recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” each of the proposals in this Proxy Statement.

Voting procedures and tabulation.

  The Board appointed ana member of the Company’s Legal Department to serve as inspector of elections to act at the 20172020 AGM and to make a written report thereof. Prior to the 20172020 AGM, the inspector will sign an oath to perform his or her duties in an impartial manner and according to the best of his or her ability. The inspector will ascertain the number of ordinary shares outstanding, determine the number of ordinary shares present and represented at the 20172020 AGM and the validity of proxies and ballots, count all votes and ballots, and perform certain other duties. The determination of the inspector as to the validity of proxies will be final and binding.

 

145

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

PROPOSALS 1(a) – 1(j) ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Ordinary Resolutions)

The Company uses a majority of votes cast standard for the election of directors. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director nominee. Each of the Director Nominees is being nominated for electionto hold office for aone-year term beginning at the end of the 20172020 AGM to be held on October 18, 201722, 2020 and expiring at the end of the 20182021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “2018“2021 AGM”).

Under our Articles of Association,Constitution, if a director is notre-elected in a director election, then that director will not be appointedre-appointed and the position on the Board that would have been elected or filled by the director nominee will become vacant, except in limited circumstances, become vacant.circumstances. The Board has the ability to fill the vacancy in accordance with the Articles of Association,Constitution, subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders at the next annual general meeting of shareholders.

Notwithstanding the requirement that a director nominee requires a majority of the votes cast, as Irish law requires a minimum of two directors at all times, in the event that an election results in either only one or no directors receiving the required majority vote, either the nominee or each of the two nominees, as appropriate, receiving the greatest number of votes in favor of his or her election shall, in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association,Constitution, hold office until his or her successor(s)successor shall be elected.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:All of the Director Nominees are current Board members. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed the performance and qualifications of the directors listed below and recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that each be recommended to shareholders for re-election to serve for an additional one-year term. All of the Director Nominees have indicated that they will be willing and able to serve as directors.

 

(a)        Stephen J. Luczo—age 60, Director since 2000

Mr. Luczo has been our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) since January 2009 and Chairman of the Board since 2002. Mr. Luczo joined Seagate in October 1993 as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development. In September 1997, he was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of Seagate Technology (Seagate Technology plc’s predecessor) and, in July 1998, he was promoted to CEO after which, he joined the Board as a director of Seagate Technology. Mr. Luczo resigned as CEO effective as of July 2004, but remained as Chairman of the Board. He served as anon-employee Chairman from October 2006 to January 2009. From October 2006 until he rejoined us in January 2009, Mr. Luczo was a private investor. Prior to joining Seagate in 1993, Mr. Luczo was Senior Managing Director of the Global Technology Group of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., an investment banking firm, from February 1992 to October 1993. Mr. Luczo served on the board of directors of Microsoft Corporation from May 2012 to March 2014.

On October 1, 2017, Mr. Luczo will step down from his position as CEO of Seagate and become our Executive Chairman.

156

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

The following table sets forth the names, ages, and certain other information for each of the members of our Board as of August 31, 2020. Full biographical information is below.

 

    Director                 Age     Director
     Since     
  Independent  Audit
Committee
  Compensation
Committee
  Nominating and
Corporate Governance  
Committee

    Mark W. Adams

  56  2017  X  LOGO    LOGO  

    Judy Bruner

  61  2018  X  LOGO  LOGO    

    Michael R. Cannon

  67  2011  X      

    William T. Coleman

  72  2012  X  LOGO      

    Jay L. Geldmacher

  64  2012  X      

    Dylan Haggart

  33  2018  X      

    Stephen J. Luczo

  63  2000        

    William D. Mosley

  54  2017        

    Stephanie Tilenius

  53  2014  X  LOGO      

    Edward J. Zander

  73  2009  X      LOGO

LOGO

Committee Chairperson

LOGO

Audit Committee Financial Expert

7

  Expertise:As our CEO, Mr. Luczo brings significant expertise to our Board in financial matters, business development, and operations, along with senior leadership experience, global experience and knowledge of competitive strategy and competition. As CEO, Mr. Luczo has direct responsibility for the Company’s strategy and operations. With a background in investment banking and his public company board experience, Mr. Luczo also brings additional expertise in mergers and acquisitions and financial issues facing large companies.

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

    LOGO         LOGO         LOGO         LOGO         LOGO         LOGO     

INNOVATION

AND

TECHNOLOGY

INVESTMENT

EXPERTISE

PUBLIC

COMPANY

BOARD

EXPERIENCE

EXECUTIVE

LEADERSHIP

EXPERIENCE

FINANCIAL

EXPERTISE

GLOBAL

EXPERTISE

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTOR NOMINEES:

(b)(a)   Mark W. Adams – Adams—age 53, 56,
Director since 2017

LOGO

  

Mark W.Mr. Adams hasis the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Smart Global Holdings, Inc., a specialty memory, storage and hybrid solutions company, effective August 31, 2020. He served as the CEO of Lumileds, Inc. since, a lighting solutions company, from February 2017.2017 until March 2019, and remains in an advisory role to the company. Mr. Adams served as President of Micron Technology, Inc., a $20 billion semiconductor solutions company, from February 2012 to February 2016. From 2006 to February 2012, Mr. Adams served in a numberpositions of positionsincreasing responsibility at Micron, Technology, Inc., including as Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Vice President of Digital Media. Prior to joining Micron, Technology, Inc., Mr. Adams served as COOChief Operating Officer (“COO”) of Lexar Media, Inc., a memory chip maker, in 2006. He served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing of Creative Labs, Inc., a digital entertainment products company, from 2002 to 2006. He held numerous roles at Creative Labs prior to 2002 including five years as General Manager of Latin America. Prior to Creative Labs, Mr. Adams spent five years in major account sales at NCR Corporation, an omni-channel technology solutions company, in their enterprise server business. Mr. Adams has served on the board of directors of Cadence Design Systems, Inc., since 2015. He has2015 and Whistle Sports, Inc. since 2014. In connection with Mr. Adams’ appointment as CEO of Smart Global Holdings, it is anticipated that he will also be appointed, or nominated for election, to their board of directors. Within the past five years, he served on the boards of directors of Lumileds, Inc. since 2017 and Whistle Sports, Inc. since 2014. Within the past five years, Mr. Adams has served on the board of directors of Aptina Inc., a leading CMOS image sensor manufacturer.

 

Expertise:Mr. Adams brings financial, international, business development, technological and operational expertise to our Board through his service as a senior level executive with several large multi-national corporations. In addition, his experienceservice on other public company boards combinedbrings valuable experience to our Board.

8

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

(b)   Judy Bruner—age 61,
Director since 2018

LOGO

Ms. Bruner served as the Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer of SanDisk Corporation, a supplier of flash storage products, from June 2004 to May 2016 and served on the SanDisk Corporation board of directors from June 2002 to July 2004. She also served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Palm, Inc., an electronics company, from September 1999 to June 2004. Prior to Palm, Ms. Bruner held financial management positions at 3Com Corporation, a digital electronics manufacturer, and Hewlett Packard Corporation, an information technology company. Ms. Bruner has been a member of the board of directors of Applied Materials, Inc. since July 2016, Varian Medical Systems, Inc. since August 2016, and Rapid7, Inc. since October 2016. Within the past five years, Ms. Bruner has also served on the board of directors of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.

Expertise: Ms. Bruner brings over 35 years of financial management experience in the global high-tech industry, including in solid state storage drives, and extensive experience with his senior-executive level experiencecompliance and enterprise risk management. In addition, her service on other public company boards brings valuable experience to our Board.

(c)    Michael R. Cannon—age 64,67, Director since 2011

LOGO

  

Mr. Cannon has served as our Chair of the Board since July 2020. He served as President, Global Operations of Dell Inc., a multinational computer technology company, from February 2007 until his retirement in January 2009, and as consultant to Dell Inc. from January 2009 until January 2011. He was the President CEO and a member of the board of directorsCEO of Solectron Corp., an electronic manufacturing services company, from January 2003 until February 2007. From July 1996 until January 2003, Mr. Cannon served as the CEO of Maxtor Corporation, (“Maxtor”), a disk drive and storage systems manufacturer. He served on Maxtor’s board of directors from July 1996 until Seagate Technology (our predecessor company) acquired Maxtor in May 2006. Prior to joining Maxtor, Mr. Cannon held senior management positions at IBM.IBM, a multinational technology company, and earlier was the Vice President of Asia Operations residing in Singapore, for the disk drive division of Control Data Corporation, a mainframe and supercomputer firm. Mr. Cannon began his career at The Boeing Company, an aerospace company, in engineering and management positions. He has served on the board of directors of Lam Research Corporation since February 2011, and is the chairperson of its Nominating and Governance Committee, and on the board of directors of Dialog Semiconductor plc since February 2013. WithinMr. Cannon has previously served on the board of directors of Elster Group SE and within the past five years, Mr. Cannon has served on the board of directors of Adobe Systems, Inc.

Expertise: Mr. Cannon has extensive relevant industry expertise, including expertise in the disk drive business as well as with our major customers, that is valuable to our Board. Mr. Cannon brings international, technological, operations, leadership, and Elster Group SE.research and development expertise to our Board through his service as a public company CEO, and as a member of other public company boards of directors.

 

169

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Expertise:Mr. Cannon has extensive industry expertise, including expertise in the disk drive business that is invaluable to our Board. Mr. Cannon brings international, technological, operations, and research and development expertise to our Board through his service as a public company President, CEO, member of boards of directors and his previous senior management positions. In addition, he has significant leadership experience due to his experience as a senior executive with other companies.

(d)        Mei-Wei Cheng—age 67, Director since 2012

Mr. Cheng served as thenon-executive Chairman of Pactera Technology International Ltd., a Blackstone portfolio company, from February 2015 to February 2017. Mr. Cheng served as CEO of Siemens North East Asia and President and CEO of Siemens Ltd., China from July 2010 until April 2014. Prior to joining Siemens in May 2010, he was Chairman and CEO of Ford Motor Company (China) Ltd. from 1998 to 2008, as well as a Corporate Group Vice President of Ford Motor Company, and served as Executive Chairman of Ford Motor Company (China), as well as Group Vice President of Ford Motor Company from 2009 to 2010. Previously, Mr. Cheng held executive positions at General Electric Corporation (GE), including Corporate Vice President, Regional Executive and President of GE Appliance-Asia, and Chairman and CEO of GE (China) Ltd. He began his career at AT&T, where he last served as President of AT&T China. Mr. Cheng has served on the China Advisory Boards of CRH plc and Magna International since 2014, and as the member of the Technology Advisory Council of Magna International since 2017. Within the past five years, Mr. Cheng has served on the board of directors of Diebold, Inc.
Expertise:Mr. Cheng brings international, business development, technological and sales and marketing expertise to our Board through his service as a senior level executive in the Asia region with several large multi-national corporations. In addition, his service on other company boards supplements his significant international executive-level leadership experience.

(e)   William T. Coleman—age 69,72, Director since 2012

LOGO

  

Mr. Coleman has been CEOis a Special Partner of Veritas Technologies LLC since January 2016. He wasVitruvian Partners, a partner withgrowth equity fund, and a Venture Partner of Alsop Louie Partners, a venture capital firm that invests in early stage technology,technology. He previously served as an Operating Executive of The Carlyle Group, a private equity and alternative asset management firm, from January 2018 to March 2020, and as the CEO of Veritas Technologies LLC, an enterprise data protection company, from January 2016 to January 2018. He was a partner with Alsop Louie Partners from June 2010 to January 2016. Mr. Coleman also served as the ChairmanChairperson and CEO of Resilient Network System, Inc., an identity and access management infrastructure company, from January 2013 until January 2014. Before joining Alsop Louie Partners, Mr. Coleman was founder, ChairmanChairperson of the Board and CEO of Cassatt Corporation, a provider of software solutions and technologies, from September 2003 to June 2009. Between June 2009 and June 2010, Mr. Coleman was a private investor. Mr. Coleman previously founded BEA Systems, Inc.,Inc, an enterprise application and service infrastructure software provider, where he served as ChairmanChairperson of the Board from 1995 to 2002 and CEO from 1995 to October 2001. Prior to BEA, Mr. Coleman held various executive management positions at Sun Microsystems, Inc., a manufacturer of computer workstations, servers, software and services for networks. Mr. Coleman has previously served on the board of directors of Veritas Technologies LLC since January 2016. WithinSymantec Corp. and Palm, Inc. and within the past five years, Mr. Coleman has also served on the boardsboard of directors of Framehawk, Inc., Palm, Inc., and Resilient Network System, Inc.

17

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


Veritas Technologies.

 

 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Expertise:As a partner of a private equity firmfirms and former founder and/or CEO of several technology companies, Mr. Coleman brings to our Board significant business development, technological, sales and marketing, and research and development expertise. Mr. Coleman’s board service withon other private and public companies providescompany boards brings significant board experience.

experience to our Board.

(f)(e)   Jay L. Geldmacher—age 61,64, Director since 2012

LOGO

  Since November 2013,

Mr. Geldmacher has served as president and CEO of Resideo Technologies, Inc. since May 2020. Resideo is a global provider of smart home solutions providing safety, security and comfort, and a global distributor of security and fire products. Mr. Geldmacher served as Global CEO and President of Electro Rent Corporation, a Platinum Equity company from September 2019 to May 2020. From November 2013 to August 2019, Mr. Geldmacher served as President and CEO of Artesyn Embedded Technologies, a spin off from the Embedded Computing and Power business of Emerson Network Power’s Embedded Computing & Power nowbusiness. Artesyn was owned by Platinum Equity.Equity, a private equity firm, which acquired a majority interest in that company through a joint venture with Emerson in November 2013. Between 2007 and 2013, Mr. Geldmacher served as Executive Vice President of Emerson Electric Company and President of Emerson Network Power’s Embedded Computing & Power Group, which designs, manufactures and distributes embedded computing and embedded power products, systems and solutions. From 2006 to 2007, he served as Group Vice President and President of Emerson Network Power’s Embedded Computing & Power Group. From 1998 to 2006, he served as President of Astec Power Solutions, an Emerson subsidiary. Mr. Geldmacher has served as an Executive Council Member for Vertiv since March 2017.currently serves on the board of directors of Resideo Technologies Inc. Within the past five years, Mr. Geldmacher has served on the board of directors of Owens Illinois, Inc.Verra Mobility and the board of University of Arizona Business School.

as an Executive Advisory Council Member for Vertiv.

Expertise:Expertise: As a CEO, Mr. Geldmacher brings international, technological, and operational expertise to our Board, along with additional board experience from his service on public company and university boards.

(g)         William D. Mosley—age 51, Director since 2017

Mr. Mosley has been our COO since June 2016 and a member of the Board since July 2017. Mr. Mosley joined Seagate in 1996 as a Senior Engineer with a Ph.D. in solid state physics. From 1996 to 2002, Mr. Mosley served at Seagate in varying roles of increasing responsibility until his promotion to Vice President, Engineering, in 2002. In 2007, he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Global Disk Storage Operations and in 2009, he was promoted to Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing. From March 2011 until October 2013, Mr. Mosley served as our Executive Vice President, Operations. In October 2013, he was promoted to President, Operations and Technology. In June 2016, he was promoted to President and COO.

On October 1, 2017, Mr. Mosley will become our CEO.

Expertise: As our COO, Mr. Mosley is directly responsible for the Company’s operations. With his broad-based executive-level experience andin-depth understanding of the various aspects of our business, Mr. Mosley brings valuable global operational, technological, research and development and sales and marketing expertise to our Board.

 

1810

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

(f)    Dylan G. Haggart—age 33, Director since 2018

LOGO

Mr. Haggart has served as a Partner at ValueAct Capital, a governance-oriented investment firm that invests in a concentrated portfolio of public companies, including Seagate, and has worked collaboratively with management and boards of directors on matters such as strategy, capital structure, mergers and acquisitions, and talent management since July 2013. Mr. Haggart also served as a board observer of Seagate on behalf of ValueAct Capital from September 2016 until he was elected to serve as a director in January 2018. Prior to joining ValueAct Capital in 2013, Mr. Haggart served as a private equity investor at TPG Capital, an investment company, focusing on North American buyouts, and as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs, an investment banking firm.

Expertise: Mr. Haggart brings experience as an investor involved in strategic planning for other public and private companies. He also brings substantial experience with complex financial markets issues, and matters of corporate governance and talent management. In addition, as a Partner and stockholder with ValueAct Capital, he has a deep knowledge of Seagate’s business and the markets it serves.

(g)    Stephen J. Luczo—age 63, Director since 2000

LOGO

Mr. Luczo served as Seagate’s Board Chair from 2002 to July 2020. From October 2017 to October 2018, he also served as Seagate’s Executive Chairperson, and prior to that served as our CEO, from January 2009 to October 2017. Mr. Luczo joined Seagate Technology (our predecessor company) in October 1993 as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development. In September 1997, he was promoted to the position of President and COO and from July 1998 to July 2004 he served as its CEO. Upon his promotion to CEO of Seagate Technology in July 1998, Mr. Luczo also joined its board of directors. After resigning as Seagate Technology’s CEO in July 2004, Mr. Luczo remained as Board Chair. Prior to joining Seagate Technology in 1993, Mr. Luczo was Senior Managing Director of the Global Technology Group of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., an investment banking firm, from February 1992 to October 1993. Mr. Luczo currently serves on the board of directors of AT&T, a telecommunications, media and technology services company, and is a member of its Audit Committee and its Corporate Development and Finance Committee. He also currently serves on the board of directors of Morgan Stanley, a global financial services firm, and is a member of its Compensation, Management Development and Succession Committee and its Operations and Technology Committee. Mr. Luczo is also a Managing Partner of Crosspoint Capital Partners LLC, a private equity firm. In addition, he currently is a member of the board of directors of Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital as well as several private and non-profit companies. Mr. Luczo has also previously served on the board of directors of Microsoft Corporation, Veritas and VMWare.

Expertise: Mr. Luczo brings significant expertise to our Board in financial matters, business development, and operations, along with senior leadership experience, global experience and knowledge of competitive strategy and competition. Mr. Luczo also brings additional expertise in mergers and acquisitions and financial issues facing large companies due to his experience in investment banking and serving on other public company boards.

11

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

(h)   Dr. Chong Sup Park—William D. Mosley—age 69,54, Director since 20062017

LOGO

  

Dr. Chong Sup ParkMosley has served as Chairman andour CEO of Maxtor from November 2004 until May 2006, as Chairman of Maxtor’s board of directors from May 1998 until May 2006,since October 2017 and as a member of its board from February 1994 to May 2006. Maxtorthe Board since July 25, 2017. He was acquired by Seagate in May 2006. Dr. Park served as Investment Partner and Senior Advisor at H&Q Asia Pacific, a private equity firm, from April 2004 until September 2004, and as a Managing Director for the firm from November 2002 to March 2004. Prior to joining H&Q Asia Pacific, Dr. Park served aspreviously our President and CEO of Hynix Semiconductor Inc. from March 2000 to May 2002, andCOO from June 20002016 to May 2002 heSeptember 2017. He also served as its Chairman. Within the past five years,our President, Operations and Technology from October 2013 until June 2016 and as our Executive Vice President of Operations from March 2011 until October 2013. Prior to these positions, Dr. Park hasMosley served as our Executive Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing from February 2009 through March 2011; Senior Vice President of Global Disk Storage Operations from 2007 to 2009; and Vice President of Research and Development, Engineering from 2002 to 2007. He joined Seagate in 1996 as a memberSenior Engineer with a PhD in solid state physics, and from 1996 to 2002, Dr. Mosley served at Seagate in varying roles of increasing responsibility until his promotion to Vice President.

Expertise: As our CEO, Dr. Mosley brings broad-based executive-level experience and in-depth understanding of the boardsvarious aspects of directors of Computer Sciences Corporation, SMART Modular Technologies, Inc., Brooks Automation, Inc., Enphase Energy, Inc.our business. Dr. Mosley also brings valuable global operational, technological, research and Ballard Power Systems, Inc.

Expertise:As a former board chair and CEO, and having held other senior management positions with other companies, Dr. Park brings to our Board significant international, business development, technological and sales and marketing experience. In addition, Dr. Park has extensive industry expertise including expertise in the disk drive business that is invaluable to our Board. Dr. Park’s board service with other public companies provides valuable board experience.

(i)  Stephanie Tilenius—age 50,53, Director since 2014

LOGO

  

Ms. Tilenius is a founder and CEO of Vida Health, Inc., a mobile continuous care platform for preventing, managing and overcoming chronic and mental health conditions deployed at Fortune 500 companies, large national payers and healthcare providers, since January 2014. Ms. Tilenius was an Executive in Residence at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture capital firm, from June 2012 until October 2014, primarily focusing on companies within its Digital Growth Fund. From February 2010 until June 2012, Ms. Tilenius was Vice President of Global Commerce and Payments at Google, Inc., a multinational technology company, where she oversaw digital commerce, product search and payments. Prior to joining Google, Inc., she wasserved in various positions at eBay Inc., an e-commerce company, from March 2001 until October 2009, ultimately as Senior Vice President of eBay.com and global products.Global Products. Ms. Tilenius was also aco-founder of PlanetRx.com, an online healthcare provider, and has worked at other technology and business enterprises. Ms. Tilenius has served as a member of Coach Inc.’s board of directors since August 2012. She iscurrently serves on the boardsboard of directors of Tradesy and servesWish, and within the past five years, served on the board of directors of Coach Inc., Redbubble Limited and served as the Chair of the Advisory Board of the Harvard Business School California Research Center. Within the past five years, Ms. Tilenius served on the board of RedBubble.

Expertise:Ms. Tilenius is an experienced senior executive in the consumer internet sector. She contributes her leadership, strategic insight, digital ande-commerce expertise, and her experience as a company founder, to our Board, along with board experience as a board member for other public and private companies.

 

1912

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

(j)  Edward J. Zander—age 70,73, Director since 2009

LOGO

  

Mr. Zander served as ChairmanChairperson and CEO of Motorola, Inc., a multinational telecommunications company, from January 2004 until January 2008, when he retired as CEO, and continued as Chairman. He resigned as Chairman inChairperson until May 2008. Prior to joining Motorola, Mr. Zander was a Managing Director of Silver Lake Partners, a leading private equity fund focused on investments in technology industries, from July 2003 to December 2003. Mr. Zander was President and COO of Sun Microsystems Inc., a leading provider of hardware, software and services for networks,an information technology company, from October 1987 until June 2002. Within the past five years, Mr. Zander has served as a member of the board of directors of NetSuite, Inc.

Expertise:Mr. Zander brings to our Board financial, technological, sales and marketing, and research and development expertise to our Board from his career as a senior executive of technology companies, and financial expertise from his prior private equity experience. He brings valuable board experience from hisHis service on other public and private company boards.boards also brings valuable experience to our Board.

There are no familial relationships between any of the directors, Director Nominees or our executive officers, nor are any of our directors, Director Nominees or executive officers party to any legal proceedings adverse to us.

 

2013

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Committee Charters

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, together with theour Board committee charters, provide the framework for the corporate governance of the Company. FollowingThis promotes the interests of our shareholders and strengthens our Board and management accountability. Below is a summary of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. OurGuidelines and Board Committee Charters. We provide our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the charters of each of our Board committees are availableand our Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics, on our website at www.seagate.com,investors.seagate.com, under “Investors - Governance.”the “Governance” tab.

Role of the Board

The Board, elected annually by our shareholders, directs and oversees the management of the business and affairs of the Company. In this oversight role, the Board serves as the ultimatedecision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved tofor the shareholders. The Board has three standing committees: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance.

The Board and its committees have the primary responsibilities of:

 

Reviewing,

reviewing, monitoring and approving the Company’s strategic direction, annual operating plan, and major corporate actions;

 

Monitoring

monitoring and evaluating the performance of the Company;

 

Evaluating

hiring and evaluating the performance of our CEO;

 

Reviewing

reviewing and approving compensation of the CEO and other executive officers;

reviewing and approving CEO and senior managementexecutive officer succession planning;

 

Advising

advising and counseling the Company’s management;

 

Overseeing

overseeing the Company’s ethics programsethical and legal compliance, including the Company’sCode of Conduct and Code of Ethics; and

 

Overseeing

overseeing the Company’s enterprise risk management processes and programs.

Role of the Board Leadership Structurein Risk Oversight

The Board generallyhas responsibility for oversight of the processes established by management to report and monitor material risks applicable to the Company. The Board and its committees focus on the Company’s general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing the Company, and regularly review the Company’s processes for monitoring and addressing risks. The Board’s review of and involvement in our long-term strategic, financial and organizational goals and its review of management’s plans designed to achieve those goals is a part of the Board’s oversight of risk management and assists the Board in assessing management’s approach to and tolerance for risk. In addition, the committees of the Board report to the full Board at regularly scheduled Board meetings on any identified material risks within that committee’s area of responsibilities.

The Audit Committee has responsibility for oversight of financial risks in the Company’s business, cash position, financing activity, tax position and tax strategy, and corporate development plans, as well as

14

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

risks associated with the Company’s financial reporting and disclosure process, and cybersecurity, data privacy, product security and other computerized information system controls;

The Compensation Committee has responsibility for oversight of the risks related to or created by the Company’s compensation programs, arrangements, policies and procedures; and

The Nominating and Governance Committee has responsibility for oversight of the risks related to director and CEO succession as well as corporate governance.

Our Board believes that open communication between management and our Board is essential for effective risk oversight and management. As such, the officesBoard is informed and engaged when new risks arise. For example, in response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, the Board received and continues to receive regular reports from members of Chairmanmanagement to monitor and assess risks to our business and to manage the impact of the pandemic on our employees, customers, suppliers and other business partners, and the communities in which we operate globally.

Board Leadership Structure

The Corporate Governance Guidelines permit the roles of Chair of the Board and CEO shouldto be heldfilled by separate persons to aid in the oversight of management, unless it is insame or different individuals, based on the Company’s needs, best practices, and the best interests of the Company that the same person holds both offices. While the combined role of Chairman and CEO has worked well for the Company,our shareholders. This allows the Board believes thatflexibility to determine whether the two roles should be combined or separated based upon the Company’s needs and the Board’s assessment of its leadership from a strategic and governance perspective, it is in the best interests of the Company, at this time to separate the offices of the CEO and Chairman.time. The Board believes that its succession strategy, with the appointment of William D. Mosley as CEO effective October 1, 2017, and as a director of the Board effective July 25, 2017, will benefit from and be enhanced by Mr. Luczo’s continued service as the Chairman of the Board. The Board believes that the separation of the offices of the CEO and Chairman will ensure an effective implementation of its succession strategy. It is the Board’s view that the Company’sour corporate governance principles, the quality, stature and substantive business knowledge of the members of the Board, as well as the Board’s culture of open communication with the CEO and senior management, are currently conducive to Board effectiveness with the separation of the ChairmanChair and CEO positions.positions to maximize Board effectiveness. Separating the Chair and CEO positions also provides an appropriate degree of Board oversight and allows Dr. Mosley, our CEO, to focus on our business strategy and market opportunities, as well as on our organizational structure and execution capabilities.

For fiscal year 2020, Stephen Luczo served as Board Chair, and as Mr. Luczo is not an independent director, Michael R. Cannon served as Lead Independent Director. Effective July 4, 2020, which is the start of our fiscal year 2021, Mr. Cannon, an independent, non-employee director, became Chair of the Board. In addition, the event that we do not have an independent Board continues to retainChair, a Lead Independent Director and it believes this role addresseswould again be appointed as part of the organizational structure for the independent directors in order to address the need for independent leadership and perspectiveperspective.

Board Composition

The Board consists of a substantial majority (80%) of independent, non-employee directors. In addition, we require that all members of the three standing committees of the Board be independent directors.

The Board has determined that each member of each of these committees is “independent” as defined in addition toThe Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) listing rules and that each member of the Compensation Committee and Audit Committee meet applicable NASDAQ and SEC independence standards for such committees (see “Director Independence” below). The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an organizational structure foraudit committee financial expert, as that term is defined by rules of the SEC, and that each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as a “Non-Employee Director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).

Board committee memberships and chairs are rotated periodically and an independence analysis is conducted annually.

 

2115

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

Board Diversity

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly reviews the diversity of skills, expertise, background and other characteristics of existing and potential director candidates in deciding on nominations for election to the Board by the Company’s shareholders or for appointment to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks director nominees that would complement and enhance the effectiveness of the existing Board with respect to skills, knowledge, perspectives, experience, background and other characteristics. Furthermore, the Company is committed to its value of inclusion and the Board believes it is important to consider diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, education, cultural background, and professional experiences. Accordingly, when evaluating candidates for nomination as new directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the foregoing factors and will include both underrepresented races and ethnicities and different genders in the pool of qualified candidates. If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chooses to engage a search firm, it will instruct such search firm to include both underrepresented races and ethnicities and different genders in the initial pool of qualified candidates.

Director Independence Determination

The Board, based on its review and the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has determined that all of our Director Nominees, with the exception of Stephen J. Luczo, who is a former employee of the Company, and William D. Mosley, who serves as CEO of the Company, are independent under the NASDAQ listing rules and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are consistent with the NASDAQ listing rules. When assessing director independence, the Board considers the various commercial, charitable and employment transactions, affiliations and relationships known to the Board (including those identified through annual director questionnaires) to exist between the Company and the entities with which our directors or members of their immediate families are, or have been, affiliated. In considering such transactions, the Board determines whether any such transactions are in the ordinary course of business, fair to the Company and on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under similar circumstances.

Committees of the Board

Audit Committee

Key Functions of the Audit Committee of the Board:

 

Oversee the Company’s financial reporting and disclosure processes.

Review annual audited and quarterly financial statements, as well as the independent directors. The Board appoints the Lead Independent Director each year after the annual general meeting for aCompany’s disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” in SEC one-yearForms 10-K term. The Lead Independent Director coordinates the activities of the otherand non-employee10-Q directors, presides over meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present and at each executive session, facilitates the CEO evaluation process, serves as liaison between the Chairman of the Boardin earnings releases, with management and the independent directors, approves meeting schedulesauditors.

Obtain and agendasreview periodic reports, at least annually, from management and from the independent auditors assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Review and monitor the Board, has authorityCompany’s processes that are designed to call meetingsensure compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and corporate policy, including with respect to senior executives’ expenses and perquisites.

Appoint the public accounting firm that will serve as our independent auditors and review the performance of the independent directors, and is available for consultation and direct communication if requested by major shareholders.auditors.

Mr. Cannon has served as our Lead Independent Director since October 19, 2016 having been appointed by the Board on that date.

Board Risk Oversight

The Board has oversight responsibility of the processes established to report and monitor systems for material risks applicable to the Company. The Board and its committees focus on the Company’s general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing the Company and ensure that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. The full Board is responsible for considering strategic risks and succession planning, and the committees oversee other categories of risk including:

risks associated with the Company’s systems of disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and risks associated with cybersecurity, foreign exchange, insurance, credit and debt;

risks associated with the Company’s compliance with legal, administrative and regulatory requirements; and

risks related to the attraction and retention of talent and risks related to the design of compensation programs and arrangements.

Finally, as part of its oversight of the Company’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considers the impact of the Company’s executive compensation program and the incentives created by the compensation awards that it administers on the Company’s risk profile. In addition, the Company reviews all of its compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may reduce the likelihood of excessive risk taking, to determine whether they present a significant risk to the Company. Based on this review, the Company has concluded that its compensation policies and procedures are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Director Compensation and Share Ownership

It is the Board’s practice to maintain a fair and straightforward compensation program at the Board level, which is designed to be competitive with compensation programs from comparable companies. The Compensation Committee recommends and administers the policies that govern the level and form of director compensation, with oversight from the independent directors. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of the total director compensation package should be in the form of equity in the Company in order to better align the interests of the Company’s directors with thelong-term interests of its shareholders. As such, the directors are subject to a share ownership requirement of four times the annual cash retainer paid to the directors as described in more detail later in this Proxy Statement.

 

2216

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Board Composition

The Board consists of a substantial majority of independent,non-employee directors. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that all members ofReview and make recommendations regarding the standing committees ofCompany’s cash position; financial position; capital needs; financing plans; the Company’s ability to access capital markets including the Company’s debt and credit ratings; bank and lender relationships; capital structure; equity and debt issuances; dividends including and, if and as delegated by the Board, must be independent directors. The Board hasmaking declarations of Company dividends; share splits; financing proposals; debt issuances, repayment, repurchase or redemption of any outstanding notes; capital asset plan and capital expenditures; and corporate development plans.

Monitor and review, and make recommendations regarding, the following four standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, NominatingCompany’s policies and Corporate Governance Committee, and Finance Committee. The Board has determined that each member of each of these committees is “independent” as definedprocedures around managing major financial risks in the NASDAQ listing standardsCompany’s business, cash position, financing activity, tax position and that each member of the Compensation Committeetax strategy, and Audit Committee meet applicable NASDAQcorporate development plans, and SEC independence standards for such committees. Committee membershipsrisks pertaining to our financial reporting and chairs are rotated periodicallydisclosure processes and an independence analysis is conducted annually.

Board Diversity

The Board has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the skills, expertise and background of director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks director nominees that would complement and enhance the effectiveness of the existing Board and ensure that its members are appropriately diverse and consists of members with various and relevant backgrounds, skills, knowledge, perspectives and experiences.

Board Advisors

The Board and its committees may, under their respective charters, retain their own external and independent advisors to carry out their responsibilities. For fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee retained FW Cook as its external and independent advisor.

Executive Sessions

The Company’s independent directors meet privately in regularly scheduled executive sessions of the Board and committees, without management present, to consider such matters as the independent directors deem appropriate. These executive sessions are typically held at each Board and committee meeting.

Board Evaluation

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in periodically evaluating its performance and the performance of the Board committees. Each committee conducts periodicself-evaluation and the Board conducts periodicpeer-to-peer evaluations. The effectiveness of individual directors is considered each year when the Board nominates directors to stand for election.

Director Orientation and Education

The Company has developed an orientation program for new directors and reimburses directors for continuing education. In addition, the directors are given full access to managementcybersecurity, data privacy, product security and other employees as a means of providing additional information.computerized information system controls.

Director Nomination Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the composition of the full Board to identify the qualifications and areas of expertise needed to further enhance the composition of the Board,

 

23

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

makes recommendationsReview, evaluate and authorize management to enter into any capital market transactions (including debt and equity financings), private equity and debt financing, or proposed merger, acquisition, divestiture or investment, in amounts of more than $25 million and up to $100 million individually (transactions of $25 million or less being within the CEO’s discretion), and to review, evaluate and recommend to the Board concerning the appropriate size and needs of the Board and, on its own, with the assistance of other Board members or management, a search firm or others, identifies candidates with those qualifications. The Board reviews and considers the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendations and determines the Director Nominations. In considering candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, including professional experience, understanding of business and financial issues, abilityrespect to exercise sound judgment, diversity, leadership, achievements, knowledge and experience in matters affecting business and industry. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials and believes that at a minimum, each nominee should satisfy the following criteria: highest character and integrity, experience and understanding of strategy, sufficient time to devote to Board matters, and no conflict of interest that would interfere with performance as a director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to ensure that the Board is composed of members whose particular expertise, qualifications, attributes and skills, when taken together, allow the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively. Shareholders may recommend candidates for consideration for Board membership by sending the recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, care of the Company Secretary. Candidates recommended by shareholders are evaluated in the same manner as director candidates identified by any other means.

Term Limits and Retirement

The Board does not have a mandatory retirement age for directors and, because the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually evaluates director nominees for the following year, the Board has decided not to adopt arbitrary term limits for its directors.

Director Independence

The Board, based on its review and the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has determined that all of our current directors and Director Nominees, except Stephen J. Luczo and William D. Mosley, who are employees of the Company, are independent under the NASDAQ listing standards and the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are consistent with the NASDAQ listing standards. When assessing director independence, the Board considers the various commercial, charitable and employment transactions and relationships known to the Board (including those identified through annual directors questionnaires) that exist between the Company and the entities with which our directors or members of their immediate families are, or have been, affiliated. The Board evaluated certain transactions that arose in the ordinary course of business between the Company and such entities and which occurred on the same terms and conditions available to other customers and suppliers. After reviewing these transactions and such other information as the Board deemed advisable, the Board determined that Messrs. Adams, Cannon, Cheng, Coleman, Geldmacher and Zander, Ms. Tilenius and Dr. Park are independent under both the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the applicable NASDAQ rules.

Director Changes

On October 19, 2016, Ms. Kristen M. Onken did not stand forre-election at the 2016 AGM. Mr. Adams was appointed as a member of our Board and of the Audit Committee effective January 19, 2017 and Mr. Mosley was appointed as a member of our Board effective July 25, 2017. The Board believes that the appointments of Messrs. Adams and Mosley enhance the overall effectiveness of the Board.

Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo and Mr. Frank J. Biondi, Jr., currently serving as members of our Board, will not stand forre-election to our Board at the conclusion of their terms at the 2017 AGM. This is not due to any disagreement with the Company’s management or Board.

24

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Communications with Directors

Shareholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with the Board, thenon-employee directors or any individual director (including our Lead Independent Director and any Committee Chair) may do so by sending a communication to the Board and/or a particular member of the Board, care of the Company Secretary at Seagate Technology plc, 10200 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014. Depending upon the nature of the communication and to whom it is directed, the Company Secretary will: (a) forward the communication to the appropriate director or directors; (b) forward the communication to the relevant department within the Company; or (c) attempt to handle the matter directly (for example, a communication dealing with a share ownership matter).

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to the CEO, the CFO, and the principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions at Seagate Technology plc. The Code of Ethics is available atwww.seagate.com, under “Investors - Governance.” Amendments to, or waivers of the Code of Ethics will be disclosed promptly on our website or on a current report onForm  8-K. No such waivers were requested or granted in the fiscal year 2017.

Securities Trading Policy and Other Restrictions

The Company prohibits its directors and executive officers from (i) purchasing any financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Company securities and (ii) engaging in any form ofshort-term speculative trading in Company securities. Directors and executive officers are also prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan unless the Chief Legal Officer or the Chief Financial Officer providespre-clearance after the director or executive officer clearly demonstrates the financial capability to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.

25

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Our Board has adopted a written policy for approval of transactions with our directors, Director Nominees, executive officers, shareholders that beneficially own more than 5% of our shares and immediate family members of such persons (each, a “Related Person”). Pursuant to the policy, if any Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest in a transaction or potential transaction in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, he or she must promptly report it to the Chief Legal Officer of the Company or her designee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then reviews any such transactions and determines whether or not to approve or ratify them. In doing so, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems to be appropriate, the extentin excess of the Related Person’s interest; whether the transaction would interfere with the Related Person’s judgment in fulfilling his or her duties to the Company; whether the transaction is fair to the Company and on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under similar circumstances; whether the transaction is in the interest of the Company and its shareholders; and whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest.$100 million.

In addition, if the transaction involves a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider whether such transaction would impact such director’s independence under NASDAQ rules or qualifications to serve on committees under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules. The Board has delegated authority to the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to review and approve or ratify transactions where the aggregate amount is expected to be less than $1 million. A summary of any new transactions approved by the Chair is provided to the full Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its review at the next scheduled committee meeting after such approval.

Josip Relota, Mr. Luczo’sbrother-in-law, is employed as a software engineer by the Company. In connection with such employment, Mr. Relota receives a total annual cash compensation of approximately $204,186 and a retention bonus of $92,787. In addition, Mr. Relota is eligible to participate in our general employee benefit plans, including vacation and health plans. The Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has ratified the terms of Mr. Relota’s employment and compensation.

On September 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Board Observer Rights Agreement (the “Observer Rights Agreement”) with ValueAct Capital Master Fund L.P. (“ValueAct”) which beneficially owns more than 5% of the Company’s ordinary shares as of August 11, 2017. Pursuant to the Observer Rights Agreement, ValueAct is entitled to one seat as a board observer provided that it continue to own not less than 2% of the ordinary shares of the Company. This board observer right was granted to ValueAct in connection with ValueAct’s purchase of 9.5 million ordinary shares of the Company. Under the terms of the Observer Rights Agreement, the Board retains the right to limit access to information and attendance at portions of the Board meetings at the Board’s discretion and ValueAct is required to comply with the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement with the Company, which was entered into on the same day. ValueAct was not a related party of the Company at the time the Company entered into these agreements.

26

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

Audit Committee

Members:       Dr. Chong Sup Park, Chair

Mark W. Adams

Mei-Wei Cheng

Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo

Key Functions:

Review annual audited and quarterly financial statements, as well as the Company’s disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations,” with management and the independent auditors.

 

Obtain and review periodic reports, at least annually, from management assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Review the Company’s processes to assure compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and corporate policy.

Recommend the public accounting firm to be proposed for appointment by the shareholders as our independent auditors and review the performance of the independent auditors.

Review the scope of the financial statements audit and the findings and approve the fees of the independent auditors.

 

Approve

Review and determine in advance permitted audit andnon-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors.

 

Satisfy itself as to the independence of the independent auditors and ensure receipt of their annual independence statement.

 

Oversight

Appoint and oversee the performance of the head of the Company’s internal audit function and its independent auditors.approve the annual internal audit plan.

The Board has determined

Review legal and related matters that all current members of the Audit Committee meet the applicable NASDAQ and SEC standards for membershipcould have a significant impact on the Audit Committee, and that each of Dr. Park, Mr. Adams, Mr. Cheng and Dr. Moyo is an audit committeeCompany’s financial expert, as that term is defined by rules of the SEC.statements.

A copy of the charter of the Audit Committee is available on our website,www.seagate.cominvestors.seagate.com, under the heading “Investors - Governance.”“Governance—Board Structure and Committees” tab.

Compensation Committee

Members:       Edward J. Zander, Chair

Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

Michael R. Cannon

Jay L. Geldmacher

Key Functions:Functions of the Compensation Committee of the Board:

 

Establish the Company’s compensation philosophy and the executive compensation policies.

 

Oversee the design, development and administration of the Company’s incentive, equity compensation and benefits plans, policies and programs.

Review and approve the goalsdecide upon executive compensation and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO, evaluate the CEO’s performance against those goalsbenefit programs and objectives and set the CEO’s compensation level

periodically review their effectiveness.

 

2717

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

based on this evaluation. The Compensation Committee Chair presents all compensation decisions pertaining to the CEO to the full Board, however, all compensation decisions related to the CEO are determined by the Board’s independent directors.

Approve compensationDiscuss the results of officers.the shareholder advisory vote on Say-on-Pay.

 

Review and approve executivedetermine, whether as a committee or together with the other independent members of the Board, all compensation and benefit programs.decisions pertaining to the CEO.

 

Administer

Review and, with advice from the Company’s equityCEO, make compensation plans.decisions pertaining to the other executive officers.

 

Review and determine all corporate financial and operational performance metrics and objectives relevant to executive officers’ compensation.

Review compliance of the NEOs with the share ownership requirements.

Review and recommend significant changes in principal employee benefit programs.

 

Approve,

Select, retain and oversee Compensation Committee consultants.consultants and advisors.

The Compensation Committee may form subcommittees composed of two or more of its

Recommend for decision by the independent members for any purpose the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and may delegate to such subcommittees such power and authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. In addition, the Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more officers of the CompanyBoard the authoritycompensation to make grants and awards of cash or equity securitiesbe paid to any employee who is not a Section 16 officer of the Company under the Company’s incentive-compensation or other equity-based plans, provided that such delegation is in compliance with such plan, the Company’s Articles of Association and applicable law.

For a discussion concerning the processes and procedures for determining executive and director compensation and the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Compensation of Directors,” respectively.

The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets all applicable NASDAQ and SEC standards for membership on the Compensation Committee. In addition, the Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as a“Non-Employeenon-employee Director” within the meaning ofRule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”).directors.

A copy of the charter of the Compensation Committee is available on our website,www.seagate.cominvestors.seagate.com, under the heading “Investors - Governance.”“Governance—Board Structure and Committees” tab.

Compensation Risk Assessment

As noted above, the Compensation Committee considers potential risks created by the Company’s executive compensation programs. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews all of its compensation policies and procedures to determine whether they present a significant risk to the Company. Based on these reviews, the Compensation Committee has concluded that its compensation policies, programs, and procedures do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Members:       Michael R. Cannon, Chair

William T. Coleman

Dr. Chong Sup Park

Stephanie Tilenius

Key Functions:Functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board:

 

Identify individuals qualified to become directors and recommend candidates for all directorships and Board committee memberships.memberships, and evaluate candidates nominated by shareholders on substantially the same basis as it considers other nominees.

 

Review the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Board committee charters, and make recommendations for changes.

 

Oversee the Board, Board committees, and director self-evaluation processes.

Consider questions of independence, related party transactions, and potential conflicts of interest of directors and executive officers.

Periodically review succession planning of the Board Chair, CEO and other executive officers.

Take a leadership role in shaping the corporate governance of the Company.

 

2818

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Consider questions of independence, related party transactions, and potential conflicts of interest of directors and executive officers.

Take a leadership role in shaping the corporate governance of the Company.

The Board has determined that each member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is “independent” as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

A copy of the charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is available on our website,www.seagate.cominvestors.seagate.com, under the heading “Investors - Governance.”“Governance—Board Structure and Committees” tab.

Finance CommitteeExecutive Sessions

Members:       Frank J. Biondi, Jr., Chair

Mei-Wei Cheng

William T. Coleman

Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo

Stephanie Tilenius

Key Functions:

Consider the Company’s cash management plans and activities; capital structure and strategies; capital asset plan and requirements and capital expenditures; equity and/or debt financing and other financing strategies.

Consider the Company’s dividend policy; share repurchase programs; securities issuances; and corporate development plans.

Evaluate and authorize potential strategic or financial transactions in amounts up to $100 million.

Review potential strategic or financial transactions in excess of $100 million, and make recommendations to the Board.

The Board has determined that each memberCompany’s independent directors meet privately in regularly scheduled executive sessions of the Finance Committee is “independent”Board and Board committees, without management present, to consider such matters as defined in the NASDAQ listing standardsindependent directors deem appropriate. These executive sessions are typically held at each Board and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.Board committee meeting.

A copy of the charter of the Finance Committee is available on our website,www.seagate.com, under the heading “Investors - Governance.”

Board, Board Committee and Annual Meeting Attendance

The Board and itsthe Board committees held the following number of meetings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017:2020:

 

  Board

   65       

  Audit Committee

   65       

  Compensation Committee

   65       

  Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

   4       

  Finance Committee

5  

Each incumbent director attended over 75% or moreat least 90% of the total number of meetings of the Board and the Board committees on which s/he or she served during the fiscal year 2017.2020. The Company’s independent directors held executive sessions without management present during the four regularly scheduled quarterly Board meetings held in fiscal year 2020 as well as during all committee meetings.

The Company expects all Board members to attend the 2020 AGM in person or to join virtually, although other commitments may prevent some directors from attending or joining the meeting. All directors who served in such capacity on October 29, 2019 except for Ms. Tilenius attended the 2019 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the “2019 AGM”), which was held on October 29, 2019 in Dublin, Ireland.

Board and Committee Evaluations

As mentioned above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in periodically evaluating its performance and the performance of the Board committees. Each Board committee conducts periodic self-evaluations and the Board conducts periodic non-employeepeer-to-peer evaluations to determine whether the Board and the committees are functioning effectively and whether any changes are necessary to improve their performance. The effectiveness of individual directors is considered each year when the Board nominates directors to stand for election.

Board Advisors

The Board and its committees may, under their respective charters, retain external and independent advisors to assist the directors in carrying out their responsibilities. For fiscal year 2020, the Compensation Committee retained FW Cook as its external and independent advisor (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Role of the Compensation Consultant” below for more information).

Director Nomination Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

reviews the composition of the full Board to identify the qualifications and areas of expertise needed to further enhance the composition of the Board;

 

2919

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

makes recommendations to the Board concerning the appropriate size and needs of the Board;

held four executive sessions withouton its own, with the assistance of other Board members or management, present duringa search firm or others, identifies candidates with those qualifications; and

seeks to ensure that the fiscalBoard is composed of members whose particular expertise, qualifications, attributes and skills, when taken together, allow the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively.

Furthermore, the Company is committed to its value of inclusion and the Board believes it is important to consider diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, education, cultural background, and professional experiences. Accordingly, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the foregoing factors and will include both underrepresented races and ethnicities and different genders in the pool of qualified candidates for nomination as a new director. If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chooses to engage a search firm, it will instruct such search firm to include both underrepresented races and ethnicities and different genders in the initial pool of qualified candidates.

In nominating candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account, among other things, the diversity factors noted above, professional experience, understanding of business and financial issues, ability to exercise sound judgment and make independent analytical inquiries, leadership, achievements, knowledge, and experience in matters affecting the Company’s business and industry. Each nominee should possess a commitment to representing the long-term interests of the shareholders, the highest character and integrity, sufficient time to devote to Board matters, an understanding of the Company’s business, and no conflict of interest that would interfere with performance as a director.

Shareholders may recommend candidates for consideration for Board membership by sending their recommendation to the Company Secretary at the registered office of the Company (set forth in this Proxy Statement) in accordance with our Constitution. The Company Secretary will forward the recommendations to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Candidates recommended by shareholders are evaluated in the same manner as director candidates identified by any other means.

Term Limits and Retirement

The Board does not have a mandatory retirement age for directors and, because the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually evaluates director nominees for the following year, 2017. It is the Board’s general practiceBoard has decided not to holdadopt specific term limits for directors.

Director Orientation and Education

The Company has developed an executive sessionorientation program for all new directors that they are required to attend, which includes receiving and reviewing materials relative to our business and operations. The directors are also reimbursed for continuing director education (subject to approval by the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee). In addition, the directors are given full access to management and other employees as a means of providing additional information.

Communications with Directors     

Shareholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with the full Board, the independent directors, or any individual director (including any Board committee Chairperson) may do so in connectionwriting by sending a

20

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

communication to the Board and/or a particular member of the Board, to Seagate Technology plc, 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, D02 NX53, Ireland, Attention: Company Secretary. Depending upon the nature of the communication and to whom it is directed, the Company Secretary will: (i) forward the communication to the appropriate director or directors; (ii) forward the communication to the relevant department within the Company; or (iii) attempt to handle the matter directly (for example, a communication dealing with regularly scheduled Board meetings.a share ownership matter), as appropriate.

Code of Ethics

The Company expects allhas adopted a Code of Ethics which is applicable to the CEO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics is available at investors.seagate.com, under the “Governance—Code of Ethics” tab. Amendments to, or waivers of the Code of Ethics will be disclosed promptly on our website or on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC. No such waivers were requested or granted in fiscal year 2020.

Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy and Other Trading Restrictions

The Company prohibits its Board members and all employees from taking “short” positions in our securities or engaging in hedging or other monetization transactions with respect to attendour securities. The Company also prohibits its Board members and all employees from (i) purchasing any financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the 2017 AGM, but from time to time other commitments prevent all directors from attending the meeting. Allmarket value of the Company’sCompany securities and (ii) engaging in any form of short-term speculative trading in Company securities. Directors, executive officers, and certain other employees are also prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

Further, our directors, who servedexecutive officers, and certain other employees are prohibited from trading in our securities absent pre-clearance from our designated compliance officer unless such capacity on October 19, 2016, attendedtrades are pursuant to a trading plan (a “10b5-1 plan”) meeting the most recent AGM (the “2016 AGM”), which was held on October 19, 2016requirements of Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The 10b5-1 plan must be reviewed and acknowledged by our designated compliance officer and we require that the first trade under a newly approved 10b5-1 plan take place after a reasonable “cooling off” period has passed from the time of adoption of the plan; in Dublin, Ireland.addition, a director, executive officer, or other covered employee is only permitted to use one 10b5-1 plan at a time.

21

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Director Compensation and Share Ownership

It is the Board’s practice to maintain a fair and straightforward non-employee director compensation program, which is designed to be competitive with director compensation programs of the Company’s peers. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the type and form of compensation paid to our non-employee directors and recommends, for approval by the Board, the amount and form of director compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of the total director compensation should be in the form of equity in the Company. The purpose of this is to better align the interests of the Company’s directors with the long-term interests of its shareholders. As such, the directors are subject to a share ownership requirement of four times their annual cash retainer.

Cash and Equity Compensation

Our director compensation program is designed to compensate(i) provide our non-employee directors fairlywith reasonable and appropriate compensation for the work required for a company of our size and scope and (ii) align theirnon-employee directors’ interests with thelong-term interests of our shareholders. The program reflects our desire to attract, retain and useutilize the expertise of highly qualified peopleindividuals serving on the Company’s Board.Employee-directors Company employees do not receive any additional compensation for servingtheir service as a director.directors.

Our fiscal year 20172020 director compensation program fornon-employee directors consisted of the following elements:elements set forth in the table below.

 

  Board or Board Committee  Compensation Element Membership Position Retainer as of
 October 19, 2016 ($)
 

  Cash Retainer

Board of Directors

  Non-executive Chairperson (non-employee) $150,000175,000  
  Lead Independent Director140,000 
 Board Member $100,000  

Audit Committee

  Chairperson  $35,000  
  Member  $15,000  

Compensation Committee

  Chairperson  $30,000  
  Member  $10,000  

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

  Chairperson  $20,000  
  Member  $10,000

  Finance Committee

 Chairperson$20,000 
 Member$10,000 

  Lead Independent Director

$40,000  

  Annual Restricted Share Unit Award (value)

  $275,000  

Each newly appointed or electednon-employee director elected in connection with the annual election of directors at an annual general meeting (includingnon-employee directorsre-elected at thean annual general meeting) receives an initial restricted share unit (“RSU”) award equal in number to $275,000 divided by the average closing share price for the quarter prior to the award, rounded to the nearest whole share. If the appointment of a non-employee director occurred other than in connection with the annual election of directors at an annual general meeting, this dollar amount would bepro-rated for the year of appointment. If, prior to commencement of Board service, the newnewly elected or appointed director was an officer or member of the board of directors of an entity acquired by Seagate, the Board couldmay award a lesser number of restricted share units (“RSUs”).RSUs. The grant date for each such award is the date of the director’s election or appointment. Generally, each restricted share unitRSU award will vest on the earlier of the one yearone-year anniversary of the grant date or the day prior to the next election of directors at an annual general meeting. All restricted share unit awards will become fully vested in the event of a “Change of Control” of Seagate (as such term is defined in the Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”)).

 

3022

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

the next election of directors at an annual general meeting (provided such annual general meeting is held at least 50 weeks after the prior meeting). All RSU awards will become fully vested in the event of a “Change of Control” of Seagate (as such term is defined in the Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (“EIP”)).

In addition to the cash compensation and equity awards, all members of the Board are reimbursed for their reasonableout-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in attending Board relatedmeetings and other Board-related activities.

Director Share Ownership Requirement

To align the interests of directors with the Company’s shareholders, the Board has adopted a share ownership requirement of four times the annual board cash retainer (excluding committee retainers, if any) fornon-executivenon-employee directors. The calculation of ordinary shares owned for purposes of the ownership requirement includes: (i) ordinary shares directly or indirectly owned (for example, through a trust), (ii) unvested restricted share awards or RSUs (if any) and, (iii) for any director affiliated with an entity and contractually obligated to assign to such entity any equity awards received as compensation for service as a non-employee director, shares owned by such entity or its affiliates. Until anon-employee director satisfies the mandatory ownership level, s/he or she may not sell more than that number of (i) shares that vest pursuant to any outstanding restricted share award or restricted share unitRSU award or (ii) shares that are obtained upon the exercise of any option as is necessary, in each case, to cover the tax liability associated with the vesting or exercise of the equity award. Once attaininga non-employee director has attained the minimum level of Company share ownership, a directors/he must maintain this minimum level of Company share ownership until his or her resignation or retirement from the Board. In setting the share ownership requirement, the Board considered the input of the independent compensation consultant, the Company’s currentthen-current share price and the period of time, generally, that it would take anon-employee director to reach the required ownership level. Executive directorsDirectors who are Company employees are subject to the share ownership requirements described in the Compensationsection entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis sectionAnalysis—Share Ownership Requirements” of this Proxy Statement. As of July 3, 2020, all of our non-employee Director Nominees meet the share ownership requirement.

2017Fiscal Year 2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation

The compensation paid or awarded to ournon-employee directors for fiscal year 20172020 is summarizedset forth in the table below:below.

 

  

Fees
Earned

or Paid in
Cash

($)

 

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

 

Total

($)

  Mark W. Adams.

 51,497(2) 169,898 221,395 

  Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

 124,011 244,757 368,768 

  Michael R. Cannon

 153,571 244,757 398,328 

  Mei-Wei Cheng

 119,011 244,757 363,768 

  William T. Coleman

 114,011 244,757 358,768 

  Jay L. Geldmacher

 104,011 244,757 348,768 

  Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo

 119,011 244,757 363,768 

  Kristen M. Onken(3)

   34,753 (3)   34,753 

  Dr. Chong Sup Park

 140,618 244,757 385,375 

  Stephanie Tilenius

 114,011 244,757 358,768 

  Edward J. Zander

 124,011 244,757 368,768 

   Name of Director

 

 

Fees Earned
        or Paid in        

Cash

($)

 

 

Share
        Awards         

($)(1)

 

 

All Other
    Compensation    

($)

 

 

    Total    

($)

 

  Mark W. Adams

 

 125,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 434,523  

 

  Judy Bruner

 

 145,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 454,523  

 

  Michael R. Cannon

 

 170,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 479,523  

 

  William T. Coleman

 

 115,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 424,523  

 

  Jay L. Geldmacher

 

 110,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 419,523  

 

  Dylan Haggart(2)

 

 110,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 419,523  

 

  Stephen J. Luczo

 

 175,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 484,523  

 

  Stephanie Tilenius

 

 115,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 424,523  

 

  Edward J. Zander

 

 140,000

 

 309,523

 

 

 

 449,523  

 

 

(1)The amounts shown represent

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards granted in fiscal year 20172020 for financial reporting purposes pursuant to the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). Such amounts do not represent amounts paid to or realized by thenon-employee director. See Note 11, “Share-based Compensation” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10 K for fiscal year 2017 regarding assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards. Additional information regarding the RSUs awarded to or held by eachnon-employee director on the last day of fiscal year 2017 is set forth in the table below.

(2)The amount shown represents thepro-rated amount of fees for fiscal year 2017 paid to Mr. Adams since his appointment to the Board on January 19, 2017.
(3)The amount shown represents thepro-rated amount of fees for fiscal year 2017 paid to Ms. Onken for her service on the Board until October 19, 2016. Ms. Onken served as a director until the 2016 AGM held on October 18, 2016, at which time she did not stand forre-election and did not receive RSUs awarded for fiscal year 2017.

 

3123

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Compensation (“ASC 718”). Such amounts do not represent amounts actually paid to or realized by the non-employee director. See Note 11, “Share-Based Compensation” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020 regarding assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards. Additional information regarding the RSUs awarded to or held by each non-employee director on the last day of fiscal year 2020 is set forth in the table below.
(2)

Mr. Haggart is a Partner at ValueAct Capital and he relinquishes all cash and vested equity compensation received for service on our Board to the limited partners of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P.

The aggregate number of unvested RSUs and outstanding optionsequity awards for each of ournon-employee directors as of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017July 3, 2020 is set forth in the table below:

  Number of
RSUs
Granted in
fiscal year
2017
 Aggregate
Number of
RSUs
 

Aggregate 

Number of 

Options 

  Mark W. Adams

 5,470(1) 5,470(1) 

  Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

 8,437 8,437 

  Michael R. Cannon

 8,437 8,437 

  Mei-Wei Cheng

 8,437 8,437 

  William T. Coleman

 8,437 8,437 

  Jay L. Geldmacher

 8,437 8,437 

  Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo

 8,437 8,437 

  Dr. Chong Sup Park

 8,437 8,437 

  Stephanie Tilenius

 8,437 8,437 

  Edward J. Zander

 8,437 8,437 

below.

 

(1)The numbers shown represent the

pro-rated number   Name of RSUs granted to Mr.Director

Aggregate
Number of
  Outstanding  

Awards

  Mark W. Adams for fiscal year 2017 following his appointment to the Board on January 19, 2017.

5,579(1)

  Judy Bruner

5,579(1)

  Michael R. Cannon

5,579(1)

  William T. Coleman

5,579(1)

  Jay L. Geldmacher

5,579(1)

  Dylan Haggart

5,579(1)(2)

  Stephen J. Luczo

397,571(3)

  Stephanie Tilenius

5,579(1)

  Edward J. Zander

5,579(1)

 

(1)

Represents outstanding RSUs awarded to our non-employee directors on October 29, 2019.

(2)

Mr. Haggart is a Partner at ValueAct Capital and he relinquishes all vested equity compensation received for service on our Board to the limited partners of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P.

(3)

Represents 5,579 outstanding RSUs awarded to Mr. Luczo on October 29, 2019 for his service as a non-employee director, 70,008 outstanding RSUs awarded to Mr. Luczo on September 11, 2017 while he was an employee of the Company, and 321,984 ordinary shares subject to options that are outstanding and were granted while he was an employee of the Company.

 

3224

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEPROPOSAL 2 – AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION – SAY-ON-PAY VOTE

(Ordinary Resolution)

We are presenting the following proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, which gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to vote, on an advisory, non-binding basis, on the compensation of our NEOs, as required by Section 16(a)14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC. The Board has determined to hold a Say-on-Pay advisory vote each year. You may endorse or not endorse, respectively, the compensation paid to our NEOs by voting for or against the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, as amended, requires our directors and officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10%an ordinary resolution, that, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s ordinary shares, to file reports of ownershipnamed executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and reports of changesAnalysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related disclosure contained in ownership with the SEC. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on its review of such forms receivedProxy Statement, is hereby approved.”

While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote is advisory and will not be binding.

In considering your vote, please be advised that our compensation program for our NEOs is guided by our compensation philosophy, as further described under the Company“Compensation Discussion and written representations that no other reports were required, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with for the fiscal year 2017.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth as of August 25, 2017, the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares for fiscal year 2017 by (i) each director and director nominee of the Company, (ii) each executive officer of the Company named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group:Analysis” section below:

 

  Name of Beneficial

  Owner

 

NumberCEOcash compensation tied to performance. At least half of
Ordinary
Shares
Beneficially
            Owned            
the annual target for the aggregate cash compensation component for our CEO is based on Company and individual performance. The total actual cash compensation of our CEO has fluctuated from year to year. In addition, we have implemented a cap on annual bonus funding for all executive officers.

 

 

Percentage
Long-term equity incentive compensation tied to performance. In fiscal year 2020, a majority of Class
Beneficially
    Owned
(1)our long-term equity incentive awards for

  Directors, Director Nomineesthe CEO and Executive Officers:

  Stephen J. Luczo

Vice Presidents (“EVPs”) were granted in the form of performance-based share units (“PSUs”), which vest dependent upon the achievement of 1,776,126(2)*

  David H. Morton, Jr.

35,409(3)*

  Philip G. Brace

108,761(4)*

  William D. Mosley

302,148(5)*

  James J. Murphy

410(6)*

  Mark W. Adams

-(7)�� *

  Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

35,699(8)*

  Michael R. Cannon

25,157(9)*

  Mei-Weipre-established Cheng

20,718(10)*

  William T. Coleman

18,357(11)*

  Jay L. Geldmacher

17,118(12)*

  Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo

11,753(13)*

  Dr. Chong Sup Park

37,411(14)*

  Stephanie Tilenius

14,463(15)*

  Edward J. Zander

106,058(16)*

  All Directors, Director Nomineesfinancial and Executive Officersoperational performance objectives, including return on invested capital, relative total shareholder return and/or adjusted earnings per share (as applicable, and as a group (16 persons)described in further detail in this Proxy Statement).

2,509,588(17)*%

 

Compensation unrelated to performance is limited. We do not have guaranteed incentive awards, “golden parachutes,” single trigger change of control severance provisions, executive pensions or excise or golden parachute tax gross-ups for our NEOs.

 

Share Ownership Requirements. Our share ownership requirements for our NEOs directly link the interests of management and our shareholders.

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board

A simple majority of all votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2020 AGM in Dublin is required to approve Proposal 2.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL 2 TO APPROVE, ON AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING BASIS, THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, THE ACCOMPANYING COMPENSATION TABLES, AND THE RELATED DISCLOSURE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

 

3325

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Fiscal Year 2020 Company Highlights

Highlights of fiscal year 2020 financial performance include:

 

Exabytes, Revenue, and Operating Margin: We shipped 442 exabytes averaging 3.6 terabytes capacity per drive, generating revenue of approximately $10.5 billion, $1.7 billion in cash flow from operations, and operating margin of 12.4%.

Share Repurchases: We repurchased approximately 17 million of our ordinary shares during fiscal year 2020 for approximately $850 million.

Dividends Paid: We paid approximately $673 million in dividends during fiscal year 2020.

Diluted Earnings per Share: Our diluted earnings per share was $3.79 for fiscal year 2020.

The following table sets forth each shareholder which is known by us to bepresents certain key financial metrics for the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding ordinary shares of the Company as of August 25, 2017 based solely on the information filed by such shareholder on Schedule 13G under the Exchange Act:past three fiscal years.

 

  (in millions except earnings per share, exabytes and gross margin percentage)

 Fiscal Year 2020    Fiscal Year 2019    Fiscal Year 2018   

 Exabytes shipped

  442   347      338  

 Revenues (GAAP)

 $10,509  $10,390     $11,184  

 Gross margin Percentage (GAAP)

  27   28      30  

 Operating Margin percentage (GAAP)

  12   14      15   

 Income from operations (GAAP)

 $1,300  $1,487     $1,634  

 Net income (GAAP)

 $1,004  $2,012(1)  $1,182  

 Diluted earnings per share (GAAP)

 $3.79  $7.06(1)  $4.05  

 

  Name and Address of Beneficial

  Owner

(1)

Number of

Ordinary

Shares

Beneficially

        Owned         

Percentage

The Company recorded an income tax benefit of Class$640 million for fiscal year 2019. Please see the section entitled “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019.

Beneficially

    Owned(1)

  Greater than five percent holders:

  Clearbridge Investments, LLC

30,450,651(18)10.58

620 8th Ave.

New York, NY 10018

  BlackRock, Inc.

20,209,803(19)7.02

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

  FMR LLC

33,346,960(20)11.59

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210

  The Vanguard Group, Inc.

29,987,592(21)10.42

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

  ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P.

21,000,000(22)7.30

One Letterman Drive, Building D, Fourth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94129

Please see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020 for a more detailed description of our fiscal year 2020 financial results.

*Less than 1% of Seagate’s ordinary shares outstanding.
(1)Percentage of class beneficially owned is based on 287,832,764 ordinary shares outstanding as of August 25, 2017. Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote. Ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017, RSUs and performance share units (“PSUs”) vesting within 60 days of June 26, 2017, and all restricted shares and performance shares are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options, RSUs, PSUs, restricted shares and/or performance shares, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person or group.
(2)Includes 534,780 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017, 1,214,158 ordinary shares held by the Stephen J. Luczo Revocable Trust and 27,188 shares held directly by Mr. Luczo.
(3)Includes 25,402 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017 and 10,007 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Morton.
(4)Includes 84,652 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017 and 24,109 shares held directly by Mr. Brace. Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities.
(5)Includes 149,183 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017 and 152,965 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Mosley.
(6)Includes 410 ordinary shares of the Company held directly by Mr. Murphy.
(7)As of August 25, 2017, Mr. Adams does not own any ordinary shares of the Company or any ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017.
(8)Includes 11,753 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Biondi and 23,946 ordinary shares held by the Biondi, Jr. Family Trust.
(9)Includes 18,272 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Cannon and 6,885 ordinary shares held by the Michael R. Cannon Trust.
(10)Includes 20,718 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Cheng.
(11)Includes 18,357 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Coleman.
(12)Includes 17,118 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Geldmacher.
(13)Includes 11,753 ordinary shares held directly by Dr. Moyo.
(14)Includes 11,753 shares held directly by Dr. Park and 25,658 ordinary shares held by the Park Family Trust.
(15)Includes 14,463 shares held directly by Ms. Tilenius.

 

3426

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2020 and our executive compensation philosophies and objectives, as well as the compensation awarded to our fiscal year 2020 NEOs, who are listed below.

 

(16)Includes 11,753 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Zander, 53,109 ordinary shares held by the Edward

  Named Executive Officers

Job Title

 William D. Mosley

Chief Executive Officer

 Gianluca Romano

Executive Vice President and Mona Zander Trust dated 4/19/1993,Chief Financial Officer

 Jeffrey D. Nygaard

Executive Vice President, Operations, Product Development, and 41,196 ordinary shares held by Zanadu Capital Partners, L.P.Technology Development
(17)All directors, Director Nominees

 Katherine E. Schuelke

Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and executive officers as a group, directly hold 350,619 ordinary shares, indirectly hold 1,364,952,Company Secretary

 Ban Seng Teh

Senior Vice President, Global Sales and hold 794,017 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017.Sales Operations
(18)Based solely on information reported by Clearbridge Investments, LLC (“Clearbridge”) on the fifth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017,

 James J. Murphy(1)

Former Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2016. Clearbridge has sole voting power over 29,615,395 ordinary shares and sole investment power over 30,450,651 ordinary shares.
(19)Based solely on information reported by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on the second amendment to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 2017, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2016. BlackRock has sole voting power over 18,309,616 ordinary shares and sole dispositive power over 20,209,803 ordinary shares.
(20)Based solely on information reported by FMR LLC (“FMR”) on the ninth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2016. FMR has sole voting power over 4,025,098 ordinary shares and sole investment power over 33,346,960 ordinary shares.
(21)Based solely on information reported by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) on the fifth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2017, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2016. Vanguard has sole voting power over 402,336 ordinary shares, shared voting power over 52,485 ordinary shares, sole investment power over 29,540,530 ordinary shares and shared dispositive power over 447,062 ordinary shares.
(22)Based solely on information reported by ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. (“ValueAct”) on Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on August 11, 2017, and reporting ownership as July 31, 2017. ValueAct has shared voting and dispositive power over all 21,000,000 ordinary shares that it beneficially owns.Marketing

 

(1)

Mr. Murphy left the Company effective December 31, 2019. Upon his termination, Mr. Murphy was eligible for benefits under and pursuant to the terms of the Fifth Amended and Restated Seagate Technology Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan.

Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Highlights

Key highlights of our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2020 are as follows:

Emphasize Pay-for-Performance Alignment: Our general philosophy and structure of the Company’s executive compensation programs seek to emphasize strong alignment between executive pay and corporate financial performance. A majority of our executives’ target total compensation is “at risk,” including cash and equity compensation that is tied to pre-established financial and operational-performance goals aligned with our short- and long-term objectives.

Deliver on our Pay-for-Performance Philosophy: Annual cash incentive payouts reflected the Company’s financial performance in fiscal year 2020. Based on performance against the Company’s executive officer performance bonus metrics (revenue, adjusted operating margin, and a customer satisfaction metric), the fiscal year 2020 bonus pool funding was at 83.52% of target. PSUs that were granted in fiscal year 2017 vested at 186.67% of target based on our three-year average annual return on invested capital (“ROIC”) as adjusted by our relative total shareholder return (“rTSR”) over the three-year performance period. With respect to the outstanding Threshold Performance Share Units (“TPSUs”), our threshold adjusted earnings per share (“AEPS”) performance for fiscal year 2020 was above the $1.00 AEPS threshold; therefore, an additional 25% of each of the outstanding TPSU awards will vest on their next scheduled vesting date following the end of fiscal year 2020, subject to continued employment. No discretion was utilized on either the level of funding for the annual cash bonus plan or the vesting of any long-term equity incentive awards.

Align Executive Compensation with Shareholder Interests: Long-term equity incentives for Dr. Mosley and Messrs. Romano, and Nygaard were granted at target levels using a portfolio of 80% performance-based awards to emphasize long-term strategic incentives (based on achievement of AEPS, ROIC, and/or rTSR goals) and 20% time-based share options. Ms. Schuelke and Mr. Teh received 60% time-based RSUs and 40% performance-based awards. Mr. Murphy did not receive a long-term equity incentive award.

 

3527

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Practices

Our executive compensation policies and practices reinforce our pay-for-performance philosophy and align with commonly viewed best practices and sound governance principles.

 

WHAT WE DOWhat We Don’t Do

   A majority of the equity incentives granted to our CEO and EVPs are performance-based

X  No “single trigger” change in control benefits

   Caps on performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation for our executive officers

X  No excise tax reimbursements or tax “gross-ups” in connection with a change in control

   Payouts under our cash bonus plan and awards under our equity incentive compensation plan for executive officers are largely based on achievement of financial and operating-performance metrics

X  No guaranteed salary increases or guaranteed bonus payments for our executives in fiscal year 2020

   A majority of total executive target compensation is “at-risk” and dependent on corporate performance

X  No defined benefit pension plan or supplemental executive pension plan

   Clawback provisions on incentive cash and equity compensation

X  No re-pricing of options without shareholder approval

   Annual as well as periodic review of, and determination upon, our compensation strategy by the Compensation Committee

X  No dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards

   Prohibition on short sales, hedging of share ownership positions and transactions involving derivatives of our ordinary shares for all employees and directors and restrictions on pledging of our ordinary shares as collateral for loans for directors, executive officers and certain other employees

   Competitive and meaningful share ownership requirements for executive officers and directors

   Independent compensation consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee

   Annual risk assessment of our compensation programs and practices

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

2017Our Executive Compensation HighlightsStrategy

The keyOur executive compensation decisions for fiscal year 2017 were as follows:

EmphasizePay-for-Performance Alignment: Our general philosophystrategy is intended to drive high performance, strengthen our market position, and structureincrease shareholder value. The goals of the Company’sour executive compensation programs emphasize strong alignment between executive pay and corporate financial performance, as evidenced with more than 95% of the votes cast for the approval of the“Say-on-Pay” proposal at our 2016 annual general meeting of shareholders;

Drive Consistency between Compensation Payouts and Company Performance: There were no base salary increases for our named executive officers (“NEOs”) in fiscal year 2017 except for the increase in base salary for Mr. Mosley in connection with his promotion to President and COO;

Deliver Majority of Total Compensation Through Performance-Based Compensation: Fiscal year bonus funding at 107.4% of target as a result of the Company’s financial performance; and

Align Executive Compensation with Shareholder Interests: Long-term equity incentives delivered in the form of options and performance-based equity awards to emphasize long-term strategic incentives for our NEOs that promote alignment with shareholder interests. In fiscal year 2017, Mr. Luczo did not receive any equity awards, but all other NEOs received an award as part of our general pay practice.

Fiscal Year 2017 Company Highlights

Please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report for a more detailed description of our fiscal year 2017 financial results.

Highlights of the Company’s fiscal year 2017 financial performance include:are to:

 

Exabytes, Revenue

attract and Gross Margin: We shipped 263 exabytes averaging 1.8TB capacity per drive, generating revenue of approximately $10.8 billion and gross margins of 29% of revenue.

retain talented leaders through competitive pay programs;

Share Repurchases: We repurchased approximately 12 million of our ordinary shares during the year for approximately $460 million.

Dividends Paid: We paid $561 million in dividends during the year.

The following table presents certain key financial metrics for the past three fiscal years:

 

  (in millions except EPS and exabytes)                    

 

 

  Fiscal 2017  

 

  

  Fiscal 2016  

 

  

  Fiscal 2015  

 

 

 Exabytes shipped

  263   233   228  

 Revenues

   $          10,771    $          11,160    $          13,739  

 Gross margin

   $3,174    $2,615    $3,809  

 Income from operations

   $1,054    $445    $2,058  

 Net income

   $772    $248    $1,742  

 Diluted earnings per share

   $2.58    $0.82    $5.26  

 

3628

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Executive Compensation Practices for Fiscal Year 2017

Our executive compensation program is heavily weighted towards compensating our executives based on company performance. We have implemented executive compensation policies and practices that reinforce ourpay-for-performance philosophy and align with commonly viewed best practices and sound governance principles. The following chart summarizes our policies and practices:

What We Do

Performance-based equity incentives

Caps on performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation for our NEOs

Balance of financial and operating performance metrics in cash incentives and equity incentive plans

Significant portion of executive compensation at risk based on corporate performance

Clawback on incentive compensation

Annual review and approval of our compensation strategy

Prohibition on short sales, hedging of share ownership positions and transactions involving derivatives of our ordinary shares

Meaningful share ownership guidelines for executive officers and directors

100% independent directors on our Compensation Committee

Independent compensation consultant engaged by our Compensation Committee

Annual risk assessment of our compensation programs and practices

What We Don’t Do

cNo “single trigger” change of control benefits

cNo employment agreements, guaranteed salary increases or guaranteed bonus payments for our executives in fiscal year 2017

cNo defined benefit pension plan or supplemental executive pension plan

cNo excise tax reimbursements or tax“gross-ups” in connection with a change in control

cNo post-termination retirement or pension-typenon-cash benefits or perquisites for our executives

cNore-pricing of options without shareholder approval

cNo dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs and PSUs

37

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Named Executive Officers

The NEOs for fiscal year 2017 are:

Name

Job Title

Stephen J. Luczo(1)

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

David H. Morton, Jr.

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Philip G. Brace(2)

President, Cloud Systems and Silicon Group

William D. Mosley(3)

President and Chief Operating Officer

James J. Murphy

Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing

(1)Mr. Luczo will step down as the Company’s CEO and transition to the role of Executive Chairman effective October 1, 2017 and will continue serving as the Chairman of the Board until the 2017 AGM.
(2)Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities.
(3)Mr. Mosley will transition to the role of CEO beginning October 1, 2017. Mr. Mosley was also appointed to the Board effective July 25, 2017.

Our Executive Compensation Strategy

Our executive compensation strategy is designed to drive high performance, strengthen our market position, and increase shareholder value. The goals of our executive compensation programs are to:

attract and retain talented leaders through competitive pay programs;

motivate executive officers to achieve and exceed business objectives as approvedset by the Board;Board or Compensation Committee;

 

align executive officer and shareholder interests to optimize long-term shareholder returnvalue with acceptable risk; and

 

manage total compensation costs in support of our financial performance.

Our Executive Compensation Programs

 

Compensation

  Compensation Element

 Designed to Reward Relationship to Compensation Strategy

Base Salary

 Related job experience, knowledge of the Company and our industry, and continued dedicated employment with sustained performance Attract and retain talented executive officers through competitive pay programs

Annual Incentive

Executive Officer Performance

 Bonus Plan

 Achievement of the Company’s annual financial and operational goals and attainment of management-based objectives for Presidents 

Motivate executive officers to achieve and exceed annual business objectives

 

Manage total compensation costs in support ofand align them with financial performance

Long-Term Equity Incentives

Equity Awards

 Increased shareholder value through achievement of long-term strategic goals such as earnings per share (EPS), return on invested capital (ROIC) and total shareholder return relative to peers (rTSR) 

Align executive officers and shareholder interests to optimize shareholder returnvalue

 

Motivate executive officers to achieve and exceed long-term business objectives

38

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Role of Our Compensation Committee

TheAs noted previously, the Compensation Committee is responsible to our Board for overseeing the design, development and administration of our compensation and benefits policies and programs. TheIn executing their duties, the Compensation Committee, which consists of four independent directors, is responsible for the review and approval of all aspects of our executive compensation programs and approval of all compensation recommendations for our executive officers, including:Committee:

 

review and approval of

determines all corporate incentive goalsfinancial and operating-performance metrics and objectives relevant to each executive officer’s compensation;

 

evaluation of executive

evaluates the CEO’s performance results in light of such goalsmetrics and objectives;

 

evaluation of

evaluates the competitiveness and mix of each executive officer’s totalcash bonus and long-term equity incentive targets in relation to compensation package;paid to executives performing similar functions at our peer companies; and

 

approval

reviews and, with advice from the CEO in the case of the other executive officers, decides or recommends (as applicable) upon any changes to our CEO’s and other executive officers’ total compensation packages, including base salary, annual cash bonus and long-term equity incentive award opportunities, share ownership guidelinesrequirements and retention programs.

The Compensation Committee recommends to the independent directors of the Board the compensation, compensation plans and equity grantsawards specific to our CEO, and the independent directors of the Board determine the overall compensation package of our CEO. Our CEO does not participate in the determination of histheir own compensation. The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by our Senior Vice President of Human Resources, her staff, and an executive compensation consultant, as described below.

29

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

compensation. The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by our Senior Vice President of Human Resources and their staff, and an independent executive compensation consultant, as described below. The Compensation Committee reviews and determines, with advice from the CEO, the compensation of all other executive officers.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee retained FW Cook as its own independent consultant for advice and counsel throughoutduring fiscal year 20172020 to provide an external review of compensation proposals and to help alignensure alignment of our compensation decisions to our executive compensation strategy. FW Cook’s consulting during fiscal year 20172020 also included oversight on thea risk assessment of all compensation programs directedoverseen and administered by the Compensation Committee, as well as consultation in support of the Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding NEO compensation programs, involving NEOs, including salary changes, determination of equity awards, annual incentive plan design, and annual review of our severance plan and share ownership guidelines.requirements. FW Cook also developed recommendationsprovided to the Compensation Committee for the compensation of our CEO.

FW Cook also provided advicerecommendations related to the Compensation CommitteeCEO’s compensation and advice regardingnon-employee director compensation.

FW Cook is not permitted to provide services to the Company’s management except as directed by the Compensation Committee and did not provide any such services in fiscal year 2017.2020. The Compensation Committee retains sole authority to hire theany compensation consultant, approve its compensation, determine the nature and scope of its services, evaluate its performance and terminate its engagement.

In connection with its engagement of FW Cook, the Compensation Committee considered various factors in determining FW Cook’s independence including, but not limited to (i) the amount of fees received by FW Cook from Seagate as a percentage of FW Cook’s total revenue, (ii) FW Cook’s policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest, and (iii) the existence of any business or personal relationship that could impact FW Cook’s independence. After reviewing these and other factors, the Compensation Committee determined that FW Cook was independent and that its engagement did not present any conflicts of interest pursuant tounder SEC rules or the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and theNASDAQ listing rules of NASDAQ.rules.

39

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Role of our CEO and Management in the Decision-MakingCompensation Process

Within the framework of the compensation programs approved by the Compensation Committee and basedBased on management’s review of market competitive practices, and within the framework of the Company’s approved compensation programs, each year our CEO Mr. Luczo, recommends the amount of base salary increase (if any), the amount of the annual incentive bonus opportunity, and the long-term equity incentive award value for our executive officers, including the NEOs. These recommendations are based upon histhe CEO’s assessment of each executive officer’s performance and individual retention considerations, as well as the Company’s performance as a whole, and individual retention considerations.whole. The Compensation Committee reviews Mr. Luczo’sand evaluates the CEO’s recommendations and approvesdecides, in its sole discretion, upon our executive officers’ compensation, including any changes to such compensation, as it determines in its sole discretion. Mr. Luczocompensation. The CEO does not play any role with respect to any matter affecting hisrecommend their own compensation and the Compensation Committee and the independent directors meet without the CEO present when evaluating and setting the CEO’s compensation.

Our Senior Vice President of Human Resources along withand members of hertheir staff assistsassist the Compensation Committee in its review of our executive compensation plans and programs, including providing market data on competitive pay practices, program design and changes in the corporate governance landscape concerning executive compensation matters.

Prior Year’sFiscal Year 2019 Shareholder Advisory Vote Results

At the 20162019 AGM, the Company’s shareholders overwhelmingly approved the advisory proposal regarding the compensation of the Company’s NEOs with more than 95%approximately 94% of the votes cast in favor of our executive compensation programs (excluding abstentions)

30

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

abstentions/broker non-votes). The Board appreciates the shareholders’ continued support of the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives, whichobjectives. This support reaffirms to the Board the appropriateness, effectiveness and effectivenessmarket competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation programs, including continued emphasis on programs that reward our executive officers for generating sustainable profitability and delivering long-term value for our shareholders. No significant changes were made to the Company’s overall executive compensation strategy in fiscal year 2017.2020. The Board and the Compensation Committee will continue to consider the results of the Company’s annual shareholder advisory votes when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers, including the NEOs. The shareholder advisory vote occurs on an annual basis.

Executive Market Comparison Peer Group and Benchmark Philosophy

The Compensation Committee reviews NEO assignmentsexecutive officers’ roles and responsibilities and establishes ranges for each incentive element of executive paycompensation after reviewing similar information for a defined group of companies (the “NEO“Executive Peer Group”) that compete for comparable executive talent. The Compensation Committee relies onreviews analyses of disclosures and of published surveys of compensation among the NEOExecutive Peer Group companies when considering cash bonus and long-term equity incentive compensation forof executive officers in similar roles.

As part of our annual review cycle, the Compensation Committee reviewed the NEOExecutive Peer Group and did not makemade changes to the selection criteria for fiscal year 2017. NEO2020. Executive Peer Group companies were selected based on a the following criteria:

similar industry classification (as defined by Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”)(GICS), 4520 Technology Hardware and Equipment or 4530 Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment,Equipment) but excluding wholesale distributors and companies that are not subject to U.S. securities law reporting requirements, and wholesale distributors), having a minimum

market value of at least $3 billion and between$4-$35 billion in 0.5 times that of Seagate,

trailing twelve-month sales.

The Compensation Committee monitors a “watch list”(TTM) sales of companies to support year-over-year consistency among companies in the NEO Peer Group. Companies identified as partbetween $4B and 3 times that of the “watch list” will only be added to the NEO Peer Group after meeting salesSeagate’s; and market value criteria for two consecutive years and once added to the NEO Peer Group will only be removed after failing to meet sales and market value criteria for two consecutive years, provided they meet at least 75% of the criteria minimum value.

 

40

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

For fiscal year 2017, the NEO Peer Group included the following companies:

Peer Group for Fiscal Year 2017(1)

   Sales     
Company Name                              

TTM

        ($M)         

   

FYE

        ($M)         

   

Market

Value

        ($M)         

 

Amphenol Corp.

  $        5,565   $        5,346   $        16,762 

Applied Materials Inc.

  $9,659   $9,659   $20,134 

ARRIS Group

  $4,960   $5,323   $4,143 

Corning Inc.

  $9,284   $9,715   $22,004 

EMC Corp.(2)

  $24,738   $24,440   $50,860 

Flextronics International Ltd.

  $24,860   $26,148   $6,336 

Harris Corp.

  $5,739   $5,083   $9,783 

Jabil Circuit Inc.

  $17,899   $17,899   $4,349 

Juniper Networks Inc.

  $4,640   $4,627   $12,067 

Lam Research Corp.

  $5,707   $5,259   $12,140 

Micron Technology Inc.

  $16,192   $16,192   $17,206 

Motorola Solutions Inc.

  $5,837   $5,881   $12,365 

NCR Corp.

  $6,461   $6,591   $4,519 

NetApp Inc.

  $5,871   $6,123   $10,027 

NVIDIA Corp.

  $4,860   $4,682   $15,291 

QUALCOMM Inc.

  $25,281   $25,281   $93,361 

TE Connectivity Ltd.

  $12,233   $12,233   $25,930 

Texas Instruments Inc.

  $13,080   $13,045   $58,217 

Western Digital Corp.

  $13,989   $14,572   $15,479 

Peer Group Median

  $9,284   $9,659   $15,291 

Peer Group Average

  $11,413   $11,479   $21,630 

Seagate Technology plc

  $12,878   $13,739   $11,381 

(1)The following table is based on information available as of October 31, 2015.

(2)Acquired by Dell, Inc. in September 2016

ARRIS Group and Lam Research Corporation were addeda comparable business model to the NEO Peer Group from the watch list upon meeting the NEO Peer Group selection criteria for two years. Broadcom Limited was placed on the watch

Seagate.

41

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

list as a potential company to be added to the NEO Peer Group for fiscal year 2018 if the company continues to meet the applicable sales and market value criteria.

How We Determine Individual Compensation Amounts

  Current Named Executive Officers

As discussed above in greater detail under the heading “Role of our CEO and Management in the Decision-Making Process,” Mr. Luczo and the Senior Vice President of Human Resources, along with members of her staff, review with the Compensation Committee all compensation elements for our NEOs at least annually, and the Compensation Committee determines the value of each compensation element as described below. The proportion of each pay element value (i.e., the compensation mix) relative to total compensation varies by individual, although for all NEOs the largest portion of pay is performance based and is variable and contingent on our financial performance. Variations in the compensation mix among NEOs reflect differences in scope of responsibility as well as NEO Peer Group market data. The mix of total annual target compensation for Mr. Luczo was 10% annual base salary, 14% target annual incentive and 76% target long-term incentives, and the average mix of total annual target compensation for Messrs. Brace, Morton, Mosley and Murphy was 14% annual base salary, 16% target annual incentives and 70% target long-term equity incentives.

For fiscal year 2017, Mr. Luczo’s total annual actual compensation was lower than the other NEOs’ total annual actual compensation, reflecting the fact that he did not receive an equity award in fiscal year 2017. As a result, for fiscal year 2017, the mix of total annual actual compensation for Mr. Luczo was 38% annual base salary and 62% annual incentive, and the average mix of total annual actual compensation for Messrs. Brace, Morton, Mosley and Murphy was 8% annual base salary, 10% annual incentives and 82% long-term equity incentives.

Total Annual Target Compensation Mix

LOGO

42

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

LOGO

We do not benchmark the total annual compensation of our executive officers to a specific market percentile, although the total annual target compensation (including base salary, target annual cash bonus incentive and target long-term equity incentives) for the executive officers, including the NEOs, generally fallshas fallen near the median for similar positions within the NEOExecutive Peer Group. We believe the total executive pay opportunity is appropriate to attract and retain top leadership talent in a competitive labor market in our industry segment, particularly given our size relative to the NEO Peer Group and in light of the uncertainty of the actual amount of pay that each NEO can earn given the volatility of our business. Due to our emphasis on performance-based pay, the amounts actually received by our NEOs are heavily dependent on the Company’s financial performance.

While we considerthe Company considers the pay practices of our NEOExecutive Peer Group companies in determining target incentive compensation for our executive officers, we diddo not compare our performance with the performance of the NEOExecutive Peer Group companies when evaluating salary levels or determining the size of particular incentive awards. The target amounts and compensation mix vary for each NEO on the basis ofexecutive officer and is dependent upon various factors, none of which is specifically weighted, including the importance of the position to our organization, overall retention value, internal pay equity, and projected future value of the total compensation package.

We believe the total executive compensation opportunity is appropriate to attract and retain top leadership talent in a competitive labor market in our industry segment, particularly given our size relative to the Executive Peer Group and in light of the uncertainty of the actual amount of compensation that each executive officer can realize given the volatility of our business. Generally, the amounts actually realized by our executive officers are dependent on the Company’s financial performance.

31

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

The Executive Peer Group for fiscal year 2020 included the following companies(1):

  Sales   
 Company Name 

TTM

        ($M)         

  

FYE

        ($M)         

  

    Market Value      

           ($M)              

 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

   6,472    5,329    20,798

 Analog Devices Inc.

   6,146    5,108    32,012

 Applied Materials Inc.

   17,208    14,537    33,009

 Corning Inc.

   10,892    10,116    25,285

 Flex Ltd.

   26,297    25,441    4,192

 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.

   30,566    28,871    22,295

 Juniper Networks, Inc.

   4,706    5,027    9,713

 KLA Corp

   4,160    4,037    14,132

 Lam Research Corp.

   10,930    11,077    22,151

 Microchip Technology Inc.

   4,641    3,981    17,033

 Micron Technology, Inc.

   30,391    30,391    43,136

 Motorola Solutions, Inc.

   7,046    6,380    21,051

 NetApp, Inc.

   6,166    5,911    20,231

 Western Digital Corp.

   20,494    20,647    13,039

 Xerox Corp.

   10,044    10,265    6,434

 Zebra Technologies Corp.

   4,107    3,722    9,322

 Peer Group Median

   8,545    8,248    20,514

 Seagate Technology plc

   11,543    11,184    12,227

(1)

Based on information available as of November 15, 2018, which was the most recent available data at the time the fiscal year 2020 peer group was approved in May 2019.

For fiscal year 2020, Analog Devices, Inc., KLA Corporation, Microchip Technology, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corp. were added to the Executive Peer Group after meeting the selection criteria. Amphenol Corp., Broadcom Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., CommScope Holding Company, Inc., L3Harris Technologies, Inc., HP Inc., Intel Corp., Jabil Circuit Inc., NCR Corp., NVIDIA Corp., QUALCOMM Inc., Sanmina Corp., TE Connectivity Ltd. and Texas Instruments Inc. were removed from the Executive Peer Group for fiscal year 2020 since they are not considered to have a comparable business model to Seagate’s. ARRIS International plc was removed due to its acquisition by CommScope Holding Company.

How We Determine Individual Compensation Amounts for the NEOs

As discussed above under the heading “Role of our CEO and Management in the Compensation Process,” the CEO recommends to the Compensation Committee all compensation elements for our NEOs (other than the CEO) and the Compensation Committee determines the value of each compensation element as described below. The CEO recommendations are based upon the CEO’s assessment of each executive officer’s performance and individual retention considerations, as well as the Company’s performance as a whole. The CEO does not recommend their own compensation and the Compensation Committee and the independent directors meet without the CEO present when evaluating and setting the CEO’s compensation.

32

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Our Senior Vice President of Human Resources and members of their staff assist the Compensation Committee in its review of our executive compensation plans and programs, including providing market data on competitive pay practices, program design and changes in the corporate governance landscape concerning executive compensation matters.

The proportion of each compensation element (i.e., the compensation mix) relative to total compensation varies by individual, although for our executive officers, the emphasis is on compensation that is variable and contingent on our financial performance. Variations in the compensation mix among NEOs reflect differences in scope of responsibility as well as Executive Peer Group market data.

Annual Target Compensation Mix

LOGO

LOGO

As a result, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2020, the actual mix of compensation for Dr. Mosley was 9% annual base salary, 12% annual cash bonus incentive and 79% long-term equity incentives. The average actual mix of compensation for Messrs. Romano, Nygaard and Teh, and Ms. Schuelke was 21% annual base salary, 13% annual cash bonus incentives and 66% long-term equity incentives.

33

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Base Salary

Base salaries are the fixed annual cash amounts paid to our NEOs on a biweekly basis.executive officers, including the NEOs. In reviewing and determining base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers:

 

competitive market levels for comparable positions in the NEO Peer Group;

related experience;

 

related experience;

expected future contributions;

 

expected future contributions;

overall ability to influence our financial performance and the strategic impact of the role; and

 

the ease or difficulty of replacing the incumbent.incumbent; and

The strategic positioning for our NEOs’ base salaries is based on a broad range

in the case of factors, which includeexecutive officers other than the competitive marketplace, the roleCEO, recommendations of the NEO, skills and performance. CEO.

Salaries are reviewed annually and may be revisedmodified to reflect significant changes in the scope of an NEO’sexecutive officer’s responsibilities and/or market conditions. Our goal is to be competitive with respect to base salary while distinguishing ourselves from the NEOExecutive Peer Group by providing a greater emphasis on compensating our executive officers through the use of performance-based incentives that are consistent with our strategy of motivating executive officers to achieve and exceed annual and multi-year business objectives.

The following NEO annualized base salary changes occurred during fiscal year 2020:

 Name  

FY2019

Base

Salary

$

  

FY2020

Base
Salary
(1)

$

  

Percent    

Change    

%    

 William D. Mosley

    1,100,008    1,100,008    0%    

 Gianluca Romano

    600,018    600,018    0%    

 Jeffrey D. Nygaard

    480,002    480,002    0%    

 Katherine E. Schuelke

    499,990    499,990    0%    

 Ban Seng Teh(2)

    357,187    361,013    1%    

(1)

Any base salary increases were determined by the strategic impact of the NEO’s role and alignment to market.

(2)

Based on the Singapore dollar (SGD) average foreign exchange rate for fiscal year 2020 of 0.7224.

Annual Incentive Plan—Executive Officer Performance Bonus

All executive officers participate in our shareholder-approved Executive Officer Performance Bonus Plan (“EOPB”), which is intended to promote achievement of the annual financial and operating-performance metrics set by the Compensation Committee. Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines and certifies the achievement level(s) of the metrics, which determines the level of funding for the EOPB bonus pool. The funded amount, once approved by the Compensation Committee, is allocated among eligible participants.

The target cash bonus percentage for each executive officer is based on the competitive marketplace and the executive officer’s role, as well as taking internal pay equity into consideration. Actual cash payments under the EOPB may be above or below this level, based on the executive officer’s performance versus pre-established goals. Individual awards paid to each executive officer, except the CEO, are determined by the Compensation Committee.

 

4334

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

During fiscal year 2017, Mr. Mosley’s base salary increased from $600,018 to $800,010 to recognize his appointment as President and COO on July  25, 2016. The base salaries of the other NEOs did not change during fiscal year 2017.

Annual Bonus Plan

  Executive Officer Performance Bonus

All NEOs participate in our shareholder-approved Executive Officer Performance Bonus Plan (“EOPB”), which is designed to promote achievement of our annual financial and operational goals as approved by the Compensation Committee. The general target bonus for each NEO is basedBased on the competitive marketplace and the NEO’s role, as well as taking internal pay equity into consideration. Actual payments under the EOPB may be above or below this level, based on performance results. Individual awards paid to each NEO following the endrecommendation of the performance period are determined by the Compensation Committee, after certifying our financial and operational performance. The Compensation Committee, together with the other independent directors of the Board determine the material terms of Mr. Luczo’sCEO’s target cash bonus opportunity under the EOPB, including the amount of Mr. Luczo’s target bonus opportunity,percentage and the payout levelactual cash award based on the CEO’s performance results.versus pre-established goals.

On July 25 2016,28, 2020, the Compensation Committee approvedcertified the performanceachievement level of the Company’s relevant annual financial and operating-performance metrics, and funding targets to bewhich are used for calculating annualthe level of EOPB bonus awards for each executive officerpool funding for fiscal year 2017 under the EOPB. Funding2020. The bonus pool funding was set at 83.52% of the EOPBtarget. The funding level for fiscal year 20172020 was determined based on the Company’s actual performance with respect to the following financial and operating-performance metrics:

 

revenue; and

 

adjusted operating margin (defined as adjusted earnings before interest, taxes and bonus,operating income, divided by revenue)(“AOM”); and modified by

 

  an independent quality

our Total Customer Experience (“TCE”) metric, referred to asReliability Quality Competitiveness Best in Class(“RQC BiC”), which is a measure of how our key customers view Seagate’scustomers’ overall satisfaction with their Seagate experience, from product quality compared with the product qualityto responsiveness of our competitors.service.

While we track many operationalfinancial, operating and strategic performance goalsmetrics throughout the year, operating marginthe combination of AOM and revenue together are considered a key measure of our success in achieving profitable growth and were selected for fiscal year 20172020 to continue to align payouts under the EOPB with the Company’s profitability year-over-year. AdjustmentsAdjusted operating income, used to earningsdetermine AOM for purposes of determining the EOPB, is defined as operating margin excludedincome, adjusted to exclude the impact ofnon-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurringnon-recurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events whichthat were not budgeted and/or foreseen at the time the performance targets were established, and includedincludes estimated interest expenses, taxes and variable cash compensation. The adjustmentsAny adjustment factors for AOM at the end of the fiscal year are reviewed and approveddecided upon by the Compensation Committee. Revenue and AOM are modified by TCE, which replaces our prior metric, Reliability Quality Competitiveness Best in Class (“RQC BiC”). We replaced RQC BiC was retained aswith TCE because we believe that success in customers’ experiences will increase revenue and, in most cases, increase our market share. The Compensation Committee determined that RQC BiC no longer provided a modifierholistic indicator of overall customer satisfaction and competitiveness in the marketplace and does not necessarily translate to an increase in revenue or market share. TCE is comprised of two customer satisfaction measurements, which are evaluated quarterly:

Quarterly Business Review (“QBR”): Customers provide a ranking of Seagate against its competitors through customer scorecards; and

Net Promoter Score (“NPS”): A Best in Class standard consumer measure that indicates if end users are satisfied with their experience of the overall bonus funding calculationSeagate brand.

The target AOM for fiscal year 2017, because quality is considered2020 was established with a critical partthreshold performance level of our overall business performance.12.9%, a target performance level of 18.1%, and a maximum performance level of 22.6%. Once the Company meets or exceeds the threshold AOM, the combination of revenue and AOM determines preliminary funding for the bonus pool. The QBR metric (weighted 15%) may increase or decrease bonus pool funding up to 3.75% each quarter and the NPS metric (weighted 10%) may increase or decrease bonus pool funding up to 2.50% each quarter, resulting in up to 25% of bonus pool funding being at risk. For fiscal year 2020, the AOM performance level was 15.94%, revenue was $10.5 billion and the total annualized TCE modifier (QBR + NPS) was 8.125%, which, as noted above, resulted in total EOPB bonus pool funding of 83.52% of target.

 

4435

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

The combination of the three performance metrics noted above was used to determine the applicable percentage of our annual revenue that would be allocated to the overall bonus pool to be used for the payment of bonuses to all eligible employees, including to our executive officers under the EOPB. For purposes of illustration, the range of overall bonus funding as a percentage of target for fiscal year 2017, assuming annual revenues of $11 billion and the achievement of the minimum level of RQC BiC of 80%, would be as indicated below for the achievement of operating margin at the threshold, target and maximum levels for fiscal year 2017:

Performance Level      

Operating

        Margin         

     

Funding

        as % of  Target        

    

Threshold

   12.6     %   50     % 

Target

   14.9     %   100     % 

Maximum

   20.0     %   200     % 

 

Actual funding is determined based on the adjusted operating margin, the level of revenues and RQC BiC actually achieved during fiscal year 2017. Once the Company achieves or exceeds the threshold operating margin, the combination of actual operating margin and revenue determines preliminary funding. This amount is then reduced by 1.25% for each of our five key markets each quarter that do not achieve the minimum RQC BiC performance requirement, with up to 25% of the funding subject to quality performance.

The funded amount, once approved by the Compensation Committee, is allocated among eligible participants. Funding for individual bonuses paid to our NEOs isare based upon each executive officer’sNEO’s target cash bonus expressed as a percentage of base salary. For fiscal year 2017, Mr. Luczo2020, there were no changes to the target cash bonus percentages from the prior year:

Dr. Mosley had a target bonus equal to 150% of his annual base salary (reflecting that a larger portion ofin his total annual target cash compensation is subject to performance conditions than is the case for the other NEOs)role as CEO;

Messrs. Romano and based on their role in the Company, the other NEOsNygaard had a target bonus ranging fromequal to 100% to 125% of their individual annual base salaries. salary in their roles as Executive Vice Presidents;

Ms. Schuelke had a target bonus equal to 75% of her annual base salary in her role as Senior Vice President; and

Mr. Teh had a target bonus of 75% of his annual base salary in his role as Senior Vice President. However due to Mr. Teh’s role as a sales executive, his target bonus was split with a 50% EOPB and a 50% sales commissions weighting resulting in a target of 37.5% for each component of his cash bonus incentive compensation.

The Compensation Committee, with respect to all NEOs except our CEO, the independent directors of the Board and with respect to our CEO, retainretains the discretion to reduce or increase the amount of the actual cash bonus payoutpayments made to NEOs based on theirits overall assessment of the Company’sNEO’s performance generally,against pre-established goals and objectives, and including factors such as revenue, profitability, product quality, cost containment and expense management, market share, strategic objectives and legal and regulatory compliance. Adjustments to actual cash bonus payouts may be made by the Compensation Committee with respect to all NEOs except our CEO, and by the independent directors of the Board for our CEO.

Based on our actual performance for fiscal year 2017, funding was set at 107.4% of target, on the basis of our adjusted operating margin of 15.8%, revenues of approximately $10.8 billion and an RQC BiC modifier of 96.3%. Based onGiven the funded EOPB bonus pool amount, the Compensation CommitteeCompany determined to award the following cash bonuses for fiscal year 2017:2020:

 

Named Executive Officer 

Annual

          Salary           

  

 

Target

Bonus

        Percentage         

     

FY2017

EOPB

      Funding       

     

FY2017

EOPB

      Payment       

 

Stephen J. Luczo

 $      1,200,056          150  %     107.4  %   $  1,933,290 

David H. Morton, Jr.

 $  525,013          100  %     107.4  %   $563,864 

Philip G. Brace(1)

 $  600,018          100  %     107.4  %   $644,419 

William D. Mosley

 $  800,010          100  %     107.4  %   $859,210 

James J. Murphy(2)

 $  575,016          100  %     107.4  %   $388,525 
 Named Executive Officer 

Annual

          Salary           

($)

  

Target

Bonus

        Percentage         

(%)

  

FY2020

EOPB

      Funding(1)      

(%)

  

FY2020

EOPB

      Payment       

($)

 William D. Mosley

   1,100,008    150    83.52    1,378,090  

 Gianluca Romano

   600,018    100    83.52    501,135  

 Jeffrey D. Nygaard

   480,002    100    83.52    400,897  

 Katherine E. Schuelke

   499,990    75    83.52    313,194  

 Ban Seng Teh(2)

   358,469    37.5    83.52    112,272  

 

(1)

Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.

(2)

Based on the Singapore dollar (SGD) foreign exchange rate on July 3, 2020 of 0.71731.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

In fiscal year 2020, the Compensation Committee granted equity awards to the NEOs under the terms of the EIP. The EIP is intended to:

 

focus executive officers and employees on achieving longer-term business performance goals;

provide significant reward potential for outstanding cumulative performance by the Company;

enhance the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly-talented executive officers and employees; and

 

4536

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

(1)Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities.
(2)Mr. Murphy’s EOPB payment is based on his employment with the Company for only a portion of the fiscal year 2017.

Management-Based Objectives Component of EOPB for Presidents

As part of our strategic performance-based cash incentive program, in fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee approved a cash bonus opportunity for each of our Presidents, Messrs. Mosley and Brace, to earn up to 25% of each executive’s annual base salary based on achievement of key operational goals (the “MBO Bonus”). The payout was based on the level of funding of the EOPB for the Company’s fiscal year 2017, up to target, as well as the CEO’s assessment of achievement of individual goals tied to strategic objectives for each President’s organization during the fiscal year 2017 as follows:

Mr. Mosley’s goals consisted of (1) driving technology initiatives, weighted at 33%, (2) improving operational efficiencies, weighted at 33%, and (3) customer advocacy, weighted at 33%. At the end of fiscal year 2017, it was determined that Mr. Mosley achieved 50%, 66% and 50% against each of these goals, respectively, for a weighted average of 55.33% of the target; and
Mr. Brace’s goals consisted of (1) driving development and business initiatives, weighted at 50%, and (2) driving strategic initiatives, weighted at 50%. At the end of fiscal year 2017, it was determined that Mr. Brace achieved 60% and 30% against each of these goals, respectively, for a weighted average of 45% of the target.

In each case, we did not specify a quantitative target that must be achieved, but we considered the goals aggressive yet attainable within the fiscal year.

Based on the achievement of the applicable goals and considering the CEO’s assessment of the achievement, the Compensation Committee awarded the following MBO Bonuses for fiscal year 2017: Mr. Mosley, $110,661; and Mr. Brace, $67,502.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

In fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee awarded equity awards to the NEOs under the terms of the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan is designed to:

focus executive officers on achieving longer-term business performance goals;
provide significant reward potential for outstanding cumulative performance by the Company;
enhance the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly talented executive officers; and
provide the Company’s management teamand employees with an opportunity for greater equity ownership and related incentives to increase shareholder return.value.

OurWhen determining our NEOs’ equity incentive awards, are based on the economic value ofCompensation Committee considers comparable equity incentive awards to executive officers in the Company’s Executive Peer Group, the NEO’s role, individual performance and potential future contributions. Our equity award guidelines and mix of the type of awards granted are based on an analysis of the unvested equity held by an NEO, the practices of NEOExecutive Peer Group companies in awarding equity for similar positions (including equity mix and award values), potential impact on earnings, and the pool of available shares. In determining the award for each NEO, the Compensation Committee also considers the Company’s goals for retaining the NEO for the long term and the following factors related to each NEO including:term.

potential future contributions to the Company’s overall success;
past equity award history; and
potential future value (holding power) of unvested equity.

46

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

NEOs are generally awarded equity on an annual basis, typically inmid-September, as part of our annual award cycle, and these equity incentive awards generally consist of a mix of time-vesting options, Threshold Performance Share UnitsTPSUs and Performance Share UnitsPSUs (each as definedgoverned by the EIP and as described more fully below), reflecting a strong emphasis onpay-for-performance and the alignment of interests between our NEOs and our shareholders.

Except for Mr. Luczo, who did not receive an equity grant for fiscal year 2017,With the exception of Ms. Schuelke and Mr. Murphy,Teh, the equity grantsawards made to each of our NEOs for fiscal year 20172020 are comprised of 20% time-based options and 80% performance-based awards (the mix of performance-based awards consisting of 30% Threshold Performance Share Units,TPSUs and 50% Performance Share Units, reflectingPSUs). In their roles as Senior Vice Presidents, Ms. Schuelke and Mr. Teh received a mix of 60% time-based RSUs and 40% PSUs. This reflects the Compensation Committee’s review and assessment of market practices at NEOExecutive Peer Group companies, as well as its determination that a mix of options and full-value equity awardsthese mixes would provide an appropriate blend of equity incentives to sustain and improve the Company’s financial performance and shareholder value. As part of Mr. Murphy’s new hire package, he received a mix of 50% Threshold Performance Share Units and 50% options.

Options

Options generally vest over four years and have a seven-year term. Options are awarded with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s ordinary shares on the grant date. Fair market value is defined as the closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares on the NASDAQ on the grant date. The grant date and vesting schedule for options granted to our eligible NEOs are generally the same as for other employees receiving optionsdetermined during the annual award process, but may be different in the case of a new hire or change in employment position.

Share Awards

Restricted Share Units

RSUs generally vest in equal annual installments over four years, contingent on continued service. Each RSU represents the right to receive one of our ordinary shares. If under the terms of the RSU award agreement dividend equivalents accrue, such dividend equivalents are subject to the same vesting conditions as the RSUs, and, therefore, no dividend equivalent payment, if any, will be paid to the employee on any ordinary shares underlying the RSUs until the RSUs vest. Due to the strongour emphasis onpay-for-performance, our CEO presidents and executive vice presidentsEVPs are not eligible to receive RSUs. WeRSUs under the Compensation Committee’s current policies; we believe that long-term equity awards made to our executives at these levelsCEO and EVPs should consist only of options, and performance-vesting shares, TPSUs, or unitsPSUs. All outstanding RSU awards currently held by Mr. Nygaard were granted prior to align with our emphasis onpay-for-performance.the promotion to his current position.

Threshold Performance Share Units

Threshold Performance Share Units (“TPSUs”)TPSUs are equity awards with a maximum seven-year vesting period, contingent on continued service and the achievement of the specified performance goals.AEPS goal. Each TPSU represents the right to receive one of our ordinary shares.

37

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

For each tranche of a TPSU award that is eligible to vest on a vesting date, vesting is contingent on the Company achieving a threshold adjusted earnings per share (“AEPS”)AEPS goal of $1.00 for the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which the vesting date occurs. If the threshold goal is not achieved, vesting of that tranche is delayed to the next scheduled vesting date for which the AEPS goal is achieved. TPSU awards may become fully vested as early as four years from the grant date and remain eligible to vest for up to seven years following the grant date. If the AEPS threshold level has not been met by the end of the seven-year period, any unvested TPSUs will be forfeited. Unvested awards from prior years may vest cumulatively on the scheduled vesting date forin a future year within the seven-year vesting period if the annual AEPS threshold for that year is achieved. For example, if AEPS performance prior to the first vesting date is below the AEPS threshold, then vesting will be delayed. If the AEPS threshold is achieved prior to the second vesting opportunity, then 50% of the award will vest (25% from the first vesting date and 25% from the second vesting date due to the cumulative feature of the award). TPSU awards may become fully vested as early as four years from the grant date and, as noted above, remain eligible to vest for up to seven years

47

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

following the grant date. If the AEPS threshold level has not been met by the end of the seven-year period, any unvested TPSUs will be forfeited. Vesting for these awards is uncertain yet considered likely due to the cumulative vesting feature. For market comparison purposes, we compare the value of TPSU awards for our NEOs with time-based restricted shares or RSUs awarded by other companies in the NEO Peer Group. For purposes of the TPSU awards, AEPS is based on diluted earnings per share, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding the impact ofnon-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurringnon-recurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events whichthat were not foreseen at the time the performance target was established, and includes estimated interest expenses, taxes and variable compensation. UnderIf under the terms of the TPSU award agreement dividend equivalents accrue during the vesting period, such dividend equivalents are subject to the same vesting conditions as the TPSUs. Consequently, no dividend equivalent payment, if any, will be madepaid to the employee on any of the ordinary shares underlying the TPSUs.TPSUs until the TPSUs vest.

Our AEPS performance for fiscal year 20172020 was above the $1.00 AEPS threshold; therefore, an additional 25% of each of the outstanding TPSU awards will vest on their next scheduled vesting date following the end of fiscal year 2017.2020, subject to continued employment.

Performance Share Units

Performance share units (“PSUs”)PSUs are performance-based RSUs that vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to continued employment and the achievement of annual return on invested capital (“ROIC”)ROIC over the performance period, modified by a factor based on the Company’s relative total shareholder return (“TSR”)rTSR percentile compared with a selected peer group, defined below.the Executive Peer Group. ROIC was selected as a key metric because of its ability to measure the efficiency of our use of capital and delivery of earnings above investment, considered a critical factor in the Company’s long-term success. In addition, the relative TSRrTSR metric rewards financial performance asand is measured by the change in our share price and the dividends we declared during the performance period relative to the performance of the select groupExecutive Peer Group. The Compensation Committee determines the number of peers (as described below).PSUs that will vest at the end of the three-year performance period according to a pre-established vesting matrix. Payout of the targeted number of PSUs will occur if target ROIC is attained over the three-year measurement period and relative TSRrTSR is at least at the median of the selected peer group.Executive Peer Group. The final ROIC metric is calculated as the average annual ROIC over the prior three fiscal years. Annual ROIC is calculated as (i) adjusted operating income multiplied by 1(1 minus the average tax rate,rate), divided by (ii) (x) net plant, property and equipment plus total current assets minus cash and cash equivalents, minus (y) total current liabilities. Adjustments toliabilities with the exclusion of the current portion of long-term debt. Adjusted operating income is operating income adjusted to exclude the impact ofnon-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurringnon-recurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events whichthat were not budgeted and/or foreseen at the time the performance target was established. established, and include estimated interest expenses, taxes and variable cash compensation

For fiscal year 2017,2020, the relative TSRrTSR modifier iswas interpolated and set between 25th to 75th percentiles.

Each PSU represents the right to receive one of our ordinary shares. The Compensation Committee will determine the number of PSUs that will vest at the endpercentiles of the three-year performance period according to apre-established vesting matrix.Executive Peer Group’s TSR. For awards granted in fiscal year 2017,2020, assuming the minimum ROIC performance threshold is achieved, the actual number of ordinary shares that may vest ranges from 38% of the target number of PSUs (for an(assuming ROIC of approximately 56% of targetat the threshold level and relative TSR at or below the selected peer group median)25th percentile of the Executive Peer Group) to 200% of the target number of PSUs (for(assuming an ROIC in excess of approximately 139% of targetat the maximum level and relative TSR equal to or above the 75th percentile of the selected peer group)Executive Peer Group). The specific ROIC target values for the PSUs are not publicly disclosed at the time of grant due to the proprietary nature and competitive sensitivity of the information. Under the terms of the PSU award agreement, no dividend equivalent payments will be made on any of the ordinary shares underlying the PSUs.

 

4838

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

The selected peer group for PSUs awarded in September 2016 included a broader range of companies thanEach PSU represents the NEO Peer Groupright to allow for comparisonreceive one of our performance against a wider range of technology companies thanordinary shares. If under the companies with whom we frequently compete for executive talent. The selected peer group for purposes of measuring our relative TSR performance consistedterms of the 25 companies listed inPSU award agreement dividend equivalents accrue during the table below, meeting the following criteria:

Similar industry classification (defined as companies in GICS, 4520 Technology Hardware and Equipment or 4530 Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment), excluding companies thatvesting period, such dividend equivalents are not subject to U.S. securities reporting requirements and wholesale distributors; and
Trailing twelve-month salesthe same vesting conditions as the PSUs. Consequently, no dividend equivalent payments, if any, will be paid to the employee on any of at least $4 billion.

PSU Peer Groupthe ordinary shares underlying the PSUs until the PSUs vest.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Juniper Networks, Inc.

Amphenol Corp.

Lam Research Corp.

Apple Inc.

Micron Technology Inc.

Applied Materials Inc.

Motorola Solutions Inc.

ARRIS International plc

NCR Corp.

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NetApp, Inc.

Corning Inc.

NVIDIA Corp.

Flextronics International Ltd.

QUALCOMM Inc.

Harris Corp.

Sanmina Corp.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.

TE Connectivity Ltd

HP Inc.

Texas Instruments Inc.

Intel Corp.

Western Digital Corp.

Jabil Circuit Inc.

In fiscal year 2014,2017, we granted PSUs (“FY2017 PSUs”) to Dr. Mosley and Messrs. MortonNygaard and MosleyTeh that were eligible to vest after the end of a three-year performance period ending on July 1, 2016,June 28, 2019, subject to continued employment and the achievement of target ROIC over the performance period, modified by a factor based on our TSRrTSR percentile. Our average share price at the beginning of the FY2017 PSUs’ performance period was $33.41 and our ending average share price was $59.24 (assuming dividends were reinvested). Therefore, our rTSR over the performance period from July 2, 2016 through June 28, 2019 was 77.29% and our shares performed at the 66.67th (rounded to 67th) percentile compared withrelative to the companies in the Executive Peer Group, which resulted in a selected peer group. modifier of 116.67%.

On September 26, 2016,27, 2019, the Compensation Committee certified the level of achievement of the financial performance metrics for the three-year measurement period, such that the FY2017 PSUs vested at 98%186.67% of target based on a three-year average annual ROIC of 54%94%, and relative TSRrTSR at the 18th67th percentile over the three-year period.

FY2017 PSUs

 Average ROIC  Threshold   Target   Maximum   Actual   

 3-Year Average Annual Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

   < 30%    54%    ³ 75%    94%   

 Vesting Level (% of Target)

   0%    100%    160%    160%   
        
 rTSR Modifier  Threshold   Target   Maximum   Actual   

 Relative Total Shareholder Return Percentile

   £ 25th%ile    50th%ile    ³ 75th%ile    66.67%ile   

 rTSR %ile Modifier1

   75%    100%    125%    116.67%   

 Overall Results

         186.67%   

(1)

with interpolation between points

As a result, the following numbers of ordinary shares were issued to the executive officers:officers during fiscal year 2020:

 

 
  FY2017 PSUs
 
Named Executive Officer         Target PSUs         

FY2014 PSUs

             Earned            

       

Minimum

PSUs

  

Target

PSUs

  

Maximum

PSUs

  

FY2017 PSUs  

Earned  

David H. Morton, Jr.

   2,160    2,117   

William D. Mosley

   50,000    49,000                0    101,706    203,412    189,855  

Jeffrey D. Nygaard

             0    10,610    21,220    19,806  

Ban Seng Teh

             0    6,190    12,380    11,555  

As theThe certification of ourthe relevant financial performance metrics with respect to the PSUs granted in fiscal year 2015,2018 to Dr. Mosley and Messrs. Nygaard and Teh, which have a three-year performance period endingthat ended on June 30, 2017, couldJuly 3, 2020 was not be completed in advance of the filing date of this Proxy Statement,Statement.

Share Ownership Requirements

We established share ownership requirements to ensure that our NEOs hold a meaningful equity stake in the vestingCompany and, by doing so, link their interests with those of these awards (if any) will be disclosed onForm 8-K within four business days following written certification by the Compensation Committee.our shareholders. Shares directly or indirectly owned (for

 

4939

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Share Ownership Guidelines

We established share ownership guidelines to ensure that our NEOs hold a meaningful equity stake in the Company and, by doing so, to link their interests with those of our shareholders. Shares directly or indirectly owned (for example, through a trust), along with unvested RSUs that do not have a performance requirement,(if any), are included in the calculation of ordinary shares owned for purposes of the ownership guidelines,requirements, but time-based and performance-based options and unvested performance-based awardsperformance share bonuses, TPSUs and PSUs are not counted until they are exercised or vested, as applicable. NEOs are expected to meet the ownership requirements within five years of becomingthe date upon which the NEO first becomes subject to the guidelines.requirements. NEOs are measured against the applicable guideline on the last day of each fiscal year, and the results are reported to the Compensation Committee.

Our NEOs will beare required to own shares in an amount equal to an applicable target value based on a multiple of annual base salary. Our NEOs were required to meet the guidelines by July 1, 2016, with the exception of Messrs. Morton, Brace, and Murphy who are required to meet the guidelinesrequirements by October 21, 2020, April 30, 2020 and November 14, 2021, respectively. The sharethe following ownership guidelines are as follows:requirement dates.

 

 Named Executive OfficerRoleOwnership Requirement Date  

Ownership

Guideline–Guideline

Salary Multiple of Salary  

Guideline
Met
(1)

 William D. Mosley

CEO

October 1, 2022  6xYes

Presidents Gianluca Romano

  4x

Executive Vice Presidents

President
January 7, 2024  3xIn Progress

 Jeffrey D. Nygaard

Executive Vice PresidentOctober 17, 20223xYes

 Katherine E. Schuelke

Senior Vice PresidentJune 29, 20222xYes

 Ban Seng Teh

Senior Vice PresidentJanuary 27, 20252xYes

 

(1)

As of July 3, 2020

All of the NEOs have met or are on track to meet ownership guidelines by the applicable deadline.

Benefits and Perquisites

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in a broad range of benefits in the same manner asnon-executive employees. Seagate does not offer separate benefits for executive officers, other than vacation and severance benefits (see “Severance and Change in Control Benefits,”Benefits” below).

We generally do not generally provide perquisites to our NEOs except that we provide theother than business use of our corporate aircraft toand, in certain limited business-related circumstances, reimbursement for the travel costs of the NEO’s spouse or significant other. If an NEO’s travel on our NEOs which may be used for travel withcorporate aircraft includes a personal element, provided they fullythe NEO is required to reimburse us for the aggregate incremental cost of any such usage. We do however consider the value of perquisites, to the extent provided at the NEOExecutive Peer Group companies, in assessing the competitiveness of our total compensation package for our NEOs. Until January 1, 2017, Mr. Luczo participated in a group replacement life insurance plan (“GRIP”) that was closed to new participants as of January 2002. Effective January 1, 2017, the GRIP plan was discontinued and Mr. Luczo was enrolled in the Seagate Basic Life plan, which is available to all eligible employees, with a benefit amount of 2x annual salary up to $1,000,000. Mr. Luczo was given the option of transitioning his GRIP coverage to an individual plan at his expense, or canceling it.

  NonqualifiedNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

The 2015 Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan (the “SDCP”), effective January 1, 2015, allows our NEOs (and other eligible employees) whose annual base pay salary is $165,000$190,000 or more, or whose target commissions and annual base salary in the aggregate is $165,000$190,000 or more, to defer on apre-tax basis (i) up to 70% of their base salary, (ii) up to 70% of commissions, andand/or (iii) up to 100% of their annual performance-based cash bonus. Deferrals and notional earnings related to those deferrals are reflected on the Company’s books as an unfunded obligation of the Company.Company and remain part of our general assets. We do not make any contributionscontribute to the SDCP, and notional earnings on deferrals are based on the performance of actual investment funds selected by each participant from a menu of investment options offered pursuant to the SDCP. Deferral amounts, earnings and year-end balances for our NEOs are set forth in the table titled “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plans” under the “Compensation of Named Executive Officers” section below. The SDCP is a successor plan to the prior Seagate Deferred Compensation Plans, as amended from time to time, under which no additional deferrals may be made after December 31, 2014. A grantor (or rabbi) trust was established to hold any assets contributed to the trust to help satisfy our obligations due under the prior plans in effect through December 31, 2014.

 

5040

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

are based on the performance of investment funds selected by each participant from a menu of investment options offered pursuant to the SDCP. Deferral amounts, earnings andyear-end balances for our NEOs are set forth in the table below titled “Fiscal Year 2017 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” The SDCP is a successor plan to the Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, which became frozen with respect to all deferrals made thereunder on or prior to December 31, 2015.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

We provide severance benefits to assist in aligning NEO and shareholder interests during the evaluation of an ownership change, to remain competitive in attracting and retaining NEOs and to support organizational changes necessary to achieve our business strategy. The purpose of the Fifth Amended and Restated Seagate Technology Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan (the “Severance Plan”) is to:

(1)provide for the payment of severance benefits to our NEOs in the event their employment with the Company or any applicable subsidiary is involuntarily terminated;
(2)encourage our NEOs to continue employment in the event of a potential “change in control” (as such term is defined in the section titled “Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control,” below); and
(3)ensure that our NEOs generally receive the same severance benefits in connection with a qualifying termination of employment.

All of our NEOs receive a level of severance benefits under the terms of the Severance Plan that reflects their level of responsibility within our organization, the strategic importance of their position and a market-competitive level of severance for comparable positions within the NEO Peer Group.

The Severance Plan provisions were developed based on a comparison of severance benefits typically available at the NEO Peer Group companies, in consultation with FW Cook, following review by the independent directors of the Board. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the Severance Plan provides for severance only in the event of an involuntary termination (i.e., a termination by us without “cause” or by the Executive for “good reason”). The Severance Plan includes the following features:

severance benefits do not include a guaranteed bonus amount;
no post-termination healthcare benefit subsidy if the involuntary termination occurs outside of a “change in control period” (as defined in the section titled “Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control—Involuntary Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason During a Change in Control Period,” below);
enhanced severance benefits provided in connection with a change in control require a “double trigger” (which is defined as an involuntary termination during a “change in control period”) before an NEO becomes entitled to receive such benefits; and
severance payments cannot equal or exceed three times the sum of the executive’s base salary and target bonus.

In the event that the benefits payable following a change in control exceed the safe harbor limits established in Section 280G of the Code, we cap benefits at the safe harbor limit if theafter-tax benefit to the NEO of the capped amount is greater than theafter-tax benefit of the full amount (which would otherwise be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code). We do not provide agross-up for any taxes payable on severance benefits and the NEO is responsible for the payment of all personal taxes, including any excise taxes imposed on change in control payments and benefits.

51

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

For further details on the Severance Plan, see the section titled “Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control.”

Other Company Policies and Compensation Considerations

  Impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

The Compensation Committee seeks to qualify NEO compensation for deductibility under applicable tax laws to the greatest extent possible. Section 162(m) of the Code (as interpreted by IRS Notice2007-49) places a limit of $1 million on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation in any taxable year to any of the CEO and each of the next three most highly compensated NEOs employed at the end of the year (other than the Company’s CFO), unless such compensation is considered “performance-based” under Section 162(m).

Both the EOPB and the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan have been approved by our shareholders and are administered by the Compensation Committee. Each plan has been structured such that compensation paid or awarded thereunder may qualify as “performance-based” and therefore not be subject to the Section 162(m) limit. However, in order to maintain flexibility in compensating our NEOs in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to pay compensation that may not be tax deductible.

  Securities Trading

Seagate’s Securities Trading Policy prohibits all employees (including our NEOs) and Board members from taking “short” positions in our securities or engaging in hedging or other monetization transactions with respect to our securities. The Company prohibits its directors and executive officers from (i) purchasing any financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Company securities and (ii) engaging in any form ofshort-term speculative trading in Company securities. Directors and executive officers are also prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan unless the Chief Legal Officer or the Chief Financial Officer providespre-clearance after the director or executive officer clearly demonstrates the financial capability to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities. We have also amended our Securities Trading Policy to, among other things, require the first trade under a new plan established pursuant toRule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act take place after a reasonable “seasoning period” has passed from the time of adoption of the plan; in addition, an insider will only be permitted to useone 10b5-1 plan at a time.

  Pay Recovery Policy

Our Pay Recovery Policy is intended to eliminate any reward for fraudulent accounting. It provides standards for recovering compensation from an NEO where such compensation was based on incorrectly reported financial results due to the fraud or willful misconduct of such NEO. The NEO’s repayment obligation applies to any bonus paid, share award issued (whether or not vested) or options exercised during the period commencing with the date that is four years prior to the beginning of the fiscal year in which a restatement is announced, and ending on the date recovery is sought. We intend to review our Pay Recovery Policy following the enactment of final rules pursuant to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.

52

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and the Board. In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in the Company’s Proxy Statement for fiscal year 2017.

Respectfully submitted,

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Edward J. Zander, Chairman

Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

Michael R. Cannon

Jay L. Geldmacher

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2017 was an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries at any time during fiscal year 2017, has ever been an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or had a relationship with the Company during that period requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 404(a) ofRegulation S-K. No executive officers of the Company served on the compensation committee of any other entity, or as a director of an entity that employed any of the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2017.

53

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our Summary Compensation Table below shows the total compensation paid to or earned by each of our NEOs with respect to the fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015. The amounts reported reflect rounding, which may result in slight variations between amounts shown in the Total column and the sum of its components as reflected in the table.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position

 

 

Year

 

  

Salary

($)

 

  

Bonus

($)

 

  

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

 

  

Option

Awards

($)(1)

 

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)(7)

 

  

All Other

Compensation

($)(2)(3)

 

  

    Total ($)    

 

 

    Stephen J. Luczo

        

  Chief Executive Officer

  2017   1,200,056            1,933,290   3,392   3,136,738 
  2016   1,246,212      7,339,382   1,831,036      4,215   10,420,845 
  2015   1,200,056      7,555,140   1,732,557   1,155,654   3,884   11,647,291 

David H. Morton, Jr.(4)

                                

  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  2017   525,013      3,680,010   958,517   563,864   5,700   5,733,104 
  2016   484,625      710,240   240,927      4,500   1,440,292 

Philip G. Brace(8)

                                

  President, Cloud Systems and Silicon Group

  2017   600,018      3,999,595   1,041,748   711,921   5,354   6,358,636 
  2016   610,017      2,935,781   732,418      7,974   4,286,190 
  2015   392,316      3,588,650   777,129   263,901   4,500   5,026,496 

William D. Mosley

                                

  President and Chief Operating Officer

  2017   784,626      4,922,537   1,282,149   969,872   5,700   7,964,884 
  2016   623,095      2,935,781   732,418      12,355   4,303,649 
  2015   600,018      2,488,763   427,708   463,217   29,470   4,009,176 

James J. Murphy(5)

                                

  Executive Vice President, Sales & Marketing

  2017   353,856   1,500,000(6)   2,803,944   3,251,624   388,525   5,700   8,303,649 

(1)Stock Awards and Option Awards: These amounts do not reflect the actual value realized by the NEO. In accordance with SEC rules, these columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For time-based share units, the grant date fair value was determined using the closing share price of Seagate ordinary shares on the date of grant, adjusted for the present value of expected dividends. For all performance share units whose vesting is subject to performance conditions as defined by ASC 718, we have assumed the probable outcome of related performance conditions at target levels. The aggregate grant-date fair value for these PSUs and TPSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance, is $0 for Mr. Luczo, $6,137,429 for Mr. Morton, $6,670,423 for Mr. Brace, $8,209,675 for Mr. Mosley and $2,803,944 for Mr. Murphy. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 11, “Share-based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

54

SEAGATE TECHNOLODGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

(2)All Other Compensation: The amounts shown in this column consist of the following:

All Other Compensation Table

  Name

 

 

  Personal Guest  

Travel

($)

 

 

    401k Match ($)(9)    

 

 

 Company Contribution 

to HSA

($)

 

 

    Executive Life    

Insurance

($)

 

 

        Total         

($)

 

  Stephen J. Luczo

   1,200 2,192 3,392

  David H. Morton, Jr.

  4,500 1,200  5,700

  Philip G. Brace(8)

  4,154 1,200  5,354

  William D. Mosley

  4,500 1,200  5,700

  James J. Murphy

  4,500 1,200  5,700

(3)We provide the use of our corporate aircraft to our NEOs primarily so that they can travel to business functions and different facilities in the course of their duties. Certain trips taken by our NEOs in fiscal year 2017 may have had a personal element. To the extent that a travel leg has a personal element to it, our NEOs have fully reimbursed the Company for the aggregate incremental cost of such leg to us. Such reimbursement includes the costs of “wheels up time”, a portion of fuel and insurance costs, catering, excise taxes, and crew expenses.
(4)Mr. Morton was not an NEO in fiscal year 2015.
(5)Mr. Murphy was not an NEO in fiscal years 2015 and 2016.
(6)Represents theone-timesign-on bonus amount paid to Mr. Murphy in connection with his employment offer.
(7)Represents amounts payable under the EOPB. For a description of the EOPB, refer to the section above entitled “Annual Bonus Plan.”
(8)Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities.
(9)401(k) match is for the 401(k) Plan contribution provided to all U.S. employees who participate in the 401(k) Plan. The maximum amount is $4,500 per calendar year, but it may be higher or lower for a particular fiscal year depending on the timing and amount of the employee’s contribution.

55

SEAGATE TECHNOLODGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Fiscal Year 2017

            

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(1)

  

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(2)

             

Name

 

 

 

Type of
Award

 

 

  

Grant

Date

 

 

  

Compensation

Committee

Action Date

 

 

  

Threshold

($)

 

 

  

Target

($)

 

 

  

Maximum

($)

 

 

  

Threshold

(#)

 

 

  

Target

(#)

(2)

 

  

Maximum

(#)

(2)

 

  

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(#)

 

 

  

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)(3)

 

 

  

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/

Share)

 

 

  

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock

and

Option

Awards

($)(5)

 

 

 

Stephen J. Luczo(6)

             
  Cash Bonus   —          —         900,042   1,800,084   3,600,168   —       —          —          —         —      —        

David H. Morton, Jr.

              
  Cash Bonus   —          —         262,507   525,013   1,050,026   —       —          —          —      —      —      —        
  Time Option   9/9/2016(3)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       —          —          —      148,665   36.09   958,517     
  PSU   9/9/2016(4)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       76,034(2)   152,068(2)   —      —      —      2,457,419(2) 
  TPSU   9/9/2016(5)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       39,772(2)   —          —      —      —      1,222,591(2) 

Philip G. Brace(8)

              
  Cash Bonus   —          —         300,009   750,022   1,200,035   —       —          —          —      —      —      —        
  Time Option   9/9/2016(3)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       —          —          —      161,574   36.09   1,041,748     
  PSU   9/9/2016(4)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       82,637(2)   165,274(2)   —      —      —      2,670,828(2) 
  TPSU   9/9/2016(5)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       43,226(2)   —          —      —      —      1,328,767(2) 

William D. Mosley

              
  Cash Bonus   —          —         400,005   1,000,012   1,600,019   —       —          —          —      —      —      —        
  Time Option   9/9/2016(3)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       —          —          —      198,860   36.09   1,282,149     
  PSU   9/9/2016(4)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       101,706(2)   203,412(2)   —      —      —      3,287,138(2) 
  TPSU   9/9/2016(5)   7/25/2016   —      —      —      —       53,201(2)   —          —      —      —      1,635,399(2) 

James J. Murphy(7)

              
  Cash Bonus   —          —         180,878   361,755   723,510   —       —          —          —      —      —      —        
  Time Option   12/20/2016(3)   10/18/2016   —      —      —      —       —          —          —      398,774   38.76   3,251,624     
  TPSU   12/20/2016(5)   10/18/2016   —      —      —      —         83,850(2)   —          —      —      —      2,803,944(2) 

(1)Amounts represent the potential range of payments for fiscal year 2017 for the NEOs under the EOPB. This range varied based on the individual’s position and bonus target as a percentage of fiscal year 2017 ending base salary (150% percent of base salary for Mr. Luczo, 100% for Messrs. Brace and Mosley, Morton and Murphy). Each of Messrs. Brace and Mosley have an additional bonus target of 25% of their annual base salary based on the achievement of individual goals tied to strategic objectives for each their organization during fiscal year 2017. For a description of the EOPB, refer to the section above entitled “Annual Bonus Plan.”
(2)In accordance with SEC rules, this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For all performance share units, we have assumed the probable outcome of related performance conditions as defined by ASC 718 at target levels. The aggregate grant-date fair value for these PSUs and TPSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance, is $0 for Mr. Luczo, $6,137,429 for Mr. Morton, $6,670,423 for Mr. Brace, $8,209,675 for Mr. Mosley and $2,803,944 for Mr. Murphy. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 11, “Share-based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
(3)Options awarded during fiscal year 2017 under the 2012 Plan are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. 25% of the shares subject to the option vest on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and the remaining 75% of the shares subject to option will vest proportionally on a monthly basis for the next three years, contingent on continuous service. For a description of the options, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options.”
(4)PSUs awarded during fiscal year 2017 under the 2012 Plan. These units vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to both continuous service and the achievement of the applicable performance criteria. For a description of the PSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Performance Share Units.”
(5)TPSUs awarded during fiscal year 2017 under the 2012 Plan. Vesting is contingent on continuous service and satisfaction of performance vesting requirements. The first tranche vests no sooner than the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date, subject to the satisfaction of specified performance criteria. The remaining tranches continue to vest annually thereafter subject to the achievement of the subsequent annual performance goals, with the ability tocatch-up vesting each year if a given annual performance goal is not achieved. If threshold performance is not achieved, no awards will vest and the shares will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. For a description of the TPSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Threshold Performance Share Units.”
(6)Mr. Luczo did not receive any equity awards for fiscal year 2017.

56

SEAGATE TECHNOLODGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

(7)Mr. Murphy did not receive any PSUs for fiscal year 2017.
(8)Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2017

  

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

        Name

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#) Exercisable 

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#) Unexercisable 

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying 

Unexercised 

Unearned

Options
(#)

 

 

Option 

Exercise 

Price 

($) 

 

 

Option 

Expiration 

Date 

 

 

Number of 

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

 

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of  Stock
That Have 

Not
Vested
($)
(1)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number

of Unearned

Shares, Units 

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested (#)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout Value 

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested  ($)(1)

 

  Stephen J. Luczo

  
 

 

34,375(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 11.07

 

 9/13/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107,922(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 30.23

 

 8/1/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

206,300(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 30.23

 

 8/1/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    79,700(5)(7)  

 

 3,088,375  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    23,900(3)(8)  

 

    926,125  

 

 

 

87,724(2)

 

 39,876

 

 

 

 60.83

 

 9/9/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    42,665(3)(9)  

 

 1,653,269  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 101,369(5)(10)

 

 3,928,049  

 

 

 

85,043(2)

 

 109,341

 

 

 

 50.10

 

 9/9/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  David H. Morton, Jr.

 
 

 

2,407(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 29.87

 

 09/10/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,387(2)

 

 507

 

 

 

 40.16

 

 09/09/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     1,350(6)(11)

 

     52,313(32)

 

 

 

5,671(2)

 

 2,579

 

 

 

 60.83

 

 09/09/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     2,200(6)(12)

 

      85,250  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     3,850(5)(7)  

 

    149,188  

 

 

 

11,189(2)

 

 14,388

 

 

 

 50.10

 

 09/09/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    20,000(3)(13)

 

    775,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     5,989(6)(14)

 

    232,074  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     7,470(5)(10)

 

    289,463  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    76,034(5)(15)

 

 2,946,318  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    39,772(3)(16)

 

 1,541,165  

 

 

 

 

 148,665

 

 

 

 36.09

 

 09/09/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

  

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

        Name

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#) Exercisable 

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#) Unexercisable 

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying 

Unexercised 

Unearned

Options
(#)

 

 

Option 

Exercise 

Price 

($) 

 

 

Option 

Expiration 

Date 

 

 

Number of 

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

 

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That Have 

Not
Vested
($)
(1)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number

of Unearned

Shares, Units 

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested (#)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout Value 

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested ($)(1)

 

  Philip G. Brace(21)

  
 

 

44,687(2)

 

 20,313

 

 

 

 55.21

 

 10/21/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   32,500(17)

 

 1,259,375

 

 

 

34,017(2)

 

 43,737

 

 

 

 50.10

 

 09/09/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   17,066(9)  

 

    661,308

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   40,548(10)

 

 1,571,235

 

 

 

 

 161,574

 

 

 

 36.09

 

 09/09/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   43,226(16)

 

 1,675,008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   82,637(15)

 

 3,202,184

 

  William D. Mosley

 
 

 

40,000(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 29.87

 

 09/10/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,875(2)

 

 3,125

 

 

 

 40.16

 

 09/09/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     7,500(18)

 

    290,625

 

 

 

21,656(2)

 

 9,844

 

 

 

 60.83

 

 09/09/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     7,875(8)  

 

    305,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   26,250(7)  

 

 1,017,188

 

 

 

34,017(2)

 

 43,737

 

 

 

 50.10

 

 09/09/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   17,066(9)  

 

    661,308

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   40,548(10)

 

 1,571,235

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 101,706(15)

 

 3,941,108

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   53,201(16)

 

 2,061,539

 

 

 

 

 198,860

 

 

 

 36.09

 

 09/09/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  James J. Murphy

 
 

 

 

 398,774

 

 

 

 38.76

 

 12/20/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   83,850(19)

 

 3,249,188

 

(1)Value based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on June 30, 2017 of $38.75.
(2)Options vest as to 25% of the shares subject thereto one year after the vesting commencement date, and then with respect to 1/48th of the shares subject to monthly thereafter see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options”).
(3)These TPSU awards, issued under the 2012 Plan, are subject to both continuous service and the satisfaction of applicable performance vesting requirements. The first tranche may vest no sooner than after the first anniversary of the grant date, with

58

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

vesting subject to satisfying specified performance criteria. The remaining tranches of these awards continue to vest annually thereafter, subject to the achievement of performance requirements. If threshold performance is not achieved, no awards will vest and the shares underlying the award will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. The TPSU awards are described in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Threshold Performance Share Units.”
(4)The TSR Options granted to our CEO vest three years following their grant date, contingent on continuous service. The performance condition associated with these options was satisfied as of July 23, 2013 (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options—TSR Performance-Vesting Options” in Seagate’s Proxy Statement filed on September 3, 2014).
(5)These PSUs were issued under the Seagate Technology plc 2004 Share Compensation Plan, as amended (the “2004 SCP”) and the 2012 Plan. The PSUs vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to both continuous service and the achievement of performance criteria. If the minimum performance threshold is not achieved, no PSUs will vest and the PSUs will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. The PSUs are described in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Performance Share Units.”
(6)RSUs awarded, issued under the 2012 Plan are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. These units vest 25% annually, contingent on continuous service. For a description of the RSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Restricted Share Units.”
(7)PSUs granted on September 9, 2014;
(8)TPSUs granted on September 9, 2014;
(9)TPSUs granted on September 9, 2015;
(10)PSUs granted on September 9, 2015;
(11)RSUs granted on September 9, 2013;
(12)RSUs granted on September 9, 2014;
(13)TPSUs granted on February 20, 2015;
(14)RSUs granted on September 9, 2015;
(15)PSUs granted on September 9, 2016;
(16)TPSUs granted on September 9, 2016;
(17)TPSUs granted on October 21, 2014;
(18)TPSUs granted on September 9, 2013;
(19)TPSUs granted on December 20, 2016;
(20)Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities.

59

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2017

Name

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Number of Shares

        Acquired on  Exercise (#)        

 

 

Value Realized

        on Exercise  ($)        

 

 

Number of Shares

        Acquired on  Vesting (#)        

 

 

Value Realized

        on Vesting  ($)        

 

  Stephen J. Luczo

   47,757 1,644,549

  David H. Morton, Jr.

   19,313 809,856

  Philip G. Brace

   21,939 756,516

  William D. Mosley

 38,581 1,397,431 72,126 2,657,417

  James J. Murphy

    

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Name

 

 

Executive

        Contributions         

in FY 2017

($)

 

 

Registrant

        Contributions         

in FY 2017

($)

 

 

    Aggregate Earnings    

in FY 2017

($)

 

 

Aggregate

        Withdrawals/         

Distributions

($)

 

 

Aggregate

        Balance at         

FY 17 End

($)(a)

 

  Stephen J. Luczo

     

  David H. Morton, Jr.

     

  Philip G. Brace

 240,007  32,830  367,307

  William D. Mosley

   22,984  569,307

  James J. Murphy

 86,252  2,634  88,886

(a)The amounts reported as Executive contributions represent compensation already reported in the Summary Compensation Table, with the exception of earnings on contributions, as such earnings are not considered at above-market rates.

The SDCP is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan allowing participants to defer on apre-tax basis up to 70% of their base salary, 70% of their commissions and up to 100% of their annual performance-based cash bonus, and to select from several mutual fund investment options used to determine notional earnings on the deferred amounts. The deferrals and notional earnings related to those deferrals are reflected on our books as an unfunded obligation of the Company, and remain part of our general assets. A grantor (or rabbi) trust was established for the purpose of accumulating funds to satisfy our obligations and process payments due under the SDCP for plans in effect for the performance period through December 31, 2014. A successor SDCP was implemented effective January 1, 2015, which is no longer supported by a grantor (rabbi) trust.

Participants may elect to receive distributions upon retirement or termination of employment or at a specified time while still employed. ParticipantsWith respect to deferrals of amounts relating to services provided to Seagate after December 31, 2019, participants may elect to receive distributions following retirement or termination in either a lump sum or in quarterlyannual installments over 3, 5, 10, or 15up to a maximum of seven years. Participants may elect to receivein-service distributions in a lump sum or annual installments payable over 2, 3, 4 or 5 years. Upon disability, a participant’s account will be distributed in accordance with his or her retirement/termination distribution elections. Additionally, upon death, a participant’s accounts will be paid to his or her beneficiary or beneficiaries in a cashlump-sum payment payable before the later of the end of the calendar year in which the participant dies andor two andone-half months after the participant dies. Unless otherwise determined by the CompensationSeagate Benefits Administrative Committee prior to a change in control, the SDCP will be terminated upon the occurrence of a change in control and the aggregate balance credited to and held in a participant’s account shall generally be distributed to himher or herhim in a lump sum not later than the thirtieth day following the change in control.

Long Term International (Expatriate) Assignment Policy

60The Company’s global business needs require it on occasion to relocate certain employees with special or unique skills to countries where those skills may not be readily available. To meet this need, the Company utilizes long term international assignments, which are provided under its Long Term International Assignment Policy (“LTIA Policy”). The Company provides certain benefits and allowances to these long-term international assignees according to the LTIA Policy. Mr. Nygaard receives the standard benefits and allowances under the LTIA Policy as described below for his assignment in Thailand. The Company provided Mr. Nygaard with housing and related support, goods and services in Thailand, education support for his children, annual home leave travel, and payment for his tax returns preparation in accordance with the LTIA Policy terms. In addition, the Company makes certain tax equalization payments or reimbursements for expatriates to ensure that the assignment is tax neutral to the employee. The Company withholds a hypothetical tax amount for the expatriate in amounts roughly equivalent to the taxes of a peer employee in the relevant country not on assignment under the LTIA Policy. After the expatriate’s actual income tax returns have been prepared, the Company’s accountants prepare a tax equalization calculation to show what the employee should have paid if s/he had remained at home and not taken the assignment. The employee receives credit for any taxes s/he has paid during the year, and the Company pays all costs related to the actual taxes due in both the home and host locations. The Company’s tax equalization cost is limited to any difference between the actual taxes paid and the “stay at home” tax the employee would have paid, after calculations are prepared by the Company’s accountants.

The total estimated payments made in fiscal year 2020 for Mr. Nygaard’s benefits under the LTIA Policy is $475,300 as described in note 13 to the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2020 in this Proxy Statement. Final actual cost is not known at the time of this filing due to pending tax calculations, which can only be completed at a later date.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

We provide severance benefits to assist in aligning executive officer and shareholder interests during the evaluation of an ownership change, to remain competitive in attracting and retaining executive officers and to support organizational changes necessary to achieve our business strategy. The purpose of the Fifth Amended and Restated Seagate Technology Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan (the “Severance Plan”) is to:

provide for the payment of severance benefits to our executive officers, including our NEOs, in the event their employment with the Company or any applicable subsidiary is terminated without cause or good reason;

41

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

encourage our executive officers, including the NEOs, to continue employment in the event of a potential “change in control” (as such term is defined under “Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control” below); and

provide our executive officers, including the NEOs, with generally the same types of severance benefits in connection with a qualifying termination of employment.

All of our executive officers receive a level of severance benefits under the terms of the Severance Plan that reflects their level of responsibility within our organization, the strategic importance of their position and a market-competitive level of severance for comparable positions within the Executive Peer Group.

The Severance Plan provisions were developed, in consultation with FW Cook, based on a comparison by the independent directors of the Board of severance benefits typically available at the Executive Peer Group companies. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the Severance Plan provides for severance only in the event of a qualifying termination under the Severance Plan (i.e., a termination by us without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason”). The Severance Plan includes the following features:

 

no guaranteed bonus amounts;

no post-termination healthcare benefit subsidy if the qualifying termination occurs outside of a “change in control period” (as defined in “Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control—Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason During a Change in Control Period,” below);

enhanced severance benefits in connection with a change in control require a “double trigger” (which is defined as a qualifying termination during a “change in control period”) before an NEO becomes entitled to receive such benefits; and

severance payments cannot equal or exceed three times the sum of the executive’s base salary and target cash bonus.

In the event that the benefits payable following a change in control exceed the safe harbor limits established in Section 280G of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), we will reduce the benefits so that no excise tax will apply under Section 4999 of the Code (relating to Section 280G of the Code), if such reduction will result in a higher after-tax benefit to the NEO. We do not provide a gross-up for any taxes payable on severance benefits and the NEO is responsible for the payment of all such taxes, including any excise taxes imposed on change in control payments and benefits.

For further details on the Severance Plan, see the section below titled “Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments Upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control.”

Other Company Policies and Compensation Considerations

Impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

Prior to the enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) on December 22, 2017, Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Code, disallowed a tax deduction to public companies for compensation paid in excess of $1 million to “covered employees” (as defined in Section 162(m)) unless such compensation was considered “performance-based” under Section 162(m) (“Prior Section 162(m)”).

42

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

The Tax Act amended Section 162(m) to eliminate the performance-based exception, effective for taxable years that begin after December 31, 2017. The Tax Act provides limited transition relief for “performance-based compensation” paid pursuant to certain grandfathered arrangements in effect as of November 2, 2017, provided the grandfathered arrangements are not materially modified. Share options and certain performance-based share awards that were granted under the EIP before November 2, 2017 (collectively, the “Outstanding Qualified Performance-Based Awards”), were intended, at the time of grant, to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Prior Section 162(m). As a result of the Tax Act, the Company’s ability to deduct compensation paid in excess of $1 million to certain of our current and former NEOs will be limited.

Securities Trading; Prohibitions Against Hedging and Pledging

Please see the “Corporate Governance—Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy and Other Trading Restrictions” section above for information on our Securities Trading Policy.

Pay Recovery Policy (Clawback)

Our Pay Recovery Policy is intended to eliminate any reward for intentional misrepresentation of financial results. It provides standards for recovering compensation from our executive officers and other officers who hold the position of Senior Vice President and above (collectively, “Designated Officers”) where such compensation was based on incorrectly reported financial results due to the fraud or willful misconduct of such Designated Officer. The Designated Officer’s repayment obligation applies to any cash bonus paid, share award issued (whether or not vested) and/or vested during the covered period (as defined below) or options exercised during the period commencing with the date that is four years prior to the beginning of the fiscal year in which a restatement is announced, and ending on the date recovery is sought (the “covered period”).

43

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and the Board. In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Compensation Committee approved the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in the Company’s Proxy Statement for fiscal year 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Mark W. Adams, Chairperson

Michael R. Cannon

Jay L. Geldmacher

Dylan Haggart

Edward J. Zander

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2020 was an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries at any time during fiscal year 2020, has ever been an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or had a relationship with the Company during that period requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. No executive officers of the Company served on the compensation committee of any other entity, or as a director of an entity that employed any of the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2020.

44

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2020 below shows the total compensation of each of our NEOs with respect to fiscal years 2020, 2019, and 2018. The amounts reported reflect rounding, which may result in slight variations between amounts shown in the Total column and the sum of its components as reflected in the table.

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2020

        
Name and Principal Position Year    

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Share

Awards

($)(1)

  

Option

Awards

($)(1)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)(2)

  

All Other

Compensation

($)(3)(4)

  

    Total    

($)

 

    William D. Mosley

        
        

Chief Executive Officer

 2020     1,100,008      7,313,257   1,900,012   1,378,090      7,400          11,698,767 
 

 

2019   

 

 

 

 

1,084,623

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,528,382

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,684,831

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,039,343   

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,400       

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,344,579

 

 

 

 

2018   

 

 

 

 

953,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,127,435

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,449,425

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,794,194   

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,169       

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,332,073

 

 

    Gianluca Romano(5)

        
        

Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer

 

2020   

 

 

600,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,032,312

 

 

 

528,001

 

 

 

501,135   

 

 

 

117,210       

 

 

 

3,778,676

 

 

 

2019   

 

 

 

 

276,931

 

 

 

 

 

 

200,000(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,060,382

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,213,679

 

 

 

 

 

 

179,631   

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,374       

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,983,997

 

 

    Jeffrey D. Nygaard

        
        

Executive Vice President, Global

Operations

 

2020   

 

 

480,002

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,032,312

 

 

 

528,001

 

 

 

400,897   

 

 

 

496,256       

 

 

 

3,937,468

 

 

 

2019   

 

 

 

 

472,312

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,072,223

 

 

 

 

 

 

792,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

302,353   

 

 

 

 

 

 

450,833       

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,090,590

 

 

 

 

2018   

 

 

 

 

402,326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,262,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,054,815

 

 

 

 

 

 

580,000   

 

 

 

 

 

 

415,906       

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,715,218

 

 

    Katherine E. Schuelke(5)

        
        

Senior Vice President, Chief Legal
Officer and Company Secretary

 

2020   

 

 

499,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

620,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

313,194   

 

 

 

7,400       

 

 

 

1,440,750

 

 

 

2019   

 

 

 

 

492,301

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,225,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

236,208   

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,707       

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,957,386

 

 

    Ban Seng Teh(5)(7)

        
        

Senior Vice President, Global

Sales and Sales Operations

 

2020   

 

 

496,343

 

 

 

 

 

 

788,081

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,272   

 

 

 

37,117       

 

 

 

1,433,813

 

    James J. Murphy(8)

        
        

Former Executive Vice President,
Sales & Marketing

 2020     329,326               1,358,444          1,687,770 
 

 

2019   

 

 

 

 

617,309

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,072,223

 

 

 

 

 

 

792,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

393,686   

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,389       

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,883,476

 

 

 

 

2018   

 

 

 

 

575,016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,770,644

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,522

 

 

 

 

 

 

780,000   

 

 

 

 

 

 

206,379       

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,832,561

 

 

(1)

Amounts do not reflect the actual value realized by the NEO. In accordance with SEC rules, the columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For RSUs and time-based options, the grant date fair value was determined using the closing share price of Seagate ordinary shares on the date of grant, adjusted for the present value of expected dividends. For all PSUs and TPSUs whose vesting is subject to performance conditions as defined by ASC 718, we have assumed the probable outcome of related performance conditions at target levels. The aggregate grant-date fair value for these PSUs and TPSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance, is $12,063,144 for Dr. Mosley, $3,352,278 for Messrs. Romano and Nygaard, $527,986 for Ms. Schuelke and $653,827 for Mr. Teh. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 11, “Share-Based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020.

(2)

Represents amounts payable under the EOPB. For a description of the EOPB, refer to the section above entitled “Annual Incentive Plan—Executive Officer Performance Bonus.”

45

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

(3)

Amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column are itemized in the supplemental “All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2020” table below.

All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2020

          
 Name 

Severance   

($)   

 

Relocation   

($)   

 

Relocation  

Tax  

Assistance  

($)  

 

Personal  

Guest  

Travel  

($)(9)  

 

401(k)  

Match  

($)(10)  

 

Company  

Contribution  

to HSA  

($)(11)  

 

Company  
Contribution  
to CPF  

($)(12)  

 

International  

Assignment  

Benefits  

($)(13)  

 

Consultant  

Payments  

($)  

 

    Total      

($)  

          

 William D. Mosley

     6,000 1,400           7,400  
          

 Gianluca Romano

  56,381(14) 53,429(14)  6,000 1,400       117,210  
          

 Jeffrey D. Nygaard

    14,956 6,000   475,300     496,256  
          

 Katherine E. Schuelke

     6,000 1,400           7,400  
          

 Ban Seng Teh

    24,591   12,526       37,117  
          

 James J. Murphy

 1,358,444(15)         1,358,444  
(4)

We provide the use of our corporate aircraft to our NEOs primarily so that they can travel to business functions and different facilities in the course of their duties. Certain trips taken by our NEOs in fiscal year 2020 may have had a personal element. To the extent that a travel leg has a personal element to it, our NEOs fully reimburse the Company for the aggregate incremental cost of such leg to us. Such reimbursement includes the costs of “wheels up time”, a portion of fuel and insurance costs, catering, excise taxes, and crew expenses.

(5)

Mr. Romano was not an NEO in fiscal year 2018, Ms. Schuelke was not an NEO in fiscal year 2018 and Mr. Teh was not an NEO in fiscal years 2018 and 2019.

(6)

Represents the one-time sign-on bonus amount paid to Mr. Romano in connection with his appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

(7)

Based on the Singapore dollar (“SGD”) average foreign exchange rate for fiscal year 2020 of 0.7224.

(8)

Mr. Murphy left the Company effective December 31, 2019.

(9)

For Mr. Nygaard, personal guest travel consists of travel costs incurred for his spouse to attend an R&D-related event. For Mr. Teh, personal guest travel consists of travel costs incurred for his spouse in connection with a sales incentive program offered to eligible sales employees who achieve designated sales goals.

(10)

Reflects 401(k) Plan matching contribution made by the Company for the NEO and available to all U.S. employees who participate in the 401(k) Plan. The maximum matching amount was $6,000 per calendar year. The amount may be higher or lower for a particular fiscal year depending on the timing and amount of the employee’s contribution for preceding and following years.

(11)

Reflects Company-paid Health Savings Account (“HSA”) contributions to eligible participants. In 2020, HSA contributions are $700.00 for employee only coverage and $1,400.00 for family coverage.

(12)

Reflects Company contribution to the Singapore Central Provident Fund (“CPF”). CPF employer contribution is capped at SGD1,020 per month, with an additional employer contribution capped at SGD5,100 per year.

(13)

Mr. Nygaard’s LTIA benefits include payments made in fiscal year 2020 for expatriate tax and tax equalization for year to date 2020, remaining expatriate tax and tax equalization owed for 2019 in the amount of $164,075, a cost of living allowance in the amount of $63,479, educational payments in the amount of $59,034; host location housing in the amount of $113,413, home leave in the amount of $18,716, transportation expenses in the amount of $55,483, and immigration and tax services in the amount of $1,100. As described more fully in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long Term International (Expatriate) Assignment Policy,” the tax equalization payments are intended to ensure that the long-term international assignment is tax neutral to Mr. Nygaard as compared to being based in the U.S.

(14)

Represents the one-time relocation bonus amount and tax assistance paid to Mr. Romano in fiscal year 2020 in connection with his relocation to corporate headquarters.

(15)

Mr. Murphy received the first installment of the cash severance payment in the amount of $520,832 on January 24, 2020, and the second installment of $837,612 will be paid on December 31, 2020. The aggregate amount of $1,358,444 represents the amounts to which he was entitled under the terms of the Severance Plan.

46

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Fiscal Year 2020

         

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(1)

  

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

             
            
Name Type of
Award
  

Grant

Date

  

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Threshold

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

  

All Other

Share

Awards:

Number

of Shares

or Units

(#)

  

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)

  

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/

Share)

  

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Share

and

Option

Awards

($)

 

William D. Mosley

            
 

 

Cash Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

 

825,006

 

 

 

1,650,012

 

 

 

3,300,024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time Option

 

 

 

9/9/2019(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

154,347

 

 

 

54.78

 

 

 

1,900,012   

 

 

 

PSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90,664

 

 

 

181,328

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,749,887(5)

 

 

 

TPSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,563,370(5)

 

Gianluca Romano

            
 

 

Cash Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

 

300,009

 

 

 

600,018

 

 

 

1,200,035

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time Option

 

 

 

9/9/2019(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,892

 

 

 

54.78

 

 

 

528,001   

 

 

 

PSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(3)

 

                 

 

25,195

 

 

 

50,390

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,319,966(5)

 

 

 

TPSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

712,346(5)

 

Jeffrey D. Nygaard

            
 

 

Cash Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

 

240,001

 

 

 

480,002

 

 

 

960,003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time Option

 

 

 

9/9/2019(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,892

 

 

 

54.78

 

 

 

528,001   

 

 

 

PSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,195

 

 

 

50,390

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,319,966(5)

 

 

 

TPSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

712,346(5)

 

Katherine E. Schuelke

            
 

 

Cash Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

 

187,496

 

 

 

374,993

 

 

 

749,986

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,039

 

 

 

10,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

263,993(5)

 

 

 

RSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

356,173   

 

Ban Seng Teh

            
 

 

Cash Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

 

67,690

 

 

 

135,380

 

 

 

270,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,240

 

 

 

12,480

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

326,914(5)

 

 

 

RSU

 

 

 

9/9/2019(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,360

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

461,167   

 

James J. Murphy

            
                                                 

(1)

Represents the potential range of payments for fiscal year 2020 for the NEOs under the EOPB. This range varied based on the individual’s position and target cash bonus as a percentage of fiscal year 2020 ending base salary (150% percent of base salary for Dr. Mosley, 100% for Messrs. Romano and Nygaard, 75% for Ms. Schuelke and 37.5% for Mr. Teh). For a description of the EOPB, refer to the section above entitled “Annual Incentive Plan — Executive Officer Performance Bonus.”

(2)

Unless otherwise indicated, options awarded during fiscal year 2020 under the EIP are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. 25% of the shares subject to the option vest one year after the grant date and then 1/48th of the shares subject to options vest monthly thereafter, contingent on continuous service through the applicable vesting dates. For a description of the options, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options.”

(3)

Unless otherwise indicated, PSUs awarded during fiscal year 2020 under the EIP vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to both continuous service and the achievement of the applicable financial and operational-performance criteria. For a description of the PSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Performance Share Units.”

(4)

Unless otherwise indicated, the vesting of the TPSUs awarded during fiscal year 2020 under the EIP is contingent on continuous service and satisfaction of the performance vesting requirement. The first tranche vests no sooner than the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date, subject to the satisfaction of the specified performance criterion. The remaining tranches continue to vest annually thereafter subject to the achievement of the subsequent annual AEPS goal, with the ability to catch-up vesting each year if the annual AEPS goal is not achieved. If threshold AEPS is not achieved, no awards will vest and the shares will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. For a description of the TPSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Threshold Performance Share Units.”

(5)

In accordance with SEC rules, this represents the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For all TPSUs and PSUs, we have assumed the probable outcome of related performance conditions as defined by ASC 718 at target levels. The aggregate grant-date fair value for these PSUs and TPSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance, is $12,063,144 for Dr. Mosley, $3,352,278 for Messrs. Romano and Nygaard, $527,986 for Ms. Schuelke and $653,827 for

47

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Mr. Teh. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 11, “Share-Based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020.
(6)

Unless otherwise indicated, RSUs awarded during fiscal year 2020 under the EIP are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. These units vest 25% annually, contingent on continuous service. For a description of the RSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Restricted Share Units.”

48

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End

     

Option Awards

 

  

Share Awards

 

 

        Name

 

 

Grant Date

 

  

Number of   

Securities   

Underlying   

Unexercised   

Options   

Exercisable(1)   

(#)   

 

 

Number of   

Securities   

Underlying   

Unexercised   

Options   

Unexercisable   

(#)   

 

 

Equity   

Incentive   

Plan   

Awards:   

Number of   

Securities   

Underlying   

Unexercised   

Unearned   

Options   

(#)   

 

 

Option   

Exercise   

Price   

($)   

 

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

  

Number of

Shares

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

  

Market
Value of
Shares
That Have

Not
Vested
($)
(2)

 

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

($)(2)

 

 

  William D. Mosley

  
         
 

 

9/9/2014

 

 

31,500

 

 

 

60.83

 

 

9/9/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2015

 

 

77,754

 

 

 

50.10

 

 

9/9/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2016

 

 

186,431

 

12,429

 

 

36.09

 

 

9/9/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,300

(3) 

 

 

629,622

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

174,066

 

79,122

 

 

30.95

 

 

9/11/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

130,480

(4) 

 

 

6,176,923

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,684

(3) 

 

 

1,594,601

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

62,030

 

79,755

 

 

50.29

 

 

9/10/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

91,769

(4) 

 

 

4,344,344

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,029

(3) 

 

 

1,800,293

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

154,347

 

 

54.78

 

 

9/9/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90,664

(4) 

 

 

4,292,034

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,027

(3) 

 

 

2,462,958

 

  Gianluca Romano

  
         
 

 

2/20/2019

 

 

38,388

 

76,776

 

 

45.89

 

 

2/20/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

2/20/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,612

(3) 

 

 

928,432

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

   

42,892

   

54.78

 

 

9/9/2026

 

                
         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,195

(4) 

 

 

1,192,731

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,458

(3) 

 

 

684,442

 

  Jeffrey D. Nygaard

  
         
 

 

9/9/2014

 

 

7,800

 

 

 

60.83

 

 

9/9/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2015

 

 

9,380

   

 

50.10

 

 

9/9/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2016

 

 

28,415

 

1,895

 

 

36.09

 

 

9/9/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,032

(6) 

 

 

143,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

5,181

 

7,773

 

 

30.95

 

 

9/11/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,705

(4) 

 

 

412,095

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,976

(6) 

 

 

235,564

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

11/20/2017

 

 

65,752

 

36,058

 

 

39.85

 

 

11/20/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

11/20/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,293

(3) 

 

 

534,611

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

29,190

 

37,533

 

 

50.29

 

 

9/10/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,186

(4) 

 

 

2,044,425

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,896

(3) 

 

 

847,197

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

42,892

 

 

54.78

 

 

9/9/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,195

(4) 

 

 

1,192,731

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,458

(3) 

 

 

684,442

 

49

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

     

Option Awards

 

  

Share Awards

 

 

        Name

 

 

Grant Date

 

  

Number of   

Securities   

Underlying   

Unexercised   

Options   

Exercisable(1)   

(#)   

 

 

Number of   

Securities   

Underlying   

Unexercised   

Options   

Unexercisable   

(#)   

 

 

Equity   

Incentive   

Plan   

Awards:   

Number of   

Securities   

Underlying   

Unexercised   

Unearned   

Options   

(#)   

 

 

Option   

Exercise   

Price   

($)   

 

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

  

Number of

Shares

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

  

Market
Value of
Shares
That Have

Not
Vested
($)
(2)

 

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

($)(2)

 

 

  Katherine E. Schuelke

  
         
 

 

7/20/2017

 

 

11,529

 

29,976

 

 

39.42

 

 

7/20/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

7/20/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,834

(6) 

 

 

654,902

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,315

(4) 

 

 

535,652

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,723

(6) 

 

 

554,967

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

5,039

(4) 

 

 

238,546

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,229

(6) 

 

 

342,221

 

        

  Ban Seng Teh

  
         
 

 

9/11/2014

 

 

17,250

 

 

 

60.87

 

 

9/9/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2015

 

 

171

 

 

 

50.10

 

 

9/9/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2016

 

 

 

1,106

 

 

36.09

 

 

9/9/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,769

(6) 

 

 

83,744

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

 

1,944

 

 

30.95

 

 

9/11/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,180

(4) 

 

 

103,201

 

         
 

 

9/11/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,246

(6) 

 

 

58,986

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,760

(4) 

 

 

225,338

 

         
 

 

9/10/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,355

(6) 

 

 

253,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,240

(4) 

 

 

295,402

 

         
 

 

9/9/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,360

 

 

 

443,102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  James J. Murphy(5)

  
         
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Options are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. 25% of the shares subject to the options vest one year after the grant date, and then 1/48th of the shares subject to the options vest monthly thereafter, contingent on continuous service through the applicable vesting dates. For more information, see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options.”

(2)

Value based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on July 2, 2020 of $47.34, which was the final trading day in fiscal year 2020.

(3)

These TPSU awards, issued under the EIP, are subject to both continuous service and the satisfaction of the applicable performance vesting requirement. The first tranche vests no sooner than the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to satisfaction of the specified performance criterion. The remaining tranches continue to vest annually thereafter, subject to the achievement of the subsequent annual AEPS goal, with the ability to catch-up vesting each year if the annual AEPS goal is not achieved. If threshold AEPS is not achieved, no awards will vest and the shares underlying the awards will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. The TPSU awards are described in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Threshold Performance Share Units.”

(4)

These PSUs were issued under the EIP. The PSUs vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to both continuous service and the achievement of the applicable performance criteria. If the minimum performance threshold is not achieved, no PSUs will vest and the PSUs will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. The PSUs are described in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Performance Share Units.”

(5)

Mr. Murphy’s employment with the Company ended effective December 31, 2019. He had three months following his resignation to exercise any vested and unexercised options. All unvested equity was forfeited upon his resignation.

50

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

(6)

RSUs issued under the EIP are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. These units vest 25% annually, contingent on continuous service. For a description of the RSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Restricted Share Units.”

Option Exercises and Shares Vested for Fiscal Year 2020

  Option Awards Unit Awards
Name 

 

Number of Shares
        Acquired on Exercise        

(#)

 

Value Realized

        On Exercise         

($)(1)

 

 

Number of Shares

        Acquired on Vesting        

(#)

 

Value Realized
         on Vesting        

($)(2)

   

William D. Mosley

   90,000 1,685,130 238,362 12,903,418
   

Gianluca Romano

         6,538      357,956
   

Jeffrey D. Nygaard

   22,885    461,104   38,188   2,106,736
   

Katherine E. Schuelke

   69,175 1,359,533   10,825      543,396
   

Ban Seng Teh

   28,869    431,703   16,824      912,224
   

James J. Murphy

 347,010 6,700,801   32,744   1,906,771

(1)

The value realized on exercise is the aggregate of the market value on each exercise date multiplied by the number of shares exercised on each such date less the total option price paid on such exercise date. Market value is defined as the sale price for same-day-sale exercises and as the closing market price of our ordinary shares on the date of the transaction for exercise-and-hold exercises.

(2)

The value realized on vesting is the aggregate of the closing market price for our ordinary shares on each vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such day, or if a vest date was a non-market day, the closing market price for our ordinary shares on the prior market day multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such day.

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

     
Name 

Executive           

Contributions            

    in Fiscal Year 2020                

($)(1)           

 

Registrant           

Contributions            

    in Fiscal Year 2020                

($)           

 

Aggregate           

Earnings           

    in Fiscal Year 2020                

($)           

 

Aggregate           

    Withdrawals/                

Distributions            

($)           

 

Aggregate           

    Balance at Fiscal Year                

2020 End            

($)(2)           

   

William D. Mosley

     16,653    278,399    352,603
   

Gianluca Romano

     
   

Jeffrey D. Nygaard

   103,300  1,207,612
   

Katherine E. Schuelke

     
   

Ban Seng Teh

     
   

James J. Murphy

 216,904    13,800 1,099,635 

(1)

Amount is included in fiscal year 2020 compensation in the “Salary” column of the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2020.

(2)

Includes executive contributions already reported in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2020 or a prior fiscal year, with the exception of earnings on contributions, as such earnings are not considered to be at above-market rates.

51

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Potential Payments Upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control

As discussed above underin the heading titledsection entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Severance and Change in Control Benefits,” the Compensation Committee adopted the Severance Plan to provide, among other things, consistent severance benefits to NEOs who are terminated without cause or resign for good reason in lieu of severance protections that might otherwise have been included in individually negotiated employment agreements. In addition to severance, participating NEOs (excluding Mr. Murphy , who is no longer an employee of the Company) are entitled to receive payment of deferred compensation amounts in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control, as described above under the immediately preceding heading titled “Nonqualified“Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plans.”

Qualifying Termination

        CEO—Months of        

Base Salary

Executive Vice

        Presidents—Months         

of Base Salary

Senior Vice

        Presidents—Months         

of Base Salary

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason—Outside of Change in Control Period

24 months20 months16 months (USA);
up to 24 months (Singapore)

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason—During a Change in Control Period

36 months24 months18 months

Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason Outside of a Change in Control Period

Under the Severance Plan in effect during fiscal year 2017,2020, if an NEO’s employment were to havehad been terminated by the Company without “cause” (as defined below) or by the NEO for “good reason” (as defined below), the NEO would have been entitled to receive a severance payment equal to apre-determined number of months of base salary, based on the NEO’s job level. In the event of such an involuntarya qualifying termination outside of a “change in control period” (as defined below), the CEO would be entitled to receive 24 months of base salary, the Presidents and Executive Vice PresidentsEVPs would be entitled to receive 20 months of base salary, and the Senior Vice Presidents would be entitled to receive 16 months of base salary if resident in the U.S. and up to 24 months of base salary, if resident in Singapore, as well as apro-rata bonus for the year of termination based on the number of days elapsed from the beginning of the fiscal year until the termination date at the most recent accrued performance level, and, if applicable, the prior year bonus (if earned but unpaid at the time of termination). The severance benefits are generally payable within 20 business days following the “payment confirmation date” (as defined in the Severance Plan) in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 50% of the severance benefit and (b) $530,000$570,000 (for calendar year 2017)2020), with the remaining amount payable twelve months following the date of termination for the CEO Presidents and Executive Vice PresidentsEVPs, and 6 months and one day following the date of termination for the Senior Vice Presidents. The Company would also provide paid outplacement services for a period of 24 months following a qualifying termination for the CEO Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents,EVPs, and a period of 18 months following a qualifying termination for the Senior Vice Presidents. The receipt of these severance benefits would generally be subject to the NEO’s execution of an effective release of claims against the Company and compliance with certainnon-competition,non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants during the applicable severance period.

Under the Severance Plan, “cause” means (i) an NEO’s continued failure to substantially perform the material duties of his or her office, (ii) fraud, embezzlement or theft by an NEO of Company property, (iii) the conviction of an NEO of, or plea of nolo contendere by the NEO to, a felony, (iv) an NEO’s willful malfeasance or willful misconduct in connection with such NEO’s duties or any other act or omission which is materially injurious to the financial condition or business reputation of Seagate, or (v) a material breach by an NEO of any of the provisions of (A) the Severance Plan, (B) anynon-compete,non-solicitation or confidentiality provisions to which such NEO is subject, or (C) any companyCompany policy or other agreement to which such NEO is subject; and “good reason” means an

52

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

NEO’s resignation of his or her employment with the Company as a result of the occurrence of one or more of the following actions without such NEO’s express written consent, which action(s) remain uncured for at least 30 days following written notice from such NEO to the Company describing the occurrence of such action(s) and asserting that such action(s) constitute(s) grounds for a good reason resignation, which notice must be provided by the NEO no later than 90 days after the initial existence of such condition; provided, that such resignation occurs no later than 60 days after the expiration of the cure period: (w) any material diminution in the level of the NEO’s level or title, authority or duties; (x) a reduction of 10% or more in the level of the base salary or target bonus opportunity, other than a reduction that is equivalent to the reduction in base salaries and/or target bonus opportunities, as applicable, imposed on all other executives of the Company at a similar level; (y) the relocation of the NEO to a principal place of employment that increases

61

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

his or herone-way commute by more than 50 miles; or (z) the failure of any successor to the business of the Company or to substantially all of the assets and/or business of the Company to assume the Company’s obligations under the Severance Plan.

If an NEO is involuntarily terminated for any qualifying reason outside a change in control period, the Severance Plan does not provide for any accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards. Instead, the terms of any vesting acceleration are governed by the applicable award agreement. Upon termination of an NEO’s continuous service for any qualifying reason (other than death or disability): (i) the award agreements (including those evidencing the TPSUs) provide that vesting will cease and, where applicable, Seagate will automatically reacquire all unvested shares without payment of consideration, and (ii) the option agreements provide that all unvested options will be cancelled effective as of the termination date, although NEOs, as well as all other option holders, would have three months to exercise options that are vested as of the date of termination.termination except that an option may not be exercised after the expiration of its term.

Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason During a Change in Control Period

The Severance Plan in effect during fiscal year 2020 provides for enhanced severance benefits if ana NEO ishad been terminated by the Company without cause or resigns for good reason during a “change in control period”. This period is defined as the period commencing six months prior to the effective date of a “change in control” (as(or “CIC”, each as defined below) and ending 24 months following such date. In the event of an involuntarya qualifying termination within a change in control period (often called a “double trigger”), the NEO would be entitled to receive the following: (i) 36 months of base salary and target bonus in the case of the CEO, 24 months of base salary and target bonus in the case of the PresidentsEVPs, and Executive Vice Presidents or 18 months of base salary and target bonus in the case of the Senior Vice Presidents, (ii) a lump sum cash payment equal to two times thebefore-tax annual cost of the applicable COBRA premiums for the NEO and his or her eligible dependents, if any, (iii) paid outplacement services for a period of 24 months for the CEO Presidents and Executive Vice PresidentsEVPs, and 18 months for the Senior Vice Presidents, and (iv) full vesting of all unvested equity-based awards (whether or not awarded prior to or following the adoption of the Severance Plan). The PSU award agreements further provide that the number of shares that will vest on the later of the closing of a CIC and an NEO’s qualifying termination within the change in control period will be based on the Company’s performance through the closing date of the CIC, with rTSR performance measured by using the average closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares over the 30-day trading period preceding the CIC. All other rights and obligations imposed under the Severance Plan upon such a qualifying termination of employment outside of the context of a change in control (as described above) would also be generally applicable in the event of a qualifying termination during a change in control period, except that the severance benefits would generally be payable within 20 business days following the “payment confirmation date” in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 100% of the severance benefit and (b) $530,000$570,000 (for calendar year 2017)2020), with the remainder, if any, payable six months and one day following the termination date.

Under the Severance Plan, “change in control” or “CIC” means the consummation or effectiveness of any of the following events: (i) the sale, exchange, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Seagate to a person or group of related persons; (ii) a merger, reorganization, recapitalization, consolidation or other similar transaction involving Seagate in which the voting securities of Seagate owned by the shareholders of Seagate

53

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

immediately prior to such transaction do not represent more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving controlling entity outstanding immediately after such transaction; (iii) any person or group of related persons is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting securities of Seagate; (iv) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board (together with any new directors whose election by such Board or whose nomination for election by the shareholders of Seagate was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors of Seagate then still in office, who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board then in office; or (v) a dissolution or liquidation of Seagate.

62

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

In addition, under the terms of our equity award agreements with each NEO and consistent with the treatment of equity awards under the Severance Plan, if a change in control (which is generally defined in a similar manner as under the Severance Plan) occurs and the successor company does not assume or replace the awards with alternatives that preserve both the intrinsic value and the rights and benefits of the award immediately prior to the CIC, then all awards accelerate and become fully vested on the later of (i) the closing date of the CIC, or (ii) the date of the “termination event” (as defined in the Severance Plan), based on the Company’s performance through the closing date of the CIC. The PSU award agreement further provides that the number of shares that will vest on the later of the closing of a CIC and an NEO’s involuntary termination within the change in control period will be based on the Company’s performance through the closing date of the CIC, with relative TSR performance measured by using the average closing price over the30-day trading period preceding the CIC. The vesting of the TSR Options and TSR PSUs issued to our CEO will accelerate in full upon the later of a CIC and a qualifying termination of employment.

In the event that the benefits payable following a CICchange in control exceed the safe harbor limits established in Section 280G of the Code, we capwill reduce the benefits atso that no excise tax will apply under Section 4999 of the safe harbor limitCode (relating to Section 280G of the Code), if thesuch reduction will result in a higher after-tax benefit to the NEO of the capped amount is greater than theafter-tax benefit of the full amount (which would be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code).NEO. We do not provide anya gross-up for exciseany taxes payable on severance benefits and the NEO is responsible for the payment of all personalsuch taxes, including any excise taxes.taxes imposed on change in control payments and benefits.

Termination due to Death or Disability

In the event a termination of employment occurs due to an NEO’s death or disability, the NEO would not be entitled to any benefits under the Severance Plan. Under the Severance Plan, “disability” means that the NEO is physically or mentally incapacitated and therefore unable to substantially perform hishis/her duties for six consecutive months or an aggregate of nine months in any consecutive24-month period. However, in the event of termination of employment due to an NEO’s death or disability, the Compensation Committee has the discretion under the terms of the EOPB to pay to the NEO or the NEO’s estate apro-rated target bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs.

The terms of the RSUsRSU and TPSUsTPSU agreements for our NEOs provide that vesting will cease upon a termination due to disability, (as defined above), and the Company will automatically reacquire all unvested shares without payment of consideration. However, for a termination due to death, the NEO will be deemed to have completed an additional year of service as of the termination date so that an additional 25% of the award will vest immediately for the purposes of acceleration for RSUs and TPSUs.

Similarly, the option agreements provide that upon termination due to death, the NEO will be deemed to have completed an additional year of service for purposesthe purpose of determining the portion of an option award that will be vested at termination. For our CEO, both the TSR Option agreement and the TSR PSU award agreement provides that the CEO will vestpro-rata in the option or award based on the number of days from the beginning of the performance period until the termination date upon termination due to death or disability. Additionally, the PSU agreements for our NEOs provide that in the event of a termination due to death or disability, the awards will vestpro-rata based on the number of days from the beginning of the performance period until the termination date, based on actual Company performance, and will be settled in ordinary shares after the end of the performance period.

Finally, for those executive officers who participate in the group replacement life insurance plan, the Company will continue to pay its portion of the insurance premiums through the end of the calendar year in which the Executive becomes disabled.

6354

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Potential Payments Upon Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason Outside a Change in Control Period; Upon Termination Due to Death; Upon Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason within a Change in Control Period

The following table sets forth (i) the estimated value of the potential payments and severance benefits to each NEO assuming termination of the NEO by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason on June 30, 2017; the estimated value as of June 30, 2017 of the potential payments and severance benefits to each NEO, assuming termination of the NEO due to death on such date; andJuly 3, 2020; (ii) the estimated value calculated as of June 30, 2017July 3, 2020 of the potential payments to each NEO, assuming termination of the NEO by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason on such date in connection with a change in control, during a change in control period, as defined in the Severance Plan.Plan; and (iii) the estimated value as of July 3, 2020 of the potential payments and severance benefits to each NEO, assuming termination of the NEO due to death on such date.

 

 Name

 

 

Type of

Benefit

 

 

Involuntary
      Termination  Without      
Cause/Constructive

Termination

($)

 

 

Qualifying

      Termination Following a       
Change in Control

($)

 

 

      Separation Due       

to Death

($)

 

 Stephen J. Luczo
 Severance 2,400,112 3,600,168 
 Outplacement Benefit(1) 15,000 15,000 
 Bonus (2) 5,400,252 1,800,084(3)
 Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options  (4) (5)
 Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units  (6) (7)
 Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units  9,595,818(8) 6,272,685(9)
 Health Care Benefit  43,470 
 Total 2,415,112 18,654,708(10) 8,072,769
 David H. Morton, Jr.
 Severance 875,022 1,050,026 
 Outplacement Benefit(1) 15,000 15,000 
 Bonus (2) 1,050,026 525,013(3)
 Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options  395,449(4) 173,006(5)
 Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units  369,636(6) 172,282(7)
 Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units  5,701,133 2,265,403
 Health Care Benefit  43,470 
 Total 890,022 8,624,740(10) 3,135,704

    
 Name                  

Type of

Benefit

 

Qualifying     

      Termination Without           

Cause/For Good Reason     

($)     

  

Qualifying     

      Termination Following a           

Change in Control     

($)     

  

      Separation Due           

to Death     

($)     

 
 William D. Mosley   
 

Severance

 

 

2,200,016

 

 

 

3,300,024

 

 

 

 

  
 

Outplacement Benefit(1)

 

 

10,615

 

 

 

10,615

 

 

 

 

  
 

Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

4,950,036(2)

 

 

 

1,650,012(3)

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of Share Options(4)

 

 

 

 

 

1,436,636

 

 

 

1,177,264

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of RSUs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of TPSUs and/or PSUs(6)

 

 

 

 

 

21,300,775

 

 

 

12,224,892

 

  
 

Health Care Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

37,872

 

 

 

 

  
  

Total

 

 

2,210,631

 

 

 

31,035,958(7)

 

 

 

15,052,168

 

  Gianluca Romano   
 

Severance

 

 

1,000,029

 

 

 

1,200,035

 

 

 

 

  
 

Outplacement Benefit(1)

 

 

10,615

 

 

 

10,615

 

 

 

 

  
 

Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

1,200,035(2)

 

 

 

600,018(3)

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of Share Options(4)

 

 

 

 

 

111,325

 

 

 

41,747

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of RSUs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of TPSUs and/or PSUs(6)

 

 

 

 

 

2,805,605

 

 

 

805,182

 

  
 

Health Care Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

38,681

 

 

 

 

  
  

Total

 

 

1,010,644

 

 

 

5,366,296(7)

 

 

 

1,446,947

 

 

6455

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

 Name

 

 

Type of

Benefit

 

 

Involuntary
      Termination Without       
Cause/Constructive

Termination

($)

 

 

Qualifying

      Termination Following a      
Change in Control

($)

 

 

      Separation Due      

to Death

($)

 

 Philip G. Brace
 Severance 1,000,029 1,200,035 
 Outplacement Benefit(1) 15,000 15,000 
 Bonus (2) 1,500,044 750,022(3)
 Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options  429,787(4) 188,030(5)
 Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units  (6) (7)
 Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units  8,369,109 3,075,636
 Health Care Benefit  43,470 
 Total 1,015,029 11,557,445(10) 4,013,688
 William D. Mosley
 Severance 1,333,349 1,600,019 
 Outplacement Benefit(1) 15,000 15,000 
 Bonus (2) 2,000,024 1,000,012(3)
 Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options  528,968(4) 231,423(5)
 Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units  (6) (7)
 Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units  9,848,158 4,136,311
 Health Care Benefit  43,470 
 Total 1,348,349 14,035,639(10) 5,367,746

    
 Name                  

Type of

Benefit

 

Qualifying       

      Termination Without             

Cause/Constructive       

Termination       

($)       

  

Qualifying     

      Termination Following a           

Change in Control     

($)     

  

      Separation Due           

to Death     

($)     

 
 Jeffrey D. Nygaard   
 

Severance

 

 

800,003

 

 

 

960,003

 

 

 

 

  
 

Outplacement Benefit(1)

 

 

10,615

 

 

 

10,615

 

 

 

 

  
 

Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

960,003(2)

 

 

 

480,002(3)

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of Share Options(4)

 

 

 

 

 

418,793

 

 

 

313,867

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of RSUs(5)

 

 

 

 

 

379,099

 

 

 

261,317

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of TPSUs and/or PSUs(6)

 

 

 

 

 

5,715,500

 

 

 

2,667,467

 

  
 

Health Care Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

46,170

 

 

 

 

  
  

Total

 

 

810,618

 

 

 

8,490,183(7)

 

 

 

3,722,653

 

 Katherine E. Schuelke   
 

Severance

 

 

666,654

 

 

 

749,986

 

 

 

 

  
 

Outplacement Benefit(1)

 

 

7,530

 

 

 

7,530

 

 

 

 

  
 

Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

562,489(2)

 

 

 

374,993(3)

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of Share Options(4)

 

 

 

 

 

237,410

 

 

 

219,146

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of RSUs(5)

 

 

 

 

 

1,552,089

 

 

 

597,952

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of TPSUs and/or PSUs(6)

 

 

 

 

 

774,198

 

 

 

388,709

 

  
 

Health Care Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

38,681

 

 

 

 

  
  

Total

 

 

674,184

 

 

 

3,922,383(7)

 

 

 

1,580,800

 

 Ban Seng Teh   
 

Severance

 

 

722,026

 

 

 

541,519

 

 

 

 

  
 

Outplacement Benefit(1)

 

 

9,344

 

 

 

9,344

 

 

 

 

  
 

Bonus

 

 

 

 

 

203,070(2)

 

 

 

135,380(3)

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of Share Options(4)

 

 

 

 

 

44,305

 

 

 

37,929

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of RSUs(5)

 

 

 

 

 

839,338

 

 

 

308,515

 

  
 

Accelerated Vesting of TPSUs and/or PSUs(6)

 

 

 

 

 

623,941

 

 

 

313,249

 

  
 

Health Care Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
  

Total

 

 

731,370

 

 

 

2,261,517(7)

 

 

 

795,073

 

 

6556

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 Name

 

 

Type of

Benefit

 

 

Involuntary
      Termination Without       
Cause/Constructive

Termination

($)

 

  

Qualifying

      Termination Following a      
Change in Control

($)

 

  

      Separation Due      

to Death

($)

 

 
 James J. Murphy 
 Severance  958,360   1,150,032    
 Outplacement Benefit(1)  15,000   15,000    
 Bonus  (2)   1,150,032   575,016(3) 
 Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options     (4)   (5) 
 Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units     (6)   (7) 
 Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units     3,249,188   812,297 
 Health Care Benefit     44,483    
 Total  973,360   5,608,735(10)   1,387,313 

 

 Name                 

Type of

Benefit

Qualifying       

      Termination Without             

Cause/Constructive       

Termination       

($)       

Qualifying     

      Termination Following a             

Change in Control       

($)       

      Separation Due           

to Death     

($)     

 James J. Murphy(8)

Severance

1,041,664

Outplacement Benefit(1)

10,615

Bonus

316,780

Accelerated Vesting of Share Options

Accelerated Vesting of RSUs

Accelerated Vesting of TPSUs and/or PSUs

Health Care Benefit

Total

1,369,059

(1)

Represents the estimated amounts payable for outplacement services for 24 months for thetwo-year period CEO and EVPs, and 18 months for Senior Vice Presidents following a qualifying termination.

(2)

Represents full-year target bonus earned but unpaid at the time of a qualifying termination.

(3)

Amounts represent the bonus component of the death benefit assuming that the Compensation Committee elects to exercise its discretion to pay the NEO’s estate a bonus for the fiscal year in which death occurs. In addition, the amount represented has been calculated assuming that the Compensation Committee elects to award the bonus at the NEO’s target bonus opportunity for that year. However, the EOPB does not obligate the Compensation Committee to pay a bonus at the target bonus level or otherwise in the event of an NEO’s death.

(4)Amounts represent

Represents the value of options that receive accelerated vesting as a result of thea qualifying termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’sSeagate ordinary sharesshare on the date of the qualifying termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017, or $38.75July 2, 2020 ($47.34 per share,share), which was the last trading day of fiscal year 2020, and are based on the difference between this price and the exercise price of options held by the NEO. As a result, the amounts represented do not include any value for the acceleration of options that have an exercise price greater than $38.75$47.34 or for options that were already vested as of June 30, 2017.July 2, 2020.

(5)Amounts represent the value of options that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’s ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017, or $38.75 per share, and are based on the difference between this price and the exercise price of options held by the NEO. As a result, the amounts represented do not include any value for the acceleration of options that have an exercise price equal to or greater than $38.75 or for options that were already vested as of June 30, 2017. Under the terms of the TSR Options issued to our CEO, the same number of options would accelerate in the event of disability as in the event of death because the performance condition was satisfied as of July 23, 2013.
(6)Amounts represent

Represents the value of share awards that receive accelerated vesting as a result of thea qualifying termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’sSeagate ordinary sharesshare on the date of the qualifying termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017 or $38.75July 2, 2020 ($47.34 per share.share), which was the last trading day of fiscal year 2020.

(6)(7)Represents amounts for an additional year of service as of the termination date so that an additional 25% of the unvested award will vest immediately.
(8)Amounts represent

Represent the value of share awards that receive accelerated vesting as a result of thea qualifying termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’sSeagate ordinary sharesshare on the date of the qualifying termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017 or $38.75July 2, 2020 ($47.34 per share.share), which was the last trading day of fiscal year 2020. In addition, the value of accelerated PSUs is calculated assuming that we would have achieved the target level of performance at the end of the three-year performance measurement cycle, except forcycle.

(7)

Calculations do not include the TSR PSUs issuedimpact of any potential reduction pursuant to our CEO which would accelerate in full because the performance condition had been satisfied asapplication of July 23, 2013.the safe harbor limit under Section 280G of the Code pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Severance Plan.

(8)

Mr. Murphy’s employment with the Company ended effective December 31, 2019, therefore amounts listed are the benefits he received or was entitled to under the Severance Plan during fiscal year 2020.

 

6657

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIO

We are a large multinational provider of data storage technology and solutions. We conduct our business internationally and as of April 30, 2020, had 41,262 employees, of which approximately 88% are located outside the United States. Approximately 84% of our workforce are located in Asia.

For fiscal year 2020, the median annual total compensation of all employees of the Company, excluding our CEO, was $9,471, and the annual total compensation of our CEO was $11,698,767, as reported in the “Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2020” on page 45 of this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to the median annual compensation of all employees (excluding the CEO) was 1,235:1.

This reflects analysis of our global workforce as of April 30, 2020, which we chose as our date of determination. Employees represent all full-time, part-time, and temporary workers as of the determination date. This number does not include any independent contractors or “leased” workers, as permitted by the applicable SEC rules. We used total compensation to determine the median employee. Our estimate of total compensation for fiscal year 2020 included (i) annual base salary plus actual annual incentives paid to salaried employees and (ii) hourly salary rate times annual hours plus additional adjustments for annual incentives, shift differentials, actual overtime rates, and other cash allowances paid to hourly employees and any equity granted to eligible employees.

Our estimates were based on an analysis of the pay components and payrolls in each of the 25 countries in which we operate. Total cash compensation rates for employees paid in foreign currencies were converted into U.S. dollars using foreign exchange conversion rates in effect on April 30, 2020 for the determination of the median and July 3, 2020 for the year-end actual total compensation. Once the median employee was identified, actual total compensation for the CEO was determined in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. In determining our median employee, we did not use any of the exemptions permitted under SEC rules. The ratio and annual total compensation amount of the median employee are reasonable estimates that have been calculated using methodologies and assumptions permitted by SEC rules. The Company notes that its ratio and annual total compensation amount may not be directly comparable to those of other companies because the methodologies and assumptions used to identify the median employee may vary significantly among companies.

 

(9)Amounts represent the value of share awards that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’s ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017 or $38.75 per share. In addition, the value of accelerated PSUs is calculated assuming that we would have achieved the target level of performance at the end of the three-year performance measurement cycle. In the event of disability, the NEOs would receive the same number of shares under the terms of the PSU award agreements as in the event of death. In addition, under the terms of the TSR PSUs issued to our CEO, the same number of PSUs would accelerate in the event of disability as in the event of death because the performance condition was satisfied as of July 23, 2013.
(10)Calculations do not include the impact of any potential cutback pursuant to the application of the Code Section 280G safe harbor limit under the relevant provisions of the Severance Plan.

6758

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

PROPOSAL 23AN ADVISORY,A NON-BINDING VOTE ONRATIFICATION OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION –SAY-ON-PAY VOTEAPPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AND BINDING

AUTHORIZATION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE TO SET AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION

(Ordinary Resolution)

The BoardOur Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending July 2, 2021. We are asking you to ratify on a nonbinding basis, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee to set the independent auditors’ remuneration. Ernst & Young LLP has been acting as our independent auditors since 1980 and, by virtue of its long familiarity with the Company’s affairs, is presentingconsidered best qualified to perform this important function.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the following proposal, commonly known as a“Say-on-Pay” proposal, which gives you as a shareholder the2020 AGM and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. They will have an opportunity to endorse or not endorse, in an advisory,non-binding vote, the compensation of our NEOs, as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC. The Board currently intends to hold such votes annually, although it will consider the outcome of the advisory vote on frequency ofSay-on-Pay described in Proposal 3 below in determining the future frequency of such vote. make a statement if they so desire.

You may endorse or not endorse, respectively, the compensation paid to our NEOsthis proposal by voting for or against the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, as an ordinary resolution, that, on an advisory,a non-binding basis, the compensationshareholders ratify the appointment of the Company’s named executive officers,Ernst & Young LLP as disclosed in the Compensation Discussionour independent auditors, and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related disclosure contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement is hereby approved.”

While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding, and is advisory in nature.

In considering your vote, please be advised that our compensation program for our NEOs is guided by our design principles, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this Proxy Statement:

Cash compensation tied to performance. At least half of the cash compensation opportunity for our NEOs is based on Company and individual performance. The cash compensation of our NEOs has fluctuated from year to year, reflecting the Company’s financial results. In addition, we have implemented a cap on annual bonus funding.

Long-term equity incentive compensation tied to performance. In fiscal year 2017, a majority of ourlong-term equity incentive awards were granted in the form ofperformance-based restricted share units, which vest dependent upon the achievement ofpre-established performance objectives, including return on invested capital, relative total shareholder return and adjusted earnings per share (as described in further detail in this Proxy Statement).

Compensation unrelated to performance is limited. We do not have executive employment agreements, guaranteed incentive awards, “golden parachutes,” single trigger change of control severance provisions, executive pensions or taxgross-ups for our NEOs.

Share Ownership Guidelines. Our share ownership guidelines for our NEOs directly tie executive performance and retained value from our shares to the value returned to our shareholders.

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board

        A simple majority of all votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM is required to approve Proposal 2.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY,NON-BINDING APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, THE ACCOMPANYING COMPENSATION TABLES, AND THE RELATED DISCLOSURE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

68

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 3 – AN ADVISORY,NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE VOTE ON COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION – FREQUENCY OFSAY-ON-PAY

(Resolution requiring affirmative plurality of votes cast)

Every six years, in accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Act), shareholders are entitled to indicate, on anon-binding basis, their preference as to how frequently they would like to cast anon-binding vote on the compensation of our NEOs. Shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer such vote occur every one, two or three years or abstain from voting. While the Board intends to consider carefully the results of this vote, the vote is advisory in nature and is not binding on the Company or the Board. The Board believes that anon-binding vote on executive compensation every year is appropriate for the Company and its shareholders basedauthorize on a number of considerations, includingbinding basis the views of its shareholders. At our 2011 Annual General Meeting, our shareholders indicated that they would preferSay-on-Pay votesAudit Committee to occur annually and we have heldSay-on-Pay votes every year since that time.

The text ofset the resolution in respect of Proposal 3 is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders wish the Company to include an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers pursuant to Sectionauditors’ remuneration.” 14A of the Exchange Act every:

one year;

two years;

three years; or

abstain.”

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board

The affirmative vote of a plurality of all the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM is required to approve any of the foregoing choices.

The Board advises you to vote for shareholder review of the Company’s executive compensation policies and procedures every year. We believe that an annual review will give shareholders the most effective voice on executive compensation, since shareholders will be able to provide input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, as disclosed in our Proxy Statement each year. Since our Board reviews, adjusts and approves our executive compensation programs and pay practices on an annual basis, it was determined that annual input from our shareholders would be preferable.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR “ONE YEAR” SHAREHOLDER REVIEW OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.

69

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 4 – APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

(Ordinary Resolution)

We are seeking the approval by our shareholders of the Second Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESP Plan”), which amends and restates in its entirety the Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Prior ESP Plan”) in the following material respects:

The ESP Plan increases the number of ordinary shares reserved for issuance under the current plan by an additional 10,000,000 shares, from 3,750,770 shares to an aggregate of 13,750,770 shares.

General

The Board is seeking the approval of our shareholders for an amendment to the ESP Plan that would provide for an additional 10,000,000 ordinary shares to offer for sale to eligible Seagate employees and employees of certain of Seagate’s subsidiaries. The ESP Plan was adopted by the Compensation Committee on October 24, 2002 and approved by our shareholders on December 3, 2002, and became effective December 10, 2002. Currently, a total of 3,750,770 ordinary shares of Seagate are available for issuance. The maximum number of shares that can be issued under the ESP Plan over the lifetime of the plan is 50,000,000. The full text of the ESP Plan is included as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement as it would read if this proposal were to be approved by our shareholders with the proposed changes. Below is a summary of certain key provisions of the ESP Plan, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the ESP Plan.

The Board is recommending the addition of 10,000,000 shares to the total shares available under the ESP Plan to ensure that eligible employees have the opportunity to invest in Seagate shares in order to take part in our future growth potential.

Description of the ESP Plan

Purpose and General Information about the ESP Plan.    We adopted the ESP Plan to provide employees of Seagate and its designated subsidiaries with an opportunity, during specified periods (“Offering Periods”), to purchase ordinary shares through accumulated payroll deductions. The ESP Plan provides eligible employees (including officers and directors who are employees) of Seagate and certain designated subsidiaries with the right to purchase ordinary shares of Seagate at a discount. For U.S. taxpayers, the ESP Plan is intended to satisfy the requirements to receive the tax advantages allowed under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The ESP Plan is not a qualified deferred compensation plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, and is not subject to the provisions of the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

Eligibility.    Employees of Seagate or a designated subsidiary who are employed as of the first day of a given Offering Period to purchase ordinary shares of Seagate (an “Offering Date”) are eligible provided that they have satisfied the minimum employment period established by the Compensation Committee. Currently, an employee must be actively employed on or before the first Friday of the open enrollment period before an Offering Date in order to be eligible to participate in the Offering Period that commences on that Offering Date. In addition, employees are not eligible to participate in the ESP Plan if they would be deemed to own five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of Seagate shares or the shares of any of its subsidiaries (including shares purchased under the ESP Plan or under any other outstanding options) immediately after such employee is granted a right to purchase shares under the ESP Plan.

70

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Directors who are not employees of a participating employer in the ESP Plan, consultants, independent contractors, temporary workers employed by a third party, and employees ofnon-designated subsidiaries of Seagate are not eligible to participate in the ESP Plan.

Administration.    The ESP Plan is administered by a committee appointed by the Board. Currently, the ESP Plan is being administered by Seagate’s Benefits Administrative Committee (the “Administrative Committee”). The Administrative Committee has full power, in a manner not inconsistent with the ESP Plan, to adopt, amend and rescind any rules for the administration of the ESP Plan, to construe and interpret the ESP Plan, to exercise any and all powers allocated to the Board under the ESP Plan, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the ESP Plan. Members of the Administrative Committee receive no additional compensation for their services in connection with the administration of the ESP Plan. Members of the Administrative Committee will serve for such time as the Board may specify and may be removed at any time by the Board or the Compensation Committee.

Offering Periods.    The ESP Plan will be implemented by a series of Offering Periods during which shares are purchased through payroll deductions (“Purchase Periods”). Each Offering Period is six months and consists of one Purchase Period that runs concurrently with the Offering Period. The last trading day of each Purchase Period is called a “Purchase Date.”

Purchase of Shares.    An employee who has satisfied the eligibility criteria will automatically be granted an option to participate in the ESP Plan on the first Offering Date on which he or she is eligible. Assuming an eligible employee has appropriately completed the applicable paperwork, payroll deductions will commence with the first payroll following the Offering Date and will end on the last payroll paid on or prior to the last Purchase Date of the Offering Period, unless the employee terminated his or her participation earlier in accordance with the ESP Plan. Thereafter, on each Offering Date of each Offering Period, participants are granted an option to buy ordinary shares, which will be exercised automatically on each Purchase Date.

Purchase Price.    The purchase price for a Purchase Period will generally be equal to 85% of the lesser of (a) the closing price for our ordinary shares on the Offering Date or (b) the closing price for our ordinary shares on the Purchase Date.

Securities to be Purchased.    The securities to be purchased under the ESP Plan are ordinary shares of Seagate. Ordinary shares are issued directly to an ESP Plan participant from Seagate and are registered with the SEC under a special form of registration statement applicable to employee benefit plans.

Plan Amendment and Termination.    The Board has the power to terminate or amend the ESP Plan at any time subject to specified restrictions protecting the rights of participating employees. Upon a termination of the ESP Plan, the Board may, in its discretion, (a) return, without interest, the payroll deductions credited to the participants’ accounts to such participants, or (b) set an earlier Purchase Date with respect to the Offering Periods and Purchase Periods then in progress.

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences

Generally, participants in the ESP Plan will recognize income for purposes of U.S. federal income tax in the year in which they make a disposition of the purchased ordinary shares. The U.S. federal income tax liability will depend on whether such disposition is “disqualifying” or “qualifying.” A disqualifying disposition is any sale or other disposition which is made within two years after the Offering Date or within one year after the Purchase Date. A qualifying disposition will occur if the sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares is made after the participant has held the ordinary shares for more than two years after the Offering Date and more than one year after the Purchase Date.

71

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Upon a disqualifying disposition, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of (a) the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the Purchase Date over (b) the purchase price paid for the ordinary shares. Seagate will be entitled to an income tax deduction in an amount equal to such excess for the taxable year in which such disposition occurs. Any additional gain recognized upon the disqualifying disposition will be capital gain. The capital gain will be long-term if the participant has held the ordinary shares more than one year after the Purchase Date, and will be short-term if the participant has held the ordinary shares not more than one year from the Purchase Date. In general, the current maximum U.S. federal income tax rate on long-term capital gains is 15%, and short-term capital gains are taxed at the same rates as ordinary income. The current general maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for ordinary income (and therefore short-term capital gains) is 39.6%.

Upon a qualifying disposition, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the lesser of: the amount by which the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the date of the qualifying disposition exceeds the purchase price paid for the ordinary shares, or the amount by which the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the Offering Date exceeds the discounted Offering Price (that amount is typically 15% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the Offering Date). Seagate is not entitled to an income tax deduction with respect to such disposition. Any additional gain recognized upon the qualifying disposition will be capital gain. Under current law, the capital gain will be long-term because the ordinary shares were held for more than one year after the Purchase Date. In general, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate on long-term capital gains is 15%.

Generally, if the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the date of a qualifying disposition is less than the purchase price paid for the ordinary shares, the participant will not recognize ordinary income, and any loss recognized will be a long-term capital loss. However, if the loss arises in connection with a disqualifying disposition, the participant may still recognize as ordinary income, and be taxed on, the excess of (a) the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the Purchase Date over (b) the purchase price paid for the ordinary shares.

New Plan Benefits

Future issuances of shares under the ESP Plan to our employees and the benefits such employees will receive as a result are not determinable at this time, since participation in the ESP Plan is voluntary; accordingly, we have not included a table reflecting such benefits.

Through August 3, 2017 we have issued a total of approximately 46,249,230 shares to employee participants under the ESP Plan.

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board

A simple majority of all votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 20172020 AGM is required to approve Proposal 4.

The Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to continue to provide employees with the opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the Company through their participation in the ESP Plan and thereby more closely align their interests with those of our shareholders and to provide employees with a valuable retention incentive.3.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOUA VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVALPROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF AMENDMENTERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE AMENDEDCOMPANY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN.TO AUTHORIZE THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD TO SET THE AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION.

 

7259

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

PROPOSAL 5 – ANON-BINDING RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AND BINDING AUTHORIZATION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE TO SET AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION

(Ordinary Resolution)

At the 2017 AGM, shareholders will be asked to approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending June 29, 2018, and to authorize the Audit Committee of our Board to set the independent auditors’ remuneration. Ernst & Young LLP has been acting as our independent auditor for many years and, both by virtue of its long familiarity with the Company’s affairs and its ability, is considered best qualified to perform this important function.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the 2017 AGM and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire.

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board

A simple majority of all votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM is required to approve Proposal 5.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY AND TO AUTHORIZE THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD TO SET THE AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION.

73

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Audit Committee Report

Our management is responsible for preparing and presenting our financial statements, and ourstatements. Our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, are responsible for performing an independent audit of our annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)(“PCAOB”) and for auditing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year. One of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities is to monitor and oversee these processes. In connection with the preparation of the financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017,2020, the Audit Committee performed the following tasks:

 

 (1)

reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for fiscal year 20172020 with management and with Ernst & Young LLP;

 

 (2)

reviewed and discussed with management its assessment and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017,July 3, 2020, which it made based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO Criteria)‘COSO Criteria’);

 

 (3)

reviewed and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017,July 3, 2020, which report was included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017;2020;

 

 (4)

discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16 “Communications with Audit Committees (AS16)”,and the SEC, including Ernst & Young LLP’s judgment about the quality, in addition to the acceptability, of our accounting principles and underlying estimates in our financial statements; and

 

 (5)

received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence.

Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended, and the Board approved, that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017,2020, for filing with the SEC.

 

 

Respectfully submitted,

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 

Dr. Chong Sup Park, ChairJudy Bruner, Chairperson

Mark W. Adams

Mei-Wei ChengStephanie Tilenius

Dr. Dambisa F. MoyoWilliam T. Coleman

 

7460

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Fees Paid to Independent Auditors

The following table presents the aggregate fees paid or accrued by us for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in fiscal years ended June 30, 20172020 and July 1, 2016 are set forth below.2019. The aggregate fees include fees billed or reasonably expected to be billed for the applicable fiscal year.

 

 
 Fiscal Year 
 
 2020   2019 
 

Fiscal Year

 

 
 

2017

 

   

2016

 

  (In thousands) 
 (In thousands) 

Audit Fees

  $5,542    $5,586   $  6,091    $  6,113   

Audit-Related Fees

  231    502   540    215   

Tax Fees

  103    90   6    98   

All Other Fees

  5    3   64    9   
 

 

   

 

 
 

 

   

 

 

Total

    $5,881      $6,181   $  6,701    $  6,435   
 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Audit Fees.    This category consists of professional services provided in connection with the integrated audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and the audit of internal control over financial reporting, the review of our unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements, and audit services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. The fees for fiscal year 20172019 included services in connection with our debt offering, and in fiscal year 2016 includedintegrated audit activitiesfees related to the acquisitionCompany’s implementation of Dot Hill Systems Corp.ASC 842 (Leases).

Audit-RelatedAudit-Related Fees.    This category consists of assurance and related services provided by Ernst & Young LLP that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and which are not reported above under “Audit Fees”. For fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, this category includes:included pension plan and grant or similar audits, agreed upon procedures, engagements, and advisementadvising on accounting matters that arose during those years in connection with the preparation of our annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements;statements, and in 2016,the review of the interim Irish statutory financial statements. For fiscal year 2020 this category of fees also included services related to due diligence procedures.(i) an audit of the accounting and tax position for a debt restructuring with respect to certain subsidiaries, (ii) the issuance of comfort letters related to new debt issued by Seagate HDD Cayman, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, and (iii) a business entity restructuring effort in the Europe, Middle East & Africa region.

Tax Fees.    This category consists primarily of professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP primarily for tax compliance for fiscal years 20172020 and 2016.2019.

All Other Fees.    This category consists of fees for the use of Ernst & Young LLP’s online accounting research tool for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 and iXBRL tagging services performed for fiscal year 2017.years 2020 and 2019.

Pre-Approval of Services by Independent Auditors

In fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, all audit, audit related,audit-related, tax and all other fees werepre-approved by the Audit Committee. Under the SEC rules, subject to certain permitted de minimis criteria,pre-approval is required for all professional services rendered by the Company’s principal accountant.auditors. We are in compliance with these SEC rules. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to grant pre-approvals to the Audit Committee Chairperson when the full Audit Committee is unable to do so. These pre-approvals are reviewed by the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting. Our independent auditors and senior management periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the services provided by the independent auditors.

61

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

In making its recommendation to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2018,2021, the Audit Committee considered whether the services provided to us by Ernst & Young LLP are compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP from us. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of these services by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining that independence.

 

7562

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

Pre-Approval of Services by Independent Auditors

The Audit Committeepre-approves all audit and other permittednon-audit services provided to us by our independent auditors. These services may include audit services,audit-related services, tax services and other permissiblenon-audit services. The Audit Committee may alsopre-approve particular services on acase-by-case basis. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to grantpre-approvals to the Audit Committee Chair when the full Audit Committee is unable to do so. Thesepre-approvals are reviewed by the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting. Our independent auditors and senior management periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors.

76

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 6 – GRANT BOARD AUTHORITY TO ALLOT AND/OR ISSUE SHARES

(Ordinary Resolution)

Under Irish law, directors of an Irish company must have authority from its shareholders to allot and/or issue any of its authorized but unissued share capital. Because our current authority will expire on July 1, 2018, we are presenting this Proposal 6 to renew the Board’s authority to allot and/or issue our authorized shares on the terms set forth below.

We are seeking approval to authorize our Board, effective upon expiration of our existing authority noted above, to issue up to 33%, or 66% pursuant to a fullypre-emptive rights issue, of our issued ordinary share capital as of the latest practicable date before this Proxy Statement, for a period expiring 18 months from July 1, 2018, unless otherwise renewed, varied or revoked.

Granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland and is consistent with Irish market practice. This authority is fundamental to our business and enables us to issue shares, including in connection with our equity compensation plans (where required) and, if applicable, funding acquisitions and raising capital. We are not asking you to approve an increase in our authorized share capital or to approve a specific issuance of shares. Instead, approval of this Proposal 6 will only grant the Board the authority to issue shares that are already authorized under our Articles of Association upon the terms below. In addition, we note that, because we are a NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) listed company, our shareholders continue to benefit from the protections afforded to them under the rules and regulations of the NASDAQ and SEC, including those rules that limit our ability to issue shares in specified circumstances. Furthermore, we note that this authorization is required as a matter of Irish law only and is not otherwise required for other U.S. companies listed on the NASDAQ with whom we compete. Accordingly, approval of this resolution would merely place us on par with NASDAQ-listed companies incorporated in the United States.

The text of this resolution is as follows:

“RESOLVED, as an ordinary resolution, that the directors be and are hereby generally and unconditionally authorized pursuant tosub-section (1) of Section 1021 of the Companies Act 2014 with effect from the passing of this resolution to exercise all powers of the Company to allot and/or issue relevant securities (within the meaning ofsub-section (12) of Section 1021 of the Companies Act 2014) up to an aggregate nominal amount of $949.81 (94,981,463 shares) (being equivalent to approximately 33% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this Proxy Statement)), and pursuant to a fullypre-emptive rights issue, up to an aggregate of $1,899.63 (189,962,927 shares being equivalent to approximately 66% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this Proxy Statement)), and the authority conferred by this resolution shall expire 18 months from the date this authority takes effect, unless otherwise renewed, varied or revoked; provided that the Company may make an offer or agreement before the expiry of this authority, which would or might require any such securities to be allotted after this authority has expired, and in that case, the directors may allot relevant securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired.”

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board

As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to this Proposal 6 is an ordinary resolution that requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” GRANTING THE BOARD AUTHORITY TO ALLOT AND/OR ISSUE SHARES.

77

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 7 – GRANT BOARD AUTHORITY TOOPT-OUT OF STATUTORYPRE-EMPTION RIGHTS

(Special Resolution)

Under Irish law, unless otherwise authorized, when an Irish company issues shares for cash, it is required first to offer those shares on the same or more favorable terms to existing shareholders of the company on apro-rata basis (commonly referred to as the statutorypre-emption right). Because our current authority will expire on July 1, 2018, we are presenting this Proposal 7 to renew the Board’s authority toopt-out of thepre-emption right on the terms set forth below. Our directors may issue shares for cash in pursuance of any offer or agreement under our current authority until its expiry.

We are seeking shareholder approval to authorize our Board, upon expiration of our existing authority, toopt-out of the statutorypre-emption rights provision in the event of (1) the allotment of shares for cash in connection with any rights issue, and (2) the allotment of shares for cash, if the allotment is limited to up to 10% of our issued ordinary share capital as of August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this Proxy Statement), provided that any amount above 5% is to be used for the purposes of an acquisition or a specified capital investment and, provided further that, in each case, such authorities commence as of July 1, 2018 and be limited to a period expiring 18 months from the date this authority takes effect, unless otherwise renewed, varied or revoked.

Granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland and is consistent with Irish market practice. Similar to the authorization sought for Proposal 6, this authority is fundamental to our business and enables us to issue shares under our equity compensation plans (where required) and if applicable, will facilitate our ability to fund acquisitions and otherwise raise capital. We are not asking you to approve an increase in our authorized share capital. Instead, approval of this Proposal 7 will only grant the Board the authority to issue shares in the manner already permitted under our articles upon the terms below. Without this authorization, in each case where we issue shares for cash, we would first have to offer those shares on the same or more favorable terms to all of our existing shareholders. This requirement could undermine the operation of our compensation plans and cause delays in the completion of acquisitions and capital raising for our business. Furthermore, we note that this authorization is required as a matter of Irish law and is not otherwise required for other U.S. companies listed on the NASDAQ with whom we compete. Accordingly, approval of this resolution would merely help us compete with other NASDAQ-listed companies.

“RESOLVED, as a special resolution, that, subject to the passing of the resolution with respect to Proposal 6 as set out above and with effect as of July 1, 2018, the directors be and are hereby empowered pursuant to Section 1023 of the Companies Act 2014 to allot equity securities (as defined in Section 1023 of that Act) for cash, pursuant to the authority conferred by Proposal 6 as if Section 1022 did not apply to any such allotment, provided that this power shall be limited to:

a)the allotment of equity securities in connection with a rights issue in favor of the holders of ordinary shares (including rights to subscribe for, or convert into, ordinary shares) where the equity securities respectively attributable to the interests of such holders are proportional (as nearly as may be) to the respective numbers of ordinary shares held by them (but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the directors may deem necessary or expedient to deal with fractional entitlements that would otherwise arise, or with legal or practical problems under the laws of, or the requirements of any recognized regulatory body or any stock exchange in, any territory, or otherwise); and

b)the allotment (otherwise than pursuant tosub-paragraph (a) above) of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal value of $287.82 (28,782,262 shares) (being equivalent to

78

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

approximately 10% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this Proxy statement)) provided that any such issuance above 5% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this Proxy Statement) is to be used for the purposes of an acquisition or a specified capital investment;

and, in each case, the authority conferred by this resolution shall expire 18 months from the date this authority takes effect, unless otherwise renewed, varied or revoked; provided that the Company may make an offer or agreement before the expiry of this authority, which would or might require any such securities to be allotted after this authority has expired, and in that case, the directors may allot equity securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired.”

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board

As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to this Proposal 7 is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” GRANTING THE BOARD AUTHORITY TOOPT-OUT OF STATUTORYPRE-EMPTION RIGHTS.

79

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 84 – DETERMINE THE PRICE RANGE AT WHICH THE COMPANY CANRE-ALLOT SHARES HELD AS

TREASURY SHARES

(Special Resolution)

Ouropen-market share repurchases and other share buyback activities, all effected by way of redemptions in accordance with our Articles of Association,Constitution, may result in ordinary shares being acquired and held by the Company as treasury shares. We mayre-allot treasury shares that we may acquire through our various share buyback activities including in connection withactivities. However, we typically cancel and retire all shares acquired through our executive and director compensation programs.various share buyback activities.

Under Irish law, our shareholders must authorize the price range at which we mayre-allot any shares held in treasury. In this Proposal 8,4, that price range is expressed as a minimum and maximum percentage of the closing market price of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ the day preceding the day on which the relevant share isre-allotted. Under Irish law, this authorization must expire no later than 18 months after its passing unless renewed.

“RESOLVED, as a special resolution, that for purposes of Sectionsection 1078 of the Companies Act 2014 of Ireland (“Companies Act”) , there-allotment price at which any treasury shares (as defined by Sectionsection 106(1) of the Companies Act of 2014)Act) held by the Company may bere-allottedoff-marketre-allotted off-market shall be as follows:

(a)        The maximum price at which a treasury share may bere-allottedoff-marketre-allotted off-market shall be an amount equal to 120% of the closing price on the NASDAQ for shares of that class on the day preceding the day on which the relevant share isre-allotted by Seagate.

(b)        The minimum price at which a treasury share may bere-allotted shall be the nominal value of the share where such a share is required to satisfy an obligation under an employees’ share scheme (as defined under Sectionsection 64(1) of the Companies Act 2014)Act) or any share incentive plan operated by Seagate or, in all other cases, an amount equal to 90% of the closing price on the NASDAQ for shares of that class on the day preceding the day on which the relevant share isre-allotted by Seagate.

(c)        There-allotment price range as determined by paragraphs (a) and (b) shall expire 18 months from the date of the passing of this resolution, unless previously varied, revoked or renewed in accordance with the provisions of Sectionsection 109 and/or Sectionsection 1078 (as applicable) of the Companies Act 2014 (and/or any corresponding provision of any amended or replacement legislation) and is without prejudice or limitation to any other authority of the Company tore-allot treasury shareson-market.”

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board

As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to this Proposal 84 is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 20172020 AGM.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO DETERMINE THE PRICE RANGE AT WHICH THE COMPANY CANRE-ALLOT SHARES HELD AS TREASURY SHARES.

 

8063

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2017.August 12, 2020, the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares by each of our Director Nominees, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2020, and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

 

 Equity compensation plans

 Number of Securities
to be Issued upon
Exercise  of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and  Rights
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
under  Equity
Compensation Plans
 

 Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

  5,665,250(1)   $39.24(2)   31,589,031(3) 

 Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Total

  5,665,250   $39.24   31,589,031 

(1)This number includes 39,766 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of share options granted under our Seagate Technology plc 2001 Share Option Plan (the “SOP”), 99,238 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of share options granted under the 2004 SCP, 5,084,652 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of shares options granted under the 2012 Plan, and 441,594 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of shares options granted under the Dot Hill 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2)This value is calculated based on the exercise price of options outstanding under the SOP, the 2004 SCP and the 2012 Plan.
(3)This number includes 30,761,435 ordinary shares available for future issuance under the 2012 Plan, 827,596 ordinary shares available for future issuance under the Dot Hill 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

  Name of Beneficial Owner  

Number of
Ordinary

Shares
Beneficially
Owned

   

Percentage

of Class
  Beneficially  

Owned(1)

 

  Director Nominees and Named Executive Officers:

    

  William D. Mosley(2)

   1,010,061    * 

  Gianluca Romano(3)

   65,059    * 

  Jeffrey D. Nygaard(4)

   244,063    * 

  Katherine E. Schuelke(5)

   41,797    * 

  B.S. Teh(6)

   35,893    * 

  James J. Murphy(7)

   —       * 

  Mark W. Adams(8)

   11,973    * 

  Judy Bruner(9)

   6,675    * 

  Michael R. Cannon(10)

   30,592    * 

  William T. Coleman(11)

   10,913    * 

  Jay L. Geldmacher(12)

   7,213    * 

  Dylan Haggart(13)

   3,293    * 

  Stephen J. Luczo(14)

   943,658    * 

  Stephanie Tilenius(15)

   19,898    * 

  Edward J. Zander(16)

   62,786    * 

  All Director Nominees and Executive Officers as a group (15 persons)(17)

   2,493,874    0.97% 

 

8164

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

The following table sets forth each shareholder which is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding ordinary shares of the Company. This information is as of August 12, 2020, except as otherwise indicated in the notes to the table.

 

  Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Number of
Ordinary
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
   

Percentage

of Class
Beneficially
Owned
(1)

 

  Clearbridge Investments, LLC(18)

  17,884,394    6.96

620 8th Ave.

   

New York, NY 10018

   

  BlackRock, Inc.(19)

  18,732,472    7.29

55 East 52nd Street

   

New York, NY 10055

   

  FMR LLC(20)

  22,079,404    8.59

245 Summer Street

   

Boston, MA 02210

   

  The Vanguard Group, Inc.(21)

  28,545,811    11.11

100 Vanguard Blvd.

   

Malvern, PA 19355

   

  ValueAct Capital(22)

  31,557,653    12.28

One Letterman Drive, Building D, Fourth Floor

   

San Francisco, CA 94129

   

*

Less than 1% of Seagate’s ordinary shares outstanding.

(1)

Percentage of class beneficially owned is based on 256,965,039 ordinary shares outstanding as of August 12, 2020. Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote. Ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 12, 2020 and ordinary shares issuable pursuant to RSUs, TPSUs and PSUs vesting within 60 days of August 12, 2020 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options, RSUs, TPSUs and/or PSUs, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person or group.

(2)

Includes 335,309 ordinary shares held directly by Dr. Mosley, 618,926 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of August 12, 2020, and 55,826 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to TPSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020. Does not include 130,480 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to PSUs that are subject to vesting within 60 days of August 12, 2020. The 130,480 PSUs represent an annual target number of PSUs that may be earned by Dr. Mosley depending upon the Company’s performance. A lesser amount of such PSUs or a greater amount of up to two times the annual target may actually be received by Dr. Mosley.

(3)

Includes 4,243 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Romano, 57,201 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of August 12, 2020 and 3,615 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to TPSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020.

(4)

Includes 505 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Nygaard, 55,231 ordinary shares held by the Jeffrey D. Nygaard Revocable Trust U/A dated August 17, 2009, 173,226 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of August 12, 2020, 5,520 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020 and 9,581 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to TPSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020. Does not include 8,705 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to PSUs that are subject to vesting within 60 days of August 12, 2020. The 8,705 PSUs represent an annual target number of PSUs that may be earned by Mr. Nygaard depending upon the Company’s performance. A lesser amount of such PSUs or a greater amount of up to two times the annual target may actually be received by Mr. Nygaard.

(5)

Includes 17,637 ordinary shares held directly by Ms. Schuelke, 18,446 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of August 12, 2020 and 5,714 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020.

(6)

Includes 10,829 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Teh, 18,547 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of August 12, 2020 and 6,517 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020. Does not include 2,180 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to PSUs that are subject to vesting within 60 days of August 12, 2020. The 2,180 PSUs represent an annual target number of PSUs that may be earned by Mr. Teh depending upon the Company’s performance. A lesser amount of such PSUs or a greater amount of up to two times the annual target may actually be received by Mr. Teh.

65

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

(7)

Mr. Murphy resigned from his position as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Sales & Marketing effective December 31, 2019.

(8)

Includes 11,973 ordinary shares held indirectly by the Mark Woolsey Adams and Maureen Madden Adams, Trustees Adams Family Trust DTD 10/27/2000.

(9)

Includes 6,675 ordinary shares held by the Bruner Living Trust.

(10)

Includes 23,707 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Cannon and 6,885 ordinary shares held by the Michael R. Cannon Trust.

(11)

Includes 10,913 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Coleman.

(12)

Includes 7,213 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Geldmacher.

(13)

Includes 3,293 shares held directly by Mr. Haggart. As a partner of ValueAct Capital, Mr Haggart relinquishes all vested equity compensation received for service on our Board to the limited partners of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. Under an agreement with ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., Mr. Haggart is deemed to hold these shares for the benefit of the limited partners of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. Mr. Haggart may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares held by the ValueAct entities as described in note 22 below. Mr. Haggart disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in ValueAct.

(14)

Includes 551,666 ordinary shares held by the Stephen J. Luczo Revocable Trust, 321,984 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of August 12, 2020, and 70,008 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020.

(15)

Includes 19,898 ordinary shares held directly by Ms. Tilenius.

(16)

Includes 46,088 ordinary shares held by the Edward and Mona Zander Trust dated 4/19/1993 and 16,698 ordinary shares held by Zanadu Capital Partners, L.P.

(17)

All Director Nominees and current executive officers as a group (i) directly and indirectly hold 1,128,763 ordinary shares, (ii) hold 1,208,330 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of August 12, 2020, (iii) hold 87,759 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020, and (iv) hold 69,022 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to TPSUs that will vest within 60 days of August 12, 2020. The 141,365 PSUs that are subject to vesting within 60 days of August 12, 2020 represent an annual target number of PSUs that may be earned collectively by the executive officers depending upon the Company’s performance and are not included. A lesser amount of such PSUs or a greater amount of up to two times the executive officers’ respective annual targets may actually be received by the executive officers.

(18)

Based solely on information reported by Clearbridge Investments, LLC (“Clearbridge”) on the ninth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2019. Clearbridge has sole voting power over 17,475,765 ordinary shares and sole dispositive power over 17,884,394 ordinary shares.

(19)

Based solely on information reported by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on the fifth amendment to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 6, 2020, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2019. BlackRock has sole voting power over 16,834,526 ordinary shares and sole dispositive power over 18,732,472 ordinary shares.

(20)

Based solely on information reported by FMR LLC (“FMR”) on the twelfth amendment to Schedule 13G (the “FMR 13G”) filed with the SEC on February 7, 2020 and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2019. FMR is a parent holding company of certain entities as described in the FMR 13G. FMR has sole voting power over 2,925,098 ordinary shares and sole dispositive power over 22,079,404 ordinary shares. Abigail P. Johnson, who, together with other members of the Johnson family own shares representing 49% of the voting power of FMR, has sole dispositive power over 22,079,404 ordinary shares. Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund has sole voting power over 17,551,933 ordinary shares.

(21)

Based solely on information reported by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) on the eighth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2019. Vanguard has sole voting power over 304,323 ordinary shares, shared voting power over 74,191 ordinary shares, sole dispositive power over 28,188,213 ordinary shares and shared dispositive power over 357,598 ordinary shares.

(22)

Based solely on information reported by ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., ValueAct Capital Master Fund B, L.P. and their affiliates on the fifth amendment to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on October 30, 2019 and reporting ownership as of October 30, 2019. The 27,298,453 ordinary shares held by ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. may be deemed to be indirectly beneficially owned by (i) VA Partners I, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., (ii) ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. as the manager of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., (iii) ValueAct Capital Management, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., (iv) ValueAct Holdings, L.P. as the majority owner of the membership interests of VA Partners I, LLC, (v) ValueAct Holdings II, L.P. as the sole owner of the membership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, LLC and as the majority owner of the limited partnership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., and (vi) ValueAct Holdings GP, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Holdings, L.P. and ValueAct Holdings II, L.P. The 4,259,200 ordinary shares held by ValueAct Capital Master Fund B, L.P. may be deemed to be indirectly beneficially owned by (i) VA Partners I, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Master Fund B, L.P., (ii) ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. as the manager of ValueAct Capital Master Fund B, L.P., (iii) ValueAct Capital Management, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., (iv) ValueAct Holdings, L.P. as the majority owner of the membership interests of VA Partners I, LLC, (v) ValueAct Holdings II, L.P. as the sole owner of the membership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, LLC and as the majority owner of the limited partnership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., and (vi) ValueAct Holdings GP, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Holdings, L.P. and ValueAct Holdings II, L.P. The ordinary shares set forth for ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. includes the 3,293 shares held by Dylan Haggart as he is deemed to hold such shares for the benefit of the limited partners of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. (see note 13 above).

66

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s equity compensation plans as of July 3, 2020.

   
  Plan Category 

Number of Securities
to be Issued  upon
Exercise of
Outstanding

Options, Warrants

and Rights

  

Weighted Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights

  

Number of Securities

Remaining Available

for Future Issuance

under Equity

Compensation Plans

 

  Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

  2,397,779 (1)  $44.18 (2)   26,955,116 (3) 

  Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

         
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Total

  2,397,779  $44.18   26,955,116 

(1)

Represents 2,355,593 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of share options granted under the EIP and 42,186 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of share options granted under the Dot Hill 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. Effective April 24, 2019, the Company terminated the Dot Hill 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

(2)

This value is calculated based on the exercise price of options outstanding under the EIP and the Dot Hill 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

(3)

Represents 26,955,115.85 ordinary shares available for future issuance under the EIP, calculated using a 2.25:1 share counting rule in accordance with the EIP.

��

67

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, as amended, requires our directors and certain officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s ordinary shares, to file reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of Section 16(a) reports and amendments thereto furnished to us during and with respect to fiscal year 2020 and on written representations from certain reporting persons, all reportable transactions during fiscal year 2020 were reported on a timely basis, except for one Form 4 filed on June 1, 2020, which was late due to an administrative error resulting in delayed notification of shares granted to Mr. Jeffrey Fochtman in connection with his promotion to Senior Vice President.

68

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Our Board has adopted a written policy for approval of transactions with our directors, Director Nominees, executive officers, shareholders that beneficially own more than 5% of our ordinary shares, and immediate family members of such persons (each, a “Related Person”). Pursuant to the policy, if any Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest in a transaction or potential transaction in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, the Related Person must promptly report it to the Chief Legal Officer of the Company or their designee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then reviews any such transactions and determines whether or not to approve or ratify them. In doing so, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other factors, the extent of the Related Person’s interest; whether the transaction would interfere with the Related Person’s judgment in fulfilling his or her duties to the Company; whether the transaction is fair to the Company and on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under similar circumstances; whether the transaction is in the interest of the Company and its shareholders; and whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest.

In addition, if the transaction involves a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider whether such transaction would impact such director’s independence under the NASDAQ listing rules or qualifications to serve on Board committees under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules. The Board has delegated authority to the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to review and approve or ratify transactions where the aggregate amount is expected to be less than $1 million. A summary of any new transactions approved by the Chairperson is provided to the full Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its review at the next scheduled committee meeting after such approval.

Josip Relota, Mr. Luczo’s brother-in-law, is employed as a software engineer by the Company. In connection with such employment in fiscal year 2020, Mr. Relota received total cash compensation of approximately $217,187, the remaining portion of his retention bonus of $12.51, and an equity award with a fair value of $41,574. In addition, Mr. Relota is eligible to participate in our general employee benefit plans on the same terms as other employees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has ratified the terms of Mr. Relota’s employment and compensation.

On September 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Board Observer Rights Agreement (the “Observer Rights Agreement”) with ValueAct Capital Master Fund L.P. (“ValueAct”), which beneficially owns more than 5% of the Company’s ordinary shares as of October 30, 2019. Pursuant to the Observer Rights Agreement, ValueAct is entitled to one seat as a board observer provided that it continues to own not less than 2% of the ordinary shares of the Company. This board observer right was granted to ValueAct in connection with ValueAct’s purchase of 9.5 million ordinary shares of the Company. Under the terms of the Observer Rights Agreement, the Board retains the right to limit access to information and attendance at portions of the Board meetings to the ValueAct board observer at the Board’s discretion and ValueAct is required to comply with the terms of a confidentiality agreement with the Company, which was entered into on the same day. ValueAct was not a related party of the Company at the time the Company entered into these agreements. On April 12, 2018, the Company and ValueAct amended and restated the confidentiality agreement.

69

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

Any proposal by a shareholder intended to be included in our Proxy Statement for the 20182021 AGM must be received by the Company at its registered office at 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, D02 NX53, Ireland, Attn:Attention: Company Secretary, no later than May 2, 2018.5, 2021. Any such proposal must meet the requirements set forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC, includingRule 14a-8, to be eligible for inclusion in our 20182021 Proxy Statement.

The Company’s Articles of Association setConstitution sets forth procedures to be followed by shareholders who wish to nominate candidates for election to the Board in connection with the annual general meetings of shareholders or who wish to bring other business before a shareholders’ general meeting. All such nominations must be accompanied by certain background and other information specified in the Articles of Association.Constitution. A shareholder wishing to nominate a director for the 20182021 AGM must provide written notice to the Company Secretary of their intention to make such nomination no earlier than April 2, 20185, 2021 and no later than May 2, 2018,5, 2021, that is by a date not less than 120 nor more than 150 days before the anniversary of the mailing of the Proxy Statement for our prior year’s annual general meeting and if such date occurs on a public holiday or a weekend, the next business day following such date.meeting. If the date of the 20182021 AGM occurs more than 30 days before or after the anniversary of the 20172020 AGM, then the written notice must be provided to the Company Secretary no earlier than the 150th day prior to the date of the 20182021 AGM and not later than the later of the 120th day prior to the date of the 20182021 AGM or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.

Unless a shareholder who wishes to bring business before the 20182021 AGM outside the processes ofRule 14a-8 (other than a nomination as outlined above, and subject to applicable rules) provides written notice of such business received by the Company Secretary, at the address specified above, no later than July 16, 2018,22, 2021, the Company-designated proxy holders will have discretionary authority to vote on any such proposal at the 20182021 AGM with respect to all proxies submitted to us, even when we do not include in our Proxy Statement advice on the nature of the matter and how the Company-designated proxy holders intend to exercise their discretion to vote on the matter. If the date of the 20182021 AGM occurs more than 30 days before or after the anniversary of the 20172020 AGM, then such notice must be received by the Company Secretary, at the address specified above, not later than the later of the 75th day prior to the date of the 20182021 AGM or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The notice must include a description of the proposed item and the reasons the proposing shareholder believes its position concerning the item. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the requirements a shareholder must meet to have a proposal included in our 20182021 Proxy Statement.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all shareholder recommendations for candidates for Board membership, which should be sent to that Committee, care of the Company Secretary, at the address set forth above. In addition to considering candidates recommended by shareholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers potential candidates recommended by current directors, Seagate officers and employees, and others. As stated in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter, all candidates for Board membership are selected based upon, theiramong other things, professional experience, recognized achievementunderstanding of business and financial issues, ability to exercise sound judgment, leadership, achievements, knowledge, and experience in his or her respective field, willingness to makematters affecting the commitment of timeCompany’s business and effort required, good judgment, strength of character, reputationindustry. Please also see “Board Diversity” above for integrity and personal and professional ethics, and an independent mind.additional relevant considerations the Board takes into account. Candidates recommended by shareholders are evaluated in the same manner as director candidates identified by any other means.

Irish law provides that any shareholder or shareholders holding not less than 50% of thepaid-up share capital of the Company carrying voting rights may convene an extraordinary general meeting of the Company. Irish law also provides any shareholder or shareholders holding not less than 10% of thepaid-up share capital of the

82

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Company carrying voting rights may requisition the directors to call an extraordinary general meeting at any time. The shareholders who wish to requisition an extraordinary general meeting must deposit a written notice, at Seagate’s registered office, which is signed

70

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2020 Proxy Statement


 2020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

by the shareholders requisitioning the meeting and states the objects of the meeting. meeting, at Seagate’s registered office set forth above.

If the directors do not, within 21 days of the date of deposit of the requisition, proceed to convene a meeting to be held within two months of that date, those shareholders (or any of them representing more than half of the total voting rights of all of them) may themselves convene a meeting but any meeting so convened cannot be held after the expiration of three months from the date of deposit of the requisition. These provisions of Irish law are in addition to, and separate from, the requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a proposal included in the Proxy Statement under the rules of the SEC.

If a shareholder wishes to communicate with the Board for any other reason, all such communications should be sent in writing, care of the Company Secretary, at the address set forth above.

DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS

Under the Irish Companies Act, 2014, persons must notify us if, as a result of a transaction, they will become interested in 3% or more of our shares or, if as a result of a transaction, the person who was interested in 3% or more of our shares ceases to be so interested. Where a person is interested in 3% or more of our shares, that person must notify us of any alteration in his or her interest that brings his or her total interest through the nearest whole percentage, whether an increase or a reduction. The relevant percentage figure is calculated by reference to the aggregate nominal value of our issued share capital (or any such class of share capital in issue). Where the percentage level of that person’s interest does not amount to a whole percentage, this figure may be rounded down to the next whole number. We must be notified within five business days of the transaction or alteration of the person’s interests that gave rise to the notification requirement. If a person fails to comply with these notification requirements, the person’s interest with respect to any of our ordinary shares that it holds will not be enforceable, either directly or indirectly. However, such person may apply to the Irish High Court to have the rights attaching to such shares reinstated.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

To the extent that this Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into any other filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled “Report of the Compensation Committee” and “Report of the Audit Committee” (to the extent permitted by the rules of the SEC) will not be deemed incorporated, unless specifically provided otherwise in that other filing.

Information contained on, or accessible through, our websitewebsites is not a part of this Proxy Statement and is not deemed incorporated by reference hereunder for any purpose.

ANNUAL REPORT

A copy of our Annual Report onForm 10-K (excluding exhibits) and our Irish Statutory Accounts,statutory financial statements, both for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017,2020, accompany this Proxy Statement. A printed copy of either document, including exhibits, will be furnished without charge to beneficial shareholders or shareholders of record upon request to Investor Relations, Seagate Technology plc, 10200 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014,47488 Kato Road, Fremont, CA 94538, or upon calling +1(408) 658-1222.+1.510.661.1600.

HOUSEHOLDING

SEC rules permit a single set of annual reports and proxy statements to be sent to any household at which two or more shareholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each shareholder continues to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure is referred to as “householding.” While the Company does not follow

 

8371

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 20172020 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

continues to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure is referred to as “householding.” While the Company does not householdhouseholding procedure in mailings to its shareholders of record holders, a number of brokerage firmsbrokers with account holders who are Company shareholders have instituted householding. In these cases, a single Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K will be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once a shareholder has received notice from his or her broker that the broker will be householding communications to the shareholder’s address, householding will continue until the shareholder is notified otherwise or until the shareholder revokes his or her consent. If at any time a shareholder no longer wishes to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statementProxy Statement and annual report, Annual Report on Form 10-K, s/he or she should notify his or her broker. Any shareholder can receive a copy of the Company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-Kby contacting the Company at Investor Relations, Seagate Technology plc, 10200 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014.47488 Kato Road, Fremont, CA 94538. Shareholders who hold their shares through a broker or other nominee who currently receive multiple copies of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker.

 

By Order of the Board,

 

LOGO

Katherine E. Schuelke

Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and

CompanySecretary

August 30, 201731, 2020

 

8472

  

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

 

       20172020 Proxy Statement

 


 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

APPENDIX A: DIRECTORS’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2017Appendix A

APPENDIX B: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLANSeagate Technology plc

Directors’ Report and Financial Statements

For the Year Ended 3 July 2020

85

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC    

    2017 Proxy Statement     


Appendix A

Seagate Technology plc
Directors’ Report and Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 30 June 2017


SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

DIRECTORS’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 June 20173  JULY 2020

Table of Contents

 

Company Information

   A-3 

Directors’ Report

   A-4 

Independent Auditor’s Report

   A-48A-53 

Consolidated Profit and Loss Account

   A-55A-60 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

   A-56A-61 

Consolidated Balance Sheet

   A-57A-62 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

   A-58A-63 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

   A-59A-64 

Parent Company Statement of Comprehensive Income

   A-109A-112 

Parent Company Statement of Financial Position

   A-110A-113 

Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity

   A-111A-114 

Notes to the Parent Company Financial Statements

   A-112A-115 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

COMPANY INFORMATION

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 June 20173 JULY 2020

 

DIRECTORS

  
Mark W. Adams (United States)
  Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

Mark W. Adams (United States)

  Michael R. Cannon

Judy Bruner (United States)

  Mei-Wei Cheng

Michael R. Cannon (United States)

  

William Coleman (United States)

  

Jay L. Geldmacher (United States)

  Stephen J. Luczo

Dylan Haggart (United States)

  Dr. Chong Sup Park

Stephen J. Luczo (United States)

  

Willam D. Mosley (United States)

  Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo

Stephanie Tilenius (United States)

  Stephanie Tilenius (United States)

Edward J. Zander (United States)

SECRETARY

  

Katherine E. Schuelke

REGISTERED OFFICE

  

38/39 Fitzwilliam Square,

  

Dublin 2, Ireland.

  

D02 NX53

REGISTERED NUMBER OF INCORPORATION

  

480010

SOLICITORSSOLICITOR

  

Arthur Cox,

  

Ten Earlsfort Terrace,

  

Dublin 2

  

D02 T380.

AUDITORSAUDITOR

  

Ernst & Young,

  

Chartered Accountants,

  

Ernst & Young Building,

  

Harcourt Centre,

  

Harcourt Street,

  

Dublin 2.

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 June 20173 July 2020

The directors present herewith their report and audited consolidated financial statements of Seagate Technology plc and its subsidiaries for the year ended 30 June 2017.3 July 2020.

In this Directors’ Report, unless the context indicates otherwise, as used herein, the terms “we,” “us,” “group,” “Seagate,” the “Company” and “our” refer to the Seagate Group.group.

REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

We are a leading provider of data storage technology and solutions. Our principal products are hard disk drives, commonly referred to as disk drives, hard drives or HDDs. In addition to HDDs, we produce a broad range of data storage products including solid state drives (“SSD”SSDs”) and their related controllers,, solid state hybrid drives (“SSHD”SSHDs”) and storage subsystems.

Hard disk drivesHDDs are devices that store digitally encoded data on rapidly rotating disks with magnetic surfaces. Disk drivesHDDs continue to be the primary medium of mass data storage due to their performance attributes, reliability, high quality and cost effectiveness. Complementing existing data center storage architecture, solid-state storage devicesarchitectures, SSDs use integrated circuit assemblies as memory to store data, and most SSDs use NAND-basedNAND flash memory. In additioncontrast to HDDs and SSDs, SSHDs combine the features of SSDs and HDDs in the same unit, containing a large hard disk drivehigh-capacity HDD and ana smaller SSD acting as a cache to improve performance of frequently accessed data.

Our HDD products are designed for mission criticalmass capacity storage and nearline applications inlegacy markets. These markets were previously categorized as enterprise servers and storage systems; client compute applications, where our products are designed primarily for desktop and mobile computing; and clientsystems, edge non-compute applications where our products are designed forand edge compute applications. Our HDD and SSD product portfolio includes Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (“SATA”), Serial Attached SCSI (“SAS”) and Non-Volatile Memory Express (“NVMe”) based designs to support a wide variety of end user devices such as portable external storage systems, surveillance systems, network-attached storage (“NAS”), digital video recorders (“DVRs”)mass capacity and gaming consoles.legacy applications.

Our cloud systems andenterprise data solutions extend innovation from the device into the information infrastructure, onsite and in the cloud. Our(“EDS”) portfolio includes modular original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) storage systems andsubsystems for enterprises, cloud service providers, scale-out storage servers.servers and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). Engineered for modularity, mobility, capacity and performance, these solutions include our enterprise HDDs and SSDs, enabling customers to integrate powerful, scalable storage within legacy environments or build new ecosystems from the ground up in a secure, cost-effective manner.

Industry Overview

Data Storage Industry

The data storage industry is comprised ofincludes companies that manufacture components or subcomponents designed for data storage devices, andas well as companies that provide storage solutions, software and services for enterprise cloud, big data, computing platforms and computing platforms.

Markets

consumer markets. The principal markets served byrapid growth of data generation and the intelligent application of data are driving demand for data storage. As more data is created at endpoints outside traditional data centers, requiring processing at the edge and in the core or cloud, the need for data storage industry are:

Enterprise Storage.We define enterprise storage as dedicated storage area networks and hyperscale cloud storage environments. Enterprise data centers run solutions which are designed for mission critical performancemanagement has also increased. These use cases include autonomous vehicles, smart manufacturing systems and nearline high capacity applications.

Mission critical applications are defined as those that are vital to the operation of large-scale enterprise workloads, requiring high performance and high reliability storage solutions. We expect the market for mission

critical enterprise storage solutions to continue to be driven by enterprises utilizing dedicated storage area networks. Our storage solutions are comprised principally of high performance enterprise class disk drives with sophisticated firmware and communications technologies.

Nearline applications are defined as those which require high capacity and energy efficient storage solutions. We expect such applications, which include storage for cloud computing, content delivery and backup services, will continue to grow and drive demand for solutions designed with these attributes. With the increased requirements for storage driven by the creation and consumption of media-rich digital content, we expect the increased exabyte demand will require furtherbuild-out of data centers by cloud service providers and other enterprises which utilize high capacity nearline devices.

Enterprise serial attached SCSI (“SAS”) SSDs are designed to deliver superior performance, reliability and enterprise features to meet the demands ofI/O-intensive applications, with potential for substantial power savings.Non-Volatile Memory Express (“NVMe”) SSDs andadd-in cards are designed to optimize enterprise applications with a persistent, high-performance, high-capacity memory design. They also leverage flash and software to accelerate any server virtualized deployment and moves any big data to the realm of real time.

Client Compute.We define client compute applications as solutions designed for desktop and mobile compute applications ranging from traditional laptops, tablets and convertible systems. As the storage of digital content in the cloud becomes more prominent and accessible, some client compute applications rely less onbuilt-in storage, which is supplemented by cloud computing solutions and branded external hard drives.

ClientNon-Compute.    We define clientnon-compute applications as solutions designed for consumer electronic devices and disk drives used for external storage. Disk drives designed for consumer electronic devices are primarily used in applications such as surveillance systems, NAS and DVRs that require a higher capacity, lowcost-per-gigabyte storage solution. Disk drives for external storage is designed for purposes such as portable external storage, and to augment storage capacity in the consumer’s current desktop, notebook, tablet or DVR devices.smart cities. We believe the proliferation and personal creation of media-rich digital content, further enabled by fifth-generation wireless (“5G”), the edge, the Internet of Things (“IoT”) and artificial intelligence (“AI”), will continue to create increasing consumer demand for higher capacity storage solutions. The new ecosystem is expected to require increasing amounts of data storage both at the edge and in the core.

Markets

The principal data storage markets include:

Cloud SystemsMass Capacity Storage Markets

Mass capacity storage supports high capacity, low-cost per terabyte (“TB”) storage applications, including nearline, video and Solutions.    We define cloud systemsimage applications and solutionsnetwork-attached storage (“NAS”). Mass capacity storage markets represent growing markets that have been increasing as a percentage of our total revenue and in total exabytes shipped in fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, with this trend expected to continue in fiscal year 2021.

Nearline. Nearline applications require mass capacity devices, HDDs as well as mass capacity EDS subsystems that provide cloud basedend-to-end solutions to businesses for the purpose ofscale-out modular and scalable storage. Enterprise storage applications require both high-capacity and energy efficient storage devices to support low total cost of ownership. The EDS solutions and modular systems. Systems can contain HDDs and SSDs and canmay also offer file management systems, software, and even compute power.capabilities to enable both private and public data center applications. We expect this market, which includes storage for cloud computing, content delivery and backup services, to continue to grow and drive increasing exabyte demand.

Video and image and NAS. Video and image applications and NAS drives are specifically designed to ensure the appropriate performance and reliability of the system for surveillance environments (video and image) and network storage environments (NAS). We expect these markets, which includes storage for security and smart video installations, to show long term secular growth in exabyte demand.

Legacy Markets

Legacy markets include mission critical, desktop, notebook, consumer, DVR, and gaming applications. We continue to service these markets but do not plan significant additional investment. These markets have been decreasing as a percentage of our total revenue in fiscal years 2020, 2019, and 2018 and this trend is expected to continue in fiscal year 2021, and the long term outlook is for a decrease in demand for exabytes in these markets.

Mission critical storage. Mission critical applications are defined as those that use very high performance enterprise class HDDs and SSDs with sophisticated firmware to reliably support very high workloads. We expect that enterprises utilizing dedicated storage area networks will continue to drive market demand for mission critical enterprise storage solutions.

Consumer storage. Consumer applications are externally connected storage, both HDD and SSD-based, used to provide backup capabilities, augmented storage capacity, or portable storage for PCs and mobile devices.

Desktop and notebook storage. These applications rely on low cost-per-HDD and SSD devices to provide built-in storage for a wide variety of consumer and business applications.

Gaming storage. This market includes storage for PC-based gaming rigs as well as console gaming applications. The products are optimized for the speed and responsiveness gamers require, and include both internal and external storage options based on HDDs and SSDs.

DVR. DVR applications are HDD storage for video streaming in always-on consumer premise equipment like DVRs and media centers.

Participants in the data storage industry include:

Major subcomponent manufacturers.Companies that manufacture components or subcomponents used in data storage devices or solutions include companies that supply spindle motors, heads and media, and application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”).

Hardware storage solutionsStorage device manufacturers.Companies that transform components into storage products include disk drive manufacturers and semiconductor storage manufacturers which include integratingthat integrate flash memory into storage products such as SSDs.

SystemStorage solutions manufacturers and system integrators. Companies, such as OEMs, that bundle and package storage solutions, into client compute, clientnon-compute or enterprise applications as well as enterprise storage solutions. Distributorsdistributors that integrate storage hardware and software intoend-user applications, and Cloud Service Providerscloud service providers (“CSP”CSPs”) that provide cloud based solutions to businesses for the purpose ofscale-out storage solutions and modular systems, thatand producers of solutions such as storage racks.

Hyperscale data centers.Large hyperscale data center companies, many of which are also includedCSPs, are increasingly designing their own storage subsystems and having them built by contract manufacturers for use inside their own data centers. This trend is reshaping the storage system and subsystem market, driving both innovation in this category.system design and changes in the competitive landscape of large storage system vendors.

Storage services. Companies that provide and host services and solutions, which include storage, backup, archiving, recovery and discovery of data.

Hyperscale Data Centers.Increasingly, large hyperscale data center companies are designing their own storage subsystems and having those built by contract manufacturers for use inside their own data centers. This trend is reshaping the storage system and subsystem market and driving innovation in system design and changes in the competitive landscape of the large storage system vendors.

Demand for Data Storage

The continued advancementInternational Data Corporation (“IDC”) forecasts in the 2020 Seagate-sponsored Data Age 2025 study that the global datasphere should grow from 59 zettabytes in 2020 to 175 zettabytes by 2025. According to IDC, we are fast approaching a new era of the cloud,Data Age, which we expect will have a positive impact on storage demand. The digital transformation has given rise to many new applications, all of which rely on faster access to and secure storage of data proliferating from endpoints through edge to cloud.

The Data Age 2025 study found that data is shifting to both the proliferation of a variety of mobile devices globally, developmentcore and the edge, and by 2025 nearly 80% of the Internetworld’s data will be stored in the core and edge, up from 35% in 2015.

As more applications require real-time decision making, some data processing and storage is moving closer to the network edge. We believe this will result in a buildup of Things (“IoT”), increasingly pervasive useprivate and edge cloud environments that will enable fast and secure access to data throughout the IoT ecosystem. According to IDC, nearly 25% of video surveillance, evolution of consumer electronic devices, and enterprise use of big data analytics are driving the growth of digital content. global datasphere will be real-time by 2025.

Factors contributing to the growth of digital content include:

 

Creation, sharing and consumption of media-rich digital content, such as high-resolution photos, high definition video,videos and digital music through smart phones, tablets, digital cameras, personal video cameras, DVRs, gaming consoles or other digital devices;

Creation, aggregation

Increasing use of video and distribution of digital content through servicesimaging sensors to collect and other offerings suchanalyze data used to improve traffic flow, emergency response times and manufacturing production costs, as Facebook®, Instagram®, iTunes®, Netflix®, Google® and YouTube®;

Newwell as for new surveillance systems whichthat feature higher resolution digital cameras and thus require larger data storage capacities;

Creation and collection of data through the development and evolution of the IoT ecosystem, big data analytics, AI and new technology trends such as self-driving carsautonomous vehicles and drones;drones, smart manufacturing, and smart cities;

Build

The growing use of analytics, especially for action on data created at the edge instead of processing and analyzing at the data center, which is particularly important for verticals such as autonomous vehicles, property monitoring systems, smart manufacturing and others;

Cloud migration initiatives and the ongoing advancement of the cloud, including the build out of large numbers of cloud data centers by cloud service providersCSPs and private companies transitioningon-site data centers into the cloud; and

Protection

Need for protection of increased digital content through redundant storage on backup devices and externally provided storage services.

As a result of these factors, we anticipate that the nature and volume of contentdata being created requireswill require greater storage capability, which is more efficiently and economically facilitated by higher capacity mass storage devices in order to store, manage, distribute, analyze and backup such content. We expect this to support the growth in demand for data storage solutions in developed and emerging economies well into the future.devices.

The amount of data created as well as where and how data is stored continues to evolve with the proliferation of mobile devices, the growth of cloud computing, and the evolving IoT. In addition, the economics of storage infrastructure are also evolving with theevolving. The utilization of public and private hyper-scalehyperscale storage and open-source solutions is reducing the total cost of ownership of storage while increasing the speed and efficiency with which customers can leverage massive computing and storage devices. Accordingly, we expect these trends will continue to create significant demand for data storage products and solutions going forward.

Demand Trends for Disk Drives

We believe that continued growth in digital content requirescreation will require increasingly higher storage capacity in order to store, aggregate, host, distribute, analyze, manage, backupprotect, back up and use such content. We also believe that as architectures evolve to serve thea growing commercial and consumer user base throughout the world, the manner in which hard drives are delivered to market and utilized by our customersstorage solutions will evolve as well.

Mass capacity is and will continue to be the enabler of scale. We expect increased data creation will lead to the expansion of the need for storage in the form of HDDs, EDS and SSDs. While the advance of solid state technology in many end markets is expected to increase, we believe that in the foreseeable future, thecloud, edge and traditional enterprise and client compute markets thatwhich require high-capacity storage solutions and the data intensive clientnon-compute markets will continue to be best served by hard disk drivesHDDs due to the industry’stheir ability to deliver the most cost effective, reliable and energy efficientenergy-efficient mass storage devices although the advance of solid state technology in the above markets is expected to increase as well. Furthermore, the increased use of clientnon-compute devices that both consume media-rich digital content streamed from the cloud and create rich digital content that is stored in the cloud, increases the demand for high capacity hard disk drives in enterprise nearline applications.

devices. We also believe that as hard disk driveHDD capacities continue to increase, a focus exclusively on unit demand

does not reflect the increase in exabytes demand. In recent years, this trend has resulted in demand for exabytes. As demand for higher capacity drives increases, the demand profile has shifted to reflect fewer total HDD units, but with higher average capacity per drive.drive and higher overall exabyte demand.

Industry Supply Balance

From time to time, the HDDstorage industry has experienced periods of imbalance between supply and demand. To the extent that the disk drivestorage industry builds or maintains capacity based on expectations of demand that do not materialize, price erosion may become more pronounced. Conversely, during periods where demand exceeds supply, price erosion is generally muted.

Our Business

Disk Drive TechnologyData Storage Technologies

The design and manufacturing of disk drivesHDDs depends on highly advanced technology and manufacturing techniques and thereforetechniques. Therefore, it requires high levels of research and development spending and capital equipment investments. We design, fabricate and assemble a number of the most important components found in our disk drives, including read/write heads and recording media. Our design and manufacturing operations are based on technology platforms that are used to produce various disk drive products that serve multiple data storage applications and markets. Our core technology platforms, are focused aroundincluding innovations like the throughput-optimizing multi actuator MACH.2 technology and the high-capacity enabling heat-assisted magnetic recording (“HAMR”) technology, focus on the areal density of media and read/write head technologies. Using an integrated platformThis design and manufacturing leverage approach allows us to deliver a portfolio of disk drivestorage products to service a wide range of data storage applications and industries.

Disk drives that we manufacture are commonly differentiated by the following key characteristics:

 

storage capacity, commonly expressed in gigabytes (“GB”) or terabytes (“TB”), which is the amount of data that can be stored on the disk drive;

spindle rotation speed, commonly expressed in revolutions per minute (“RPM”), which has an effect on speed of access to data;

interface transfer rate, commonly expressed in megabytes per second, which is the rate at which data moves between the disk drive and the computer controller;

average seek time, commonly expressed in milliseconds, which is the time needed to position the heads over a selected track on the disk surface;

data transfer rate, commonly expressed in megabytes per second, which is the rate at which data is transferred to and from the disk drive;

input/output operations per second (“IOPS”), commonly expressed in megabytes per second, which is the maximum number of reads and writes to a storage location;

 

storage capacity, commonly expressed in TB, which is the amount of data that can be stored on the disk drive;

spindle rotation speed, commonly expressed in revolutions per minute (“RPM”), which has an effect on speed of access to data;

interface transfer rate, commonly expressed in megabytes per second, which is the rate at which data moves between the disk drive and the computer controller;

average seek time, commonly expressed in milliseconds, which is the time needed to position the heads over a selected track on the disk surface;

data transfer rate, commonly expressed in megabytes per second, which is the rate at which data is transferred to and from the disk drive;

product quality and reliability, commonly expressed in annualized return rates; and

 

energy efficiency, commonly measured by the power output necessary to operate the disk drive.

Areal density is measured by storage capacity per square inch on the recording surface of a disk. The storage capacity of a disk drive is determined by the size and number of disks it contains as well as the areal density capability of these disks.

We have been pursuing, and will continue to pursue, a number of technologies to increase areal densities across the entire rangealso offer SSDs as part of our products for expanding disk drive capacitiesstorage solutions portfolio. Our portfolio includes devices with SATA, SAS and reducing the numberNVMe interfaces. The SSDs differ from HDDs in that they are without mechanical parts.

SSDs store data on NAND flash memory cells, or metal-oxide semiconductor transistors using a charge on a capacitor to represent a binary digit. SSD technology offers fast access to data and robust performance. SSDs complement hyperscale applications, high-density data centers, cloud environments and web servers. They are also used in mission-critical enterprise applications, consumer, gaming and NAS applications.

The SSHDs that we manufacture contain technology that fuses some features of disksSSDs and heads per driveHDDs. They include high capacity HDDs with flash memory that acts as a cache to further reduce product costs.improve performance of frequently accessed data and are primarily targeted at PC gaming applications.

Manufacturing

We primarily design and producemanufacture our own read/write heads and recording media, which are critical technologies for disk drives. This integrated approach enables us to lower costs and to improve the functionality of components so that they work together efficiently.

We believe that because of our vertical design and manufacturing strategy, we are well suitedpositioned to take advantage of the opportunities to leverage the close interdependence of components for disk drives. Our manufacturing efficiency and flexibility are critical elements of our integrated business strategy. We continuously seek to improve our manufacturing efficiency and reduce manufacturing costcosts by:

 

employing manufacturing automation;

 

employing machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence;

improving product quality and reliability;

 

integrating our supply chain with suppliers and customers to enhance our demand visibility and reduce our working capital requirements;

 

coordinating between our manufacturing group and our research and development organization to rapidly achieve volume manufacturing; and

 

operating our facilities at optimal capabilities.capacities.

A vertically integrated model, however, tends to have less flexibility when demand moderatesdeclines as it exposes us to higher unit costs aswhen capacity utilization is not optimized.

Components and Raw Materials

Disk drives incorporate certain components, including a head disk assembly and a printed circuit board mounted to the head disk assembly, which are sealed inside a rigid base and top cover containing the recording components in a contamination controlled environment. We maintain a highly integrated approach to our business by designing and manufacturing a significant portion of the components we view as critical to our products, such as recordingread/write heads and recording media.

Read/Write Heads.The function of the read/write head is to scan across the disk as it spins, magnetically recording or reading information. The tolerances of recordingread/write heads are extremely demanding and requirestate-of-the-art equipment and processes. Our read/write heads are manufactured with thin-film and photolithographic processes similar to those used to produce semiconductor integrated circuits, though challenges inrelated to magnetic film properties and topographical structures are unique to the disk drive industry. We perform all primary stages of design and manufacture of read/write heads at our facilities. We use a combination of internally manufactured and externally sourced read/write heads, the mix of which varies based on product mix, technology and our internal capacity levels.

Media.Information Data is written to or read from the media, or disk, as it rotates at very high speeds past the read/write head. The media is made fromnon-magnetic material,substrates, usually an aluminum alloy or glass and is coated with thin layers of magnetic materials. We use a combination of internally manufactured and externally sourced finished media and aluminum substrates, the mix of which varies based on product mix, technology and our internal capacity levels. We purchase all of our glass substrates from third parties.

Printed Circuit Board Assemblies.The printed circuit board assemblies (“PCBAs”) are comprised of standard and custom ASICs and ancillary electronic control chips. The ASICs control the movement of data to and from the read/write heads and through the internal controller and interface, which communicates with the host computer. The ASICs and control chips form electronic circuitry that delivers instructions to a head

positioning mechanism called an actuator to guide the heads to the selected track of a disk where the data is recorded or retrieved. Disk drive manufacturers use one or more industry standard interfaces such as serial advanced technology architecture (“SATA”); small computer system interface (“SCSI”); SAS;SATA, SCSI, or Fibre Channel (“FC”)SAS to communicate to the host systems. We outsource to third parties the manufacture and assembly of the PCBAs used in our disk drives. We do not manufacture any ASICs, but we participate in their proprietary design.

Head Disk Assembly.The head disk assembly consists of one or more disks attached to a spindle assembly powered by a spindle motor that rotates the disks at a high constant speed around a hub. Read/write heads, mounted on an arm assembly,

similar in concept to that of a record player, fly extremely close to each disk surface and record data on and retrieve it from concentric tracks in the magnetic layers of the rotating disks. The read/write heads are mounted vertically on anE-shaped assembly(“E-block”) that is actuated by a voice-coil motor to allow the heads to move from track to track. TheE-block and the recording media are mounted inside the head disk assembly. We purchase spindle motors from outside vendors and from time to time participate in the design of the motors that go into our products. We use a combination of internally manufactured and externally sourced head disk assemblies.

Disk Drive Assembly.Following the completion of the head disk assembly, it is mated to the PCBA, and the completed unit goes through extensive defect mapping and testingmachine learning prior to packaging and shipment. Disk drive assembly and testmachine learning operations occur primarily at our facilities located in China and Thailand. We perform subassembly and component manufacturing operations at our facilities in China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore, Thailand and in the United States. In addition,

Contract Manufacturing. We outsource the manufacturing and assembly of certain components and products to third parties manufacture and assemble components and disk drive assemblies for us in various countries worldwide. This includes outsourcing the PCBAs used in our disk drives, SSDs and storage subsystems. We continue to participate in the design of our components and products and are directly involved in qualifying key suppliers and components used in our products.

Suppliers of Components and Industry Constraints.There are a limited number of independent suppliers of components, such as recording heads and media, available to disk drive manufacturers. Vertically integrated disk drive manufacturers like us, who manufacture their own components, are less dependent on external component suppliers than less vertically integrated disk drive manufacturers. However, our business has been adversely affected by our suppliers’ capacity constraints in the past and this could occur in the future.

Commodity and Other Manufacturing Costs.The production of disk drives requires rare earth elements, precious metals, scarce alloys and industrial commodities, which are subject to fluctuations in pricesprice and the supply of which has at times been constrained. In addition to increased costs of components and commodities, volatility in fuel and other transportation costs may also increase our costs related to commodities, manufacturing and freight. As a result, we may increase our use of ocean shipmentsalternative shipment methods to help offset any increase in freight costs, and we will continually review various forms of shipments and routes in order to minimize the exposure to higher freight costs.

Products

We offer a broad range of storage solutions for the enterprise, data center, client computemass capacity storage and clientnon-computelegacy applications. We offersupply more than one product within each product category and differentiate products on the basis of capacity, performance, product quality, reliability, price, performance, form factor, capacity, interface, power consumption efficiency, security features and other customer integration requirements. Our industry is characterized by continuous and significant advances in technology whichthat contribute to rapid product life cycles. We listCurrently our main current product offerings below.include:

Mass Capacity Storage

Enterprise Storage

Enterprise PerformanceNearline HDDs. Our 10,000 and 15,000 RPM Enterprise Performance disk drives feature increased throughput and improved energy efficiency, targeted at high random performance server application needs. Performance 10,000 RPMhigh-capacity enterprise HDDs ship in storage capacities ranging from 300GB to 2.4TB, and our 15,000 RPM HDDs ship in storage capacities ranging from 146GB to 900GB.

Enterprise Capacity and Archive HDDs.Our Enterprise Capacity disk drives ship in2.5-inch and3.5-inch form factors and in storage capacities of up to 12TB that mainly rotate at a speed of 7,200 RPM.18TB. These products

are designed for bulkmass capacity data storage in the core and at the edge, server environments and cloud systems that require high capacity, enterprise reliability, energy efficiency and integrated security, andsecurity. They are available in SATA and SAS interfaces. Our Archive HDDs provide up to 8TB oflow-cost storage designed specifically for active archive storage environments in cloud data centers where very low cost and power are paramount.

Enterprise Nearline SSDs. Our enterprise SSDs are designed for high-performance, hyperscale, high-density and cloud applications. They are offered with multiple interfaces, including SAS, SSD are availableSATA, and NVMe and in capacities up to 3.8TB15TB.

Enterprise Nearline Systems. Our systems portfolio provides modular storage system components to expand and upgrade data centers and other enterprise applications. They feature 12GB per second interface to deliver the speed, scalability and consistency needed for demanding enterprise storagesecurity. Our capacity-optimized systems feature multiple configurations and server applications. We also offer a wide range of NVMe and SATA interface SSDs andadd-in cards in our Nytro family with capacitiescan accommodate up to 7.7TB.106 16TB drives. Our performance-optimized systems include an all-flash array for critical workloads demanding the highest performance.

Client Compute

Desktop HDDsVideo and SSHDs.    Our3.5-inch desktop drives ship in both traditional HDD and SSHD configurations and offer up to 10TB of capacity. Desktop drives are designed for applications such as personal computers and workstations.

Mobile HDDs and SSHDs.Image. Our family of2.5-inch laptop drives ship in a variety of capacities (up to 5TB)video and technologies (HDD and SSHD) to support mobile needs. Used in applications ranging from traditional laptops, convertible systems and external storage, our drives are built to address a range of performance needs and sizes for affordable, high capacity storage.

ClientNon-Compute

Surveillance HDDs.    Our surveillance drivesimage HDDs are built to support the high-write workload of analways-on, always-recording video surveillance system. These surveillance optimized drives are built to support the growing needs of the surveillancevideo imaging market with support for multiple hard drive (“HD”) streams and capacities up to 10TB.16TB.

NAS HDDs.NAS. Our NAS drives are built to support the performance and reliability demanded by small and medium businesses, and incorporate interface software with custom-built health management, error recovery controls, power settings and vibration tolerance. Our NAS HDD solutions are available in capacities up to 10TB.16TB. We also offer NAS SSDs with capacities up to 3.8TB.

Legacy Applications

Video HDDs.Mission Critical HDDs and SSDs. We continue to support 10,000 and 15,000 RPM HDDs, offered in capacities up to 2.4TB, which enable increased throughput while improving energy efficiency. Our enterprise SSDs are available in capacities up to 15TB, with endurance options up to 10 drive writes per day and various interfaces. Our SSDs deliver the speed and consistency required for demanding enterprise storage and server applications.

Consumer Solutions. Our external storage solutions are shipped under the Seagate Backup Plus and Expansion product lines, as well as under the LaCie and Maxtor brand names. These product lines are available in capacities up to 16TB. We strive to deliver the best customer experience by leveraging our core technologies, offering services such as Seagate Recovery Services (data recovery) and partnering with leading brands such as Xbox, Sony and Adobe.

Desktop Drives. Our 3.5-inch desktop drives offer up to 14TB of capacity for HDD and up to 2TB for SSD. Desktop drives are designed for applications such as personal computers and workstations.

Notebook Drives. Our Video2.5-inch notebook drives offer up to 5TB for HDD and up to 2TB for SSD. Used in applications such as traditional notebooks, convertible systems and external storage, our drives are built to address a range of performance needs and sizes for affordable, high-capacity storage.

DVR. Our DVR HDDs are used in video applications like DVR’s and media centers. These disk drives are optimized for video streaming inalways-on consumer premise equipment applications with capacities up to 4TB to support leading-edge digital entertainment.

Gaming HDDs.Gaming. Gaming HDDsOurgaming SSDs are specifically optimized internal storage for console gaming usage.rigs. These products are designed to enhance the gaming experience during game-loadgame load and game-playgame play and are available in capacities up to 2TB.4TB for SSD.

CustomersBranded Solutions.    Our external backup storage solutions are shipped under the Backup Plus and Expansion product lines, as well as under the Maxtor and LaCie brand names. These product lines are available in capacities up to 120TB.

Customers

We sell our products to major OEMs, distributors and retailers.

The following table summarizes our HDD revenue by channel and by geography:

       Fiscal Years Ended     
   30 June
2017
  1 July
2016
 

Revenues by Channel (%)

   

OEM

   67  69

Distributors

   18  17

Retail

   15  14

Revenues by Geography (%)(1)

   

Americas

   31  29

EMEA

   17  17

Asia Pacific

   52  54

(1)Revenue is attributed to countries based on the shipping location.

OEM customers, including large hyperscale data center companies and CSPs, typically enter into master purchase agreements with us. These agreements provide for pricing, volume discounts, order lead times, product support obligations and other terms and conditions including sales programs offered to promote selected products. Deliveries are scheduled only after receipt of purchase orders. In addition, with limited lead-time, customers may defer most purchase orders without significant penalty. Anticipated orders from many of our customers have in the past failed to materialize or OEM delivery schedules have been deferred or altered as a result of changes in their business needs.

Our distributors generally enter intonon-exclusive agreements for the resale of our products. They typically furnish us with anon-binding indication of their near-term requirements and product deliveries are generally scheduled accordingly. The agreements and related sales programs typically provide the distributors with limited rightrights of return and price protection rights. In addition, we offer sales programs to distributors on a quarterly and periodic basis to promote the sale of selected products in the sales channel.

Our retail channel consists of our branded storage products sold to retailers either by us directly or by our distributors. Retail sales made by us or our distributors typically require greater marketing support, sales incentives and price protection periods.

In fiscal years 2017 and 2016, Dell Inc. accounted for approximately 10% and 12% of consolidated revenue, respectively. In fiscal year 2016, HP Inc., formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, completed its separation with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, and each company accounted for less than 10% of our consolidated revenue in both fiscal year 2017 and 2016. See “Principal Risks andUncertainties-We may be adversely affected by the loss of, or reduced, delayed or canceled purchases by, one or more of our major customers”

Competition

We compete primarily with manufacturers of hard drives used in the enterprise, client computemass capacity storage and clientnon-compute applications. We are also a supplier of Enterprise SSDs, NVMeadd-in cards, cloud storage solutionslegacy markets and storage subsystems through our acquisitions. The markets that we participate in are highly competitive. Disk drive manufacturers compete for a limited number of major disk drive customers but also compete with other companies in the data storage industry that provide SSDs and NVMeadd-in technology.EDS. Some of the principal factors used by customers to differentiate among data storage solutions manufacturers are storage capacity, product performance, product quality and reliability, price per unit and price per gigabyte,time-to-market andtime-to-volume leadership,TB, storage/retrieval access times, data transfer rates, form factor,

product warranty and

support capabilities, supply continuity and flexibility, power consumption, total cost of ownership and brand. While different markets and customers place varying levels of emphasis on these factors, we believe that our products are competitive with respect to many of these factors in the markets that we currently address.compete in.

Principal Disk Drive Competitors.    There are three companiesWe compete with manufacturers of storage solutions and the other principal manufacturers in the data storage solution industry that manufacture disk drives:include:

Seagate, selling the Seagate, LaCie

Micron Technology, Inc.;

Samsung Electronics;

SK hynix, Inc.;

Kioxia Holdings Corporation;

Toshiba Corporation; and Maxtor brands;

Western Digital Corporation, operating the Western Digital, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies subsidiaries and SanDisk; andSanDisk brands.

Toshiba Corporation.

Other Competition.We are seeing direct competition from SSD’s that is adversely impacting demand for HDD in some markets including Notebook and Enterprise Mission Critical. We expect that this trend will continue although we believe both product types will be required in the market to satisfy the growing demand for data storage.

Price Erosion.Historically, our industry has been characterized by price declines for disk drivedata storage products with comparablecapacity, performance and feature sets(“like-for-like products”). Price declines forlike-for-like products (“price erosion”) tend to be more pronounced during periods of:

economic contraction in which competitors may use discounted pricing to attempt to maintain or gain market share;

few new product introductions when competitors have comparable or alternative product offerings; and

industry supply exceeding demand.

Disk driveData storage manufacturers typically attempt to offset price erosion with an improved mix of disk drivedata storage products characterized by higher capacity, better performance and additional feature sets and product cost reductions.

We believe the HDD industry experienced modest price erosion in fiscal years 20172020 and 2016.2019.

Product Life Cycles and Changing Technology.Success in our industry has been dependent to a large extent on the ability to balance the introduction and transition of new products withtime-to-volume, performance, capacity and quality metrics at a competitive price, level of service and support that our customers expect. Generally, the drive manufacturer that introduces a new product first benefits from improved product mix, favorable profit margins and less pricing pressure until comparable products are introduced. Changing technology also necessitateson-going investments in research and development, which may be difficult to recover due to rapid product life cycles and economic declines. Further, there is a continued need to successfully execute product transitions and new product introductions, as factors such as quality, reliability and manufacturing yields continue to be of significant competitive importance.

Seasonality

The disk drive industryVariability of sales can be related to the timing of IT spending or a reflection of cyclical demand from CSPs based on the timing of their procurement and deployment requirements and the supply and demand balance of other components such as NAND and DRAM. Our legacy markets traditionally experiencesexperience seasonal variability in demand with higher levels of demand in the second half of the calendar year. This seasonality is driven by consumer spending in theback-to-school season from late summer to fall and the traditional holiday shopping season from fall to winter.

Research and Development

We are committed to developing new component technologies, products and alternative storage technologies. Our research and development focus is designed to bring new products to market in high volume, with quality attributes that our customers expect, before our competitors. Part of our product development strategy is to leverage a design platform and/or subsystem within product families to serve different market needs. This platform strategy allows for more efficient resource utilization, leverages best design practices, reduces exposure to changes in demand, and allows for achievement of lower costs

through purchasing economies. Our advanced technology integration effort focuses disk drive and component research on recording subsystems, including read/write heads and recording media; market-specific product technology; and technology we believe may lead to new business opportunities. The primary purpose of our advanced technology integration effort is to ensure timely availability of mature component technologies for our product development teams as well as to allow us to leverage and coordinate those technologies in the design centers across our products in order to take advantage of opportunities in the marketplace.

Patents and Licenses

As of 3 July 2020, we had approximately 5,300 US patents and 1,200 patents issued in various foreign jurisdictions as well as approximately 700 US and 400 foreign patent applications pending. The number of patents and patent applications will vary at any given time as part of our ongoing patent portfolio management activity. Due to the rapid technological change that characterizes the data storage industry, we believe that, in addition to patent protection, the improvement of existing products, reliance upon trade secrets, protection of unpatented proprietary know-how and development of new products are also important to our business in establishing and maintaining a competitive advantage. Accordingly, we intend to continue our efforts to broadly protect our intellectual property, including obtaining patents, where available, in connection with our research and development program.

The data storage industry is characterized by significant litigation arising from time to time relating to patent and other intellectual property rights. From time to time, we receive claims that our products infringe patents of third parties. Although we have been able to resolve some of those claims or potential claims without a material adverse effect on us, other claims have resulted in adverse decisions or settlements. In addition, other claims are pending, which if resolved unfavorably to us could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. For more information on these claims, see “Note 14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies.” The costs of engaging in intellectual property litigation in the past have been, and in the future may be, substantial, irrespective of the merits of the claim or the outcome.

Backlog

In view of industry practice, whereby customers may cancel or defer orders with little or no penalty, we believe backlog for our business is of limited indicative value in estimating future performance and results.

Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to US laws and regulations in the various jurisdictions in which we operate relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Some of our operations require environmental permits and controls to prevent and reduce air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities.

We have established environmental management systems and continually update environmental policies and standard operating procedures for our operations worldwide. We believe that our operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and permits. We budget for operating and capital costs on an ongoing basis to comply with environmental laws. If additional or more stringent requirements are imposed on us in the future, we could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures.

Some environmental laws, such as the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (as amended, the “Superfund” law) a US law, and its state equivalents, can impose liability for the cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former site owners or operators or upon parties who sent waste to these sites, regardless of whether the owner or operator owned the site at the time of the release of hazardous substances or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. We have been identified as a responsible or potentially responsible party at several sites. Based on current estimates of cleanup costs and our expected allocation of these costs, we do not expect costs in connection with these sites to be material.

We may be subject to various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing environmental matters, including those restricting the presence of certain substances in electronic products. For example, the European Union (“EU”) enacted the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (2011/65/EU), which prohibits the use of certain substances, including lead, in certain products, including disk drives and server storage products, put on the market after 1 July 2006. Similar legislation has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, China and Japan. The EU REACH Directive (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals, EC 1907/2006) also restricts substances of very high concern in products. If we or our suppliers fail to comply with the substance restrictions, recycle requirements or other environmental requirements as they are enacted worldwide, it could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

Employees

At 3 July 2020, we employed approximately 42,000 employees and temporary employees worldwide, of which approximately 35,000 were located in our Asia operations. We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified employees at all levels. We believe that our employee relations are good.

REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BUSINESS

Fiscal Year 2020 Summary

During fiscal year 2020, we shipped 442 exabytes of HDD storage capacity. We generated revenue of $10.5 billion and gross profit of 27% and our operating cash flow was $1.7 billion. We repurchased $1,137 million of certain outstanding senior notes, exchanged $456 million of certain senior notes to longer duration notes, borrowed $500 million under our term loan facility (“Term Loan”) and issued $500 million of new senior notes. We repurchased approximately 17 million of our ordinary shares for 850 million and paid $673 million in dividends. Additionally, we changed our estimate of the useful lives of our manufacturing equipment from a range of three to five years to a range of three to seven years. The effect of this change in estimate increased the fiscal year 2020 net income by $134 million.

Impact of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a widespread health crisis and numerous disease control measures being taken to limit its spread, the effects of which began during our quarter ended April 3, 2020. We incurred certain supply chain and demand disruptions during the fiscal year 2020, as well as factory under-utilization and higher logistics and operational costs and softer demand across our markets due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which we expect to continue into our fiscal year 2021. Our customers also experienced certain supply chain and demand disruptions in our fourth fiscal quarter 2020, which we anticipate will continue into fiscal year 2021. We are continuing to actively monitor the effects and potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of our business, liquidity and capital resources. We are complying with governmental rules and guidelines across all of our sites and are actively working on opportunities to lower our cost structure and drive further operational efficiencies. Although we are unable to predict the impact of COVID-19 on our business, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources at this time, we expect we will be negatively affected if the pandemic and related public and private health measures result in substantial manufacturing or supply chain problems, substantial reductions in demand due to disruptions in the operations of our customers or partners, disruptions in local and global economies, volatility in the global financial markets, sustained reductions or volatility in overall demand trends, restrictions on the export or shipment of our products, or other ramifications from the COVID-19 pandemic. For further discussion of the uncertainties and business risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, see the “Principal Risk and Uncertainties” section of the Directors’ Report.

Results of Operations

We list in the tables below summarized information from our Consolidated Profit and Loss Account by dollar amounts and as a percentage of revenue:    

  Fiscal Years Ended

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
2020
 28 June
2019

Revenue

 

 $

  10,509

 

 $

  10,390

Cost of revenue

 

 

7,667

 

 

7,458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

  2,842  2,932

Product development

 

 

973

 

 

991

Marketing and administrative

 

 

473

 

 

453

Amortization of intangibles

 

 

14

 

 

23

Restructuring and other, net

 

 

82

 

 

(22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

  1,300  1,487

Other income and charges, net

 

 

(268

 

 

(115

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before taxes

  1,032  1,372

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

28

 

 

(640

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

  $1,004  $2,012
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Fiscal Years Ended

(As a percentage of Revenue)

 3 July
2020
 28 June
2019

Revenue

 

 

        100

 

 

        100

Cost of revenue

 

 

73

 

 

72

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

  27  28

Product development

 

 

9

 

 

10

Marketing and administrative

 

 

5

 

 

4

Amortization of intangibles

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring and other, net

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

 

 

12

 

 

14

Other income and charges, net

 

 

(2

 

 

(1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before taxes

 

 

10

 

 

13

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

 

 

 

(6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

10

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table summarizes information regarding consolidated revenues by channel, geography, and market and HDD exabytes shipped by market and price per terabyte:

      Fiscal Years Ended    
  3 July
2020
 28 June
2019

Revenues by Channel (%)

  

OEMs

 

 

71

 

 

70

Distributors

 

 

17

 

 

17

Retailers

 

 

12

 

 

13

Revenues by Geography (%) (1)

  

Asia Pacific

 

 

48

 

 

49

Americas

 

 

34

 

 

32

EMEA

 

 

18

 

 

19

Revenues by Market (%)

  

Mass capacity

  53  43

Legacy

  39  50

Other

  8  7
  

HDD Exabytes Shipped by Market

  

Mass capacity

  317  202

Legacy

  125  145
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

      442      347
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

HDD Price per Terabyte

  $    22  $    28

(1) Revenue is attributed to countries based on the bill from location.

Revenue

  Fiscal Years Ended       

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
2020
  28 June
2019
    Change    %
  Change  
 

Revenue

 

 $

 10,509 

 

 $

 10,390 

 

 $

    119 

 

 

1%

 

Revenue in fiscal year 2020 increased approximately 1% or $119 million, from fiscal year 2019, primarily due to an increase in mass capacity storage exabytes shipped, partially offset by price erosion and a decrease in legacy exabytes shipped.

Gross Profit

  Fiscal Years Ended    

(US Dollars in millions)

   3 July  
2020
   28 June  
2019
   Change   %
  Change  

Cost of revenue

 

 $

  7,667

 

 $

  7,458

 

 $

      209

 

 

3

Gross profit

 

 $

  2,842

 

 $

  2,932

 

 $

      (90

 

 

(3

)% 

Gross profit percentage

 

 

27

 

 

28

  

For fiscal year 2020, gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased compared to the prior fiscal year due to price erosion and higher logistics costs and factory under-utilization due to COVID-19-related disruptions, partially offset by improved product mix and lower depreciation expense due to the change in useful lives of our manufacturing equipment in the quarter ended 4 October 2019.

Operating Expenses

  Fiscal Years Ended    

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
2020
 28 June
2019
 Change %
Change

Product development

 

 $

973

 

 

 $

991 

 

 $

(18

 

 

(2

)% 

Marketing and administrative

 

 

473

 

 

453

 

 

20

 

 

4

Amortization of intangibles

 

 

14

 

 

23

 

 

(9

 

 

(39

)% 

Restructuring and other, net

 

 

82

 

 

(22

 

 

104

 

 

(473

)% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

 $

    1,542

 

 $

    1,445

 

 $

          97

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product Development Expense.    Product development expenses for fiscal year 2020 decreased by $18 million from fiscal year 2019 primarily due to a $21 million decrease in depreciation expense and an $18 million decrease in materials expense, partially offset by a $13 million increase in outside services expense, an $8 million increase in variable compensation expense and a $7 million increase in compensation and other employee benefits.

Marketing and Administrative Expense.    Marketing and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2020 increased by $20 million from fiscal year 2019 primarily due to a $13 million increase in other general expenses, an $11 million increase in outside services expense, a $6 million increase in share-based compensation expense and a $5 million increase in variable compensation expense, partially offset by a $5 million decrease in compensation and other employee benefits and a $4 million decrease in depreciation expense.

Amortization of Intangibles.    Amortization of intangibles for fiscal year 2020 decreased by $9 million, as compared to fiscal year 2019, due to certain intangible assets that reached the end of their useful lives.

Restructuring and Other, net.    Restructuring and other, net for fiscal year 2020 was $82 million, primarily comprised of restructuring charges related to the restructuring plan the Company committed to on 1 June 2020 to reduce our workforce by approximately 500 employees and charges related to a voluntary early exit program and other restructuring plans.

Restructuring and other, net for fiscal year 2019 was comprised of a $75 million net gain from the sale of a certain property partially offset by charges related to a voluntary early exit program.

Other income and charges, net

  Fiscal Years Ended    

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
2020
 28 June
2019
 Change %
  Change   

Other income and charges, net

 

 $

     (268)

 

 

 $

     (115)

 

 

 $

      (153)

 

 

 

133

Other income and charges, net for fiscal year 2020 increased by $153 million, as compared to fiscal year 2019 mainly due to $80 million of non-recurring income, net in fiscal year 2019 related to our previous investment in Toshiba Memory Holdings Corporation (“TMHC”), now known as Kioxia, which was redeemed in fiscal year 2019, a $62 million loss resulting from the repurchase of certain long-term debt, an $18 million strategic investment impairment and an $11 million net increase in losses due to unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by a $20 million decrease in interest expense related to the repurchase of certain long-term debt.

Income Taxes

  Fiscal Years Ended    

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
2020
 28 June
2019
 Change %
  Change  

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 $

         28 

 

 $

     (640)

 

 

 $

     668 

 

 

(104

)% 

We recorded an income tax expense of $28 million for fiscal year 2020 compared to an income tax benefit of $640 million for fiscal year 2019. Our fiscal year 2020 income tax expense included net tax benefits of approximately $12 million associated with share-based compensation expense and $16 million associated with the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets driven by our profitability outlook in the US. Our fiscal year 2019 income tax benefit included a net tax benefit of $761 million primarily associated with the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets driven by improvements in our profitability outlook in the US, including our efforts to structurally and operationally align our EDS business with the rest of the Company.

Our Irish tax resident parent holding company owns various US and non-Irish subsidiaries that operate in multiple non-Irish income tax jurisdictions. Our worldwide operating income is either subject to varying rates of income tax or is exempt from income tax due to tax incentive programs we operate under in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. These tax incentives are scheduled to expire in whole or in part at various dates through 2025. Certain tax incentives may be extended if specific conditions are met.

Our income tax expense recorded for fiscal year 2020 differed from the expense for income taxes that would be derived by applying the Irish statutory rate of 25% to income before income taxes, primarily due to the net effect of (i) tax benefits related to non-US and non-Irish earnings generated in jurisdictions that are subject to tax incentive programs and are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland; and (ii) tax benefits related to research credits. Our income tax benefit recorded for fiscal year 2019 differed from the income tax expense that would be derived by applying the Irish statutory rate of 25% to income before income taxes, primarily due to the net effect of (i) a decrease in valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets, primarily driven by improvements in our profitability outlook in the US; and (ii) tax benefits related to non-US and non-Irish earnings generated in jurisdictions that are subject to tax incentive programs and are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland.

Based on our non-Irish ownership structure and subject to (i) potential future increases in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets; and (ii) a future change in our intention to indefinitely reinvest earnings from our subsidiaries outside of Ireland, we anticipate that our effective tax rate in future periods will generally be less than the Irish statutory rate.

On 27 March 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law in the US. We have concluded the tax provisions of the CARES Act did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2020.

During the fiscal year ended 3 July 2020, tax legislation was enacted, which becomes effective in our fiscal years 2020 and 2021. We have concluded these tax legislation changes have no material impact to our consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2020.

We generated a net income of $1.0 billion and $2.0 billion for the fiscal years ended 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019, respectively. These amounts have been transferred to reserves.

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Our operations expose us to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our business, operating results and financial condition, as well as the operations and financial performance of many of the customers and suppliers in industries that we serve. We are unable to predict the extent to which the pandemic and related effects will adversely impact our business operations, financial performance, results of operations, financial position and the achievement of our strategic objectives.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a widespread health crisis and numerous disease control measures being taken to limit its spread. The impact of the pandemic on our business has included or could in the future include:

disruptions to or restrictions on our ability to ensure the continuous manufacture and supply of our products and services, including insufficiency of our existing inventory levels;

temporary closures or reductions in operational capacity of our facilities or the facilities of our direct or indirect suppliers or customers;

permanent closures of our direct and indirect suppliers, resulting in adverse effects to our supply chain;

temporary shortages of skilled employees available to staff manufacturing facilities due to stay at home orders and travel restrictions within as well as into and out of countries;

increases in operational expenses and other costs related to requirements implemented to mitigate the impact of the pandemic;

supply chain disruptions;

delays or limitations on the ability of our customers to perform or make timely payments;

reductions in short- and long-term demand for our products, or other disruptions in technology buying patterns;

adverse effects on economies and financial markets globally or in various markets throughout the world, potentially leading to a prolonged economic downturn or reductions in business and consumer spending, which may result in decreased net revenue, gross margins, or earnings and/or in increased expenses and difficulty in managing inventory levels;

delays to and/or lengthening of our sales or development cycles or qualification activity;

challenges for us, our direct and indirect suppliers and our customers in obtaining financing due to turmoil in financial markets;

workforce disruptions due to illness, quarantines, governmental actions, other restrictions, and/or the social distancing measures we have taken to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 at certain of our locations around the world in an effort to protect the health and well-being of our employees, customers, suppliers and of the communities in which we operate (including working from home, restricting the number of employees attending events or meetings in person, limiting the number of people in our buildings and factories at any one time, further restricting access to our facilities, suspending employee travel and inability to meet in person with customers);

increased vulnerability to cyberattacks due to the significant number of employees working remotely; and

our management team continuing to commit significant time, attention and resources to monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic and seeking to mitigate its effects on our business and workforce.

The ultimate extent of the impact of COVID-19 on our business, financial condition and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time. These impacts, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Such effect may be exacerbated in the event the pandemic and the measures taken in response to it, and their effects, persist for an extended period of time, or if there is a resurgence of the outbreak. Under any of these circumstances, the resumption of normal business operations may be delayed or hampered by lingering effects of COVID-19 on our operations, direct and indirect suppliers, partners, and customers.

We operate in highly competitive markets and our failure to anticipate and respond to technological changes and other market developments, including price, could harm our ability to compete.

We face intense competition in the data storage industry. Our principal sources of competition include:

disk drive and SSD manufacturers, such as Micron Technology, Inc., Samsung Electronics, SK hynix, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Kioxia Holdings Corporation and Western Digital Corporation; and

companies that provide storage subsystems and components to OEMs, including electronic manufacturing services (“EMS”) and contract electronic manufacturing (“CEM”).

The markets for our data storage products are characterized by technological change, which is driven in part by the adoption of new industry standards. These standards provide mechanisms to ensure technology component interoperability but they also hinder our ability to innovate or differentiate our products. When this occurs, our products may be deemed commodities, which could result in downward pressure on prices.

We also experience competition from other companies that produce alternative storage technologies such as flash memory, where increasing capacity, decreasing cost, energy efficiency and improvements in performance have resulted in increased competition with our lower capacity, smaller form factor disk drives. Some customers for both mass capacity storage and legacy markets have adopted SSDs as an alternative to hard drives in certain applications. Further adoption of alternative storage technologies may limit our total addressable HDD market, impact the competitiveness of our product portfolio and reduce our market share. Any resulting increase in competition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the barriers to entry into our markets could be lowered, allowing large EMS and CEM companies that utilize general-purpose design skills to enter our markets and reduce the value of our specialized research and design skills. If our markets become more commoditized and we fail to deliver innovative, alternative products to our customers or match the price declines or cost efficiencies, we will have difficulty competing against the large EMS and CEM companies. This could result in lower profit margins or a loss of market share. Any significant decline in our market share in any of our principal markets would adversely affect our results of operations.

We must plan our investments in our products and incur costs before we have customer orders or know about the market conditions at the time the products are produced. If we fail to predict demand accurately for our products or if the markets for our products change, we may be unable to meet demand or we may have insufficient demand, which may materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our industry operates primarily on quarterly purchasing cycles, with most of the orders typically coming at the end of each quarter. Our manufacturing process requires us to make significant product-specific investments in inventory each quarter for production in that quarter or a specific quarter in the future. As a result, we incur inventory and manufacturing costs in advance of anticipated sales that may never materialize or that may be substantially lower than expected. If actual demand for our products is lower than the forecast, we may also experience higher inventory carrying costs, manufacturing rework costs and product obsolescence. Conversely, if we underestimate demand, we may have insufficient inventory to satisfy demand and may have to forego sales.

Other factors that have affected and may continue to affect our ability to anticipate or meet the demand for our products and adversely affect our results of operations include:

competitive product announcements or technological advances that result in excess supply when customers cancel purchases in anticipation of newer products;

variable demand resulting from unanticipated upward or downward pricing pressures;

our ability to successfully qualify, manufacture and sell our data storage products;

changes in our product mix, which may adversely affect our gross profits;

manufacturing delays or interruptions, particularly at our manufacturing facilities in China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore, Thailand or the United States;

limited access to components that we obtain from a single or a limited number of suppliers; and

the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the cost of producing our products and the effective price of our products to non-U.S. customers.

In addition, we derive a portion of our revenues in each quarter from a small number of relatively large orders. If one or more of our key customers decides to defer or cancel a purchase order or delay product acceptance in any given quarter, our revenues for that quarter may be significantly reduced and fall below our expectations. Conversely, if one of our key customers unexpectedly increases its orders, we may be unable to produce the additional product volumes in a timely manner or take advantage of any overall increased market demand. This could damage our customer relationships and reputation, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

Changes in demand for computer systems, data storage subsystems and consumer electronic devices may in the future cause a decline in demand for our products.

Our products are components in computers, data storage systems and consumer electronic devices. Historically, the demand for these products has been volatile. Unexpected slowdowns in demand for computers, data storage subsystems or consumer electronic devices generally result in sharp declines in demand for our products. Declines in customer spending on the systems and devices that incorporate our products could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and on our financial condition and results of operations. Uncertain global economic and business conditions can exacerbate these risks.

Sales to the legacy markets remain an important part of our business. These markets, however, have been, and we expect them to continue to be, adversely affected by:

announcements or introductions of major new operating systems or semiconductor improvements or shifts in customer preferences, performance requirements and behavior, such as the shift to tablet computers, smart phones, NAND flash memory or similar devices;

longer product life cycles; and

changes in macroeconomic conditions that cause customers to spend less, such as the imposition of new tariffs, increased laws and regulations, and increased unemployment levels.

We believe these announcements and introductions from time to time have caused customers to defer or cancel their purchases, making certain inventory obsolete. Whenever an oversupply of products in the market causes participants in our industry to have higher than anticipated inventory levels, we experience even more intense price competition from other manufacturers than usual, which may materially adversely affect our financial results. We believe that the deterioration of demand for disk drives in certain of the legacy markets has accelerated, and this deterioration may continue or further accelerate, which could cause our operating results to suffer.

In addition, the demand for legacy markets products is volatile. This volatility may be exacerbated by competing alternative storage technologies, such as flash memory, which meet customers’ cost and capacity metrics. Unpredictable fluctuations in demand for our products or rapid shifts in demand from our products to alternative storage technologies could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

We are dependent on our long-term investments to manufacture adequate products. Our investment decisions in adding new assembly and test capacity require significant planning and lead-time, and a failure to accurately forecast demand for our products could cause us to over-invest or under-invest, which would lead to excess capacity, under-utilization charges, impairments or loss of sales and revenue opportunities.

Our ability to increase our revenue and maintain our market share depends on our ability to successfully introduce and achieve market acceptance of new products on a timely basis.

The markets for our products are characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and technology enhancements, uncertain product life cycles and changes in customer demand.

Historically, our results of operations have substantially depended upon our ability to be among the first-to-market with new data storage product offerings. We may face technological, operational and financial challenges in developing new

products. In addition, our investments in new product development may not yield the anticipated benefits. Our market share, revenue and results of operations in the future may be adversely affected if we fail to:

consistently maintain our time-to-market performance with our new products;

produce these products in adequate volume;

qualify these products with key customers on a timely basis by meeting our customers’ performance and quality specifications; or

achieve acceptable manufacturing yields, quality and costs with these products.

Accordingly, we cannot accurately determine the ultimate effect that our new products will have on our results of operations. Our failure to accurately anticipate customers’ needs and accurately identify the shift in technological changes could materially adversely affect our long-term financial results.

In addition, the limited number of high-volume OEMs magnifies the potential effect of missing a product qualification opportunity. If the delivery of our products is delayed, our OEM customers may use our competitors’ products to meet their production requirements.

We cannot assure you that we will be among the leaders in time-to-market with new products or that we will be able to successfully qualify new products with our customers in the future. If our new products are not successful, our future results of operations may be adversely affected.

If our products do not keep pace with technological changes, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

Our customers demand new generations of storage products as advances in computer hardware and software have created the need for improved storage products, with features such as increased storage capacity, enhanced security, improved performance and reliability and lower cost. We, and our competitors, have developed improved products, and we will need to continue to do so in the future. If we are unable to develop new products, identify business strategies and timely introduce competitive product offerings to meet technological shifts, or we are unable to execute successfully, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

When we develop new products with higher capacity and more advanced technology, our results of operations may decline because the increased difficulty and complexity associated with producing these products increases the likelihood of reliability, quality or operability problems. If our products experience increases in failure rates, are of low quality or are not reliable, customers may reduce their purchases of our products, our factory utilization may decrease and our manufacturing rework and scrap costs and our service and warranty costs may increase. In addition, a decline in the reliability of our products may make it more difficult for us to effectively compete with our competitors.

Additionally, we may be unable to produce new products that have higher capacities and more advanced technologies in the volumes and timeframes that are required to meet customer demand. We are transitioning to key areal density recording technologies that use HAMR technology to increase HDD capacities. If our transitions to more advanced technologies, including the transition to HDDs utilizing HAMR technology, require development and production cycles that are longer than anticipated or if we otherwise fail to implement new HDD technologies successfully, we may lose sales and market share, which could significantly harm our financial results.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows from operations and our investments to meet our liquidity requirements, including servicing our indebtedness.

Our business may not generate sufficient cash flows to enable us to meet our liquidity requirements, including working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, investments, servicing our indebtedness and other general corporate requirements. If we cannot fund our liquidity requirements, we may have to reduce or delay capital expenditures, product development efforts, investments and other general corporate expenditures. We cannot assure you that any of these remedies would, if necessary, be effected on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or that they would permit us to meet our obligations, which would affect our results of operations.    

We are leveraged and require significant amounts of cash to service our debt. Our debt and debt service requirements could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities and reduce our options for capital allocation. Our high level of debt presents the following risks:

we are required to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to pay principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances and other general corporate requirements;

our substantial leverage increases our vulnerability to economic downturns, decreased availability of capital, and adverse competitive and industry conditions and could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to those of our competitors that are less leveraged;

our debt service obligations could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry, and could limit our ability to pursue other business opportunities, borrow more money for operations or capital in the future and implement our business strategies;

our level of debt may restrict us from raising, or make it more costly to raise, additional financing on satisfactory terms to fund working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances and other general corporate requirements; and

covenants in our debt instruments limit our ability to pay future dividends or make other restricted payments and investments.

In addition, in the event that we need to refinance all or a portion of our outstanding debt as it matures or incur additional debt to fund our operations, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as the terms of our existing debt or refinance our existing debt at all. If prevailing interest rates or other factors result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to the refinanced debt would increase. Furthermore, if any rating agency changes our credit rating or outlook, our debt and equity securities could be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our ability to refinance existing debt or raise additional capital.

We may not be successful in our efforts to grow our EDS and SSD revenues.

We have made and continue to make investments to grow our EDS and SSD revenues. Our ability to grow EDS and SSD revenues is subject to the following risks:

we may be unable to accurately estimate and predict data center capacity and requirements;

we may not be able to offer compelling solutions to enterprises and consumers;

we may be unable to obtain cost effective supply of NAND flash memory in order to offer competitive SSD solutions; and

our cloud systems revenues generally have a longer sales cycle, and growth is likely to depend on relatively large customer orders, which may increase the variability of our results of operations and the difficulty of matching revenues with expenses.

Our results of operations and share price may be adversely affected if we are not successful in our efforts to grow our revenues as anticipated. In addition, our growth in these markets may bring us into closer competition with some of our customers or potential customers, which may decrease their willingness to do business with us.

Changes in the macroeconomic environment may in the future negatively impact our results of operations.

Changes in macroeconomic conditions may affect consumer and enterprise spending, and as a result, our customers may postpone or cancel spending in response to volatility in credit and equity markets, negative financial news and/or declines in income or asset values, all of which may have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products and/or result in significant decreases in our product prices. Other factors that could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and on our financial condition and results of operations include conditions in the labor market, healthcare costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer and business spending behavior.

Macroeconomic developments such as the withdrawal of the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) from the European Union (“EU”), slowing economies in parts of Asia and the Americas, increased tariffs between the US and China, Mexico and other countries,

or adverse economic conditions worldwide resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and efforts of governments and private industry to slow the pandemic through stay at home orders, social distancing requirements and other disease control measures could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition which, in turn, could adversely affect the price of our ordinary shares. A general weakening of, and related declining corporate confidence in, the global economy or the curtailment in government or corporate spending could cause current or potential customers to reduce their information technology (“IT”) budgets or be unable to fund data storage systems, which could cause customers to delay, decrease or cancel purchases of our products or cause customers not to pay us or to delay paying us for previously purchased products and services.

Our quarterly results of operations fluctuate, sometimes significantly, from period to period, and may cause our share price to decline.

Our quarterly revenue and results of operations fluctuate, sometimes significantly, from period to period. These fluctuations, which we expect to continue, have been and may continue to be precipitated by a variety of factors, including:

uncertainty in global economic and political conditions which may pose a risk to the overall economy or specific geographies or industries and adversely affect our customers’ purchasing behavior;

adverse changes in the level of economic activity in the major regions in which we do business;

competitive pressures resulting in lower selling prices by our competitors which may shift demand away from our products toward those of our competitors;

delays or problems in our introduction of new, more cost-effective products, the inability to achieve high production yields or delays in customer qualification or initial product quality issues;

changes in purchasing patterns of our customers;

application of new or revised industry standards;

disruptions in our supply chain;

increased costs or adverse changes in availability of supplies of raw materials or components;

the impact of corporate restructuring activities that we have and may continue to engage in;

changes in the demand for the computer systems and data storage products that contain our products due to seasonality, economic conditions and other factors;

shifting trends in customer demand which, when combined with overproduction of particular products, particularly when the industry is served by multiple suppliers, results in unfavorable supply and demand imbalances;

our high proportion of fixed costs, including research and development expenses;

any impairments in goodwill or other long-lived assets;

announcements of new products, services or technological innovations by us or our competitors;

changes in tax laws, regulatory requirements, including export regulations or tariffs, or accounting standards; and

adverse changes in the performance of our products.

As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter and year-over-year comparisons of our revenue and results of operations may not be meaningful, and that these comparisons may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance. Our results of operations in one or more future quarters may fail to meet the expectations of investment research analysts or investors, which could cause an immediate and significant decline in our market value.

We experience seasonal declines in the sales of our products during the second half of our fiscal year which may adversely affect our results of operations.

Sales of computers, storage subsystems and consumer electronic devices tend to be seasonal, and therefore, we expect to continue to experience seasonality in our business as we respond to variations in our customers’ demand for our products. In particular, we anticipate that sales of our products will continue to be lower during the second half of our fiscal year. In the desktop and notebook, consumer and gaming storage legacy markets applications of our data storage business, this seasonality is partially attributable to the historical trend of our customers’ increased sales of desktop computers, notebook computers and consumer electronics during the back-to-school and winter holiday season. In the desktop and notebook, consumer and gaming storage legacy markets, our sales are seasonal because of the purchasing cycles of our end users. We also experience seasonal

reductions in the business activities of our customers during international holidays like Lunar New Year, as well as in the summer months (particularly in Europe), which typically result in lower sales during those periods. Since our working capital needs peak during periods in which we are increasing production in anticipation of orders that have not yet been received, our results of operations will fluctuate seasonally even if the forecasted demand for our products proves accurate. Furthermore, it is difficult for us to evaluate the degree to which this seasonality may affect our business in future periods because of the rate and unpredictability of product transitions and new product introductions, as well as macroeconomic conditions.

We have a long and unpredictable sales cycle for nearline and mission critical storage solutions, which impairs our ability to accurately predict our financial and operating results in any period and may adversely affect our ability to forecast the need for investments and expenditures.

Our nearline and mission critical storage solutions are technically complex and we typically supply them in high quantities to a small number of customers. Many of our products are also tailored to meet the specific requirements of individual customers, and are often integrated by our customers into the systems and products that they sell. Factors that affect the length of our sales cycle include:

the time required for developing, testing and evaluating our products before they are deployed;

the size of the deployment; and

the complexity of system configuration necessary to deploy our products.

As a result, our sales cycle for nearline and mission critical storage solutions is often in excess of one year and frequently unpredictable. Given the length of development and qualification programs and unpredictability of the sales cycle, we may be unable to accurately forecast product demand, which may result in lost sales or excess inventory and associated inventory reserves or write-downs, each of which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by the loss of, or reduced, delayed or canceled purchases by, one or more of our key customers.

Some of our key customers account for a large portion of our revenue. While we have long-standing relationships with many of our customers, if any of our key customers were to significantly reduce their purchases from us, or we were prohibited or restricted by law, regulation or other governmental action from selling to those key customers, our results of operations would be adversely affected. Although sales to key customers may vary from period to period, a key customer that permanently discontinues or significantly reduces its relationship with us could be difficult to replace. In line with industry practice, new key customers usually require that we pass a lengthy and rigorous qualification process at the customer’s expense. Accordingly, it may be difficult or costly for us to attract new key customers.

Additionally, if there is consolidation among our customer base, our customers may be able to command increased leverage in negotiating prices and other terms of sale, which could adversely affect our profitability. Furthermore, if, as a result of increased leverage, customer pressures require us to reduce our pricing such that our gross profits are diminished, it might not be feasible to sell our products to a particular customer, which could result in a decrease in our revenue. Consolidation among our customer base may also lead to reduced demand for our products, replacement of our products by the combined entity with those of our competitors and cancellations of orders, each of which could adversely affect our results of operations. If a significant transaction or regulatory impact involving any of our key customers results in the loss of or reduction in purchases by these key customers, it could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are dependent on sales to distributors and retailers, which may increase price erosion and the volatility of our sales.

A substantial portion of our sales has been to distributors of disk drive products. Certain of our distributors may also market other products that compete with our products. Product qualification programs in this distribution channel are limited, which increases the number of competing products that are available to satisfy demand, particularly in times of lengthening product cycles. As a result, purchasing decisions in this channel are based largely on price, terms and product availability. Sales volumes through this channel are also less predictable and subject to greater volatility than sales to our OEM customers. In addition, deterioration in business and economic conditions could exacerbate price erosion and volatility as distributors lower prices to

compensate for lower demand and higher inventory levels. Our distributors’ ability to access credit for purposes of funding their operations may also affect purchases of our products by these customers. If distributors reduce their purchases of our products or prices decline significantly in this distribution channel or if distributors experience financial difficulties or terminate their relationships with us, our revenues and results of operations would be adversely affected.

In addition, retail sales of our legacy markets solutions traditionally experience seasonal variability in demand with higher levels of demand in the first half of our fiscal year driven by consumer spending in the back-to-school season from late summer to fall and the traditional holiday shopping season from fall to winter. Our ability to reach such consumers depends on us maintaining effective working relationships with major retailers and distributors. Failure to anticipate consumer demand for our branded solutions as well as an inability to maintain effective working relationships with retail and online distributors may adversely impact our future results of operations.

Our worldwide sales and manufacturing operations subject us to risks that may adversely affect our business related to disruptions in international markets, currency exchange fluctuations, longer payment cycles, potential adverse tax consequences, increased costs, our customers’ credit and access to capital, health-related risks (including pandemics such as COVID-19), investment risks, tariffs, privacy and protection of data, and access to personnel.

We have significant sales and manufacturing operations outside of the United States, including manufacturing facilities, sales personnel and customer support operations. We have manufacturing facilities in China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore, Thailand, and the United States. Additionally, the manufacturing of some of our products is concentrated in certain geographical locations. The production of certain drive subassemblies are limited to Thailand and the production of media is limited to Singapore. We also generate a significant portion of our revenue from sales outside the United States. Disruptions in the economic, environmental, political, legal or regulatory landscape in these countries may have a material adverse impact on our manufacturing and sales operations.

Our worldwide operations are subject to economic, regulatory and other risks inherent in doing business internationally, including the following:

Disruptions in International Markets. Disruptions in financial markets and the deterioration of the underlying economic conditions in the past in some countries, including the United Kingdom and those in Asia and the European Union have had an impact on our sales to customers located in, or whose end-user customers are located in, these countries.

Fluctuations in Currency Exchange Rates. Prices for our products are denominated predominantly in US dollars, even when sold to customers that are located outside the US. An increase in the value of the dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in those markets outside of the US where we sell in dollars. This could adversely impact our sales and market share in such areas or increase pressure on us to lower our price, and adversely impact our profit margins. In addition, we have revenue and expenses denominated in currencies other than the dollar, primarily the Thai Baht, Singaporean dollar, Chinese Renminbi and British Pound Sterling, which further exposes us to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. A weakened dollar could increase the effective cost of our expenses such as payroll, utilities, tax and marketing expenses, as well as overseas capital expenditures. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. We have attempted to manage the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes by, among other things, entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts from time to time, which could be designated as cash flow hedges or not designated as hedging instruments. Our hedging strategy may be ineffective, and specific hedges may expire and not be renewed or may not offset any or more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from currency variations. The hedging activities may not cover our full exposure, subject us to certain counterparty credit risks and may impact our results of operations. See “Financial Risk Management” of this report for additional information about our foreign currency exchange risk.

Longer Payment Cycles. Our customers outside of the United States are sometimes allowed longer time periods for payment than our US customers. This increases the risk of nonpayment due to the possibility that the financial condition of particular customers may worsen during the course of the payment period.

Potential Adverse Tax Consequences. We are incorporated in Ireland and have offices, operations, and subsidiaries in many countries around the world. Our international operations create a risk of potential adverse tax consequences,

including imposition of withholding or other taxes on payments by our subsidiaries. In addition, our taxable income in any jurisdiction is dependent upon acceptance of our operational practices and intercompany transfer pricing by local tax authorities as being on an arm’s length basis. Due to inconsistencies in application of the arm’s length standard among taxing authorities, as well as a lack of adequate treaty-based protection, transfer pricing challenges by tax authorities could, if successful, substantially increase our income tax expense. We are subject to tax audits around the world, and are under audit in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions have in the past assessed and may in the future assess additional income tax against us. Although we believe our tax positions are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits could be materially different from our recorded income tax provisions and accruals. The ultimate results of an audit could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made and could result in increases to our overall tax expense in subsequent periods. In light of the ongoing fiscal challenges many countries are facing, various levels of government are increasingly focused on tax reform and other legislative or regulatory action to increase tax revenue. In addition, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting recommendations are reshaping international tax rules in numerous countries. These actual and potential changes in the relevant tax laws applicable to corporate multinationals along with potential changes in accounting and other laws, regulations, administrative practices, principles and interpretations could increase the risk of double taxation, cause increased tax audit activity, and could impact our effective tax rate.

Increased Costs. The shipping and transportation costs associated with our international operations are typically higher than those associated with our US operations, resulting in decreased operating margins in some countries. Volatility in fuel costs, political instability or constraints in or increases in the costs of air transportation may lead us to develop alternative shipment methods, which could disrupt our ability to receive raw materials, or ship finished product, and as a result our business and results of operations may be harmed.

Credit and Access to Capital Risks. Our customers could have reduced access to working capital due to global economic conditions, higher interest rates, reduced bank lending resulting from contractions in the money supply or the deterioration in the customer’s, or their bank’s financial condition or the inability to access other financing, which would increase our credit and non-payment risk, and could result in an increase in our operating costs or a reduction in our revenue. In addition, some of our OEM customers have adopted a subcontractor model that requires us to contract directly with companies, such as original design manufacturers, that provide manufacturing and fulfillment services to our OEM customers. Because these subcontractors are generally not as well capitalized as our direct OEM customers, this subcontractor model exposes us to increased credit risks. Our agreements with our OEM customers may not permit us to increase our product prices to alleviate this increased credit risk.

Global Health Outbreaks. The occurrence of a pandemic disease, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, has impacted and may adversely impact our operations (including, without limitation, logistical and other operational costs) and the operations of some of our key direct and indirect suppliers and customers. The reactions by governments and private industry to such diseases have also disrupted and could continue to disrupt the availability, timeliness and reliability of the supply chains and distribution networks we rely on.

Privacy and Protection of Data. Our business is subject to a number of laws, rules and regulations in the countries where we operate pertaining to the collection, processing, security, use, retention and transfer of information about our customers, consumers and employees. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which is in effect in the European Economic Area (“EEA”), applies to our operations. The GDPR imposes stringent data protection requirements in the EEA and provides for greater penalties for noncompliance of up to the greater of 4% of worldwide annual revenue or 20 million. In China, we are monitoring legal and government advisory developments regarding the Chinese Cybersecurity Law and Draft Cybersecurity Review Measures for impacts to our business related to cross-border transfer limitations and evolving privacy, security, or data protection requirements. In the US, numerous federal and state laws, rules and regulations apply to our data handling practices. For example, California recently enacted legislation, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) which, among other things, requires new disclosures to California consumers and affords such consumers new abilities to opt-out of certain sales of personal information. The CCPA has required us to modify our data processing practices and policies and incur substantial compliance-

related costs and expenses. Additionally, a new privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), recently was certified by the California Secretary of State to appear on the ballot for the 3 November 2020 election. If this initiative is approved by California voters, the CPRA would significantly modify the CCPA, potentially resulting in further uncertainty and requiring us to incur additional costs and expenses. The US federal government and other states in the US also have proposed or enacted similar laws and regulations relating to privacy and data protection. Some countries have passed or are considering legislation limiting extraterritorial transfers of data, including requiring the local storage and processing of data or similar requirements. As a result of the 16 July 2020, European Court of Justice (“ECJ”), opinion in Case C-311/18 (Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems), the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework was deemed an invalid method of compliance with restrictions set forth in the GDPR regarding the transfer of personal data from EEA member states to the US and uncertainty was expressed regarding viability of the Standard Contractual Clauses option as a method of transferring personal data outside of the EEA. Present solutions to legitimize transfers of personal data from the EEA may be challenged or deemed insufficient, whether as a result of future ECJ rulings, changes in the GDPR (and EEA member states’ implementations thereof), successor EEA data protection regulations, or otherwise, and may have a material adverse effect on our business, including our data transfers, financial condition, operating results and reputation. Laws, rules and regulations relating to privacy and data protection evolve frequently and their scope may continually change, through new legislation, amendments to existing legislation and changes in enforcement, and may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another. Compliance with various laws, rules, rulings, and regulations relating to privacy and data protection have required and may continue to require us to change our data practices, which resulted and may continue to result in increased costs, require significant changes to our business and operations and could otherwise have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Actual or perceived violations of privacy or data protection laws could result in adverse effects on our business and results of operations including damage to our brand and reputation, significant financial penalties and liability, governmental investigations and proceedings, private actions, and unanticipated changes to our data handling and processing practices. We cannot ensure that any limitation-of-liability provisions in our customer and user agreements, contracts with third-party vendors and service providers or other contracts are enforceable or adequate or would protect us from any liabilities or damages with respect to claims relating to a security breach or other security-related matter. Although our insurance policies include some liability coverage, if we experienced a widespread security breach or other incident then we could be subject to indemnity claims or other damages that either aren’t covered or exceed our insurance coverage. We also cannot be certain that our insurance coverage is adequate for data-handling or data-security liabilities incurred, or that insurance will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms or at all, or that any insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more claims against us that exceed our insurance coverage, or changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our financial condition, operating results and reputation.

Access to Personnel. There is substantial competition for qualified and capable personnel in certain jurisdictions in which we operate, including the US, Thailand, China and Singapore, which may make it difficult for us to recruit and retain qualified employees in sufficient numbers. The reductions in workforce that result from our historical restructurings have made and may continue to make it difficult for us to recruit and retain personnel. Increased difficulty in access to, or recruiting or retaining sufficient and adequate personnel in our international operations may lead to increased manufacturing and employment compensation costs, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We are subject to counterparty default risks.

We have numerous arrangements with financial institutions that subject us to counterparty default risks, including cash and investment deposits, and foreign currency forward exchange contracts and other derivative instruments. As a result, we are subject to the risk that the counterparty to one or more of these arrangements will, voluntarily or involuntarily, default on its performance obligations. In times of market distress in particular, a counterparty may not comply with its contractual commitments that could then lead to it defaulting on its obligations with little or no notice to us, thereby limiting our ability to

take action to lessen or cover our exposure. Additionally, our ability to mitigate our counterparty exposures could be limited by the terms of the relevant agreements or because market conditions prevent us from taking effective action. If one of our counterparties becomes insolvent or files for bankruptcy, our ability to recover any losses suffered as a result of that counterparty’s default may be limited by the liquidity of the counterparty or the applicable laws governing the bankruptcy proceedings. In the event of any such counterparty default, we could incur significant losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.

Our business is subject to various laws, regulations and governmental policies that may cause us to incur significant expense.

Our business is subject to regulation under a wide variety of US federal and state and non-US laws, regulations and policies. There can be no assurance that laws, regulations and policies will not be changed in ways that will require us to modify our business model and objectives or affect our returns on investments by restricting existing activities and products, subjecting them to escalating costs or prohibiting them outright. In particular, legislative, regulatory or other areas of significance for our businesses that US and non-US governments have focused and continue to focus on, including antitrust and competition law, improper payments, data privacy and sovereignty, currency exchange controls that could restrict the movement of liquidity from particular jurisdictions, trade controls or tariffs on imports and exports in the US or other countries, complex economic sanctions and the enactment of US tax reform and potential further changes to global tax laws, have had and may continue to have an effect on our corporate structure, operations, sales, liquidity, capital requirements, effective tax rate and financial performance. China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore and Thailand, in which we have significant operating assets, and the European Union each have exercised and continue to exercise significant influence over many aspects of their domestic economies including, but not limited to, fair competition, tax practices, anti-corruption, anti-trust, price controls and international trade.

In addition, regulation or government scrutiny may impact the requirements for marketing our products and slow our ability to introduce new products, resulting in an adverse impact on our business. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors or agents will not violate these or other applicable laws, rules and regulations to which we are and may be subject. Violations of these laws and regulations could lead to significant penalties, restraints on our export or import privileges, monetary fines, government investigations, disruption of our operating activities, damage to our reputation and corporate brand, criminal proceedings and regulatory or other actions that could materially adversely affect our results of operations. The political and media scrutiny surrounding a governmental investigation for the violation of such laws, even if an investigation does not result in a finding of violation, could cause us significant expense and collateral consequences, including reputational harm, that could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in US trade policy, including the imposition of sanctions or tariffs and the resulting consequences, may have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

The US government has adopted a new approach to trade policy including in some cases to renegotiate, or potentially terminate, certain existing bilateral or multi-lateral trade agreements. The US government has also imposed tariffs on certain non-US goods, including information and communication technology products. These measures may materially increase costs for goods imported into the United States. This in turn could require us to materially increase prices to our customers which may reduce demand, or, if we are unable to increase prices to adequately address any tariffs, quotas or duties result in lowering our margin on products sold. Changes in US trade policy have resulted in, and could result in more, US trading partners adopting responsive trade policies, including imposition of increased tariffs, quotas or duties, making it more difficult or costly for us to export our products to those countries. The implementation of a border tax, tariff or higher customs duties on our products manufactured abroad or components that we import into the US, or any potential corresponding actions by other countries in which we do business, could negatively impact our financial performance. The US government also imposes sanctions through executive orders restricting US companies from conducting business activities with specified individuals and companies, and the sanctions imposed by the US government could be expanded in the future. If we are unable to conduct business with new or existing customers, our business, including revenue, profitability and cash flows, could be materially adversely affected.

We could suffer a loss of revenue and increased costs, exposure to significant liability including legal and regulatory consequences, reputational harm and other serious negative consequences in the event of cyber-attacks, ransomware or other cyber security breaches that disrupt our operations or result in the dissemination of proprietary or confidential information about us or our customers or other third parties.

Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment and the electronic data stored in our databases. We manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data relating to our operations. As our operations become more automated and increasingly interdependent, our exposure to the risks posed by storage and maintenance of data will continue to increase. The measures we have implemented to secure our computer equipment and electronic data have been and may continue to be vulnerable to phishing, employee error, hacking, malfeasance, system error or other irregularities and may not be sufficient for all eventualities, including sustained maintenance of remote working requirements. The insurance coverage we maintain that is intended to address certain data security risks, may be insufficient to cover all types of claims or losses that may arise. We have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to computer viruses or other malicious codes, cyber-attacks or other computer-related attempts to breach the IT systems we use for these purposes. We have been and may also continue be subject to IT system failures and network disruptions due to these factors. Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security, misappropriate or compromise our confidential information or that of third-parties, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products. Such attempts are increasing in technical sophistication, number and the ability to evade detection or to obscure such activities. Although we take steps to protect against and detect such attempts, our efforts may not be sufficient for all eventualities, including sustained maintenance of remote working requirements. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third-parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system.

The costs to us to eliminate or address the foregoing security problems and security vulnerabilities before or after a cyber-incident could be significant. System redundancy may be ineffective or inadequate, and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities. Our remediation efforts may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays or cessation of service, and loss of existing or potential customers that may impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution or other critical functions. We could lose existing or potential customers for outsourcing services or other IT solutions in connection with any actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our products. Some of our products contain encryption and other measures to protect third-party content stored on our products. Such measures may be compromised, breached or circumvented by sophisticated attackers and losses or unauthorized access to or releases of confidential information may occur. Breaches of our security measures and the unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive or confidential data about us or our customers or other third-parties, has exposed us and could expose us, our vendors and customers or other third-parties affected to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation or governmental investigations and potential liability for us, damage our brand and reputation or otherwise harm our business. Failure to meet our contractual obligations to promote information security with certain customers may result in liability, including additional costs, indemnification claims, litigation and damage to our brand and reputation. In addition, we rely in certain limited capacities on third-party data management providers whose possible security problems and security vulnerabilities may have similar effects on us. Our business, brand and reputation could also be adversely affected by media or other reports of perceived security vulnerabilities in our products, network or processes, even if unsubstantiated.

We are subject to laws, rules and regulations in the US, UK, EU and other countries relating to the collection, use, and security of user data. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between us and our subsidiaries, and among us, our subsidiaries and other parties with which we have commercial relations. Our ability to execute transactions and to possess and use personal information and data in conducting our business subjects us to legislative and regulatory burdens that require us to notify vendors, customers or employees of a data security breach. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant expenses to comply with mandatory privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards and contractual obligations. These laws, protocols and standards continue to develop and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Complying with emerging and changing

international requirements has caused and may continue to cause us to incur substantial costs or required or may continue to require us to change our business practices. If we fail to comply with applicable federal, state or international privacy-related or data protection laws we may be subject to proceedings by governmental entities and incur penalties, significant legal liability or reputational harm.

We must successfully maintain and upgrade our IT systems, and our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time, we expand and improve our IT systems to support our business going forward. Consequently, we are in the process of implementing, and will continue to invest in and implement, modifications and upgrades to our IT systems and procedures, including making changes to legacy systems or acquiring new systems with new functionality, and building new policies, procedures, training programs and monitoring tools, including in connection with the sustained maintenance of remote working requirements. These types of activities subject us to inherent costs and risks associated with changing and acquiring these systems, policies, procedures and monitoring tools, including capital expenditures, additional operating expenses, demands on management time and other risks and costs of delays or difficulties in transitioning to or integrating new systems policies, procedures or monitoring tools into our current systems. These implementations, modifications and upgrades may not result in productivity improvements at a level that outweighs the costs of implementation, or at all. In addition, difficulties with implementing new technology systems, delays in our timeline for planned improvements, significant system failures or our inability to successfully modify our IT systems, policies, procedures or monitoring tools to respond to changes in our business needs have caused and may continue to cause disruptions in our business operations and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we experience shortages or delays in the receipt of, or cost increases in, critical components, equipment or raw materials necessary to manufacture our products, we may suffer lower operating margins, production delays and other material adverse effects.

The cost, quality, availability and supply of components, subassemblies, certain equipment and raw materials used to manufacture our products and key components like recording media and heads are critical to our success. Particularly important for our products are components such as read/write heads, substrates for recording media, ASICs, spindle motors, printed circuit boards, suspension assemblies and NAND flash memory. In addition, the equipment we use to manufacture our products and components is frequently custom made and comes from a few suppliers and the lead times required to obtain manufacturing equipment can be significant.

We rely on sole direct and indirect suppliers or a limited number of direct and indirect suppliers for some or all of these components that we do not manufacture, including substrates for recording media, read/write heads, ASICs, spindle motors, printed circuit boards, suspension assemblies and NAND flash memory. Many of such direct and indirect component suppliers are geographically concentrated, making our supply chain more vulnerable to regional disruptions such as severe weather, the occurrence of local or global health issues or pandemics (such as COVID-19), acts of terrorism and an unpredictable geopolitical climate, which may have a material impact on the production, availability and transportation of many components. For example, we have experienced and continue to experience disruptions in our supply chain due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. If our direct and indirect vendors for these components are unable to meet our cost, quality, supply and transportation requirements, continue to remain financially viable or fulfill their contractual commitments and obligations, we could experience disruption in our supply chain, including shortages in supply or increases in production costs, which would materially adversely affect our results of operations.

Certain rare earth elements are critical in the manufacture of our products. We purchase components that contain rare earth elements from a number of countries, including China. We cannot predict whether any nation will impose regulations or trade barriers including tariffs, duties, quotas or embargoes upon the rare earth elements incorporated into our products that would restrict the worldwide supply of such metals or increase their cost. We have experienced increased costs and production delays when we were unable to obtain the necessary equipment or sufficient quantities of some components, and/or have been forced to pay higher prices or make volume purchase commitments or advance deposits for some components, equipment or raw materials that were in short supply in the industry in general. Further, if our customers experience shortages

of components or materials used in their products it could result in a decrease in demand for our products and have an adverse effect on our results of operations. If any major supplier were to restrict the supply available to us or increase the cost of the rare earth elements used in our products, we could experience a shortage in supply or an increase in production costs, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

From time to time, we may be subject to litigation, government investigations or governmental proceedings, which may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

From time to time, we have been and may continue to be involved in various legal, regulatory or administrative investigations, negotiations or proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the event of litigation, government investigations or governmental proceedings, we are subject to the inherent risks and uncertainties that may result if outcomes differ from our expectations. In the event of adverse outcomes in any litigation, investigation or government proceeding, we could be required to pay substantial damages, fines or penalties and cease certain practices or activities, which could materially harm our business.

The costs associated with litigation and government investigations can also be unpredictable depending on the complexity and length of time devoted to such litigation or investigation. Litigation, investigations or government proceedings may also divert the efforts and attention of our key personnel, which could also harm our business.

If we do not control our fixed costs, we will not be able to compete effectively in our industry.

We continually seek to make our cost structure and business processes more efficient. We are focused on increasing workforce flexibility and scalability, and improving overall competitiveness by leveraging our global capabilities, as well as external talent and skills, worldwide. Our strategy involves, to a substantial degree, increasing revenue and exabytes volume while at the same time controlling operating expenses. If we do not control our operating expenses, our ability to compete in the marketplace may be impaired. In the past, activities to reduce operating costs have included closures and transfers of facilities, significant personnel reductions, restructuring efforts and efforts to increase automation. Our restructuring efforts may not yield the intended benefits and may be unsuccessful or disruptive to our business operations which may materially adversely affect our financial results.

Shortages or delays in critical components, as well as reliance on single-source suppliers, can affect our production and development of products and may harm our operating results.

We are dependent on a limited number of qualified suppliers who provide critical materials or components. If there is a shortage of, or delay in supplying us with, critical components, equipment or raw materials, then:

it is likely that our suppliers would raise their prices and, if we could not pass these price increases to our customers, our operating margin would decline;

we may have to reengineer some products, which would likely cause production and shipment delays, make the reengineered products more costly and provide us with a lower rate of return on these products;

we would likely have to allocate the components we receive to certain of our products and ship less of others, which could reduce our revenues and could cause us to lose sales to customers who could purchase more of their required products from manufacturers that either did not experience these shortages or delays or that made different allocations; and

we may be late in shipping products, causing potential customers to make purchases from our competitors, thus causing our revenue and operating margin to decline.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain critical components in a timely and economic manner. Many of our suppliers’ manufacturing facilities are fully utilized. If they fail to invest in additional capacity or deliver components in the required timeframe, such failure would have an impact on our ability to ramp new products, and may result in a loss of revenue or market share if our competitors did not utilize the same components and were not affected.

We often aim to lead the market in new technology deployments and leverage unique and customized technology from single source suppliers who are early adopters in the emerging market. Our options in supplier selection in these cases are

limited and the supplier based technology has been and may continue to be single sourced until wider adoption of the technology occurs and any necessary licenses become available. In such cases, any technical issues in the supplier’s technology may cause us to delay shipments of our new technology deployments and harm our financial position.

If revenues fall or customer demand decreases significantly, we may not meet all of our purchase commitments to certain suppliers.

From time to time, we enter into long-term, non-cancelable purchase commitments or make large up-front investments with certain suppliers in order to secure certain components or technologies for the production of our products or to supplement our internal manufacturing capacity for certain components. If our actual revenues in the future are lower than our projections or if customer demand decreases significantly below our projections, we may not meet all of our purchase commitments with these suppliers. As a result, it is possible that our revenues will not be sufficient to recoup our up-front investments, in which case we will have to shift output from our internal manufacturing facilities to these suppliers or make penalty-type payments under the terms of these contracts. Additionally, because our markets are volatile, competitive and subject to rapid technology and price changes, we face inventory and other asset risks in the event we do not fully utilize firm purchase commitments.

The loss of key executive officers and employees could negatively impact our business prospects.

Our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued service of key members of management as well as marketing, sales and product development personnel. We believe our future success will also depend in large part upon our ability to attract, retain and further motivate highly skilled management, marketing, sales and product development personnel. We have experienced intense competition for personnel, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our key employees or that we will be successful in attracting, assimilating and retaining personnel in the future. Additionally, because a portion of our key personnel’s compensation is contingent upon the performance of our business, including through cash bonuses and equity compensation, when our results of operations or financial condition are negatively impacted, we may be at a competitive disadvantage for retaining and hiring employees. The loss of one or more of our key personnel or the inability to hire and retain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Due to the complexity of our products, some defects may only become detectable after deployment.

Our products are highly complex and are designed to operate in and form part of larger complex networks and storage systems. Our products may contain a defect or be perceived as containing a defect by our customers, as a result of improper use or maintenance. Lead times required to manufacture certain components are significant, and a quality excursion may take significant time and resources to remediate. Defects in our products, third-party components or in the networks and systems of which they form a part, directly or indirectly, have resulted in and may in the future result in:

increased costs and product delays until complex solution level interoperability issues are resolved;

costs associated with the remediation of any problems attributable to our products;

loss of or delays in revenues;

loss of customers;

failure to achieve market acceptance and loss of market share;

increased service and warranty costs; and

increased insurance costs.

Defects in our products could also result in legal actions by our customers for property damage, injury or death. Such legal actions, including but not limited to product liability claims could exceed the level of insurance coverage that we have obtained. Any significant uninsured claims could significantly harm our financial condition.

We may pursue strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures and investment opportunities that involve risks that could adversely affect our results of operations.

From time to time, we pursue strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures and investments in other companies that are complementary to our business. There is substantial competition for attractive strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture and investment candidates. Therefore, we may not be able to identify suitable strategic alliances, acquisition, joint venture, or investment candidates. Even if we can identify them, the terms on which we are able to consummate a transaction may not be commercially reasonable for us to pursue. We cannot assure you that we will be able to partner with, acquire or invest in suitable candidates, or integrate acquired technologies or operations successfully into our existing technologies and operations. Moreover, our ability to finance potential strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investments may be limited by market conditions, our leverage level, the covenants contained in the instruments that govern our outstanding indebtedness, and any agreements governing any other debt we may incur. In addition, our cash reserves could diminish significantly as a result of any acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances or other investments we pursue. Even if we are successful in forming strategic alliances or acquiring, forming joint ventures with or making investments in other companies, we cannot be certain that we will realize the anticipated benefits or synergies of any strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture or investment that we pursue, which could cause, among other things, an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets. If our goodwill or net intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a charge to our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income which would adversely affect our financial results.

Political events, war, terrorism, natural disasters, public health issues and other circumstances could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

War, terrorism, geopolitical uncertainties, natural disasters, public health issues and other business interruptions have caused and could cause damage or disruption to international commerce and the global economy, and thus could have a strong negative effect on our business, our direct and indirect suppliers, logistics providers, manufacturing vendors and customers. Our business operations are subject to interruption by natural disasters such as floods and earthquakes, fires, power or water shortages, terrorist attacks, other hostile acts, labor disputes, public health issues (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), and other events beyond our control. Such events may decrease demand for our products, make it difficult or impossible for us to make and deliver products to our customers or to receive components from our direct and indirect suppliers, and create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain. In the event of a natural disaster, losses and significant recovery time could be required to resume operations and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Should major public health issues, including pandemics, arise, we could be negatively affected by stringent employee travel restrictions, additional limitations or cost increases in freight and other logistical services, governmental actions limiting the movement of products or employees between regions, increases in or changes to data collection and reporting obligations, delays in production ramps of new products, and disruptions in our operations and those of some of our key direct and indirect suppliers and customers. For example, the recent COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in government-imposed travel restrictions, border closures, stay-at-home orders, facility closures or operating constraints in a number of locations including, but not limited to, China, Malaysia, Singapore and the United States, disruptions in our operations and those of our suppliers, partners, and customers, increases in air freight rates, limited numbers of employees available to staff manufacturing operations, and shortages of supplies of personal protective equipment required for our manufacturing operations. If any of these circumstances continue for an extended period of time, our manufacturing ability and capacity, or those of our key direct and indirect suppliers or customers, could be impacted, and our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations, customer requirements and regulations regarding conflicts minerals and other laws and regulations applicable to our business could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The sale and manufacturing of products in certain states and countries has and may continue to subject us and our suppliers to state, federal and international laws and regulations governing protection of the environment, including those governing discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes,

the cleanup of contaminated sites, restrictions on the presence of certain substances in electronic products and the responsibility for environmentally safe disposal or recycling. We endeavor to ensure that we and our suppliers comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, however, compliance has increased and may continue to increase our operating costs and may otherwise impact future financial results. If additional or more stringent requirements are imposed on us in the future, we could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures. If we fail to comply with applicable environmental laws, regulations, initiatives, or standards of conduct, our customers may refuse to purchase our products and we could be subject to fines, penalties and possible prohibition of sales of our products into one or more states or countries, liability to our customers and damage to our reputation, which could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

SEC rules require certain disclosures regarding the use of specified minerals, often referred to as conflict minerals, that are necessary to the functionality or production of products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured. These rules could affect our ability to source, directly or indirectly, certain materials used in our products at competitive prices and could impact the availability of certain minerals used in the manufacture of our products, including gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers of “conflict free” minerals, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict free minerals in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Our customers, including our OEM customers, may require that our products be free of conflict minerals, and our revenues and margins may be harmed if we are unable to procure conflict free minerals at a reasonable price, or at all, or are unable to pass through any increased costs associated with meeting these demands. We may also face challenges with government regulators and our customers and suppliers if we are unable to sufficiently verify that the metals used in our products are conflict free. Furthermore, our customers and manufacturing stakeholders may place increased demands on our compliance framework which may in turn negatively impact our relationships with our suppliers. If we are unable to comply with requirements regarding the use of conflict and other minerals, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Any cost reduction initiatives that we undertake may not deliver the results we expect, and these actions may adversely affect our business.

From time to time, we engage in restructuring plans that have resulted and may continue to result in workforce reduction and consolidation of our real estate facilities and our manufacturing footprint. In addition, management will continue to evaluate our global footprint and cost structure, and additional restructuring plans are expected to be formalized. As a result of our restructurings, we have experienced and may in the future experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge, disruptions to our operations and inefficiency during transitional periods. Additionally, global footprint consolidation and reduction in excess capacity may result in us being unable to respond to increases in forecasted volume of customer demand and loss of revenue opportunity if our competitors have underutilized factories. Any cost-cutting measures could impact employee retention. In addition, we cannot be sure that any future cost reductions or global footprint consolidations will deliver the results we expect, be successful in reducing our overall expenses as we expect or that additional costs will not offset any such reductions or global footprint consolidation. If our operating costs are higher than we expect or if we do not maintain adequate control of our costs and expenses, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our ability to use our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards may be limited.

The use of a portion of our US net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is subject to annual limitations pursuant to US tax law. Sections 382 and 383 of the US Internal Revenue Code generally impose annual limitations on the amount of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in ownership. As a result, future changes in ownership could put further limitations on the availability of our net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. See “Note 5. Income Taxes” contained in this report for, among other things, a description of current net operating loss and tax credit carryforward limitations.

We are at times subject to intellectual property proceedings and claims which could cause us to incur significant additional costs or prevent us from selling our products, and which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject from time-to-time to legal proceedings and claims, including claims of alleged infringement of the patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties by us, or our customers, in connection with the use of our products. Intellectual property litigation can be expensive and time-consuming, regardless of the merits of any claim, and could divert our management’s attention from operating our business. In addition, intellectual property lawsuits are subject to inherent uncertainties due to the complexity of the technical issues involved, which may cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Patent litigation has increased due to the current uncertainty of the law and the increasing competition and overlap of product functionality in the field. Some of the actions that we face from time-to-time seek injunctions against the sale of our products and/or substantial monetary damages, which, if granted or awarded, could materially harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

We cannot be certain that our products do not and will not infringe issued patents or other intellectual property rights of others. We may not be aware of currently filed patent applications that relate to our products or technology. If patents are later issued on these applications, we may be liable for infringement. If our products were found to infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products in one or more geographic locations, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology, discontinue the use of specific processes or obtain licenses to the technology infringed. We might not be able to obtain the necessary licenses on acceptable terms, or at all, or be able to reengineer our products successfully to avoid infringement. Any of the foregoing could cause us to incur significant costs and prevent us from selling our products, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. See “Note 14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies” contained in this report for a description of pending intellectual property proceedings.

We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, confidentiality agreements, security measures and licensing arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. In the past, we have been involved in significant and expensive disputes regarding our intellectual property rights and those of others, including claims that we may be infringing patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third-parties. We expect that we will be involved in similar disputes in the future.

There can be no assurance that:

any of our existing patents will continue to be held valid, if challenged;

patents will be issued for any of our pending applications;

any claims allowed from existing or pending patents will have sufficient scope or strength to protect us;

our patents will be issued in the primary countries where our products are sold in order to protect our rights and potential commercial advantage;

we will be able to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information through confidentiality agreements with our customers, suppliers and employees and through other security measures; and

others will not gain access to our trade secrets.

In addition, our competitors may be able to design their products around our patents and other proprietary rights. Enforcement of our rights often requires litigation. If we bring a patent infringement action and are not successful, our competitors would be able to use similar technology to compete with us. Moreover, the defendant in such an action may successfully countersue us for infringement of their patents or assert a counterclaim that our patents are invalid or unenforceable.

Furthermore, we have significant operations and sales in countries where intellectual property laws and enforcement policies are often less developed, less stringent or more difficult to enforce than in the United States. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we will be able to protect our intellectual property rights in jurisdictions outside the United States.

The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile and could decline significantly.

The market price of our ordinary shares has experienced price fluctuations and could be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. The market price of our ordinary shares has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate significantly in response to various factors including:

general uncertainty in stock market conditions occasioned by global economic conditions and negative financial news unrelated to our business or industry, including the impact of the recent COVID-19 pandemic;

the timing and amount of our share repurchases;

actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;

announcements of innovations, new products or significant price reductions by us or our competitors, including those competitors who offer alternative storage technology solutions;

our failure to meet our guidance or the performance estimates of investment research analysts;

the timing of announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts or acquisitions;

significant announcements by or changes in financial condition of a large customer;

general stock market conditions;

actual or perceived security breaches or security vulnerabilities;

the occurrence of major catastrophic events;

changes in financial estimates by investment research analysts;

actual or anticipated changes in the credit ratings of our indebtedness by rating agencies; and

the sale of our ordinary shares held by certain equity investors or members of management.

Market price fluctuations of our ordinary shares has impacted and could continue to impact the value of our equity compensation, which could affect our ability to recruit and retain employees. In addition, in the past, following periods of decline in the market price of a company’s securities, class action lawsuits have often been pursued against that company. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Any decision to reduce or discontinue the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders or the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase program could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly.

Although historically we have announced regular cash dividend payments and a share repurchase program, we are under no obligation to pay cash dividends to our shareholders in the future at historical levels or at all or to repurchase our ordinary shares at any particular price or at all. The declaration and payment of any future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our previously announced share repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Our payment of quarterly cash dividends and the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our share repurchase program are subject to, among other things, our financial position and results of operations, available cash and cash flow, capital and regulatory requirements, market and economic conditions, our ordinary share price and other factors. Any reduction or discontinuance by us of the payment of quarterly cash dividends or the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our share repurchase program could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly. Moreover, in the event our payment of quarterly cash dividends or repurchases of our ordinary shares are reduced or discontinued, our failure to resume such activities at historical levels could result in a persistent lower market valuation of our ordinary shares.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following sections discuss the effects of changes in our balance sheet and cash flows, contractual obligations, and other commitments on our liquidity and capital resources. Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in investments with remaining maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase. The principal objectives of our investment policy are the preservation of principal and maintenance of liquidity. We believe our cash equivalents are liquid and accessible. During fiscal year 2020, we reduced and restructured our long-term debt portfolio through a combination of new issuances, repurchases and exchanges to lower annual repayment levels by extending the maturity dates of certain notes and lowering the average interest rates. We operate in some countries that have restrictive regulations over the movement of cash and/or foreign exchange across their borders. However, we believe our sources of cash have been and will continue to be sufficient to meet our cash needs for the next 12 months. Although there can be no assurance, we believe that our financial resources, along with controlling our costs, will allow us to manage the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations for the foreseeable future. However, the challenges posed by COVID-19 to our industry and to our business are evolving rapidly and are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time. Consequently, we will continue to evaluate our financial position in light of future developments, particularly those relating to COVID-19.

We are not aware of any downgrades, losses or other significant deterioration in the fair value of our cash equivalents from the values reported as of 3 July 2020.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

  As of    
(US Dollars in millions) 

3 July

    2020    

  

28 June

    2019    

      Change     

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 $

1,722 

 

 $

2,220 

 

 $

(498

Our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $498 million from 28 June 2019 primarily as a result of repurchases of certain long-term debt of $1,137 million, repurchases of our ordinary shares of $850 million, dividends to our shareholders of $673 million and payments for capital expenditures of $585 million partially offset by net cash of $1,714 million provided by operating activities and net proceeds of $994 million from issuance of long-term debt. The following table summarizes results from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the periods indicated:

  Fiscal Years Ended
(US Dollars in millions) 3 July
    2020    
 28 June
        2019        

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

  

Operating activities

 

  $

1,714

 

  $

    1,761

Investing activities

 

 

      (635

 

 

846

Financing activities

 

 

(1,605

 

 

(2,212

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates

 

 

(1

 

 

(1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

  $

(527

 

  $

394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2020 was approximately $1.7 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation and:

an increase of $394 million in trade creditors, primarily due to timing of payments and an increase in materials purchased; partially offset by;

an increase of $166 million in inventories, primarily due to an increase in materials purchased for new product ramps and the potential for supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19; and

an increase of $127 million in trade debtors, primarily due to the timing of shipments.

Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2019 was approximately $1.8 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation, a release of valuation allowance related to our US deferred tax assets and:

a decrease of $204 million in trade debtors, primarily due to lower revenue; and

a decrease of $80 million in inventories, primarily due to a decrease in units built; partially offset by

a decrease of $268 million in trade creditors, primarily due to a decrease in direct material purchases; and

a decrease of $84 million in accrued employee compensation, primarily due to a decrease in our variable compensation expense.

Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities

In fiscal year 2016,2020, we used $0.6 billion for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to payments for the purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of approximately $585 million and payments for the purchase of investments of $58 million.

In fiscal year 2019, we received $0.8 billion for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to proceeds of $1.3 billion from the redemption of an investment in non-convertible preferred stock of TMHC and the proceeds of $144 million primarily from the sale of certain properties, partially offset by the payments for the purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of approximately $602 million.

Cash Used in Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities of $1.6 billion for fiscal year 2020 was primarily attributable to the following activities:

$1,137 million net repurchases of long-term debt;

$850 million in payments for repurchases of our ordinary shares;

$673 million in dividend payments; partially offset by

$498 million in net proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan;

$496 million from the issuance of Senior Notes; and

$103 million in proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares under employee stock plans.

Net cash used in financing activities of $2.2 billion for fiscal year 2019 was primarily attributable to the following activities:

$963 million in payments for repurchases of our ordinary shares;

$713 million in dividend payments; and

$574 million net repurchases of long-term debt.

Liquidity Sources and Going Concern

Our primary sources of liquidity as of 3 July 2020, consist of: (1) approximately $1.7 billion in cash and cash equivalents, (2) cash we expect to generate from operations and (3) subject to compliance with certain requirements under our control, up to $1.5 billion available for borrowing under our senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which is part of our credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”).

As of 3 July 2020, no borrowings had been drawn and no borrowings had been utilized for letters of credit or swing line loans issued under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility is available for borrowings, subject to compliance with financial covenants and other customary conditions to borrowing.

The Credit Agreement includes three financial covenants: (1) interest coverage ratio, (2) total leverage ratio and (3) a minimum liquidity amount. The term of the Revolving Credit Facility is through 20 February 2024, and the maturity date of the Term Loan is 16 September 2025.

As of 3 July 2020, cash and cash equivalents held by non-Irish subsidiaries was $1.7 billion. This amount is potentially subject to taxation in Ireland upon repatriation by means of a dividend into our Irish parent. However, it is our intent to

indefinitely reinvest earnings of non-Irish subsidiaries outside of Ireland and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate such earnings by means of a taxable Irish dividend. Should funds be needed in the Irish parent company and should we be unable to fund parent company activities through means other than a taxable Irish dividend, we would be required to accrue and pay Irish taxes on such dividend.

Given the impact of COVID-19 on our business, operating results, and financial condition, the Directors have placed a particular focus on the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis in the preparation of the financial statements for the year ended 3 July 2020.

Our going concern assessment considers our Risk Factors, including those specific to the COVID-19 pandemic, and is dependent on a number of factors including financial performance and maintenance of supply chain operations. The going concern assessment has been performed for a period of at least 12 months from the approval of the financial statements. The following factors were considered in our going concern assessment:

Based on the results of our forecasting procedures and assessment of its liquidity requirements, we believe our sources of cash, including the undrawn revolving credit facility of $1.5 billion, have been and will continue to be sufficient to meet our cash needs for at least the next 12 months.

We believe that our cash equivalents are liquid and accessible.

We were in compliance with the covenants as of 3 July 2020 and expect to be in compliance for the next 12 months.

While there is a high level of uncertainty concerning the challenges posted by COVID-19 to our industry, we believe that its financial resources, along with controlling its costs, will allow us to manage the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations for the foreseeable future

Taking into account the financial resources available to us, it is management’s view, to the best of their current knowledge, that COVID-19 will not have a material adverse impact on our ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the Directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.

For additional information on factors that could impact our ability to fund our operations and meet our cash requirements, including the COVID-19 pandemic, see the section entitled “Principal Risks and Uncertainties” section of the Directors’ Report.

Cash Requirements and Commitments

Our liquidity requirements are primarily to meet our working capital, product development and capital expenditure needs, to fund scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness, and to fund our quarterly dividend and any future strategic investments. Our ability to fund these requirements will depend on our future cash flows, which are determined by future operating performance, and therefore, subject to prevailing global macroeconomic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond traditional seasonality,our control.

On 22 July 2020, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.65 per share, which will be payable on 7 October 2020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 23 September 2020.

As of 3 July 2020, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements. Based on our current outlook and the information we currently have available to us, we expect to be in compliance with the covenants in our debt agreements over the next 12 months.

The carrying value of our debt as of 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019 was $4.2 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively. The table below presents the principal amounts of our outstanding debt:

  As of    

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
    2020    
  28 June
    2019    
      Change     

4.250% Senior Notes due March 2022

 

 $

229 

 

 $

750 

 

 $

(521)

 

4.750% Senior Notes due June 2023

 

 

546 

 

 

941 

 

 

(395)

 

4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024

 

 

500 

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

4.750% Senior Notes due January 2025

 

 

479 

 

 

920 

 

 

(441)

 

4.875% Senior Notes due June 2027

 

 

505 

 

 

690 

 

 

(185)

 

4.091% Senior Notes due June 2029

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

4.125% Senior Notes due January 2031

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

5.75% Senior Notes due December 2034

 

 

490 

 

 

490 

 

 

— 

 

LIBOR based Term Loan due September 2025

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 

 $

4,249 

 

 $

4,291 

 

 $

(42)

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

From time to time, we may repurchase any of our outstanding ordinary shares through private, open market, or broker assisted purchases, tender offers, or other means. During fiscal year 2020, we repurchased approximately 18 million of our ordinary shares including shares withheld for statutory tax withholdings related to vesting of employee equity awards. As of 3 July 2020, $1.3 billion remained available for repurchase under our existing repurchase authorization limit. All repurchases are effected as redemptions in accordance with our Constitution.

For fiscal year 2021, we expect capital expenditures to be at or below our long-term targeted range of 6% to 8% of revenue. We require substantial amounts of cash to fund any increased working capital requirements, future capital expenditures, scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness and payments of dividends. We will continue to evaluate and manage the retirement and replacement of existing debt and associated obligations, including evaluating the issuance of new debt securities, exchanging existing debt securities for other debt securities and retiring debt pursuant to privately negotiated transactions, open market purchases, tender offers or other means or otherwise. In addition, we may selectively pursue strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures and investments, which may require additional capital.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Our contractual cash obligations and commitments as of 3 July 2020, are summarized in the table below:

     Fiscal Year(s) 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Total  2021  2022-2023  2024-2025  Thereafter 

Contractual Cash Obligations:

     

Long-term debt

 

 $

4,249 

 

 $

19 

 

 $

825 

 

 $

1,029 

 

 $

2,376 

Interest payments on debt

 

 

1,352 

 

 

183 

 

 

360 

 

 

283 

 

 

526 

Purchase obligations (1)

 

 

1,251 

 

 

1,088 

 

 

68 

 

 

95 

 

 

— 

 

Operating leases, including imputed interest (2)

 

 

148 

 

 

15 

 

 

25 

 

 

 

 

100 

Capital expenditures

 

 

326 

 

 

274 

 

 

51 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

 

 

7,326 

 

 

1,579 

 

 

1,329 

 

 

1,416 

 

 

3,002 

Commitments:

     

Letters of credit or bank guarantees

 

 

104 

 

 

94 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 

 $

    7,430 

 

 $

    1,673 

 

 $

    1,330 

 

 $

    1,416 

 

 $

    3,011 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Purchase obligations are defined as contractual obligations for the purchase of goods or services, which are enforceable and legally binding on us, and that specify all significant terms.

(2)

Includes total future minimum rent expense under non-cancelable leases for both occupied and vacated facilities (rent expense is shown net of sublease income). Refer to Note 6.—Leases for details.

As of 3 July 2020, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits and an accrual for the payment of related interest totaling $2 million, none of which is expected to be settled within one year. Outside of one year, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of when cash settlement with a taxing authority will occur.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of 3 July 2020, we did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.

Financial Risk Management

We have exposure to market risks due to the volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit rating changes and equity and bond markets. A portion of these risks may be hedged, but fluctuations could impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash investment portfolio. As of 3 July 2020, we had no available-for-sale debt securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for a period greater than 12 months. We determined no available-for-sale debt securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of 3 July 2020.

In the quarter ended 4 October 2019, we entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $500 million to convert the variable interest rate on the Term Loan to fixed interest rates. The contracts were effective as of 4 October 2019 and will mature on 16 September 2025. The objective of the interest rate swap agreements is to eliminate the variability of sales wasinterest payment cash flows associated with the variable interest rate on the Term Loan. The Company designated the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges.

We have fixed rate and variable rate debt obligations. We enter into debt obligations for general corporate purposes including capital expenditures and working capital needs. Our Term Loan bears interest at a reflectionvariable rate equal to London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a variable margin set on 19 June 2020.

The table below presents principal amounts and related fixed or weighted-average interest rates by year of more cyclical demandmaturity for our investment portfolio and debt obligations as of 3 July 2020.

  Fiscal Years Ended

 

       

(US Dollars in millions, except

percentages)

 

 2021

 

  2022

 

  2023

 

  2024

 

  2025

 

  Thereafter

 

  Total

 

  Fair Value
at

3 July 2020

 

 

Assets

        

Cash equivalents:

        

Floating rate

 

$

551   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

551   

 

$

551   

Average interest rate

 

 

0.48%

 

      

 

0.48%

 

 

Other debt securities

        

Fixed rate

 

$

10   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

8   

 

$

18   

 

$

18   

Fixed interest rate

 

 

5.00%

 

      

 

5.00%

 

 

Debt

        

Fixed rate

 

$

—   

 

$

229   

 

$

546   

 

$

500   

 

$

479   

 

$

1,995   

 

$

  3,749   

 

 

4,010   

Average interest rate

  

 

4.25%

 

 

 

4.75%

 

 

 

4.88%

 

 

 

4.75%

 

 

 

4.71%

 

 

 

4.71%

 

 

Variable rate

 

$

19   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

381   

 

$

500   

 

 

490   

 

Average interest rate

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. From time to time, we may enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to manage exposure related to certain foreign currency commitments and anticipated foreign currency denominated expenditures. Our policy prohibits us from CSPsentering into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. At this time, we have not identified any material exposure associated with the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union.

We hedge portions of our foreign currency denominated balance sheet positions with foreign currency forward exchange contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings will be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The change in fair value of these contracts is recognized in earnings in the same period as the gains and losses from the remeasurement of the assets and liabilities. All foreign currency forward exchange contracts mature within 12 months.

We recognized $4 million in Other income and charges, net related to hedge ineffectiveness and discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal year 2020. We did not have any material net gains or losses recognized in Cost of revenue, or Other income and charges, net for cash flow hedges due to hedge ineffectiveness or discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal year 2019.

The table below provides information as of 3 July 2020 about our foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The table is provided in US dollar equivalent amounts and presents the notional amounts (at the contract exchange rates) and the weighted-average contractual foreign currency exchange rates.

(Dollars in millions, except average contract rate)

 

 Notional
Amount

 

  Average
  Contract Rate  

 

 Estimated
Fair
Value(1)

 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts:

   

Thai Baht

 

 $

199 

 

 $

31.67

 

 $

Singapore Dollar

 

 

243 

 

 

1.39

 

 

(2)

 

Chinese Renminbi

 

 

106 

 

 $

7.17

 

 

British Pound Sterling

 

 

84 

 

 $

            0.81

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

 

 $

            632 

  

 $

              3 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Equivalent to the unrealized net gain (loss) on existing contracts.

Other Market Risks. We have exposure to counterparty credit downgrades in the form of credit risk related to our foreign currency forward exchange contracts and our fixed income portfolio. We monitor and limit our credit exposure for our foreign currency forward exchange contracts by performing ongoing credit evaluations. We also manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any one counterparty, and we maintain limits on maximum tenor of contracts based on the timing of large systems installations and the shiftcredit rating of the underlying technology. financial institution. Additionally, the investment portfolio is diversified and structured to minimize credit risk.

Changes in our corporate issuer credit ratings have minimal impact on our near term financial results, but downgrades may negatively impact our future ability to raise capital, our ability to execute transactions with various counterparties and may increase the cost of such capital.

We believeare subject to equity market risks due to changes in the fair value of the notional investments selected by our employees as part of our Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan—the Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan (the “SDCP”). The SDCP is a successor plan to the prior Seagate Deferred Compensation Plans, as amended from time to time, under which no additional deferrals may be made after 31 December 2014. In fiscal year 2017 reflected seasonality consistent2014, we entered into a Total Return Swap (“TRS”) in order to manage the equity market risks associated with historical patterns.

the SDCP liabilities. We pay a floating rate, based on the LIBOR plus an interest rate spread, on the notional amount of the TRS. The TRS is designed to substantially offset changes in the SDCP liabilities due to changes in the value of the investment options made by employees. See Note 8. Derivative Financial Instruments for details.

Research and DevelopmentLIKELY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

We are committed to developing new component technologies, products and alternative storage technologies. Our research and development focus is designed to bring new products to market in high volume, with quality attributes that our customers expect, before our competitors. Part of our product development strategy is to leverage a design platform and/or subsystem within product families to serve different market needs. This platform strategy allows for more efficient resource utilization, leverages best design practices, reduces exposure to changes in demand, and allows for achievement of lower costs through purchasing economies. Our advanced technology integration effort focuses disk drive and component research on recording subsystems, including read/write heads and recording media; market-specific product technology; and technology focused towardswe believe may lead to new business opportunities. The primary purpose of our advanced technology integration effort is to ensure timely availability of mature component technologies tofor our product development teams as well as allowingto allow us to leverage and coordinate those technologies in the design centers across our products in order to take advantage of opportunities in the marketplace.    During

NON-FINANCIAL STATEMENT

Introduction

The European Union Directive 2014/95/EU (“the 2017 Regulations”) requires the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. This has been transposed into Irish legislation. This legislation requires us to identify and report on our business model and key non-financial matters related to the Company’s activities. Our fiscal years 2017year 2019 Global Citizenship Annual Report (“the 2019 GCAR”) provides additional information that may be relevant to investors in assessing the Company’s sustainability commitments and 2016, we had product development expensesachievements but, except as expressly provided below, the information integrated in the 2019 GCAR is not incorporated by reference into the Irish Directors’ Report. Copies of approximately $1,232 millionthe 2019 GCAR can be accessed at www.seagate.com, under “Global Citizenship”.

Business Overview

Refer to pages A-4 to A-10 for the ‘Industry Overview’, ‘Our Business’, and $1,237 million respectively, which represented 11%‘Products’ section of the Directors’ Report.

Corporate Governance and 11%Organization

We have concluded that the manufacture and distribution of storage solutions constitutes one reporting segment. We are governed by a Board of Directors (“the Board”). Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide a framework for our consolidated revenue, respectively.

PatentsBoard of Directors in exercising their responsibilities toward our stakeholders, and Licenses

Asthese guidelines entrust the Board with the authority to review our business operations and make decisions independent of 30 June 2017, we had approximately 5,600 US patents and 1,300 patents issued in various foreign jurisdictionsthe Company’s management. The guidelines also provide a process for shareholders to communicate concerns with the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as approximately 1,100 US and 900 foreign patent applications pending. The numberthe charters of patents and patent applications will vary at any given time as parteach of our ongoing patent portfolio management activity. Due to the rapid technological change that characterizes the data storage industry, we believe that, in addition to patent protection, the improvement of existing products, reliance upon trade secrets, protection of unpatented proprietaryknow-how and development of new productsBoard committees, are also important to our business in establishing and maintaining a competitive advantage. Accordingly, we intend to continue our efforts to broadly protect our intellectual property, including obtaining patents, where available in connection with our research and development program.

We have patent licenses with a number of companies. Additionally, as part of our normal intellectual property practices, we may be engaged in negotiations with other major data storage companies and component manufacturers with respect to patent licenses.

The data storage industry is characterized by significant litigation arising from time to time relating to patent and other intellectual property rights. Because of rapid technological development in the data storage industry, some of our products have been, and in the future could be, alleged to infringe existing patents of third parties. From time to time, we receive claims that our products infringe patents of third parties. Although we have been able to resolve some of those claims or potential claims by obtaining licenses or rights under the patents in question without a material adverse effect on us, other claims have resulted in adverse decisions or settlements. In addition, other claims are pending, which if resolved unfavorably to us could have a material adverse effect on our businesswebsite at www.seagate.com, under “Investors- Governance.”

Principal Risks and results of operations. For more information on these claims, see “Note 14. Legal, EnvironmentalManagement

Refer to pages A-17 to A-35 for the ‘Principal Risks and Other Contingencies.” The costs of engaging in intellectual property litigation in the past have been, and in the future may be, substantial, irrespectiveUncertainties’ section of the merits of the claim or the outcome.Directors’ Report.

Backlog

In view of industry practice, whereby customers may cancel or defer orders with little or no penalty, we believe backlog in the disk drive industry is of limited indicative value in estimating future performance and results.

Environmental MattersIncome Taxes” contained in this report for, among other things, a description of current net operating loss and tax credit carryforward limitations.

Our

We are at times subject to intellectual property proceedings and claims which could cause us to incur significant additional costs or prevent us from selling our products, and which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject from time-to-time to legal proceedings and claims, including claims of alleged infringement of the patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties by us, or our customers, in connection with the use of our products. Intellectual property litigation can be expensive and time-consuming, regardless of the merits of any claim, and could divert our management’s attention from operating our business. In addition, intellectual property lawsuits are subject to USinherent uncertainties due to the complexity of the technical issues involved, which may cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Patent litigation has increased due to the current uncertainty of the law and foreignthe increasing competition and overlap of product functionality in the field. Some of the actions that we face from time-to-time seek injunctions against the sale of our products and/or substantial monetary damages, which, if granted or awarded, could materially harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

We cannot be certain that our products do not and will not infringe issued patents or other intellectual property rights of others. We may not be aware of currently filed patent applications that relate to our products or technology. If patents are later issued on these applications, we may be liable for infringement. If our products were found to infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products in one or more geographic locations, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology, discontinue the use of specific processes or obtain licenses to the technology infringed. We might not be able to obtain the necessary licenses on acceptable terms, or at all, or be able to reengineer our products successfully to avoid infringement. Any of the foregoing could cause us to incur significant costs and prevent us from selling our products, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. See “Note 14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies” contained in this report for a description of pending intellectual property proceedings.

We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, confidentiality agreements, security measures and licensing arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. In the past, we have been involved in significant and expensive disputes regarding our intellectual property rights and those of others, including claims that we may be infringing patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third-parties. We expect that we will be involved in similar disputes in the future.

There can be no assurance that:

any of our existing patents will continue to be held valid, if challenged;

patents will be issued for any of our pending applications;

any claims allowed from existing or pending patents will have sufficient scope or strength to protect us;

our patents will be issued in the primary countries where our products are sold in order to protect our rights and potential commercial advantage;

we will be able to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information through confidentiality agreements with our customers, suppliers and employees and through other security measures; and

others will not gain access to our trade secrets.

In addition, our competitors may be able to design their products around our patents and other proprietary rights. Enforcement of our rights often requires litigation. If we bring a patent infringement action and are not successful, our competitors would be able to use similar technology to compete with us. Moreover, the defendant in such an action may successfully countersue us for infringement of their patents or assert a counterclaim that our patents are invalid or unenforceable.

Furthermore, we have significant operations and sales in countries where intellectual property laws and regulations relatingenforcement policies are often less developed, less stringent or more difficult to enforce than in the protectionUnited States. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we will be able to protect our intellectual property rights in jurisdictions outside the United States.

The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile and could decline significantly.

The market price of our ordinary shares has experienced price fluctuations and could be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. The market price of our ordinary shares has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate significantly in response to various factors including:

general uncertainty in stock market conditions occasioned by global economic conditions and negative financial news unrelated to our business or industry, including the impact of the environment,recent COVID-19 pandemic;

the timing and amount of our share repurchases;

actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;

announcements of innovations, new products or significant price reductions by us or our competitors, including those governing dischargescompetitors who offer alternative storage technology solutions;

our failure to meet our guidance or the performance estimates of pollutants into investment research analysts;

the airtiming of announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts or acquisitions;

significant announcements by or changes in financial condition of a large customer;

general stock market conditions;

actual or perceived security breaches or security vulnerabilities;

the occurrence of major catastrophic events;

changes in financial estimates by investment research analysts;

actual or anticipated changes in the credit ratings of our indebtedness by rating agencies; and water,

the managementsale of our ordinary shares held by certain equity investors or members of management.

Market price fluctuations of our ordinary shares has impacted and disposalcould continue to impact the value of hazardous substancesour equity compensation, which could affect our ability to recruit and wastesretain employees. In addition, in the past, following periods of decline in the market price of a company’s securities, class action lawsuits have often been pursued against that company. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Any decision to reduce or discontinue the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders or the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase program could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly.

Although historically we have announced regular cash dividend payments and a share repurchase program, we are under no obligation to pay cash dividends to our shareholders in the future at historical levels or at all or to repurchase our ordinary shares at any particular price or at all. The declaration and payment of any future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our previously announced share repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Our payment of quarterly cash dividends and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Somerepurchase of our operations require environmental permits and controlsordinary shares pursuant to prevent and reduce air and water pollution, and these permitsour share repurchase program are subject to, modification, renewalamong other things, our financial position and revocationresults of operations, available cash and cash flow, capital and regulatory requirements, market and economic conditions, our ordinary share price and other factors. Any reduction or discontinuance by issuing authorities.us of the payment of quarterly cash dividends or the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our share repurchase program could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly. Moreover, in the event our payment of quarterly cash dividends or repurchases of our ordinary shares are reduced or discontinued, our failure to resume such activities at historical levels could result in a persistent lower market valuation of our ordinary shares.

We have established environmental management systems

Liquidity and continually update environmental policiesCapital Resources

The following sections discuss the effects of changes in our balance sheet and standard operating procedures forcash flows, contractual obligations, and other commitments on our operations worldwide. We believe that our operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and permits. We budget for operatingliquidity and capital costs on an ongoing basis to complyresources. Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in investments with environmental laws. If additionalremaining maturities of 90 days or more stringent requirements are imposed on us in the future, we could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures.

Some environmental laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (as amended, the “Superfund” law) and its state equivalents, can impose liability for the cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former site owners or operators or upon parties who sent waste to these sites, regardless of whether the owner or operator owned the siteless at the time of purchase. The principal objectives of our investment policy are the releasepreservation of hazardous substances principal and maintenance of liquidity. We believe our cash equivalents are liquid and accessible. During fiscal year 2020, we reduced and restructured our long-term debt portfolio through a combination of new issuances, repurchases and exchanges to lower annual repayment levels by extending the maturity dates of certain notes and lowering the average interest rates. We operate in some countries that have restrictive regulations over the movement of cash and/or the lawfulnessforeign exchange across their borders. However, we believe our sources of the original disposal activity. Wecash have been identified as a potentially responsible party at several sites. At each of these sites, we have an assigned portion of the financial liability based on the type and amount of hazardous substances disposed of by each party at the site and the number of financially viable parties. We have fulfilled our responsibilities at some of these sites and remain involved in only a few at this time.

While our ultimate costs in connection with these sites is difficult to predict with complete accuracy, based on current estimates of cleanup costs and our expected allocation of these costs, we do not expect costs in connection with these siteswill continue to be material.

We maysufficient to meet our cash needs for the next 12 months. Although there can be subject to various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing the environment, including those restricting the presence of certain substances in electronic products. For example, the European Union (“EU”) enacted the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, which prohibits the use of certain substances, including lead, in certain products, including disk drives and server storage products, put on the market after 1 July 2006. Similar legislation has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, China, Japan and others. The European Union REACH Directive (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals, EC 1907/2006) also restricts substances of very high concern (“SVHCs”) in products.

Employees

At 30 June 2017,no assurance, we employed approximately 41,000 employees and temporary employees worldwide, of which approximately 33,000 were located in our Asian operations. We believe that our future successfinancial resources, along with controlling our costs, will depend in partallow us to manage the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our abilitybusiness operations for the foreseeable future. However, the challenges posed by COVID-19 to attractour industry and retain qualified employeesto our business are evolving rapidly and are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at all levels. this time. Consequently, we will continue to evaluate our financial position in light of future developments, particularly those relating to COVID-19.

We believe that our employee relations are good.

REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BUSINESS

Fiscal Year 2017 Summary

Duringnot aware of any downgrades, losses or other significant deterioration in the fiscal year 2017, we shipped 263 exabytes, generating revenue of $10.8 billion and gross margin of 29%. Our operating cash flow was $1.9 billion. We repurchased approximately 12 millionfair value of our ordinary

cash equivalents from the values reported as of 3 July 2020.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

shares during the year for approximately $460 million. We issued $750

  As of    
(US Dollars in millions) 

3 July

    2020    

  

28 June

    2019    

      Change     

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 $

1,722 

 

 $

2,220 

 

 $

(498

Our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $498 million from 28 June 2019 primarily as a result of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2022 and $500repurchases of certain long-term debt of $1,137 million, of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2024 and paid $316 million for the redemption and repurchaserepurchases of our outstanding debt, as well as paid $561ordinary shares of $850 million, in dividends in fiscal year 2017.

Resultsto our shareholders of Operations

We list in the tables below summarized information$673 million and payments for capital expenditures of $585 million partially offset by net cash of $1,714 million provided by operating activities and net proceeds of $994 million from our Consolidated Profit and Loss Account by dollars and as a percentageissuance of revenue:

   Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June
2017
   1 July
2016
 

Revenue

   $  10,771     $  11,160  

Cost of revenue

   7,597     8,545  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

   3,174     2,615  

Product development

   1,232     1,237  

Marketing and administrative

   606     635  

Amortization of intangibles

   104     123  

Restructuring and other, net

   178     175  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating earnings

   1,054     445  

Other income and charges, net

   (239)    (171) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before taxes

   815     274  

Income tax expense

   43     26  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $772     $248  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Fiscal Years Ended 
(as a percentage of Revenue)  30 June
2017
   1 July 2016 

Revenue

   100%    100% 

Cost of revenue

             71                 77    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

   29       23    

Product development

   11       11    

Marketing and administrative

   5       6    

Amortization of intangibles

   1       1    

Restructuring and other, net

   2       2    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating earnings

   10       4    

Other income and charges, net

   (2)      (2)   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before taxes

   8       2    

Income tax expense

   1       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   7%    2% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

long-term debt. The following table summarizes HDD information regarding average drive selling prices (“ASPs”), exabytes shipped, and revenues by channel and geography:results from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the periods indicated:

 

   Fiscal Years Ended 
   30 June
2017
   1 July 2016 

ASPs (US Dollars per unit)

   $      66       $      61    

Exabytes Shipped

   263       233    

Revenues by Channel (%)

    

OEMs

   67%    69% 

Distributors

   18%    17% 

Retailers

   15%    14% 

Revenues by Geography (%)

    

Americas

   31%    29% 

EMEA

   17%    17% 

Asia Pacific

   52%    54% 
  Fiscal Years Ended
(US Dollars in millions) 3 July
    2020    
 28 June
        2019        

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

  

Operating activities

 

  $

1,714

 

  $

    1,761

Investing activities

 

 

      (635

 

 

846

Financing activities

 

 

(1,605

 

 

(2,212

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates

 

 

(1

 

 

(1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

  $

(527

 

  $

394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RevenueCash Provided by Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2020 was approximately $1.7 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation and:

 

   Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June
2017
   1 July 2016   Change   %
Change
 

Revenue

  $  10,771    $  11,160     $    (389)    (3)% 

Revenuean increase of $394 million in fiscal year 2017 decreased approximately 3% or $0.4 billion, from fiscal year 2016, as a resulttrade creditors, primarily due to timing of price erosion partially offset bypayments and an increase in exabytes shipped.materials purchased; partially offset by;

Gross Profit

 

   Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June
2017
   1 July 2016   Change   %
Change
 

Cost of revenue

  $  7,597      $  8,545      $    (948)    (11)% 

Gross profit

  $3,174      $2,615      $559    21 % 

Gross profit percentage

   29%    23%     

For fiscal year 2017, gross margin as a percentagean increase of revenue increased by 600 basis points compared$166 million in inventories, primarily due to an increase in materials purchased for new product ramps and the potential for supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19; and

an increase of $127 million in trade debtors, primarily due to the prior fiscal year due to a favorable product mix and improved factory utilization resulting from cost savings due to our ongoing workforce reductions and manufacturing consolidationtiming of shipments.

Cash provided by operating activities partially offset by price erosion.

Operating Expenses

   Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June 2017   1 July 2016   Change   %
Change
 

Product development

   $1,232     $1,237     $(5)    — % 

Marketing and administrative

   606     635     (29)    (5)% 

Amortization of intangibles

   104     123     (19)    (15)% 

Restructuring and other, net

   178     175         2 % 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating expenses

   $    2,120     $    2,170     $      (50)   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Product Development Expense.    Product development expenses for fiscal year 2017 decreased from fiscal year 20162019 was approximately $1.8 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation, a release of valuation allowance related to our US deferred tax assets and:

a decrease of $204 million in trade debtors, primarily due to lower revenue; and

a $102decrease of $80 million decrease in salaries and related benefits as a result of an increase in operational efficiencies in our business and the restructuring of our workforce in the prior periods, offset by a $71 million increase in variable compensation and share-based compensation driven by better financial performance and a $26 million increase in impairment charges related to the closure of our Korea design center.

Marketing and Administrative Expense.    Marketing and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2017 decreased from fiscal year 2016inventories, primarily due to a decrease in salariesunits built; partially offset by

a decrease of $268 million in trade creditors, primarily due to a decrease in direct material purchases; and related benefits

a decrease of $52$84 million asin accrued employee compensation, primarily due to a result of the restructuring of our workforce in prior periods, a $28 million cost reduction resulting from an increase in operational efficienciesdecrease in our businessvariable compensation expense.

Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities

In fiscal year 2020, we used $0.6 billion for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to payments for the purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of approximately $585 million and payments for the purchase of investments of $58 million.

In fiscal year 2019, we received $0.8 billion for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to proceeds of $1.3 billion from the redemption of an investment in non-convertible preferred stock of TMHC and the completionproceeds of $144 million primarily from the sale of certain promotional and branding activities in fiscal year 2016,properties, partially offset by a $51 million increasethe payments for the purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of approximately $602 million.

Cash Used in variable compensation and share-based compensation driven by better financial performance.Financing Activities

AmortizationNet cash used in financing activities of Intangibles.    Amortization of intangibles$1.6 billion for fiscal year 2017 decreased2020 was primarily attributable to the following activities:

$1,137 million net repurchases of long-term debt;

$850 million in payments for repurchases of our ordinary shares;

$673 million in dividend payments; partially offset by $19

$498 million as compared to fiscal year 2016, due to certain intangible assets reachingin net proceeds from borrowings under the endTerm Loan;

$496 million from the issuance of their useful life.Senior Notes; and

Restructuring and Other, net.    Restructuring and other, net

$103 million in proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares under employee stock plans.

Net cash used in financing activities of $2.2 billion for fiscal year 20172019 was comprised primarily attributable to the following activities:

$963 million in payments for repurchases of restructuring charges recorded duringour ordinary shares;

$713 million in dividend payments; and

$574 million net repurchases of long-term debt.

Liquidity Sources and Going Concern

Our primary sources of liquidity as of 3 July 2020, consist of: (1) approximately $1.7 billion in cash and cash equivalents, (2) cash we expect to generate from operations and (3) subject to compliance with certain requirements under our control, up to $1.5 billion available for borrowing under our senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which is part of our credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”).

As of 3 July 2020, no borrowings had been drawn and no borrowings had been utilized for letters of credit or swing line loans issued under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility is available for borrowings, subject to compliance with financial covenants and other customary conditions to borrowing.

The Credit Agreement includes three financial covenants: (1) interest coverage ratio, (2) total leverage ratio and (3) a minimum liquidity amount. The term of the Revolving Credit Facility is through 20 February 2024, and the maturity date of the Term Loan is 16 September 20162025.

As of 3 July 2020, cash and cash equivalents held by non-Irish subsidiaries was $1.7 billion. This amount is potentially subject to taxation in Ireland upon repatriation by means of a dividend into our Irish parent. However, it is our intent to

indefinitely reinvest earnings of non-Irish subsidiaries outside of Ireland and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate such earnings by means of a taxable Irish dividend. Should funds be needed in the Irish parent company and should we be unable to fund parent company activities through means other than a taxable Irish dividend, we would be required to accrue and pay Irish taxes on such dividend.

Given the impact of COVID-19 on our business, operating results, and financial condition, the Directors have placed a particular focus on the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis in the preparation of the financial statements for the year ended 3 July 2020.

Our going concern assessment considers our Risk Factors, including those specific to the COVID-19 pandemic, and is dependent on a number of factors including financial performance and maintenance of supply chain operations. The going concern assessment has been performed for a period of at least 12 months from the approval of the financial statements. The following factors were considered in our going concern assessment:

Based on the results of our forecasting procedures and assessment of its liquidity requirements, we believe our sources of cash, including the undrawn revolving credit facility of $1.5 billion, have been and will continue to be sufficient to meet our cash needs for at least the next 12 months.

We believe that our cash equivalents are liquid and accessible.

We were in compliance with the covenants as of 3 July 2020 and expect to be in compliance for the next 12 months.

While there is a high level of uncertainty concerning the challenges posted by COVID-19 to our industry, we believe that its financial resources, along with controlling its costs, will allow us to manage the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations for the foreseeable future

Taking into account the financial resources available to us, it is management’s view, to the best of their current knowledge, that COVID-19 will not have a material adverse impact on our ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the Directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.

For additional information on factors that could impact our ability to fund our operations and meet our cash requirements, including the COVID-19 pandemic, see the section entitled “Principal Risks and Uncertainties” section of the Directors’ Report.

Cash Requirements and Commitments

Our liquidity requirements are primarily to meet our working capital, product development and capital expenditure needs, to fund scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness, and to fund our quarterly dividend and any future strategic investments. Our ability to fund these requirements will depend on our future cash flows, which are determined by future operating performance, and therefore, subject to prevailing global macroeconomic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

On 22 July 2020, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.65 per share, which will be payable on 7 October 2020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 23 September 2020.

As of 3 July 2020, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements. Based on our current outlook and the information we currently have available to us, we expect to be in compliance with the covenants in our debt agreements over the next 12 months.

The carrying value of our debt as of 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019 was $4.2 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively. The table below presents the principal amounts of our outstanding debt:

  As of    

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
    2020    
  28 June
    2019    
      Change     

4.250% Senior Notes due March 2022

 

 $

229 

 

 $

750 

 

 $

(521)

 

4.750% Senior Notes due June 2023

 

 

546 

 

 

941 

 

 

(395)

 

4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024

 

 

500 

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

4.750% Senior Notes due January 2025

 

 

479 

 

 

920 

 

 

(441)

 

4.875% Senior Notes due June 2027

 

 

505 

 

 

690 

 

 

(185)

 

4.091% Senior Notes due June 2029

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

4.125% Senior Notes due January 2031

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

5.75% Senior Notes due December 2034

 

 

490 

 

 

490 

 

 

— 

 

LIBOR based Term Loan due September 2025

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 

 $

4,249 

 

 $

4,291 

 

 $

(42)

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

From time to time, we may repurchase any of our outstanding ordinary shares through private, open market, or broker assisted purchases, tender offers, or other means. During fiscal year 2020, we repurchased approximately 18 million of our ordinary shares including shares withheld for statutory tax withholdings related to vesting of employee equity awards. As of 3 July 2020, $1.3 billion remained available for repurchase under our existing repurchase authorization limit. All repurchases are effected as redemptions in accordance with our Constitution.

For fiscal year 2021, we expect capital expenditures to be at or below our long-term targeted range of 6% to 8% of revenue. We require substantial amounts of cash to fund any increased working capital requirements, future capital expenditures, scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness and payments of dividends. We will continue to evaluate and manage the retirement and replacement of existing debt and associated obligations, including evaluating the issuance of new debt securities, exchanging existing debt securities for other debt securities and retiring debt pursuant to privately negotiated transactions, open market purchases, tender offers or other means or otherwise. In addition, we may selectively pursue strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures and investments, which may require additional capital.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Our contractual cash obligations and commitments as of 3 July 2020, are summarized in the table below:

     Fiscal Year(s) 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Total  2021  2022-2023  2024-2025  Thereafter 

Contractual Cash Obligations:

     

Long-term debt

 

 $

4,249 

 

 $

19 

 

 $

825 

 

 $

1,029 

 

 $

2,376 

Interest payments on debt

 

 

1,352 

 

 

183 

 

 

360 

 

 

283 

 

 

526 

Purchase obligations (1)

 

 

1,251 

 

 

1,088 

 

 

68 

 

 

95 

 

 

— 

 

Operating leases, including imputed interest (2)

 

 

148 

 

 

15 

 

 

25 

 

 

 

 

100 

Capital expenditures

 

 

326 

 

 

274 

 

 

51 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

 

 

7,326 

 

 

1,579 

 

 

1,329 

 

 

1,416 

 

 

3,002 

Commitments:

     

Letters of credit or bank guarantees

 

 

104 

 

 

94 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 

 $

    7,430 

 

 $

    1,673 

 

 $

    1,330 

 

 $

    1,416 

 

 $

    3,011 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Purchase obligations are defined as contractual obligations for the purchase of goods or services, which are enforceable and legally binding on us, and that specify all significant terms.

(2)

Includes total future minimum rent expense under non-cancelable leases for both occupied and vacated facilities (rent expense is shown net of sublease income). Refer to Note 6.—Leases for details.

As of 3 July 2020, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits and an accrual for the payment of related interest totaling $2 million, none of which is expected to be settled within one year. Outside of one year, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of when cash settlement with a taxing authority will occur.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of 3 July 2020, we did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.

Financial Risk Management

We have exposure to market risks due to the volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit rating changes and equity and bond markets. A portion of these risks may be hedged, but fluctuations could impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash investment portfolio. As of 3 July 2020, we had no available-for-sale debt securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for a period greater than 12 months. We determined no available-for-sale debt securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of 3 July 2020.

In the quarter ended 4 October 2019, we entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $500 million to convert the variable interest rate on the Term Loan to fixed interest rates. The contracts were effective as of 4 October 2019 and March 2017 quarterwill mature on 16 September 2025. The objective of the interest rate swap agreements is to eliminate the variability of interest payment cash flows associated with the variable interest rate on the Term Loan. The Company designated the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges.

We have fixed rate and variable rate debt obligations. We enter into debt obligations for general corporate purposes including capital expenditures and working capital needs. Our Term Loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a variable margin set on 19 June 2020.

The table below presents principal amounts and related fixed or weighted-average interest rates by year of maturity for our investment portfolio and debt obligations as of 3 July 2020.

  Fiscal Years Ended

 

       

(US Dollars in millions, except

percentages)

 

 2021

 

  2022

 

  2023

 

  2024

 

  2025

 

  Thereafter

 

  Total

 

  Fair Value
at

3 July 2020

 

 

Assets

        

Cash equivalents:

        

Floating rate

 

$

551   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

551   

 

$

551   

Average interest rate

 

 

0.48%

 

      

 

0.48%

 

 

Other debt securities

        

Fixed rate

 

$

10   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

8   

 

$

18   

 

$

18   

Fixed interest rate

 

 

5.00%

 

      

 

5.00%

 

 

Debt

        

Fixed rate

 

$

—   

 

$

229   

 

$

546   

 

$

500   

 

$

479   

 

$

1,995   

 

$

  3,749   

 

 

4,010   

Average interest rate

  

 

4.25%

 

 

 

4.75%

 

 

 

4.88%

 

 

 

4.75%

 

 

 

4.71%

 

 

 

4.71%

 

 

Variable rate

 

$

19   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

381   

 

$

500   

 

 

490   

 

Average interest rate

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. From time to time, we may enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to manage exposure related to certain foreign currency commitments and anticipated foreign currency denominated expenditures. Our policy prohibits us from entering into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. At this time, we have not identified any material exposure associated with the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union.

We hedge portions of our foreign currency denominated balance sheet positions with foreign currency forward exchange contracts to reduce the risk that our workforceearnings will be adversely affected by approximately 6,800 employees,changes in currency exchange rates. The change in fair value of these contracts is recognized in earnings in the same period as we continue to consolidate our global footprint across Asia, EMEAthe gains and losses from the Americas.remeasurement of the assets and liabilities. All foreign currency forward exchange contracts mature within 12 months.

Restructuring and other, net for fiscal year 2016 comprised of restructuring charges recorded during the September 2015 quarter, March 2016 quarter and June 2016 quarter, to reduce our workforce by approximately 4,600 employees and align our manufacturing footprint with current macroeconomic conditions.

We recognized $4 million in Other income and charges, net

   Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June
2017
   1 July 2016   Change   %
Change
 

Other income and charges, net

  $      (239)   $      (171)   $      (68)    40% 

related to hedge ineffectiveness and discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal year 2020. We did not have any material net gains or losses recognized in Cost of revenue, or Other income and charges, net for cash flow hedges due to hedge ineffectiveness or discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal year 2017 increased2019.

The table below provides information as of 3 July 2020 about our foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The table is provided in US dollar equivalent amounts and presents the notional amounts (at the contract exchange rates) and the weighted-average contractual foreign currency exchange rates.

(Dollars in millions, except average contract rate)

 

 Notional
Amount

 

  Average
  Contract Rate  

 

 Estimated
Fair
Value(1)

 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts:

   

Thai Baht

 

 $

199 

 

 $

31.67

 

 $

Singapore Dollar

 

 

243 

 

 

1.39

 

 

(2)

 

Chinese Renminbi

 

 

106 

 

 $

7.17

 

 

British Pound Sterling

 

 

84 

 

 $

            0.81

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

 

 $

            632 

  

 $

              3 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Equivalent to the unrealized net gain (loss) on existing contracts.

Other Market Risks. We have exposure to counterparty credit downgrades in the form of credit risk related to our foreign currency forward exchange contracts and our fixed income portfolio. We monitor and limit our credit exposure for our foreign currency forward exchange contracts by $68 million,performing ongoing credit evaluations. We also manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any one counterparty, and we maintain limits on maximum tenor of contracts based on the credit rating of the financial institution. Additionally, the investment portfolio is diversified and structured to minimize credit risk.

Changes in our corporate issuer credit ratings have minimal impact on our near term financial results, but downgrades may negatively impact our future ability to raise capital, our ability to execute transactions with various counterparties and may increase the cost of such capital.

We are subject to equity market risks due to changes in the fair value of the notional investments selected by our employees as comparedpart of our Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan—the Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan (the “SDCP”). The SDCP is a successor plan to the prior Seagate Deferred Compensation Plans, as amended from time to time, under which no additional deferrals may be made after 31 December 2014. In fiscal year 2016 primarily due2014, we entered into a Total Return Swap (“TRS”) in order to manage the $33 million of other incomeequity market risks associated with the final payment of unpaid interestSDCP liabilities. We pay a floating rate, based on the arbitration awardLIBOR plus an interest rate spread, on the notional amount of the TRS. The TRS is designed to substantially offset changes in the SDCP liabilities due to changes in the value of the investment options made by employees. See Note 8. Derivative Financial Instruments for details.

LIKELY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

We are committed to developing new component technologies, products and alternative storage technologies. Our research and development focus is designed to bring new products to market in high volume, with quality attributes that our customers expect, before our competitors. Part of our product development strategy is to leverage a design platform and/or subsystem within product families to serve different market needs. This platform strategy allows for more efficient resource utilization, leverages best design practices, reduces exposure to changes in demand, and allows for achievement of lower costs through purchasing economies. Our advanced technology integration effort focuses disk drive and component research on recording subsystems, including read/write heads and recording media; market-specific product technology; and technology we believe may lead to new business opportunities. The primary purpose of our advanced technology integration effort is to ensure timely availability of mature component technologies for our product development teams as well as to allow us to leverage and coordinate those technologies in the design centers across our products in order to take advantage of opportunities in the marketplace.    

NON-FINANCIAL STATEMENT

Introduction

The European Union Directive 2014/95/EU (“the 2017 Regulations”) requires the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. This has been transposed into Irish legislation. This legislation requires us to identify and report on our business model and key non-financial matters related to the Company’s case against Western Digital inactivities. Our fiscal year 2016 which did2019 Global Citizenship Annual Report (“the 2019 GCAR”) provides additional information that may be relevant to investors in assessing the Company’s sustainability commitments and achievements but, except as expressly provided below, the information integrated in the 2019 GCAR is not recurincorporated by reference into the Irish Directors’ Report. Copies of the 2019 GCAR can be accessed at www.seagate.com, under “Global Citizenship”.

Business Overview

Refer to pages A-4 to A-10 for the ‘Industry Overview’, ‘Our Business’, and ‘Products’ section of the Directors’ Report.

Corporate Governance and Organization

We have concluded that the manufacture and distribution of storage solutions constitutes one reporting segment. We are governed by a Board of Directors (“the Board”). Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide a framework for our Board of Directors in fiscal year 2017,exercising their responsibilities toward our stakeholders, and these guidelines entrust the Board with the authority to review our business operations and make decisions independent of the Company’s management. The guidelines also provide a $12 million increase from impairmentprocess for shareholders to communicate concerns with the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the charters of certain strategic investmentseach of our Board committees, are available on our website at www.seagate.com, under “Investors- Governance.”

Principal Risks and $24 million interest expense onManagement

Refer to pages A-17 to A-35 for the issuance‘Principal Risks and Uncertainties’ section of $750 million of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2022 and $500 million of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2024.the Directors’ Report.

Income Taxes

   Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June
2017
   1 July 2016   Change   %
Change
 

Income tax expense

  $          43   $          26   $        17    65% 

We recorded an income tax expense” contained in this report for, among other things, a description of $43 million for fiscal year 2017 compared to an income tax expense of $26 million for fiscal year 2016. Our fiscal year 2017 income tax expense included approximately $2 million of net tax expense associated with variousnon-recurring items. Our fiscal year 2016 income tax expense included approximately $22 million of income tax benefits primarily associated with the release of tax reserves due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitation.

Our Irish tax resident parent holding company owns various US andnon-US subsidiaries that operate in multiplenon-Irish income tax jurisdictions. Our worldwide operating income is either subject to varying rates of income tax or is exempt from income tax due to tax holiday programs we operate under in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. These tax holidays are scheduled to expire in whole or in part at various dates through 2024.

Our income tax expense recorded for fiscal year 2017 differed from the income tax expense that would be derived by applying the Irish statutory rate of 25% to income before income taxes, primarily due to the net effect of (i) tax benefits related tonon-US earnings generated in jurisdictions that are subject to tax holidays or tax incentive programs and are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland, (ii) a decrease in valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets, and (iii) permanent differences. Our income tax expense recorded for fiscal year 2016 differed from the income tax expense that would be derived by applying the Irish statutory rate of 25% to income before income taxes, primarily due to the net effect of (i) tax benefits related tonon-US earnings generated in jurisdictions that are subject to tax holidays or tax incentive programs and are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland, (ii) tax benefits associated with the reversal of previously recorded taxes, and (iii) a decrease in valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets. The acquisition of Dot Hill System Corporation did not have a material impact on our effective tax rate.

Based on ournon-US ownership structure and subject to (i) potential future increases in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets; and (ii) a future change in our intention to indefinitely reinvest earnings from our subsidiaries outside of Ireland, we anticipate that our effective tax rate in future periods will generally be less than the Irish statutory rate.

At 30 June 2017, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was approximately $966 million.

At 30 June 2017, we had net deferred tax assets of $602 million, excluding $2 million of deferred taxes on intra-entity transactions. The realization of most of these deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on our ability to generate sufficient US and certainnon-US taxable income in future periods. Although realization is not assured, we believe that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, may increase or decrease in subsequent periods when were-evaluate the underlying basis for our estimates of future US and certainnon-US taxable income.

As of 30 June 2017, approximately $560 million and $101 million of our total UScurrent net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, respectively, are subject to annual limitations from $1 million to $45 million pursuant to US tax law.carryforward limitations.

We are required to file US federal, US, state, andnon-US income tax returns. We are no longer subject to tax examination of US federal income tax returns for years prior to fiscal year 2014. With respect to US state andnon-US income tax returns, we are generally no longer subject to tax examination for years ending prior to fiscal year 2006.

The Company generated a net income of $772 million and $248 million for the fiscal years ended 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, respectively. These amounts have been transferred to reserves.

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

The Company’s operations expose it to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

If we fail to predict demand accurately for our products in any quarter, we may not be able to recapture the cost of our investments which may materially adversely affect our financial results and the results of our operations.

Our industry operates primarily on quarterly purchasing cycles, with much of the order flow in any given quarter typically coming at the end of that quarter. Our quarterly results are subject to substantial fluctuations

and can be difficult to predict. Our manufacturing process requires us to make significant product-specific investments in inventory in each quarter for that quarter’s production. Since we typically receive the bulk of our orders late in a quarter after we have made our investments, there is a risk that our orders will not be sufficient to allow us to recapture the costs of our investment before the products resulting from that investment have become obsolete. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to accurately predict demand in the future.

Our revenues in any quarter are substantially dependent upon customer orders in that quarter. We attempt to project future orders based in part on estimates from our major customers. Our customers’ estimated requirements are not always accurate and we therefore cannot predict our quarterly revenues with any degree of certainty. In addition, we derive a portion of our revenues in each quarter from a number of relatively large orders. If one or more of our major customers decide to defer a purchase order or delays product acceptance in any given quarter, this is likely to result in reduced total revenues for that quarter.

The difficulty in forecasting demand also increases the difficulty in anticipating our inventory requirements, which may cause us to over-produce finished goods, resulting in increased working capital requirements, or under-produce finished goods, adversely affecting our ability to meet customer requirements and maintain our market share. Additionally, the risk of inventory write-offs could increase if we were to continue to hold higher inventory levels. Our uneven sales cycle makes inventory management challenging and future financial results less predictable. We cannot be certain that we will be able to recover the costs associated with increased inventory.

Other factors that may negatively impact our ability to recapture the cost of investments in any given quarter include:

the impact of variable demand and an aggressive pricing environment for disk drives;
the impact of competitive product announcements and possible excess industry supply both with respect to particular disk drive products and with respect to competing alternative storage technology solutions such as solid state drives (“SSDs”) in tablet, notebook and enterprise compute applications;
our inability to reduce our fixed costs to match sales in any quarter because of our vertical manufacturing strategy may increase our capital expenditures;
dependence on our ability to successfully qualify, manufacture and sell in increasing volumes on a cost-effective basis and with acceptable quality our disk drive products, particularly the new disk drive products with lower cost structures;
uncertainty in the amount of purchases from our distributor customers who from time to time constitute a large portion of our total sales;
our product mix and the related margins of the various products;
accelerated reduction in the price of our disk drives due to technological advances and/or an oversupply of disk drives in the market and shifting trends in demand which can create supply and demand imbalances;
manufacturing delays or interruptions, particularly at our manufacturing facilities in China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore, Thailand, or the United States;
limited access to components that we obtain from a single or a limited number of suppliers;
the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the cost of producing our products and the effective price of our products to foreign consumers; and
operational issues arising out of the increasingly automated nature of our manufacturing processes.

In addition, the demand for clientnon-compute products can be even more volatile and unpredictable than the demand for client compute products. In some cases, our products manufactured for clientnon-compute applications are uniquely configured for a single customer’s application, which creates a risk of unwanted and unsellable inventory if the anticipated volumes are not realized. This potential for unpredictable volatility is

increased by the possibility of competing alternative storage technologies like flash memory meeting the customers’ cost and capacity metrics, resulting in a rapid shift in demand from our products and disk drive technology, generally, to alternative storage technologies. Unpredictable fluctuations in demand for our products or rapid shifts in demand from our products to alternative storage technologies in new clientnon-compute applications could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

Market acceptance of new product introductions cannot be accurately predicted, and our results of operations will suffer if there is less demand for our new products than is anticipated.

The markets for our products are characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and technology enhancements, uncertain product life cycles and changes in customer demand. The success of our new product introductions is dependent on a number of factors, including market acceptance, our ability to manage the risks associated with product transitions, the effective management of inventory levels in line with anticipated product demand and the risk that our new products will have quality problems or other defects in the early stages of introduction that were not anticipated in the design of those products. Accordingly, we cannot accurately determine the ultimate effect that our new products will have on our results of operations. Failure to accurately anticipate customers’ need and accurately identify the shift in technological changes could materially adversely affect our long-term financial results.

Historically, our results of operations have substantially depended upon our ability to be among thefirst-to-market with new product offerings. We may face technological, operational and financial challenges in developing new products. In addition, our investments directed toward new product development may not yield the anticipated benefits. Our market share and results of operations in the future may be adversely affected if we fail to:

consistently maintain ourtime-to-maturity performance with our new products;
produce these products in sufficient volume;
qualify these products with key customers on a timely basis by meeting our customers’ performance and quality specifications; or
achieve acceptable manufacturing yields, quality and costs with these products.

In addition, the success of our new product introductions is dependent upon our ability to qualify as a primary source of supply with our OEM customers. In order for our products to be considered by our customers for qualification, we must be among the leaders intime-to-market with those new products. Once a product is accepted, any failure or delay in the qualification process or a requirement that we requalify can result in our losing sales to that customer until new products are introduced. The limited number of high-volume OEMs magnifies the effect of missing a product qualification opportunity. These risks are further magnified because we expect competitive pressures to result in declining sales, eroding prices, and declining gross margins on our current generation products. If the delivery of our products is delayed, our OEM customers may use our competitors’ products to meet their production requirements. We cannot assure that we will be among the leaders intime-to-market with new products or that we will be able to successfully qualify new products with our customers in the future.

We face the related risk that consumers and businesses may wait to make their purchases if they want to buy a new product that has been announced but not yet released. If this were to occur, we may be unable to sell our existing inventory of products that may be less efficient and cost effective compared to new products. As a result, even if we are among thefirst-to-market with a given product, subsequent introductions or announcements by our competitors of new products could cause us to lose revenue and not achieve a positive return on our investment in existing products and inventory.

If we cannot successfully deliver competitive products, our future results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our industries are highly competitive and our failure to anticipate and respond to technological and market developments could harm our ability to compete.

We operate in markets that are highly competitive and subject to rapid change and that are significantly affected by new product introductions, substantial price erosion and lower prices as part of a strategy to gain or retain market share and customers. Should these practices continue, we may need to continually reduce our prices for existing products to retain our market share, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our ability to offset the effect of price erosion through new product introductions at higher average prices is diminished to the extent competitors introduce products into particular markets ahead of our similar, competing products. Our ability to offset the effect of price erosion is also diminished during times when supply exceeds demand for a particular product.

Market share for our products can be negatively affected by our customers’ diversifying their sources of supply as our competitors enter the market for particular products, as well as by our ability to ramp volume production of new product offerings. When our competitors successfully introduce product offerings that are competitive with our recently introduced products, our customers may quickly diversify their sources of supply. Any significant decline in our market share in any of our principal market applications would adversely affect our results of operations.

Our principal sources of competition include:

disk drive manufacturers, such as Western Digital Corporation and Toshiba;
companies providing storage subsystems and components to OEMs;
electronic manufacturing services (“EMS”) companies acquiring the necessary skills and intellectual property to enter the enterprise data storage marketplace; and
collaborations betweenin-house development teams of existing and potential customers and a combination of EMS, contract electronic manufacturing (“CEM”) or emerging technology companies.

We also experience competition from other companies that produce alternative storage technologies like flash memory, where increasing capacity, decreasing cost, energy efficiency and improvements in performance ruggedness have resulted in competition with our lower capacity, smaller form factor disk drives. This competition has traditionally been in the markets for handheld consumer electronics applications and now it also includes SSDs for tablet, notebook and enterprise compute applications. Certain customers for both notebook and enterprise compute applications are adopting SSDs as alternatives to hard drives in certain applications. Further adoption of these alternative storage technologies may impact the competitiveness of our product portfolio and reduce our market share and adversely affect our results of operation.

The markets for our data storage system products are also characterized by technological change driven in part by the adoption of new industry standards. These standards provide mechanisms to ensure technology component interoperability can occur and may reduce our capability for differentiation or innovation and our affected products would revert to commodity status. This could lower the barriers to entry to our market away from our specialist research and development skills and enable entry for the general-purpose design skills found in some large EMS and CEM companies. Commodity markets are driven by extremely low margins and very aggressive competitive pricing. If our market becomes more commoditized and we fail to deliver innovative value-added alternatives to our customers, we will have difficulty competing against the larger EMS and CEM companies. If we are unable to compete successfully against our current and future competitors, we could experience profit margin reductions or loss of market share, which could significantly harm our financial condition.

We may be unable to effectively plan and make strategic changes in our business which may materially adversely affect our financial and business results. Additionally, we may not achieve the intended benefits of our strategic change efforts.

We may not be able to identify suitable strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investment opportunities, to successfully acquire and integrate companies that provide complementary products or technologies or to realize the anticipated benefits of such transactions.

Our growth strategy involves pursuing strategic alliances with, making acquisitions of, forming joint ventures with or making investments in other companies that are complementary to our business. There is substantial competition for attractive strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture and investment candidates. Additionally, the current trend of consolidation in the data storage industry may materially adversely affect our business and financial results and our future growth prospects. Accordingly, we may not be able to identify suitable strategic alliances, acquisition, joint venture, or investment candidates. Even if we can identify them, we cannot assure you that we will be able to partner with, acquire or invest in suitable candidates, or integrate acquired technologies or operations successfully into our existing technologies and operations. Moreover, our ability to finance potential strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investments may be limited by our leverage level, the covenants contained in the instruments that govern our outstanding indebtedness, and any agreements governing any other debt we may incur.

If we are successful in forming strategic alliances or acquiring, forming joint ventures or making investments in other companies, any of these transactions may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, particularly while the operations of an acquired business are being integrated. It is also likely that integration of acquired companies would lead to the loss of key employees from those companies or the loss of customers of those companies. In addition, the integration of any acquired companies would require substantial attention from our senior management, which may limit the amount of time available to be devoted to ourday-to-day operations or to the execution of our strategy. Growth by strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture or investment involves an even higher degree of risk to the extent we combine new product offerings and enter new markets in which we have limited experience, and no assurance can be given that acquisitions of entities with new or alternative business models will be successfully integrated or achieve their stated objectives. There can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture or investment that we make or, if we do, how long it will take to achieve such benefits.

Furthermore, the expansion of our business involves the risk that we might not manage our growth effectively, that we would incur additional debt to finance these acquisitions or investments, that we may have impairment of goodwill or acquired intangible assets associated with these acquisitions and that we would incur substantial charges relating to thewrite-off ofin-process research and development. Each of these items could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we could issue additional ordinary shares in connection with future strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investments. Issuing shares in connection with such transactions would have the effect of diluting your ownership percentage of the ordinary shares and could cause the price of our ordinary shares to decline.

If we do not develop products in time to keep pace with technological changes, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

Our customers demand new generations of disk drive products as advances in computer hardware and software have created the need for improved storage products, with features such as increased storage capacity, improved performance and reliability and lower cost. We, and our competitors, have developed improved products, and we will need to continue to do so in the future. Such product development requires significant investments in research and development. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully complete the design or introduction of new products in a timely manner, that we will be able to manufacture new products in sufficient volumes with acceptable manufacturing yields, that we will be able to successfully

market these new products or that these products will perform to specifications on a long-term basis. In addition, the impact of slowing areal density growth may adversely impact our ability to be successful.

When we develop new products with higher capacity and more advanced technology, our results of operations may decline because the increased difficulty and complexity associated with producing these products increases the likelihood of reliability, quality or operability problems. If our products suffer increases in failures, are of low quality or are not reliable, customers may reduce their purchases of our products and our manufacturing rework and scrap costs and service and warranty costs may increase. In addition, a decline in the reliability of our products may make us less competitive as compared with other disk drive manufacturers or competing technologies.

We may fail to successfully anticipate technological shifts, business opportunities and market demand. Additionally, the barriers to entry in developing NAND flash memory products and SSDs may materially adversely affect our future growth prospects. We may fail to develop new products, identify business strategies and introduce competitive product offerings to meet those technological shifts which may materially adversely affect our ability to compete effectively and may impact our future financial results.

Servicing our indebtedness requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.

We are leveraged and have significant debt service obligations. Our significant debt and debt service requirements could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities and reduce our options for capital allocation. For example, our high level of debt presents the following risks:

we are required to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to pay principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances, and other general corporate requirements;

our substantial leverage increases our vulnerability to economic downturns and adverse competitive and industry conditions and could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to those of our competitors that are less leveraged;

our debt service obligations could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry and could limit our ability to pursue other business opportunities, borrow more money for operations or capital in the future and implement our business strategies;

our level of debt may restrict us from raising additional financing on satisfactory terms to fund working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances, and other general corporate requirements; and

covenants in our debt instruments limit our ability to pay future dividends or make other restricted payments and investments.

In the event that we need to refinance all or a portion of our outstanding debt as it matures, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as the terms of our existing debt or refinance our existing debt at all. If prevailing interest rates or other factors existing at the time of refinancing result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to the refinanced debt would increase. Furthermore, if any rating agency changes our credit rating or outlook, our debt and equity securities could be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our ability to refinance existing debt or raise additional capital.

In addition, our business may not generate cash flow in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay the principal of, or interest on, our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs, including working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances and other general corporate requirements.

Our ability to generate cash is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that:

our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations;

we will continue to realize the cost savings, revenue growth and operating improvements that result from the execution of our long-term strategic plan; or

future sources of funding will be available to us in amounts sufficient to enable us to fund our liquidity needs.

If we cannot fund our liquidity needs, we will have to take actions such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances, and other general corporate requirements. We cannot assure you that any of these remedies could, if necessary, be effected on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or that they would permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In addition if we incur additional debt, the risks associated with our substantial leverage, including the risk that we will be unable to service our debt or generate enough cash flow to fund our liquidity needs, could intensify.

Changes in demand for computer systems and storage subsystems may in the future cause a decline in demand for our products.

Our products are components in computers, data storage systems, and consumer electronics devices. The demand for these products has been volatile. Unexpected slowdowns in demand for computer systems, storage subsystems or consumer electronics devices generally cause sharp declines in demand for our products. Declines in consumer spending could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and services and on our financial condition and results of operations.

While sales to ClientNon-Compute and Cloud Systems and Solutions markets are becoming a more significant source of revenue, sales to the Client Compute market remain an important part of our business. The Client Compute market, however, has been, and we expect it to continue to be, adversely affected by the growth of tablet computers, smart phones and similar devices and that perform many of the same capabilities as computers, the lengthening of product life cycles and macroeconomic conditions. We believe that the deterioration of the Client Compute market has accelerated recently, and that this accelerated deterioration may continue or further accelerate, which could cause our operating results to suffer. Additionally, if demand in the Client Compute market is worse than expected as a result of these or other conditions, demand for our products in the Client Compute market may decrease at a faster rate and our operating results may be adversely affected.

The Enterprise Storage market has been adversely affected by the growth of the utilization of NAND flash in mission critical applications. This deterioration of the Enterprise Storage market could cause our operating results to suffer. The potential migration of the Enterprise Storage market to NAND flash memory products and an acceleration of the pace of migration may materially adversely affect our financial results.

Causes of declines in demand for our products in the past have included weakness in macroeconomic environments, announcements or introductions of major new operating systems or semiconductor

improvements or changes in consumer preferences, such as the shift to mobile devices. We believe these announcements and introductions have from time to time caused consumers to defer their purchases and made inventory obsolete. Whenever an oversupply of our products causes participants in our industry to have higher than anticipated inventory levels, we experience even more intense price competition from other manufacturers than usual which may materially adversely affect our financial results.

Increases in the areal density of disk drives may outpace customers’ demand for storage capacity.

The rate of increase in areal density, or storage capacity per square inch on a disk, may be greater than the increase in our customers’ demand for aggregate storage capacity, particularly in certain market applications like client compute. As a result, our customers’ storage capacity needs may be satisfied with lower priced, low capacity disk drives. These factors could decrease our sales, especially when combined with continued price erosion, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We may not be successful in our efforts to grow our cloud systems and silicon group.

We have made and are continuing to make investments to develop our Cloud Systems and Silicon group. Our Cloud Systems and Silicon group is subject to the following risks:

the cloud systems and solutions market may develop more slowly than we expect;
we may be unable to accurately estimate and predict data center capacity and requirements;
we may not be able to offer compelling solutions to enterprises and consumers;
our Cloud Systems and Silicon group generally has a long and unpredictable sales cycle, and growth in this business is likely to depend on relatively large customer orders, which may increase the variability of our results of operations and the difficulty of matching revenues with expenses; and
the current uncertainty surrounding net neutrality may cause the data center and cloud business to grow at a slower rate than expected.

Our results of operations and share price may be adversely affected if we are not successful in our efforts to grow our cloud computing business as anticipated. In addition, our growth in this sector may bring us into closer competition with some of our customers or potential customers, which may decrease their willingness to do business with us.

Changes in the macroeconomic environment have negatively impacted, and may continue to, negatively impact our results of operations.

Due to the continuing uncertainty about current macroeconomic conditions affecting consumer and enterprise spending, we believe our customers may postpone spending in response to volatility in credit and equity markets, negative financial news and/or declines in income or asset values, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products. Additionally, enterprise spending continues to remain cautious in many regions around the world. Other factors that could influence demand include conditions in the labor market, healthcare costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and on our financial condition and operating results.

Macroeconomic developments like the ongoing withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, the debt crisis in certain countries in the European Union and slowing economies in parts of Asia and South America could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition which, in turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A general weakening of, and related declining corporate confidence in, the global economy or the curtailment in government or corporate spending could cause current or potential customers to reduce their IT budgets or be unable to fund hardware systems, which could cause customers to delay, decrease or cancel purchases of our products or cause customers not to pay us or to delay paying us for previously purchased products and services.

Our quarterly results of operations fluctuate, sometimes significantly, from period to period, and may cause our share price to decline.

Our quarterly revenue and results of operations may fluctuate, sometimes significantly, from period to period. These fluctuations, which we expect to continue, may be occasioned by a variety of factors, including:

current uncertainty in global economic conditions may pose a risk to the overall economy;
adverse changes in the level of economic activity in the major regions in which we do business;
competitive pressures resulting in lower selling prices by our competitors targeted to encourage shifting of customer demand;
delays or problems in our introduction of new, more cost-effective products, the inability to achieve high production yields or delays in customer qualification or initial product quality issues;
changes in purchasing patterns by our distributor customers;
application of new or revised industry standards;
disruptions in our supply chain;
increased costs or adverse changes in availability of supplies of raw materials or components;
the impact of corporate restructuring activities that we have and may continue to engage in;
changes in the demand for the computer systems and data storage products that contain our products due to seasonality, economic conditions and other factors;
changes in purchases from period to period by our primary customers;
shifting trends in customer demand which, when combined with overproduction of particular products, particularly when the industry is served by multiple suppliers, results in unfavorable supply/demand imbalances;
our high proportion of fixed costs, including research and development expenses;
any impairments in goodwill or other long-lived assets;
announcements of new products, services or technological innovations by us or our competitors; and
adverse changes in the performance of our products.

As a result, we believe thatquarter-to-quarter and year-over-year comparisons of our revenue and results of operations may not be meaningful, and that these comparisons may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance. Our results of operations in one or more future quarters may fail to meet the expectations of investment research analysts or investors, which could cause an immediate and significant decline in the trading price of our ordinary shares.

Because we experience seasonality in the sales of our products, our results of operations will generally be adversely impacted during the second half of our fiscal year.

Sales of computer systems, storage subsystems and consumer electronics tend to be seasonal, and therefore we expect to continue to experience seasonality in our business as we respond to variations in our customers’ demand for our products. In particular, we anticipate that sales of our products will continue to be lower during the second half of our fiscal year. In the client compute and clientnon-compute market applications of our disk drive business, this seasonality is partially attributable to the historical trend in our results derived from our customers’ increased sales of desktop computers, notebook computers, and consumer electronics during theback-to-school and winter holiday season. In the enterprise market our sales are seasonal because of the capital budgeting and purchasing cycles of our end users. Since our working capital needs peak during periods in which we are increasing production in anticipation of orders that have not yet been received, our results of operations will fluctuate seasonally even if the forecasted demand for our products proves accurate. Furthermore, it is difficult for us to evaluate the degree to which this seasonality may affect our business in future periods because of the rate and unpredictability of product transitions and new product introductions, particularly in the clientnon-compute market, as well as macroeconomic conditions.

We have a long and unpredictable sales cycle for enterprise data storage solutions.

Our enterprise data storage solutions are technically complex and we typically supply them in high quantities to a small number of customers. Many of our products are also tailored to meet the specific requirements of individual customers, and are often integrated by our customers into the systems and products that they sell. Factors that affect the length of our sales cycle include:

the time required for testing and evaluating our products before they are deployed;
the size of the deployment; and
the degree of system configuration necessary to deploy our products.

As a result, our sales cycle for enterprise data storage solutions is often in excess of one year, and the length of our sales cycle is frequently unpredictable. In addition, the emerging and evolving nature of the market for the products that we sell may lead prospective customers to postpone their purchasing decisions. We invest resources and incur costs during this cycle that may not be recovered if we do not successfully conclude sales. These factors lead to difficulty in matching revenues with expenses, and to increased expenditures which together may adversely impact our results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by the loss of, or reduced, delayed or canceled purchases by, one or more of our major customers.

Some of our key customers account for a large portion of our disk drive revenue. While we have longstanding relationships with many of our customers, if any of our key customers were to significantly reduce their purchases from us, our results of operations would be adversely affected. While sales to major customers may vary from period to period, a major customer that permanently discontinues or significantly reduces its relationship with us could be difficult to replace. In line with industry practice, new customers usually require that we pass a lengthy and rigorous qualification process at the customer’s cost. Accordingly, it may be difficult or costly for us to attract new major customers. Additionally, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations or other significant transactions involving our customers generally entail risks to our business. If a significant transaction involving any of our key customers results in the loss of or reduction in purchases by these key customers, it could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

We are dependent on sales to distributors and retailers, which may increase price erosion and the volatility of our sales.

A substantial portion of our sales has been to distributors of disk drive products. Certain of our distributors may also market other products that compete with our products. Product qualification programs in this distribution channel are limited, which increases the number of competing products that are available to satisfy demand, particularly in times of lengthening product cycles. As a result, purchasing decisions in this channel are based largely on price, terms and product availability. Sales volumes through this channel are also less predictable and subject to greater volatility than sales to our OEM customers. In addition, deterioration in business and economic conditions could exacerbate price erosion and volatility as distributors lower prices to compensate for lower demand and higher inventory levels. Our distributors’ ability to access credit for purposes of funding their operations may also affect purchases of our products by these customers.

If distributors reduce their purchases of our products or prices decline significantly in the distribution channel or if distributors experience financial difficulties or terminate their relationships with us, our revenues and results of operations would be adversely affected.

We believe that industry demand for storage products in the long-term is increasing due to the proliferation of media-rich digital content in consumer applications and is fueling increased consumer demand

for storage. This has led to the expansion of our branded solutions such as external storage products to provide additional storage capacity and to secure data in case of disaster or system failure, or to provide independent storage solutions for multiple users in home or small business environments. Consumer spending on retail sales of our branded solutions has deteriorated in some markets and may continue to do so if poor global economic conditions continue and higher levels of unemployment persist. This could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and services and on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, such retail sales of our branded solutions traditionally experience seasonal variability in demand with higher levels of demand in the first half of our fiscal year driven by consumer spending in theback-to-school season from late summer to fall and the traditional holiday shopping season from fall to winter. Additionally, our ability to reach such consumers depends on us maintaining effective working relationships with major retailers and distributors. Failure to anticipate consumer demand for our branded solutions as well as an inability to maintain effective working relationships with retail and online distributors may adversely impact our future results of operations.

Our international sales and manufacturing operations subject us to risks related to disruptions in foreign markets, currency exchange fluctuations, longer payment cycles, seasonality, limitations imposed by a variety of legal and regulatory regimes, potential adverse tax consequences, increased costs, our customers’ credit and access to capital, health-related risks, and access to personnel.

We have significant sales and manufacturing operations in foreign countries, including manufacturing facilities, sales personnel and customer support operations. We have manufacturing facilities in China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore and Thailand, in addition to those in the United States. Additionally, the manufacturing of some of our products is concentrated in certain geographical locations. The production of certain drive subassemblies are limited to Thailand and the production of media is limited to Singapore. Disruptions in the economic, environmental, political, legal or regulatory landscape in these countries may have a material adverse impact on our manufacturing operations.

Our international operations are subject to economic risks inherent in doing business in foreign countries, including the following:

Disruptions in Foreign Markets.  Disruptions in financial markets and the deterioration of the underlying economic conditions in the past in some countries, including those in Asia, United Kingdom and the European Union have had an impact on our sales to customers located in, or whoseend-user customers are located in, these countries.

Fluctuations in Currency Exchange Rates.    Prices for our products are denominated predominately in US dollars, even when sold to customers that are located outside the United States. An increase in the value of the dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in those markets outside of the US where we sell in dollars. This could adversely impact our sales and market share in such areas or increase pressure on us to lower our price, and adversely impact our profit margins. A weakened dollar could increase the cost of expenses such as payroll, utilities, tax, and marketing expenses, as well as overseas capital expenditures. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. We may attempt to manage the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes by, among other things, entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts. However, these contracts may not cover our full exposure and subject us to certain counterparty credit risks. See “Financial Risk Management disclosures” of this report for additional information about our foreign currency exchange risk.

Longer Payment Cycles.  Our customers outside of the United States are sometimes allowed longer time periods for payment than our US customers. This increases the risk of nonpayment due to the possibility that the financial condition of particular customers may worsen during the course of the payment period.

Seasonality.  Seasonal reductions in the business activities of our customers during the summer months, particularly in Europe, and the impact of international holidays like the Chinese New Year, typically result in lower earnings during those periods.

Legal and Regulatory Limitations.  Our international operations are affected by limitations on imports, tariffs, duties, currency exchange control regulations, price controls, export control laws, antitrust matters including the trade and economic sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, and other restraints on trade. In addition, China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore and Thailand, in which we have significant operating assets, and the European Union have exercised and continue to exercise significant influence over many aspects of their domestic economies including, but not limited to, fair competition, tax practices, anti-corruption, antitrust, price controls and international trade. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate these or other applicable laws, rules and regulations to which we may be subject. Violations of these laws and regulations could lead to significant penalties, restraints on our export or import privileges, monetary fines, government investigations, disruption of our operating activities, criminal proceedings and regulatory or other actions that could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

Potential Adverse Tax Consequences.  Our international operations create a risk of potential adverse tax consequences, including imposition of withholding or other taxes on payments by our subsidiaries. In addition, our taxable income in any jurisdiction is dependent upon acceptance of our operational practices and intercompany transfer pricing by local tax authorities as being on an arm’s length basis. Due to inconsistencies in application of the arm’s length standard among taxing authorities, as well as a lack of adequate treaty-based protection, transfer pricing challenges by tax authorities could, if successful, substantially increase our income tax expense. We are subject to tax audits around the world, and are under audit in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional income tax against us. Although we believe our tax positions are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits could be materially different from our recorded income tax provisions and accruals. The ultimate results of an audit could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made and could result in increases to our overall tax expense in subsequent periods. In light of the ongoing fiscal challenges many countries are facing, various levels of government are increasingly focused on tax reform and other legislative action to increase tax revenue. In addition, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting recommendations are reshaping international tax rules in numerous countries. These actual and potential changes in the relevant tax laws applicable to corporate multinationals along with potential changes in accounting and other laws, regulations, administrative practices, principles, and interpretations could increase the risk of double taxation, cause increased tax audit activity, and could impact our effective tax rate.

Increased Costs.  The shipping and transportation costs associated with our international operations are typically higher than those associated with our US operations, resulting in decreased operating margins in some foreign countries.

Credit and Access to Capital Risks.  Our international customers could have reduced access to working capital due to higher interest rates, reduced bank lending resulting from contractions in the money supply or the deterioration in the customer’s or its bank’s financial condition, or the inability to access other financing.

Global Health Outbreaks.  The occurrence of a pandemic disease may adversely impact our operations, and some of our key customers. Such diseases could also potentially disrupt the timeliness and reliability of the distribution network we rely on.

Tariffs or Other Restrictions on Foreign Imports.  The US government could impose tariffs or other restrictions on foreign imports. The implementation of a border tax, tariff or higher customs duties on our products manufactured abroad or components that we import into the US, or any potential corresponding actions by other countries in which we do business, could negatively impact our financial performance.

Access to Personnel.  There is substantial competition for qualified and capable personnel in certain jurisdictions in which we operate, including China, which may make it difficult for us to recruit and retain qualified employees in sufficient numbers. Increased difficulty in recruiting or retaining sufficient and adequate personnel in our international operations may lead to increased manufacturing and employment compensation costs, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We could suffer a loss of revenue and increased costs, exposure to significant liability including legal and regulatory consequences, reputational harm, and other serious negative consequences if we encounter cyber-attacks, ransomware or other data security breaches that disrupt our operations or result in the dissemination of proprietary or confidential information about us or our customers or other third-parties.

Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment and the electronic data stored in our databases from damage by, among other things, earthquake, floods, fire, natural disasters, accidents, power disruptions, telecommunications failures, acts of terrorism or war, employee misconduct, physical or electronicbreak-ins, cyber-attacks, ransomware, system security breaches or similar events or disruptions. We manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data relating to our operations. In addition, our outsourcing services and cloud computing businesses routinely process, store, and transmit large amounts of data for our customers and vendors, including sensitive and personally identifiable information. As our operations become more automated and increasingly interdependent, our exposure to the risks posed by these types of events will increase. We have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to computer viruses or other malicious codes, cyber-attacks, or other computer-related attempts to breach the information technology (“IT”) systems we use for these purposes. We may also be subject to IT system failures and network disruptions due to these factors. Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate or compromise our confidential information or that of third-parties, create system disruptions, or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third-parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system.

The costs to us to eliminate or address the foregoing security problems and security vulnerabilities before or after a cyber-incident could be significant. System redundancy may be ineffective or inadequate, and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities. Our remediation efforts may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays, or cessation of service, and loss of existing or potential customers that may impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution, or other critical functions. We could lose existing or potential customers for outsourcing services or other IT solutions in connection with any actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our products. In addition, breaches of our security measures and the unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive or confidential data about us or our customers or other third-parties, could expose us, our vendors and customers, or other third-parties affected to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation and potential liability for us, damage our brand and reputation, or otherwise harm our business. In addition, we rely in certain limited capacities on third-party data management providers whose possible security problems and security vulnerabilities may have similar effects on us.

We are subject to laws, rules, and regulations in the US, UK, European Union and other countries relating to the collection, use, and security of user data. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between us and our subsidiaries, and among us, our subsidiaries and other parties with which we have commercial relations. Our ability to execute transactions and to possess and use personal information and data in conducting our business subjects us to legislative and regulatory burdens that may require us to notify vendors, customers or employees of a data security breach. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant expenses to comply with mandatory privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards, or contractual obligations. These laws, protocols and standards continue to develop and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Complying with emerging and changing international requirements may cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices. If we fail to comply with applicable federal, state or international privacy-related or data protection laws we may be subject to proceedings by governmental entities and incur penalties or significant legal liability.

From time to time, we may be subject to litigation, government investigations or governmental proceedings, which may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various legal, regulatory or administrative investigations, negotiations or proceedings arising in the normal course of business.

In the event of litigation, government investigations or governmental proceedings, we are subject to the inherent risks and uncertainties that may result if outcomes differ from our expectations. In the event of adverse outcomes in any litigation, investigation or government proceeding, we could be required to pay substantial damages, fines or penalties, and cease certain practices or activities, which could materially harm our business.

The costs associated with litigation and government investigations can also be unpredictable depending on the complexity and length of time devoted to such litigation or investigation. Litigation, investigations or government proceedings may also divert the efforts and attention of our key personnel, which could also harm our business.

If we do not control our fixed costs, we will not be able to compete effectively in our industry.

We continually seek to make our cost structure and business processes more efficient. We are focused on increasing workforce flexibility and scalability, and improving overall competitiveness by leveraging our global capabilities, as well as external talent and skills, worldwide. Our strategy involves, to a substantial degree, increasing revenue and product volume while at the same time controlling operating expenses. If we do not control our operating expenses, our ability to compete in the marketplace may be impaired. In the past, activities to reduce operating costs have included closures and transfers of facilities, significant personnel reductions, restructuring efforts and efforts to increase automation. Our restructuring efforts may not yield the intended benefits and may be unsuccessful or disruptive to our business operations which may materially adversely affect our financial results.

If we experience shortages or delays in the receipt of, or cost increases in, critical components, equipment or raw materials necessary to manufacture our products, we may suffer lower operating margins, production delays and other material adverse effects.

The cost, quality and supply of components, subassemblies, certain equipment and raw materials used to manufacture our products and key components like recording media and heads are critical to our success. The equipment we use to manufacture our products and components is frequently custom made and comes from a few suppliers and the lead times required to obtain manufacturing equipment can be significant. Particularly

important for our products include read/write heads, aluminum or glass substrates for recording media, ASICs, spindle motors, printed circuit boards, and suspension assemblies.

We rely on sole suppliers or a limited number of suppliers for some or all of these components that we do not manufacture, including aluminum and glass substrates, read/write heads, ASICs, spindle motors, printed circuit boards, and suspension assemblies. Many of such component suppliers are geographically concentrated which makes our supply chain more vulnerable to regional disruptions such as severe weather, acts of terrorism and unpredictablegeo-political climate which may have a material impact on the production and availability of many components. If our vendors for these components are unable to meet our cost, quality, and supply requirements, continue to remain financially viable or fulfill their contractual commitments and obligations, we could experience a shortage in supply or an increase in production costs, which would materially adversely affect our results of operations and our financial results.

Certain rare earth elements are critical in the manufacture of our products. We purchase components that contain rare earth elements from a number of countries, including the People’s Republic of China. We cannot predict whether any nation will impose regulations, quotas or embargoes upon the rare earth elements incorporated into our products that would restrict the worldwide supply of such metals or increase their cost. We have experienced increased costs and production delays when we were unable to obtain the necessary equipment or sufficient quantities of some components, and/or have been forced to pay higher prices or make volume purchase commitments or advance deposits for some components, equipment or raw materials that were in short supply in the industry in general. If any major supplier were to restrict the supply available to us or increase the cost of the rare earth elements used in our products, we could experience a shortage in supply or an increase in production costs, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Consolidation among component manufacturers has resulted and may continue to result in some component manufacturers exiting the industry or not making sufficient investments in research to develop new components.

If there is a shortage of, or delay in supplying us with, critical components, equipment or raw materials, then:

it is likely that our suppliers would raise their prices and, if we could not pass these price increases to our customers, our operating margin would decline;
we might have to reengineer some products, which would likely cause production and shipment delays, make the reengineered products more costly and provide us with a lower rate of return on these products;
we would likely have to allocate the components we receive to certain of our products and ship less of others, which could reduce our revenues and could cause us to lose sales to customers who could purchase more of their required products from manufacturers that either did not experience these shortages or delays or that made different allocations; and
we might be late in shipping products, causing potential customers to make purchases from our competitors, thus causing our revenue and operating margin to decline.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain critical components in a timely and economic manner.

We often aim to lead the market in new technology deployments and leverage unique and customized technology from single source suppliers who are early adopters in the emerging market. Our options in supplier selection in these cases are limited and the supplier based technology may consequently be single sourced until wider adoption of the technology occurs and any necessary licenses become available. In such cases any technical issues in the supplier’s technology may cause us to delay shipments of our new technology deployments and therefore harm our financial position.

If revenues fall or customer demand decreases significantly, we may not meet all of our purchase commitments to certain suppliers.

From time to time, we enter into long-term,non-cancelable purchase commitments or make largeup-front investments with certain suppliers in order to secure certain components or technologies for the production of our products or to supplement our internal manufacturing capacity for certain components. If our actual revenues in the future are lower than our projections or if customer demand decreases significantly below our projections, we may not meet all of our purchase commitments with these suppliers. As a result, it is possible that our revenues will not be sufficient to recoup ourup-front investments, in which case we will have to shift output from our internal manufacturing facilities to these suppliers or make penalty-type payments under these contracts.

Conflict minerals regulations may cause us to incur additional expenses and could limit the supply and increase the cost of certain metals used in manufacturing our products.

In August 2012, the SEC adopted rules establishing additional disclosure and reporting requirements regarding the use of specified minerals, or conflict minerals, that are necessary to the functionality or production of products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured. These rules will require us to determine, disclose and report whether or not such conflict minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country. These rules could affect our ability to source certain materials used in our products at competitive prices and could impact the availability of certain minerals used in the manufacture of our products, including gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers of “conflict free” minerals, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict free minerals in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Our customers, including our OEM customers, may require that our products be free of conflict minerals, and our revenues and margins may be harmed if we are unable to procure conflict free minerals at a reasonable price, or at all, or are unable to pass through any increased costs associated with meeting these demands. Additionally, we may face reputational challenges with our customers and other stakeholders if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins of all minerals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement. We may also face challenges with government regulators and our customers and suppliers if we are unable to sufficiently verify that the metals used in our products are conflict free. We expect that there may be material costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of certain minerals used in our products, as well as costs related to possible changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification and disclosure requirements. Additionally, the regulatory and compliance framework for conflict minerals may undergo changes which may further increase the cost of compliance. Our stakeholders and customers may place increased demands on our compliance framework which may in turn negatively impact our relationships with our suppliers.

The loss of key executive officers and employees could negatively impact our business prospects.

Our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued service of key members of management as well as marketing, sales and product development personnel. The loss of one or more of our key personnel may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We believe our future success will also depend in large part upon our ability to attract, retain and further motivate highly skilled management, marketing, sales and product development personnel. We have experienced intense competition for personnel, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our key employees or that we will be successful in attracting, assimilating and retaining personnel in the future.

Due to the complexity of our products, some defects may only become detectable after deployment.

Our products are highly complex and are designed to operate in and form part of larger complex networks and storage systems. Defects in our products, or in the networks and systems of which they form a part, directly or indirectly, have resulted in and may in the future result in:

increased costs and product delays until complex solution level interoperability issues are resolved;
costs associated with the remediation of any problems attributable to our products;
loss of or delays in revenues;
loss of customers;
failure to achieve market acceptance and loss of market share;
increased service and warranty costs; and
increased insurance costs.

Defects in our products could also result in legal actions by our customers for property damage, injury or death. Product liability claims could exceed the level of insurance coverage that we have obtained to cover defects in our products. Any significant uninsured claims could significantly harm our financial condition.

Political events, war, terrorism, natural disasters, public health issues and other circumstances could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

War, terrorism, geopolitical uncertainties, natural disasters, public health issues, and other business interruptions have caused and could cause damage or disruption to international commerce and the global economy, and thus could have a strong negative effect on our business, our suppliers, logistics providers, manufacturing vendors and customers. Our business operations are subject to interruption by natural disasters such as floods and earthquakes, fires, power shortages, terrorist attacks, other hostile acts, labor disputes, public health issues, and other events beyond our control. Such events could decrease demand for our products, make it difficult or impossible for us to make and deliver products to our customers, or to receive components from our suppliers, and create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain. In the event of a natural disaster, losses and significant recovery time could be required to resume operations and our financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected. Should major public health issues, including pandemics, arise, we could be negatively affected by stringent employee travel restrictions, additional limitations in freight services, governmental actions limiting the movement of products between regions, delays in production ramps of new products, and disruptions in our operations and some of our key customers.

Failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The sale and manufacturing of products in certain states and countries may subject us and our suppliers to state, federal and international laws and regulations governing protection of the environment, including those governing discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, restrictions on the presence of certain substances in electronic products and the responsibility for environmentally safe disposal or recycling. We endeavor to ensure that we and our suppliers comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, however, compliance may increase our operating costs and otherwise impact future financial results. If additional or more stringent requirements are imposed on us in the future, we could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures. If we fail to comply with applicable environmental laws, regulations, initiatives, or standards of conduct, our customers may refuse to purchase our products and we could be subject to fines, penalties and possible prohibition of sales of our products into one or more states or countries, liability to our customers and damage to our reputation, which could result in a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations.

Any cost reduction initiatives that we undertake may not deliver the results we expect, and these actions may adversely affect our business.

From time to time, we engage in restructuring plans that may result in workforce reduction and consolidation of our real estate facilities and our manufacturing footprint. In addition, management will continue to evaluate our global footprint and cost structure, and additional restructuring plans are expected to be formalized. As a result of our restructuring, we may experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge, disruptions to our operations and/or inefficiency during transitional periods. Any cost-cutting measures could impact employee retention. In addition, we cannot be sure that the cost reduction and global footprint consolidation will be successful in reducing our overall expenses as we expect or that additional costs will not offset any such reductions or global footprint consolidation. If our operating costs are higher than we expect or if we do not maintain adequate control of our costs and expenses, our result of operations may suffer.

Our ability to use our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards might be limited.

The use of a portion of our US net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is subject to annual limitations pursuant to US tax law. Section 382 of the US Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards that might be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in ownership. As a result, future changes in ownership could put further limitations on the availability of our net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards.

Deterioration in global credit and financial market conditions could negatively impact the value of our current portfolio of cash equivalents or short-term investments and our ability to meet our financing objectives.

Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase. Our short-term investments consist primarily of readily marketable debt securities with remaining maturities of more than 90 days at the time of purchase. Our investment policy has as its principal objectives the preservation of principal and maintenance of liquidity. We mitigate default risk by investing in high-quality investment grade securities, limiting the time to maturity and by monitoring the counter-parties and underlying obligors closely.

While as of the date of this filing, we are not aware of any material downgrades, losses, or other significant deterioration in the fair value of our cash equivalents or short-term investments, no assurance can be given that future deterioration in conditions of the global credit and financial markets would not negatively impact our current portfolio of cash equivalents or short-term investments or our ability to meet our financing objectives.

We are at times subject to intellectual property legal proceedings and claims which could cause us to incur significant additional costs or prevent us from selling our products, and which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject fromtime-to-time to legal proceedings and claims, including claims of alleged infringement of the patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties by us, or our customers, in connection with theirthe use of our products. Intellectual property litigation can be expensive and time-consuming, regardless of the merits of any claim, and could divert our management’s attention from operating our business. In addition, intellectual property lawsuits are subject to inherent uncertainties due to the complexity of the technical issues involved, which may cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Patent litigation has increased due to the current uncertainty of the law and the increasing competition and overlap of product functionality in the field. Some of the actions that we face fromtime-to-time seek injunctions against the sale of our products and/or substantial monetary damages, which, if granted or awarded, could materially harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

We cannot be certain that our products do not and will not infringe issued patents or other intellectual property rights of others. We may not be aware of currently filed patent applications that relate to our products or technology. If patents are later issued on these applications, we may be liable for infringement. If our products were found to infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products in one or more geographic locations, expend significant resources to developnon-infringing technology, discontinue the use of specific processes or obtain licenses to the technology infringed. We might not be able to obtain the necessary licenses on acceptable terms, or at all, or be able to reengineer our products successfully to avoid infringement. Any of the foregoing could cause us to incur significant costs and prevent us from selling our products, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. See Note“Note 14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies”Contingencies contained in this report for a description of pending intellectual property proceedings.

We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, confidentiality proceduresagreements, security measures and licensing arrangements to protect our IPintellectual property rights. In the past, we have been involved in significant and expensive disputes regarding our IPintellectual property rights and those of others, including claims that we may be infringing patents, trademarks and other IPintellectual property rights of third-parties. We expect that we will be involved in similar disputes in the future.

There can be no assurance that:

 

any of our existing patents will continue to be held valid, if challenged;

patents will be issued for any of our pending applications;

any claims allowed from existing or pending patents will have sufficient scope or strength to protect us;

our patents will be issued in the primary countries where our products are sold in order to protect our rights and potential commercial advantage;

we will be able to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information through confidentiality agreements with our customers, suppliers and employees and through other security measures; and

others will not gain access to our trade secrets.

In addition, our competitors may be able to design their products around our patents and other proprietary rights. Enforcement of our rights often requires litigation. If we bring a patent infringement action and are not successful, our competitors would be able to use similar technology to compete with us. Moreover, the defendant in such an action may successfully countersue us for infringement of their patents or assert a counterclaim that our patents are invalid or unenforceable.

Furthermore, we have significant operations and sales in foreign countries where intellectual property laws and enforcement policies are often less developed, less stringent or more difficult to enforce than in the United States. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we will be able to protect our intellectual property rights in jurisdictions outside the United States.

The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile and could decline significantly.

The stock market in general, and the market for technology stocks in particular, has recently experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of companies. If these market or industry-based fluctuations continue, the trading price of our ordinary shares has experienced price fluctuations and could decline significantly independent of our actual operating performance, and you could lose all or a substantial part of your investment.be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. The market price of our ordinary shares couldhas fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate significantly in response to severalvarious factors including among others:including:

 

general uncertainty in stock market conditions occasioned by global economic conditions and negative financial news unrelated to our business or industry, including the impact of the recent COVID-19 pandemic;

the timing and the continued instabilityamount of several large financial institutions;our share repurchases;

actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;

announcements of innovations, new products or significant price reductions by us or our competitors, including those competitors who offer alternative storage technology solutions;

our failure to meet our guidance or the performance estimates of investment research analysts;

the timing of announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts or acquisitions;

significant announcements by or changes in financial condition of a large customer;

general stock market conditions;

actual or perceived security breaches or security vulnerabilities;

the occurrence of major catastrophic events;

changes in financial estimates by investment research analysts;

actual or anticipated changes in the credit ratings of our indebtedness by rating agencies; and

the sale of our ordinary shares held by certain equity investors or members of management.

Market price fluctuations of our ordinary shares has impacted and could continue to impact the value of our equity compensation, which could affect our ability to recruit and retain employees. In addition, in the past, following periods of decline in the market price of a company’s securities, class action lawsuits have often been pursued against that company. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Any decision to reduce or discontinue the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders or the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase program could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly.

Although historically we have announced targeted regular cash dividend amountspayments and a share repurchase program, we are under no obligation to pay cash dividends to our shareholders in the future at the announced targetedhistorical levels or at all or to repurchase our ordinary shares at any particular price or at all. The declaration and payment of any future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and ourDirectors. Our previously announced share repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Our payment of quarterly cash dividends and the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our share repurchase program are subject to, among other things, our financial position and results of operations, available cash and cash flow, capital and regulatory requirements, market and economic conditions, our ordinary share price and other factors. Any reduction or discontinuance by us of the payment of quarterly cash dividends or the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our share repurchase program could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly. Moreover, in the event our payment of quarterly cash dividends or repurchases of our ordinary shares are reduced or discontinued, our failure to resume such activities at historical levels could result in a persistent lower market valuation of our ordinary shares.

Significant fluctuations in the market price of our ordinary shares could result in securities class action claims against us.

Significant price and value fluctuations have occurred with respect to the publicly traded securities of technology companies. The price of our ordinary shares is likely to be volatile in the future. In the past, following periods of decline in the market price of a company’s securities, class action lawsuits have often been pursued against that company. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following sections discuss the effects of changes in our balance sheet and cash flows, contractual obligations, and other commitments on our liquidity and capital resources. Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in investments with remaining maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase. Our short-term investments consist primarily of money market funds, time deposits and certificates of deposit. The principal objectives of our investment policy are the preservation of principal and maintenance of liquidity. We believe our cash equivalents and short-term investments are liquid and accessible. During fiscal year 2020, we reduced and restructured our long-term debt portfolio through a combination of new issuances, repurchases and exchanges to lower annual repayment levels by extending the maturity dates of certain notes and lowering the average interest rates. We operate in some countries that have restrictive regulations over the movement of cash and/or foreign exchange across their borders. However, we believe our sources of cash have been and will continue to be sufficient to meet our cash needs for the next 12 months. Although there can be no assurance, we believe that our financial resources, along with controlling our costs, will allow us to manage the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations for the foreseeable future. However, the challenges posed by COVID-19 to our industry and to our business are evolving rapidly and are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time. Consequently, we will continue to evaluate our financial position in light of future developments, particularly those relating to COVID-19.

We are not aware of any downgrades, losses or other significant deterioration in the fair value of our cash equivalents or short-term investments and we do not believe the fair value of our short-term investments has significantly changed from the values reported as of 30 June 2017.3 July 2020.

Cash and cash equivalents and investmentsCash Equivalents

 

  As of  As of   
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June
2017
   1 July
2016
   Change  

3 July

    2020    

 

28 June

    2019    

     Change     

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   $    2,539     $    1,125     $    1,414   

 $

1,722 

 

 $

2,220 

 

 $

(498

Investments

   —         (6) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   $2,539     $1,131     $1,408  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Our cash and cash equivalents and investments increaseddecreased by $498 million from 1 July 201628 June 2019 primarily as a result of repurchases of certain long-term debt of $1,137 million, repurchases of our ordinary shares of $850 million, dividends to our shareholders of $673 million and payments for capital expenditures of $585 million partially offset by net cash of $1,714 million provided by operating activities and thenet proceeds of $994 million from the issuance of $750 million of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2022 and $500 million of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2024. These cash inflows were partially offset by net cash outflows for capital expenditures of $434 million, dividends paid to our shareholders of $561 million, repurchase of our ordinary shares of $460 million and early redemption and repurchase of debt of $316 million.long-term debt. The following table summarizes results from the statementConsolidated Statement of cash flowsCash Flows for the periods indicated:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended  Fiscal Years Ended
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June
2017
   1 July
2016
  3 July
    2020    
 28 June
        2019        

  

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

      

Operating activities

   $    1,916     $1,680   

  $

1,714

 

  $

    1,761

Investing activities

   (459)    (1,211)  

 

      (635

 

 

846

Financing activities

   (46)    (1,820)  

 

(1,605

 

 

(2,212

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates

       (3)  

 

(1

 

 

(1

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   $1,411     $    (1,354) 

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

  $

(527

 

  $

394

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2017 was approximately $1.9 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted fornon-cash items including depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, and:

a decrease of $122 million in trade debtors, primarily due to a decrease in revenue and improved collections; and

an increase of $121 million in trade creditors, primarily due to timing of payments of material purchases; offset by

an increase of $114 million in inventory, primarily due to an increase in units built in connection with our manufacturing footprint consolidating activities.

Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 20162020 was approximately $1.7 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted fornon-cash items including depreciation, and amortization, share-based compensation and:

 

an increase of $394 million in trade creditors, primarily due to timing of payments and an increase in materials purchased; partially offset by;

an increase of $166 million in inventories, primarily due to an increase in materials purchased for new product ramps and the potential for supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19; and

an increase of $127 million in trade debtors, primarily due to the timing of shipments.

Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2019 was approximately $1.8 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation, a release of valuation allowance related to our US deferred tax assets and:

a decrease of $204 million in revenue accelerated by trade debtors, primarily due to lower revenue; and

a reductiondecrease of $80 million in the cash conversion cycle, leadinginventories, primarily due to a decrease in working capital.units built; partially offset by

a decrease of $268 million in trade creditors, primarily due to a decrease in direct material purchases; and

a decrease of $84 million in accrued employee compensation, primarily due to a decrease in our variable compensation expense.

Cash Used in(Used in) Provided by Investing Activities

In fiscal year 2017,2020, we used $459 million for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to payments for the purchase of tangible assets of approximately $434 million.

In fiscal year 2016, we used $1.2$0.6 billion for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to payments for the purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of approximately $587$585 million and payments for the acquisitionpurchase of Dot Hill, netinvestments of cash acquired for $634$58 million.

In fiscal year 2019, we received $0.8 billion for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to proceeds of $1.3 billion from the redemption of an investment in non-convertible preferred stock of TMHC and the proceeds of $144 million primarily from the sale of certain properties, partially offset by the payments for the purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of approximately $602 million.

Cash Used in Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities of $46 million$1.6 billion for fiscal year 20172020 was primarily attributable to the following activities:

 

$1,137 million net proceedsrepurchases of $1.2 billion received from issuance of $750 million of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2022 and $500 million of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2024;long-term debt;

 

$86850 million in payments for repurchases of our ordinary shares;

$673 million in dividend payments; partially offset by

$498 million in net proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan;

$496 million from the issuance of Senior Notes; and

$103 million in proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares under employee stock plans, offset by

plans.

$561 million in dividend payments;

$460 million paid to repurchase 12 million of our ordinary shares;

$316 million of redemption and repurchase of long-term debt; and

$27 million paid for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards.

Net cash used in financing activities of $1.8$2.2 billion for fiscal year 20162019 was primarily attributable to the following activities:

 

$1.1 billion paid to repurchase 24963 million in payments for repurchases of our ordinary shares; and

 

$0.7 billion713 million in dividends paid to our shareholders.dividend payments; and

Dividends

From the closing$574 million net repurchases of our initial public offering in December 2002 through 2017, we have paid dividends, pursuant to our dividend policy then in effect, totaling approximately $4.9 billion in the aggregate.long-term debt.

Liquidity Sources and Going Concern

Our primary sources of liquidity as of 30 June 2017, consisted3 July 2020, consist of: (1) approximately $2.5$1.7 billion in cash and cash equivalents, (2) a $700 million senior revolving credit facility and (3) cash we expect to generate from operations.operations and (3) subject to compliance with certain requirements under our control, up to $1.5 billion available for borrowing under our senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which is part of our credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”).

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, no borrowings had been drawn under the revolving credit facility orand no borrowings had been utilized for letters of credit or swing line loans issued under this credit facility.the Revolving Credit Facility. The line of creditRevolving Credit Facility is available for borrowings, through 15 January 2020, subject to compliance with financial covenants and other customary conditions to borrowing and investment grade ratings. If the Company does not have investment grade ratings (as defined in the revolving credit facility) on 15 August 2018, then the maturity date will be August 16, 2018 unless certain extension conditions have been satisfied.borrowing.

The credit agreement that governs our revolving credit facility, as amended, contains certain covenants that we must satisfy in order to remain in compliance with the credit agreement, as amended. The agreementCredit Agreement includes three financial covenants: (1) minimum cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities;interest coverage ratio, (2) a fixed charge coverage ratio;total leverage ratio and (3) a net leverage ratio on 28 April 2016,minimum liquidity amount. The term of the Revolving Credit Agreement was

amended in order to increaseFacility is through 20 February 2024, and the allowable net leverage ratio to adjust for our current financial liquidity position. We were in compliance withmaturity date of the modified covenants as of 30 June 2017 and expect to be in compliance for the next 12 months.Term Loan is 16 September 2025.

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, cash and cash equivalents held bynon-Irish subsidiaries was $2.5$1.7 billion. This amount is potentially subject to taxation in Ireland upon repatriation by means of a dividend into our Irish parent. However, it is our intent to

indefinitely reinvest earnings ofnon-Irish subsidiaries outside of Ireland and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate such earnings by means of a taxable Irish dividend. Should funds be needed in the Irish parent company and should we be unable to fund parent company activities through means other than a taxable Irish dividend, we would be required to accrue and pay Irish taxes on such dividend.

Given the impact of COVID-19 on our business, operating results, and financial condition, the Directors have placed a particular focus on the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis in the preparation of the financial statements for the year ended 3 July 2020.

Our going concern assessment considers our Risk Factors, including those specific to the COVID-19 pandemic, and is dependent on a number of factors including financial performance and maintenance of supply chain operations. The going concern assessment has been performed for a period of at least 12 months from the approval of the financial statements. The following factors were considered in our going concern assessment:

Based on the results of our forecasting procedures and assessment of its liquidity requirements, we believe our sources of cash, including the undrawn revolving credit facility of $1.5 billion, have been and will continue to be sufficient to meet our cash needs for at least the next 12 months.

We believe that our sourcescash equivalents are liquid and accessible.

We were in compliance with the covenants as of cash3 July 2020 and expect to be in compliance for the next 12 months.

While there is a high level of uncertainty concerning the challenges posted by COVID-19 to our industry, we believe that its financial resources, along with controlling its costs, will be sufficientallow us to manage the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations for the foreseeable future

Taking into account the financial resources available to us, it is management’s view, to the best of their current knowledge, that COVID-19 will not have a material adverse impact on our ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the Directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.

For additional information on factors that could impact our ability to fund our operations and meet our cash requirements, for at leastincluding the next 12 months.COVID-19 pandemic, see the section entitled “Principal Risks and Uncertainties” section of the Directors’ Report.

Cash Requirements and Commitments

Our liquidity requirements are primarily to meet our working capital, product development and capital expenditure needs, to fund scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness, and to fund our quarterly dividend.dividend and any future strategic investments. Our ability to fund these requirements will depend on our future cash flows, which are determined by future operating performance, and therefore, subject to prevailing global macroeconomic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

On 2522 July 2017,2020, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63$0.65 per share, which will be payable on 47 October 20172020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 2023 September 2017.2020.

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements. Based on our current outlook and the information we currently have available to us, we expect to be in compliance with the covenants ofin our debt agreements over the next 12 months.

The carrying value of our long-term debt as of 303 July 2020 and 28 June 2017 and 1 July 20162019 was $5.0$4.2 billion and $4.1$4.3 billion, respectively. The table below presents the principal amounts of our outstanding long-term debt:

 

  As of  As of   
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June 2017   1 July 2016   Change  3 July
    2020    
 28 June
    2019    
     Change     

3.75% Senior Notes due November 2018

   $ 710     $ 800     $(90) 

7.00% Senior Notes due November 2021

   —     158     (158) 

4.250% Senior Notes due March 2022

   750     —     750   

 $

229 

 

 $

750 

 

 $

(521)

 

4.75% Senior Notes due June 2023

   951     990     (39) 

4.750% Senior Notes due June 2023

 

 

546 

 

 

941 

 

 

(395)

 

4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024

   500     —     500   

 

500 

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

4.75% Senior Notes due January 2025

   975     995     (20) 

4.750% Senior Notes due January 2025

 

 

479 

 

 

920 

 

 

(441)

 

4.875% Senior Notes due June 2027

   697     700     (3)  

 

505 

 

 

690 

 

 

(185)

 

4.091% Senior Notes due June 2029

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

4.125% Senior Notes due January 2031

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

5.75% Senior Notes due December 2034

   490     490     —   

 

490 

 

 

490 

 

 

— 

 

LIBOR based Term Loan due September 2025

 

 

500 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

500 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   $        5,073     $        4,133     $          940   

 $

4,249 

 

 $

4,291 

 

 $

(42)

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

From time to time, we may repurchase any of our outstanding ordinary shares through private, open market, tender offers,or broker assisted purchases, tender offers, or other means. During fiscal year 2017,2020, we repurchased approximately 1318 million of our ordinary shares including shares withheld for statutory tax withholdings related to vesting of employee equity awards. As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, $1.3 billion remained available for repurchase under our existing repurchase authorization limit. All repurchases are effected as redemptions in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association.our Constitution.

For fiscal year 2018,2021, we expect capital expenditures to be less than 5%at or below our long-term targeted range of 6% to 8% of revenue. We require substantial amounts of cash to fund any increased working capital requirements, future capital expenditures, scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness and payments of dividends. We will continue to evaluate and manage the retirement and replacement of existing debt and associated obligations, including evaluating the issuance of new debt securities, exchanging existing debt securities for other debt securities and retiring debt pursuant to privately negotiated transactions, open market purchases, tender offers or other means or otherwise. In addition, we may selectively pursue strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures and investments, which may require additional capital.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Our contractual cash obligations and commitments as of 30 June 2017, have been3 July 2020, are summarized in the table below:

 

      Fiscal Year(s) 
   Fiscal Year(s) 
(US Dollars in millions)  Total   2018   2019-2020   2021-2022   Thereafter  Total 2021 2022-2023 2024-2025 Thereafter 

Contractual Cash Obligations:

               

Long-term debt

  $5,073    $—    $710    $750    $3,613   

 $

4,249 

 

 $

19 

 

 $

825 

 

 $

1,029 

 

 $

2,376 

Interest payments on debt

   1,848     241     433     420     754   

 

1,352 

 

 

183 

 

 

360 

 

 

283 

 

 

526 

Purchase obligations(1)

   1,484     959     525     —     —   

 

1,251 

 

 

1,088 

 

 

68 

 

 

95 

 

 

— 

 

Operating leases(2)

   135     19     26     15     75  

Operating leases, including imputed interest (2)

 

 

148 

 

 

15 

 

 

25 

 

 

 

 

100 

Capital expenditures

   107     107     —     —     —   

 

326 

 

 

274 

 

 

51 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

Other funding requirements(3)

   30     12     18     —     —  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Subtotal

   8,677     1,338     1,712     1,185     4,442   

 

7,326 

 

 

1,579 

 

 

1,329 

 

 

1,416 

 

 

3,002 

Commitments:

               

Letters of credit or bank guarantees

   106     106     —     —     —   

 

104 

 

 

94 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $    8,783    $    1,444    $    1,712    $    1,185    $    4,442   

 $

    7,430 

 

 $

    1,673 

 

 $

    1,330 

 

 $

    1,416 

 

 $

    3,011 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Purchase obligations are defined as contractual obligations for the purchase of goods or services, which are enforceable and legally binding on us, and that specify all significant terms.

(2)

Includes total future minimum rent expense undernon-cancelable leases for both occupied and vacated facilities (rent expense is shown net of sublease income).

(3)Consists of funding requirements related Refer to strategic commitments.Note 6.—Leases for details.

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits and an accrual for the payment of related interest totaling $15$2 million, none of which is expected to be settled within one year. Outside of one year, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of when cash settlement with a taxing authority will occur.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, we did not have any materialoff-balance sheet arrangements.

Financial Risk Management

We have exposure to market risks due to the volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit rating changes and equity and bond markets. A portion of these risks may be hedged, but fluctuations could impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Interest Rate Risk.Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash investment portfolio. As of 30 June 2017, the Company3 July 2020, we had noavailable-for-sale debt securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for a period greater than 12 months. The CompanyWe determined noavailable-for-sale debt securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of 30 June 2017. We currently do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.3 July 2020.

In the quarter ended 4 October 2019, we entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $500 million to convert the variable interest rate on the Term Loan to fixed interest rates. The contracts were effective as of 4 October 2019 and will mature on 16 September 2025. The objective of the interest rate swap agreements is to eliminate the variability of interest payment cash flows associated with the variable interest rate on the Term Loan. The Company designated the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges.

We have fixed rate and variable rate debt obligations. We enter into debt obligations for general corporate purposes including capital expenditures and working capital needs. Our Term Loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a variable margin set on 19 June 2020.

The table below presents principal amounts and related fixed or weighted-average interest rates by year of maturity for our investment portfolio and debt obligations as of 30 June 2017.3 July 2020.

 

 Fiscal Years Ended     
 Fiscal Years Ended

 

     
(US Dollars in millions, except
percentages)
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total Fair Value
at
30 June 2017
  2021

 

 2022

 

 2023

 

 2024

 

 2025

 

 Thereafter

 

 Total

 

 Fair Value
at

3 July 2020

 

 

Assets

                

Cash equivalents:

                

Floating rate

 

$

551   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

551   

 

$

551   

Average interest rate

 

 

0.48%

 

      

 

0.48%

 

 

Other debt securities

        

Fixed rate

  $1,178      $—      $—     $—     $—      $—      $1,178      $      1,178    

$

10   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

—   

 

$

8   

 

$

18   

 

$

18   

Average interest rate

  1.21%        1.21%  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total fixed income

  $1,178      $—      $—     $—     $—      $—      $1,178      $1,178   

Fixed interest rate

 

 

5.00%

 

      

 

5.00%

 

 

Debt

                

Fixed rate

  $—      $  710      $  —     $    —     $  750      $  3,613      $5,073      $5,159    

$

—   

 

$

229   

 

$

546   

 

$

500   

 

$

479   

 

$

1,995   

 

$

  3,749   

 

 

4,010   

Average interest rate

   3.75%     4.25%   4.93%   4.66%    

 

4.25%

 

 

 

4.75%

 

 

 

4.88%

 

 

 

4.75%

 

 

 

4.71%

 

 

 

4.71%

 

 

Variable rate

 

$

19   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

25   

 

$

381   

 

$

500   

 

 

490   

 

Average interest rate

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

 

3.04%

 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. From time to time, we may enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to manage exposure related to certain foreign currency commitments and anticipated foreign currency denominated expenditures. Our policy prohibits us from entering into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. At this time, we have not identified any material exposure associated with the changes as a result of the British vote to exitUnited Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union.

We hedge portions of our foreign currency denominated balance sheet positions with foreign currency forward exchange contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings will be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The changeschange in fair value of these hedges arecontracts is recognized in earnings in the same period as the gains and losses from the remeasurement of the assets and liabilities. TheseAll foreign currency forward exchange contracts are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging. The Company has no outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts as of 30 June 2017.mature within 12 months.

We evaluate hedging effectiveness prospectivelyrecognized $4 million in Other income and retrospectivelycharges, net related to hedge ineffectiveness and record any ineffective portion of the hedging instruments in Cost of revenue on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal year 2020. We did not have any material net gains (losses)or losses recognized in Cost of revenue, or Other income and charges, net for cash flow hedges due to hedge ineffectiveness or discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal year 2019.

The table below provides information as of 3 July 2020 about our foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The table is provided in US dollar equivalent amounts and presents the fiscal years 2017notional amounts (at the contract exchange rates) and 2016.the weighted-average contractual foreign currency exchange rates.

(Dollars in millions, except average contract rate)

 

 Notional
Amount

 

  Average
  Contract Rate  

 

 Estimated
Fair
Value(1)

 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts:

   

Thai Baht

 

 $

199 

 

 $

31.67

 

 $

Singapore Dollar

 

 

243 

 

 

1.39

 

 

(2)

 

Chinese Renminbi

 

 

106 

 

 $

7.17

 

 

British Pound Sterling

 

 

84 

 

 $

            0.81

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

 

 $

            632 

  

 $

              3 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Equivalent to the unrealized net gain (loss) on existing contracts.

Other Market Risks. We have exposure to counterparty credit downgrades in the form of credit risk related to our foreign currency forward exchange contracts and our fixed income portfolio. We monitor and limit our credit exposure for our foreign currency forward exchange contracts by performing ongoing credit evaluations. We also manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any one counterparty, and we maintain limits on maximum tenor of contracts based on the credit rating of the financial institution. Additionally, the investment portfolio is diversified and structured to minimize credit risk.

Changes in our corporate issuer credit ratings have minimal impact on our near term financial results, but downgrades may negatively impact our future transaction costs andability to raise capital, our ability to execute transactions with various counterparties.counterparties and may increase the cost of such capital.

We are subject to equity market risks due to changes in the fair value of the notional investments selected by itsour employees as part of itsour Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan—the Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan (the “SDCP”). The SDCP is a successor plan to the prior Seagate Deferred Compensation Plans, as amended from time to time, under which no additional deferrals may be made after 31 December 2014. In fiscal year 2014, the Companywe entered into a Total Return Swap (“TRS”) in order to manage the equity market risks associated with the SDCP liabilities. The Company paysWe pay a floating rate, based on the LIBOR plus an interest rate spread, on the notional amount of the TRS. The TRS is designed to substantially offset changes in the SDCP liabilityliabilities due to changes in the value of the investment options made by employees. See Note 8. Derivative Financial Instruments for details.

LIKELY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

We are committed to developing new component technologies, products and alternative storage technologies. Our research and development focus is designed to bring new products to market in high volume, with quality attributes that our customers expect, before our competitors. Part of our product development strategy is to leverage a design platform and/or subsystem within product families to serve different market needs. This platform strategy allows for more efficient resource utilization, leverages best design practices, reduces exposure to changes in demand, and allows for achievement of lower costs through purchasing economies. Our advanced technology integration effort focuses disk drive and component research on recording subsystems, including read/write heads and recording media; market-specific product technology; and technology focused towardswe believe may lead to new business opportunities. The primary purpose of our advanced technology integration effort is to ensure timely availability of mature component technologies tofor our product development teams as well as allowingto allow us to leverage and coordinate those technologies in the design centers across our products in order to take advantage of opportunities in the marketplace.    During

NON-FINANCIAL STATEMENT

Introduction

The European Union Directive 2014/95/EU (“the 2017 Regulations”) requires the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. This has been transposed into Irish legislation. This legislation requires us to identify and report on our business model and key non-financial matters related to the Company’s activities. Our fiscal years 2017year 2019 Global Citizenship Annual Report (“the 2019 GCAR”) provides additional information that may be relevant to investors in assessing the Company’s sustainability commitments and 2016, we had product development expensesachievements but, except as expressly provided below, the information integrated in the 2019 GCAR is not incorporated by reference into the Irish Directors’ Report. Copies of approximately $1,232 millionthe 2019 GCAR can be accessed at www.seagate.com, under “Global Citizenship”.

Business Overview

Refer to pages A-4 to A-10 for the ‘Industry Overview’, ‘Our Business’, and $1,237 million, respectively, which represented 11%‘Products’ section of the Directors’ Report.

Corporate Governance and 11%Organization

We have concluded that the manufacture and distribution of storage solutions constitutes one reporting segment. We are governed by a Board of Directors (“the Board”). Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide a framework for our Board of Directors in exercising their responsibilities toward our stakeholders, and these guidelines entrust the Board with the authority to review our business operations and make decisions independent of the Company’s management. The guidelines also provide a process for shareholders to communicate concerns with the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the charters of each of our consolidated revenue,Board committees, are available on our website at www.seagate.com, under “Investors- Governance.”

Principal Risks and Management

Refer to pages A-17 to A-35 for the ‘Principal Risks and Uncertainties’ section of the Directors’ Report.

Environmental Matters

We understand and acknowledge that climate change is contributed to by human activity, and will lead to a number of social, economic and environmental consequences if not properly dealt with. We continue to set sustainability goals, track our progress, and audit our systems to reduce energy consumption, carbon emissions, waste and water usage throughout our global footprint. These efforts are both important to and fully supported by senior management. We also work closely with our suppliers and provide training to key stakeholders to educate them on sustainability best practices, with indicators to gauge performance. These actions comprise the majority of our environmental sustainability efforts. We report our metrics based on the fiscal year 2020 or the calendar year 2019, if fiscal year information is unavailable.

At Seagate, we understand the importance of reducing the impact our products and packaging have on the environment as identified by our Life Cycle Assessments (“LCA”). We take a holistic view of product impacts, considering the environment, our customers, suppliers and communities where our products and operations reside. Each LCA addresses impacts at every stage in the product life cycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal and recycling. The LCAs include four endpoints judged for particular relevance to the electronics industry: Climate Change, Human Toxicity, Metal Depletion and Water Depletion. In addition to LCAs, we maintain a Material Circularity Indicator for these products to identify opportunities for improvement and to move toward greater material efficiency. Most Seagate products are highly recyclable, containing aluminum, steel, copper and other recoverable materials, and many regions where our products are sold have electronic waste recycling programs. We also help to manage product waste by taking back warranty-returned drives, which then get refurbished or recycled.

We maintain a catalog of restricted substances, and product compliance data as it relates to restricted substances, which are made available to our customers upon request. We adhere to global restricted substance regulations, including the European regulation regarding the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (“REACH”), and the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (“RoHS”) “Recast” Directive, as amended by Directive (EU) 2015/863. We regularly participate in industry-wide reviews and discussions to assist in leading the development of industry standards that meet regulatory requirements.

Our environmental management system is shaped by the International Organization of Standardization (“ISO”) standards, the Responsible Business Alliance (“RBA”) Code of Conduct and the United Nations Global Compact (“UNGC”) principles. All of our manufacturing facilities are certified to ISO 14001 Environmental Management System. We reduce the amount of energy and carbon required to produce HDDs by identifying energy conservation opportunities, auditing management systems, setting targets, creating awareness among employees and reporting on progress throughout our operations. Our Environment, Health, and Safety policy, which is available in our annual Global Citizenship Report published on our website, details our commitment to environmental responsibility and a safe workplace. To achieve our objective of reducing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, each manufacturing site is required to achieve annual energy saving goals. In calendar year 2019, our total grid electricity consumption was 1,586,842 Megawatt hour (“MWh”). In fiscal year 2020, we saved 17,703 MWh of electricity, exceeding our conservation goal of 14,000 MWh. Energy savings are calculated using the Metered Baseline Method (“MBM”); since fiscal year 2014, the site initiated energy conservation projects have saved a cumulative 187,626 MWh.

Carbon emissions are measured using three scopes: Scope 1 emissions are all direct emissions, Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions from electricity purchased and used by the Company and Scope 3 emissions are all other indirect emissions. For technology products, we find that Scope 3 carbon emissions, particularly those from product use, are much greater than Scope 1 and Scope 2 carbon emissions, highlighting the importance of our continued efforts to reduce the amount of energy used by our products. One way that we achieve improvements in all aspects of our products, including sustainability impacts like energy usage, is to learn from current products and continuously improve upon each new generation. Our LCA results help to inform these improvements in products and packaging. As a result, each generation of products is more energy efficient (EB/ watt) compared to previous generations. In calendar year 2019, our carbon emissions under Greenhouse Gas Protocol for Scope 1 and Scope 2 totaled 262,445 tons and 869,654 tons, which was relatively flat compared to calendar year 2018. Our Scope 3 emissions totaled 9.9 million metric tons in calendar year 2019, which was lower compared to calendar year 2018.

Our hazardous waste disposition continues to shift away from treatment to recycling due to the new electrowinning process introduced at our Johor, Malaysia manufacturing facility. We committed to keeping 100% of hazardous waste out of landfills in fiscal year 2020. In fiscal year 2020, our hazardous waste disposition was 10,422 tons, with 87% of the waste recycled. Additionally, we increased the solid waste diversion rate from 87% in fiscal year 2019 to 88% in fiscal year 2020, leveraging site initiatives as well as the insights of our dedicated teams, to achieve this metric.

Our progress in reducing water consumption has been driven by reducing water use through more efficient processes, and recycling the water we use. We have applied measures to reduce water consumption, improve water recycling, increase awareness among employees, and reduce water intensity over the past several years. In calendar year 2019, our water withdrawal was 8,029 ML and our water recycling was 2,775 ML.

Social and Employee Matters

We rely on our diverse workforce to develop, deliver and sustain business strategy and achieve our goals. We establish goals each year to retain our employees and in fiscal year 2020 we exceeded our goal of non-operator employee turnover, with a worldwide voluntary turnover for non-operator employees of less than 5%. One way we promote diversity, equity and inclusion is through the support of employee resource groups (“ERGs”). These voluntary, employee-led communities are built on a shared diversity identity and provide a number of benefits to employees, including professional and leadership development. Seagate’s ERG community encompasses a wide array of diverse identities, such as LGBTQ+, women, people of color and interfaith, and includes over 20 chapters across five countries. We also support inclusion through active employee communications, unconscious bias education and ongoing efforts to ensure our employees feel safe, respected and welcomed.

All of our manufacturing sites have health and safety management systems certified to ISO45001, which was migrated from Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series (“OHSAS”) 18001 in fiscal year 2020. We work hard to keep our employees safe and healthy, which is why our global health and safety standards, as well as our accompanying management systems, frequently go beyond country or industry-level guidelines. Our accident rate and incident rate in fiscal year 2020 was 0.18 and 0.10, respectively. We also hosted health and safety regulatory visits, focused on issues such as safety, radiation, fire codes, food and transportation. Remaining focused on the continuous improvement of employee health and safety, we continued to provide comprehensive health and safety training to our employees in fiscal year 2020. We continued to emphasize e-learning courses as our main vehicle for delivering training because employees can learn at their own pace.

Performance Management is a continuous process that helps team members focus on the right priorities. Meaningful conversations between managers and employees have been the foundation of performance management at Seagate. We focus on dialogue centered around manager and employee conversations, and ongoing feedback, to align goals. This approach removes the emphasis on annual performance reviews and ratings and focuses instead on the high-quality, productive dialogue between managers and employees. This is assessed twice during the year based on progress against goals and demonstrated behaviors. We also have education offerings for our employees, with courses ranging from leadership and technical skills to health, safety and the environment.

Employee engagement is the commitment and passion that drives people to achieve goals and connect as a team. Our micro engagement survey is designed to help us understand global employee perspectives on engagement. In our last survey cycle, approximately 95% of our global employees responded to share their perspectives on respect, belonging, challenging work and the direction of the company. Once the survey concluded, the results were analyzed and shared with leaders. Managers worked with their teams to develop targeted action plans. These action plans follow a 1-2-3 approach where teams pick one issue to improve from the micro survey results, two things that the team sees as important to implement and then they commit to having three meaningful conversations about their progress. Using the micro survey results to have open, candid discussions is an important step in driving engagement and trust that our workplace is a safe place to speak up.

Our community engagement program is designed to provide support to our local communities, with an emphasis on STEM but also addressing health and wellness and environmental opportunities.

The program is reflective of Seagate’s vertically integrated model, with multiple large facilities across EMEA, Asia and the United States. Accordingly, the program is highly localized, involving a cross-functional process to identify and execute on opportunities that are meaningful locally.

With the emphasis on STEM, we target K-12 students, supporting STEM efforts in a way that is age-appropriate and allows for fun as well as learning. The opportunities range from support of general larger STEM activities such as science fairs and field trips to science museums, to more targeted small group experiences. We look for opportunities to introduce data management, automation and robotics into events. An additional newer focus involves identifying and reaching the underserved, including the socially, academically or economically disadvantaged, and we are exploring ways to reach students with special needs.

A focus on the underserved also extends to supporting food banks and other social agencies that serve a range of needs for those in the community who need assistance including food, referrals to social services, clothing and other necessities.

Respect for Human Rights

As part of our commitment to respect and protect human rights, we seek to uphold the highest standards in our labor practices. Our company policies adhere to applicable local labor laws, are consistent with both the UNGC and the International Labor Organization (“ILO”) core labor principles, and conform to the RBA Code of Conduct. We conduct annual assessments in our manufacturing sites to identify and mitigate labor and human rights risks that could arise. We also participate in internal labor audits to ensure policies and practices are aligned with local legislation and the RBA code. Our internal Human Rights Policy is reviewed annually and includes clear statements about our commitment to labor and human rights. According to the policy, we do not tolerate harassment in the workplace, involuntary labor, child labor and excessive working hours. We also look to foster open communication and employees have access to the Seagate Global Ethics Helpline to report complaints. The policy is communicated to new hires during orientation and onboarding, and annually to all employees to build awareness and drive transparency within our organization.

Supply Chain

To ensure integrity throughout our supply chain, we require all of our direct materials suppliers with whom we spend at least $1 million annually, as well as selected indirect suppliers, to undergo the RBA Validated Assessment Program (“VAP”) audit process. RBA VAP audit reports are valid for two years, and our suppliers are on a two-year audit cycle. We completed 42 full supplier audits and 22 closure audits through the RBA VAP process in fiscal year 2020, down from 75 full supplier audits in fiscal year 2019, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our RBA VAP audit closure rate in fiscal year 2020 was 52% for working

hour related findings and 77% for non working hour related findings. Our top findings include Working Hours, Emergency Preparedness and Occupational Safety. We remain vigilant to the risk of child labor, forced labor and threats to the freedom of association within our supply chain. The highest risk of forced labor in our supply chain is where foreign labor is utilized; suppliers in Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore pose the highest risk. This is why our training on forced labor has been focused on suppliers in these countries over the past three years. Based on our supplier VAP audits, child labor has not been identified as a concern in our supply chain.

Anti-bribery and Corruption

We pursue our business objectives with integrity and in compliance with the law in every country in which we operate. We comply with applicable laws in the United States and other countries in which we do business, including the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, and other laws designed to prevent bribery and corruption. Violation of these laws may also result in fines and imprisonment for employees. Seagate prohibits offering or accepting all forms of bribes, kickbacks, facilitation payments and other forms of corruption.

We have a Business Conduct Policy which serves as our guide for legal and ethical conduct at all times and outlines the values we exemplify and the applicable laws and regulations. We also have a Code of Ethics for senior financial officers, which promotes honest and ethical conduct and compliance with the law as it relates to the maintenance of Seagate’s accounting records and the preparation of the financial statements. Both policies are made available publicly on our website and are reviewed annually by the Board.

Conflict Minerals

Our hardware products in the aggregate contain each of the 3TG (tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold), which are necessary to the functionality or production of the products. We have implemented due diligence measures to conform to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence (“OECD”) Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. We have established strong management systems for 3TG supply chain due diligence, identified and assessed 3TG risks in its supply chain, designed and implemented strategies to respond to identified risks, supported independent third-party audits of the due diligence practices and reported on 3TG supply chain due diligence activities.

In response to our planned due diligence measures, we posted the Seagate Corporate Policy on Conflict Minerals to our external corporate website and communicated to Seagate’s direct suppliers. We updated our internal Corporate Standard Operating Procedures for Conflict Minerals Management to satisfy the OECD guidance. We also have an internal team to implement the procedure, including establishing requirements in supplier contracts to define our expectations of suppliers’ sourcing of 3TG, conducting a review to identify direct suppliers of products containing 3TG, requesting all 3TG suppliers provide information to us regarding their 3TG using the template developed by the RBA and validating the information provided by our 3TG direct suppliers.

DIRECTORS AND SECRETARY

The directors and secretary are as listed on page 3. Ms. Kristen M. Onken resigned fromA-3. On 28 April 2020, the board on 19 October 2016.Board of Directors approved Mr. Mark W. Adams was appointedStephen J. Luczo’s request to step down as Board Chair effective 3 July 2020. Mr. Luczo will continue to serve as a director on 19 January 2017.director. Mr. William D. Mosley was appointedMichael R. Cannon succeeded Mr. Luczo as a director on 25Board Chair effective 4 July 2017.2020.

SECRETARY

Ms. Regan J. MacPherson resigned as the secretary effective 2 June 2017. Ms. Katherine E. Schuelke was appointed as the secretary on 26 June 2017.

DIRECTORS’ AND SECRETARY’S INTERESTS IN SHARES

Details of directors’ and secretary’s interests in the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc as at 30 June 20173 July 2020 were as follows:

 

  Interests held as at 30 June 2017(1) 
 Interests held as at 3 July 2020(1)

 

 

Director

  Shares   Vested
options
   Unvested
options
   Restricted
share units
   Restricted
shares
  Shares

 

 Vested
options

 

 Unvested
options

 

 

 

Restricted
share
units

 

 Restricted
shares

 

Stephen J. Luczo(2)

   1,251,346    521,364    149,217        —  

Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

   27,262            8,437    —  

Mark W. Adams(3)

               5,470    —  

Stephen J. Luczo

 

 

551,666

 

 

321,984

 

 

 

 

 

75,587

 

 

  

Mark W. Adams

 

 

11,973

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,579

 

 

 

Judy Bruner

 

 

6,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,579

 

 

 

Michael R. Cannon

   16,720            8,437    —   

 

30,592

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,579

 

 

 

Mei-Wei Cheng

   12,281            8,437    —  

William T. Coleman

   9,920            8,437    —   

 

10,913

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,579

 

 

 

Jay L. Geldmacher

   8,681            8,437    —   

 

7,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,579

 

 

 

Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo

   3,316            8,437    —  

Dr. Chong Sup Park

   28,974            8,437    —  

Dylan Haggart (2)

 

 

3,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,579

 

 

 

Dr. William D. Mosley (3)

 

 

335,290

 

 

531,781

 

 

325,653

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stephanie Tilenius

   6,026            8,437    —   

 

19,898

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,579

 

 

 

Edward J. Zander

   97,621            8,437    —   

 

62,786

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,579

 

 

 

Secretary

               

Katherine E. Schuelke

                   —  

     

Katherine E. Schuelke (4)

 

 

26,718

 

 

80,704

 

 

29,976

 

 

32,786

 

 

 

 

(1)

All interests declared are in the ordinary shares of $0.00001 par value of Seagate Technology plc.

(2)

Mr. Luczo’sHaggart is a Partner at ValueAct Capital and he relinquishes all cash and equity compensation received for service on the board to ValueAct Capital.

(3)

Dr. Mosley’s interests held as at 30 June 20173 July 2020 excludes 247,634449,953 unvested awards that contain certain performance and market conditions.

(3)(4)Mr. Adams’

Ms. Schuelke’s interests held as at the date of appointment consisted of 5,470 restricted share units.3 July 2020 excludes 16,354 unvested awards that contain certain performance and market conditions.

Details of directors’ and secretary’s interests in the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc as at 1 July 2016,28 June 2019 or subsequent date of appointment, were as follows:

 

  Interests held as at 1 July 2016(1) 
 Interests held as at 28 June 2019(1)

 

 

Director

  Shares   Vested
options
   Unvested
options
   Restricted
share units
   Restricted
shares
  

Shares

 

 

Vested
options

 

 

Unvested
options

 

 

 

Restricted
share
units

 

 

Restricted
shares

 

 

 

 

 

Stephen J. Luczo(2)

   1,826,969    400,423    270,158        —   

 

1,028,137

 

 

309,835

 

 

12,149

 

 

145,159

 

 

  

Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

   23,946    1,251        5,182    —  

Mark W. Adams

 

 

8,680

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,146

 

 

 

Judy Bruner

 

 

3,382

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,146

 

 

 

Michael R. Cannon

   13,404            5,182    —   

 

27,299

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,146

 

 

 

Mei-Wei Cheng

   9,794            5,182    —  

William T. Coleman

   13,235            5,182    —   

 

11,020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,146

 

 

 

Jay L. Geldmacher

   5,365            5,182    —   

 

9,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,146

 

 

 

Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo(3)

               5,182    —  

Dr. Chong Sup Park

   32,735            5,182    —  

Dylan Haggart (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,146

 

 

 

Dr. William D. Mosley (4)

 

 

214,148

 

 

441,879

 

 

351,208

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stephanie Tilenius

   2,710            5,182    —   

 

16,605

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,146

 

 

 

Edward J. Zander

   67,996    10,000        5,182    

 

59,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,146

 

 

 

Secretary

               

Katherine E. Schuelke

                   —  

     

Katherine E. Schuelke(5)

 

 

5,304

 

 

53,034

 

 

57,646

 

 

36,382

 

 

 

 

(1)

All interests declared are in the ordinary shares of $0.00001 par value of Seagate Technology plc.

(2)

Mr. Luczo’s interests held as at 1 July 201628 June 2019 excludes 295,39114,221 unvested options and awards that contain certain performance and market conditions.

(3)

Mr. Haggart is a Partner at ValueAct Capital and he relinquishes all cash and equity compensation received for service on the board to ValueAct Capital.

(4)

Dr. Moyo’sMosley’s interests held as at the date of appointment includes 5,182 restricted share units.28 June 2019 excludes 457,475 unvested awards that contain certain performance and market conditions.

(5)

Ms. Schuelke’s interests held as at 28 June 2019 excludes 11,315 unvested awards that contain certain performance and market conditions.

The directors and the company secretary had no interests in any other group company as required to be disclosed in accordance with Section 329 of the Companies Act 2014.

REPURCHASES OF SHARES

The following table sets forth information with respect to repurchases of the Company’s ordinary shares during fiscal years 2020 and 2019 pursuant to the share repurchase program. Shares repurchased are redeemed and cancelled immediately by the Company and no shares were held by the Company at 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019.

(US Dollars and shares in millions)

 

 Number of
Shares
Repurchased

 

 Nominal
    Value    

 

 Consideration
Paid

 

Repurchased, redeemed and cancelled in fiscal year 2019

 

22

 

$—

 

$994

Repurchased, redeemed and cancelled in fiscal year 2020

 

18

 

$—

 

$890

IMPORTANT EVENTS SINCE THE PERIOD END

Dividends

On 2522 July 2017,2020, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63$0.65 per share, which will be payable on 47 October 20172020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 2023 September 2017.

July 2017 Restructuring Plan

On July 25, 2017, the Company committed to an additional restructuring plan (the “July 2017 Plan”) to reduce its cost structure. The July 2017 Plan included reducing the Company’s global headcount by approximately 600 employees. The July 2017 Plan, which the Company expects to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, is expected to result in totalpre-tax charges of approximately $50 million, primarily in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. These charges are expected to be comprised of cash expenditures on severance and employee-related costs.

Planned Leadership Transition

On July 25, 2017 the Company’s Board of Directors appointed William D. Mosley to serve as Chief Executive Officer, of the Company effective October 1, 2017. The Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Mosley to serve as a director of the Company, effective July 25, 2017. Mr. Mosley will serve as a director until the Company’s next annual general meeting of shareholders when he is expected to stand for election by a vote of the Company’s shareholders. On July 25, 2017, the Company also announced that Stephen J. Luczo will step down from his position as Chief Executive Officer, effective October 1, 2017. Mr. Luczo will remain with the Company in the role of Executive Chairman effective October 1, 2017 and will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors.

As previously announced on June 2, 2017, Philip G. Brace, President of Cloud Systems and Silicon group, will be leaving the Company. On July 20, 2017, the Company and Mr. Brace agreed that the effective date of his departure will be October 2, 2017.2020.

POLITICAL DONATIONS

During the yearyears ended 303 July 2020 and 28 June 2017 and 1 July 2016,2019 the Company made no political donations.

BRANCHES OUTSIDE THE STATE

As required to be disclosed in accordance with Section 326 of the Companies Act 2014, the group has established branches, within the meaning of European Communities Council Directive 89/666/EEC in Brazil, China, Russia, the Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, France, Northern Ireland (Springtown), India, Korea and Thailand.India.

ACCOUNTING RECORDS

The directors are responsible for ensuring that adequate accounting records, as outlined in Sections 281 to 285 of the Companies Act 2014, are kept by the Company. To achieve this, the directors have appointed experienced bookkeepers who are professionally qualified, who report to the Chief Financial Officer and ensure that the requirements of Sections 281 to 285 of the Companies Act 2014 are complied with.

The books and accounting records are maintained at the Company’s principal accounting offices at 10200 South De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino,47488 Kato Rd, Fremont, California, United States of America, and are open at all reasonable times to inspection by the directors. Accounts and returns relating to the business dealt with in the accounting records are kept in order to disclose with reasonable accuracy the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company. These records are returned to the Company’s registered office at intervals not exceeding six months.

RELEVANT AUDITDISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION TO THE AUDITOR

The directors believe that they have taken all steps necessary to make themselves aware of any “relevant audit information” (as defined in Section 330(2) of the Companies Act 2014) and have established that the Group’sgroup’s statutory auditorsauditor are aware of that information. In so far as they are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Group’sgroup’s statutory auditorsauditor are unaware.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

In accordance with Section 167(3) of the Companies Act 2014, the Groupgroup has established an Audit Committee with responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process, the audit process, the system of internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations.

STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

Company law in the Republic of Ireland requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the state of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the Parent Company and of the Groupgroup and of the profit or loss of the Groupgroup for that period.

In preparing the financial statements of the Group,group, the Directors are required to:

 

select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

make judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

comply with applicable US generally accepted accounting principles to the extent that the use of US generally accepted accounting principles does not contravene any provision of the Companies Act 2014, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and

prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Groupgroup will continue in business

The considerations set out above for the Groupgroup are also required to be addressed by the Directors in preparing the financial statements of the Parent Company (which are set out on pages A-109A-101 to A-116)A-103), in respect of which the applicable Irish law and accounting standards are those which are generally accepted in the Republic of Ireland.

The Directors have elected to prepare the Parent Company’s financial statements in accordance with accounting standards issued by the Financial Reporting Council, and promulgated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland, including FRS 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in Ireland).

The Directors are responsible for keeping accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit and loss of the Parent Company and which enable them to ensure that the financial statements of the Groupgroup are prepared in accordance with applicable US generally accepted accounting principles and comply with the provisions of the Companies Acts 2014. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Groupgroup and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Under company law, the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and financial position, of the group and parent company as at the end of the financial year, and the profit or loss for the group for the financial year, and otherwise comply with the Companies Act 2014.

DIRECTORS’ COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

As required by Section 225 (2) of the Companies Act 2014, the directors acknowledge that they are responsible for securing the Company’s compliance with its “relevant obligations” (as defined in Section 225 of Companies Act 2014). The directors further confirm that a compliance policy statement has been drawn up in accordance with Section 225(3)(a) of the Companies Act 2014, and that appropriate arrangements and structures have been put in place that are, in the directors’ opinion, designed to secure material compliance with the relevant obligations. A review of those arrangements and structures has been conducted in the financial year to which this report relates.

AUDITORSAUDITOR

Ernst & Young, Chartered Accountants, have expressed their willingness to continue in office in accordance with the Section 383(2) of the Companies Act 2014.

Approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 2521 August 20172020.

 

/s/ STEPHEN J. LUCZODR. WILLIAM D. MOSLEY

    

/s/ CHONG SUP PARKJUDY BRUNER

Stephen J. Luczo

Dr. William D. Mosley

    Dr. Chong Sup Park

Judy Bruner

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

Report on the audit of the financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the financial statements of Seagate Technology plc (the ‘parent company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘group’) for the year ended 30 June 20173 July 2020 which comprise the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Balance Sheet, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the Parent Company Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Parent Company Statement of Financial Position, the Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity, the related notes 1 to 2021 in respect of the Groupconsolidated financial statements and the related notes 1 to 910 in respect toof the parent company financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies set out in note 1. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Groupconsolidated financial statements is Irish law and U.S.US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S.(US GAAP), as defined in section 279 of Part 6 of the Companies Act 2014, to the extent that the use of those principles in the preparation of the financial statements does not contravene any provision of that Part of the Companies Act 2014. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the parent company financial statements is applicable Irish law and accounting standards issued by the Financial Reporting Council and promulgated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in Ireland), including FRS 102The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland.Ireland Irish (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

In our opinion:

 

the groupconsolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the Groupgroup as at 30 June 20173 July 2020 and of the profit for the Groupgroup for the year then ended, and have been properly prepared in accordance with U.S.US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S.(US GAAP), as defined in section 279 of Part 6 of the Companies Act 2014, to the extent that the use of those principles in the preparation of the financial statements does not contravene any provision of that Part of the Companies Act 2014;

 

  

the parent company statement of financial position gives a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the parent company as at 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, and has been properly prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP,Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, including FRS 102The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland; and

 

the consolidated financial statements and parent company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2014.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (Ireland) (ISAs (Ireland)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Groupgroup and the parent company in accordance with ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of financial statements in Ireland, including the Ethical Standard issued by the Irish AccountingAuditing and AuditingAccounting Supervisory Authority (IAASA), as applied to listed entities and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Conclusions relating to going concern

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters, in relation to which ISAs (Ireland) require us to report to you where:

the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is not appropriate; or

the directors have not disclosed in the financial statements any identified material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the group’s and parent company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting for a period of at least twelve months from the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Revenue recognition—

Description of the matter

How we addressed the matter in our opinion

Key observations
communicated to the
Audit Committee

Revenue recognition - Sales incentive program rebates and discounts

Refer to the Accounting policies (page A-67); and Note 17 of the consolidated financial statements (page A-108).

Reported revenue is a key financial statement metric of higher importance to users of the consolidated financial statements. The group sells its products to original equipment manufacturers, distributors and retailers (collectively, “customers”). Revenue is recognised when the criteria in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (ASC 606) have been met, including upon the transfer of control to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the group expects to receive in exchange for those products, net of sales tax. As disclosed in Note 1 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the group reduces revenue for estimated future reductions to the final selling prices for shipped products including sales incentive programs, such as price protection and volume incentives.

Auditing management’s estimates of future reductions to the final selling prices is complex as it requires management to make subjective assumptions including the amount of price adjustments on products as well as the timing of its channel sales of products through to end customers.

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the completeness of sales incentive programs, the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data used in the calculations and management’s assumptions of the amount of future reductions to the final selling prices as well as the timing of its channel sales of products through to end customers.

To test the estimated sales incentive programs, our audit procedures included, among others, sending confirmations to sale representatives and testing the completeness of sales incentive programs as well as the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data used in the calculations and evaluating the significant assumptions used by management to estimate its reserves related to remaining channel inventory. To test the completeness of the sales incentive programs, we inspected significant new sales contracts and agreements that include the contractual rights to discounts and rebates to validate they are being properly considered in the incentives reserve calculations, and examined credit memos issued after year end. We also directly confirmed terms and conditions of agreements with a sample of the group’s customers as well as inquired of sales representatives and other members of management to assess whether all contractual terms were provided to the Finance Department. To test the underlying data used in the sales incentive program reserve calculations, we confirmed ending on hand inventory at distributors and retailers. To test management’s assumptions of the amount of future reductions to the final selling prices as well as the timing of its distributors’ sales of products through to end customers we inquired

Our observations included an outline of the range of audit procedures performed and a summary of the results.

We provided our assessment of the critical accounting estimates used in the sales program accrual, including estimated future price erosion.

Description of the matter

How we addressed the matter in our opinion

Key observations
communicated to the
Audit Committee

with operations management and compared estimates with industry and analysts forecasts. In addition, we performed a retrospective review comparing prior period assumptions to the actual results in subsequent periods and performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the potential effect of changes in the group’s significant assumptions.

Deferred income taxes

Refer to the Accounting policies (page A-68) and discounts

Reported revenue is a key financial statement metric of higher importance to users of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As disclosed by the Company in note 1Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, revenue is measured taking into account sales incentive program rebates and price protection discounts earned by customers on the Group’s sales to original equipment manufacturers and distributors. Revenue is recognised when the criteria in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605 (ASC 605) have been met, including upon the transfer of the risk and rewards of the underlying products to the customer and when the related fee is fixed or determinable. There are varying levels of judgment in the calculation of sales program rebates and discounts, including estimating the number of products qualifying for the same and the level of customer attainment of available incentive rebates. Higher levels of judgment are required to estimate future price erosion for quantities of inventory to be sold by the Company’s distributor customers in future periods, which could have a material impact on the financial statements. There is a risk that revenue may be overstated because of fraud resulting from the existence of undisclosed special terms or side agreements or other customer compensatory elements resulting from management feeling the pressure to meet performance targets at the period end, which are not accounted for in the financial statements.

Our audit procedures included testing the Company’s revenue recognition accounting policies relating to sales program rebates and discounts under applicable accounting standards, and assessing the Company’s compliance with those policies. We tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over the completeness and accuracy of sales program rebates and discounts computations, and correct timing of revenue recognition.

In addition, our audit procedures addressing sales programs included the following:

Inspecting significant new sales contracts and agreements; to evaluate whether revenue was appropriately recognised
On a sample basis, directly confirming sales terms and conditions with the Company’s customers to test the occurrence, measurement and completeness of customer sales
On a sample basis, inspect employee sales certifications and inquire directly to employees on a sample basis as to their knowledge of special terms or side agreements
Testing the approval of sales program rebate and discount offerings to customers
On a sample basis, obtaining confirmation of ending on hand inventory at distributors/retailers used to compute customer sale program accruals
Performing retrospective review of sales program accrual movements by comparing prior period accruals to the actual usage of the accruals in subsequent periods
Inspecting credit notes issued after year-end to determine that revenue was recorded in the period that revenue recognition would be required in accordance with U.S. GAAP

Deferred income Taxes

As disclosed by the Company in note 7 Income Taxes, at 30 June 2017, the Company has gross deferred tax assets of $1,640 million, partially offset by a valuation allowance of $966 million. The Company operates

across a number of income tax jurisdictions and undertakes a high level of cross-border transactions. The Group also has significant recognised and unrecognised deferred tax assets in respect of tax losses in its U.S. income tax jurisdiction. Deferred income tax positions were significant to our audit because the assessment process, which includes forecasting future taxable profits in the U.S., involves inherent uncertainty, is complex, and the amounts involved are material to the financial statements as a whole.

We performed audit procedures on the completeness and accuracy of the amounts recognised as current and deferred income tax expense, including managements’ assessment of the tax impact of changes in the Company’s business due to ongoing restructuring activities, correspondence with tax authorities and the evaluation of tax exposures. In addition, in respect of deferred tax assets, we assessed and tested the Company’s analysis and assumptions supporting the probability that deferred tax assets recognised in the balance sheet will be recovered through taxable income in future years. As part of our procedures, we inspected and tested, among other things, management’s budgets, forecasts and assessments of the impact of tax laws on current and deferred income taxes. In addition, we assessed the historical accuracy of management’s assumptions by comparing prior period forecasts to actual current period results. We also evaluated the design and performed tests of the operating effectiveness of controls in this area. In conducting our procedures, we involved local and international tax specialists to analyse the Company’s tax positions and to test the assumptions used to determine tax positions. We further assessed the adequacy of the disclosure in Note 7 of the consolidated financial statements.

Provisions for product warranties

As disclosed by the Company in note 16Guarantees, at 30 June 2017 the provisions for product warranties amounted to $233 million. The Company issues various types of product warranties under which the performance of products delivered is generally guaranteed for a certain period or term. The reserve for product warranties includes estimates regarding product failure rates, the timing of returns during the warranty period, and the cost to repair or replace products under warranty. We focused on this area because changes in these estimates and assumptions can materially affect the levels of provisions recorded in the financial statements due to the higher estimation uncertainty around the Company’s product return rates.

We obtained an understanding of the Company’s process for estimating reserves related to product warranties, evaluated the design of, and performed tests of the operating effectiveness of controls in this area. Our focus included evaluating and testing the basis for the assumptions developed and used in the determination of the warranty provisions by performing retrospective reviews of the prior return rates used by the Company and any changes to current rates, by performing sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact of changes to the warranty provision based on changes in product return rates, and testing the validity, completeness and accuracy of the data used in the calculations. This included testing, on a sample basis, the historical product return and current period shipments data used by the Company in the warranty provision calculation, and comparison to relevant available industry data. We further assessed the adequacy of the disclosure in Note 16 of the consolidated financial statements.

Restructuring activities and related accrued liabilities

As disclosed by the Company in note 5Restructuring and Exit Costs,restructuring charges of $178 million were recorded during the year ended 30 June 2017 in relation to the Company’s ongoing manufacturing facilities consolidation. Management judgment is required in relation to the recognition, measurement and disclosure of these restructuring expenses, including estimates of fair value of land and buildings no longer held for use and/or held for sale and related impairment charges.

We have tested management’s assumptions used to identify direct and incremental costs of restructuring activities, primarily relating to asset impairment charges, severance payments and other costs incurred to close manufacturing facilities arising as a result of the restructuring activities. Our audit work included:

Evaluating the design of, and performing tests of operating effectiveness of controls in this area;
Obtaining evidence of approval by the appropriate levels of management for the various restructuring plans;
Testing the Company’s assessment of the plans as either ongoing orone-time in nature and resultant accounting in accordance with the applicable accounting standards; and
Obtaining supporting documentation, such as underlying payroll records and severance agreements, to support the recorded severance costs;
Testing third-party valuations and related market analyses supporting fair values of land and buildings as of 30 June 2017;
Evaluating the adequacy of accrued restructuring liabilities recorded atperiod-end by testing, on a sample basis, the calculation of accruals and vouching related payments.

For those exit and impairment charges classified as restructuring and other within operating expenses, we have tested the classification based on the nature and timing of such amounts. We further assessed the adequacy of the disclosure in Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements (pages A-82 to A-86).

As disclosed by the group in Note 5 Income Taxes, at 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019, the group has gross deferred tax assets of $1,566 million and $1,583 million, partially offset by a valuation allowance of $438 million and $460 million, respectively.

As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the group recognizes a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of its deferred tax assets to the amount that management believes is more likely than not to be realized.

Auditing the realizability of the deferred tax assets was complex as the assessment process includes forecasting future sources of taxable income and scheduling the use of the applicable deferred tax assets which includes subjective management assumptions, and the amounts involved are material to the financial statements as a whole.

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls that address the risks of material misstatement relating to the realizability of deferred tax assets. This included controls over management’s determination of sources and amount of future taxable income including income from operations and scheduling of the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences.

Among other audit procedures performed, we evaluated the assumptions used by the group to develop projections of future taxable income by jurisdiction and tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in its projections. For example, we compared the projections of future taxable income with the actual results of prior periods, as well as management’s consideration of current industry and economic trends. We also assessed the historical accuracy of management’s projections and compared the projections of future taxable income with other forecasted financial information prepared by the group. In addition, we tested the group’s scheduling of the reversal of existing temporary taxable differences.

Our observations included our assessment of the valuation allowance in light of current budget and forecasts, open tax authority examinations periods, transfer-pricing and other country matters.

Provisions for product warranties

Refer to the Accounting policies (page A-67); and Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements (page A-103).

As disclosed by the group in Note 12 Guarantees, at 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019 the provisions for product warranties amounted to $151 million and $195 million, respectively.

As disclosed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the group issues various

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the group’s process for recording product warranties, including controls over management’s review of the estimated failure rates, estimated return rates, and completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the calculation.

To test the group’s accrual for product warranties, our audit procedures included, among other procedures, evaluating the

Our observations included our assessment of the reasonableness of the judgement and estimates used in the calculation of the warranty accrual and the risk around overreliance on historical trends amidst dynamically changing

Description of the matter

How we addressed the matter in our opinion

Key observations
communicated to the
Audit Committee

types of product warranties under which the performance of products delivered is generally guaranteed for a specified contractual period.

Auditing the group’s product warranty accrual was complex as the calculation of the accrual for product warranties is based on estimates of product failure rates and changes in the estimates can materially affect the accrual recorded in the consolidated financial statements.

reasonableness of the estimated failure rate and estimated return rates and testing the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data used in the calculations. We also performed retrospective reviews of the actual rates to the estimated product failure rates used by the group, and performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact of changes to the warranty accrual based on changes in product failure rates. This included testing, on a sample basis, the historical product return and current period shipments data used in the warranty accrual calculation, and benchmarking to peer company data.

market and installed base conditions.

Our application of materiality

We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and in forming our audit opinion.

Materiality

The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of the users of the financial statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the nature and extent of our audit procedures.

We determined materiality for the Groupgroup to be $40$52 million (2019: $69 million), which is approximately 5% (2019: 5%) of Groupgroup profit before tax. We believe that profit before tax is a key performance indicator for the Group.group. We therefore considered Profitprofit before tax to be the most appropriate performance metric on which to base our materiality calculation as we consider it to be the most relevant performance measure to the stakeholders of the Group.group. During the course of our audit, we reassessed initial materiality and the only change in final materiality was to reflect the actual reported performance of the Groupgroup in the year.

Performance materiality

ThePerformance materiality is the application of materiality at the individual account or balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.

On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the Group’sgroup’s overall control environment, our judgement was that performance materiality should be set at 75% (2019: 75%) of our planning materiality, namely $30 million.$39 million (2019: $52 million). We have set performance materiality at this percentage due to our past history of a low number of misstatements, our ability to assess the likelihood of misstatements, both corrected and uncorrected, the effectiveness of the control environment and other factors affecting the entity and its financial reporting.

Audit work at component locations for the purpose of obtaining audit coverage over significant financial statement accounts is undertaken based on a percentage of total performance materiality. The performance materiality set for each component is based on the relative scale and risk of the component to the Groupgroup as a whole and our assessment of the risk of misstatement at that component.

In the current year, the range of performance materiality allocated to components was $6$7.8 million to $24 million.$31 million (2019: $10 million to $42 million).

Reporting threshold

AnReporting Threshold is the amount below which identified misstatements are considered as being clearly trivial.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of $2$2.6 million (2019: $3.5 million), which is set at approximately 5% of planning materiality, as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.

We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in light of other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.

Audit Scope

We performed an audit of the complete financial information of the full-scope component that is managed completely by the U.S. corporate management team and performed audit procedures on specific balances for a further 9 components
The components where we performed either full or specific audit procedures accounted for 99% of Group profit before tax, 100% of Group Revenue and 99% of Group Total Assets
‘Components’ represent business units across the Group considered for audit scoping purposes

An overview of the scope of our audit report

Tailoring the scope

Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our allocation of performance materiality determine our audit scope for each entity within the Group. Taken together, this enables us to form an opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements. We take into account size, risk profile, the organisation of the group and effectiveness of group wide controls, changes in the business environment and other factors such as recent Internal audit results when assessing the level of work to be performed at each entity.

In assessing the risk of material misstatement to the Groupconsolidated financial statements, and to ensure we had adequate quantitative coverage of significant accounts in the financial statements, we selected 109 components covering entities across the Americas, Asia and Europe, which represent the principal business units within the Group.group.

Of the 109 components selected, one was characterised as all U.S.US locations for which we reviewed allperformed an audit of the relevantcomplete financial information (‘full scope component’) which was selected based on its size or risk characteristics. For the remaining 98 components (‘specific scope components’), we performed audit procedures on specific accounts within that component that we considered had the potential for the greatest impact on the significant accounts in the financial statements either because of the size of these accounts or their risk profile.

The reporting components where we performed audit procedures accounted for 99%100% (2019: 97%) of the Group’sgroup’s profit before tax, 100% (2019: 100%) of the Group’s Revenuegroup’s revenue and 99%98% (2019: 96%) of the Group’s Total Assets.group’s total assets.

Revenue recognition, including our procedures to addressSales incentive program rebates and discounts, a key audit matter, was subject to full audit procedures in each of the full and specific scope locations with significant revenue streams. For the current year, the full scope component contributed 39%94% (2019: 74%) of the Group’sgroup’s profit before tax, 35%34% (2019: 47%) of the Group’s Revenuegroup’s revenue and 91%66% (2019: 72%) of the Group’s Total Assets.group’s total assets. The specific scope components contributed 60%6% (2019: 23%) of the Group’s Profitgroup’s profit before tax, 65%66% (2019: 53%) of the Group’s Revenuegroup’s revenue and 8%32% (2019: 27%) of the Group’s Total Assets.group’s total assets. The audit scope of these components may not have included testing of all significant accounts of the component but will have contributed to the coverage of significant risks tested for the Group.group.

The remaining components together represent less than 1% (2019: 4%) of the Group’sgroup’s profit before tax and therefore none are individually greater than 5% of profit before tax used to establish materiality. For these components, we performed other procedures, including analytical review, testing of consolidation journals and intercompany eliminations and foreign currency translation recalculations to respond to any potential risks of material misstatement to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

consolidated financial statements.

Involvement with component teams

Conclusions relatingIn establishing our overall approach to going concern

We have nothingthe group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to report in respectbe undertaken at each of the following matters in relationcomponents by us, EY Dublin, as the primary audit engagement team, or by component auditors from other EY global network firms operating under our instruction. For all components we determined the appropriate level of involvement to which ISA 570 (Ireland) ‘Going concern’ requiresenable us to report to you where;

determine that sufficient audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the group as a whole. The directors’ useprimary team interacted with the component team where appropriate during various stages of the going concern basis of accounting inaudit, reviewed key working

papers and were responsible for the preparationscope and direction of the audit process. This, together with the additional procedures performed at a group level, gave us appropriate evidence for our opinion on the consolidated financial statements is not appropriate: or

The directors have not disclosed in the financial statements any identified material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the Group and parent Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting for a period of at least twelve months from the date when which the financial statements are authorised for issue.
statements.

Other information

The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the annual report other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

MattersOpinions on which we are required to reportother matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2014

In our opinion, based solely on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

the information given in the directors’Directors’ Report, other than those parts dealing with the non-financial statement pursuant to the requirements of the European Union (Disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups) Regulations 2017 (as amended) on which we are not required to report, for the financial year for which the statutory financial statements are prepared is consistent with the company’s statutory financial statements in respect of the financial year concerned; and

the directors’Directors’ Report, other than those parts dealing with the non-financial statement pursuant to the requirements of the European Union (Disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups) Regulations 2017 (as amended) on which we are not required to report, has been prepared in accordance with the applicable legal requirements.

We have obtained all the information and explanations which we consider necessary for the purposes of our audit.

In our opinion the accounting records of the parent company were sufficient to permit the financial statements to be readily and properly audited and the parent company statement of financial position is in agreement with the accounting records.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception

Based on ourthe knowledge and understanding of the companygroup and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the directors’ report.

Directors’ Report. We have obtained allare not required to report in respect of section 13 of the informationEuropean Union (Disclosure of Non-Financial and explanationsDiversity Information by certain large undertakings and groups) Regulations 2017 (as amended), which we consider necessary for the purposes of our audit;
Inrequire us to report to you if, in our opinion, the accounting recordsgroup has not provided in the non-financial statement the information required by Section 5(2) to (7) of the Company were sufficient to permit the financial statements to be readily and properly audited;
The parent company statementthose Regulations, in respect of financial position is in agreement with the accounting records.

Matters on which we are required to report by exceptionyear ended 28 June 2019.

We have nothing to report in respect of SectionsSection 305 to 312 of the Companies Act 2014 which require us to report to you if, in our opinion, the disclosures of directors’ remuneration and transactions specified by law are not made.

Respective responsibilities

Responsibilities of directors for the financial statements

As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statementDirectors’ Responsibilities Statement set out on page A-47,A-48, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair

view, and for such internal control

as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Company’sgroup and parent company’s ability to continue as a going concern,concerns, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the group or the parent company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (Ireland) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the IAASA’s website at:http://www.iaasa.ie/getmedia/b2389013-1cf6-458b-9b8f-a98202dc9c3a/Description_of_auditors_ responsiblities_for_audit.pdf.Description_of_auditors_responsiblities_for_audit.pdf. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

The purpose of our audit work and to whom we owe our responsibilities

ThisOur report is made solely to the parent company’s members, as a body, in accordance with section 391 of the Companies Act 2014. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the parent company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the parent company and the parent company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

/s/ DERMOT DALY

Dermot Daly

For and on behalf of Ernst & Young

Chartered Accountants and Statutory Audit Firm

Dublin

2521 August 20172020

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

CONSOLIDATED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT

 

              Fiscal Years Ended               

 

Fiscal Years Ended

 

 
(US Dollars in millions)  Note   

30 June

2017

  1 July
2016
 
(US Dollars in millions except per share data)

 

 

Note

 

 

 

3 July
2020

 

 

 

28 June
2019

 

 

Revenue

    $    10,771    $    11,160   

 

17

 

 

 $

10,509 

 

$

10,390 

Cost of revenue

    7,597    8,545    

 

7,667 

 

 

7,458 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

    3,174    2,615    

 

2,842 

 

 

2,932 

   

Product development

    1,232    1,237    

 

973 

 

 

991 

Marketing and administrative

    606    635    

 

473 

 

 

453 

Amortization of intangibles

   4   104    123   

 

3

 

 

 

14 

 

 

23 

Restructuring and other, net

   5   178    175   

 

7

 

 

 

82 

 

 

(22)

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 
    2,120    2,170    

 

1,542 

 

 

1,445 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Operating earnings

    1,054    445    

 

1,300 

 

 

1,487 

   

Interest income

    12       

 

20 

 

 

84 

Interest expense

    (222)    (193)    

 

(201)

 

 

 

(224)

 

Other income and charges, net

    (29)    19    

 

(87)

 

 

 

25 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Income before taxes

    815    274    

 

1,032 

 

 

1,372 

Income tax expense

   7   43    26  

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

5

 

 

 

28 

 

 

(640)

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net income

    $772    $248    

 $

1,004 

 

$

2,012 

  

 

  

 

 
   

 

  

 

    

Net income per share:

       

Basic

   12   $2.61    $0.83   

 

13

 

 

 $

3.83 

 

$

7.13 

Diluted

   12   2.58    0.82   

 

13

 

 

 

3.79 

 

 

7.06 

Number of shares used in per share calculations:

    

Number of shares used in per share calculations (in millions):

   

Basic

   12   296    299   

 

13

 

 

 

262 

 

 

282 

Diluted

   12   299    302   

 

13

 

 

 

265 

 

 

285 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 Fiscal Years Ended  

 

Fiscal Years Ended

 

 
(US Dollars in millions)     30 June 2017           1 July 2016        

 

3 July
2020

 

 

 

28 June
2019

 

 

Net income

  $                    772    $                    248   

 $

1,004 

 

 $

2,012 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

    

Cash flow hedges

  

Change in net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges

  (3)    (4)  

Less: reclassification for amounts included in net income

      

Change in net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges:

  

Net unrealized losses arising during the period

 

 

(27)

 

 

 

— 

 

Losses reclassified into earnings

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net change

     (2)   

 

(24)

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Post-retirement plans

  

Change in unrealized gain on post-retirement plans

  —     

Less: reclassification for amounts included in net income

     —  

Change in unrealized components of post-retirement plans:

  

Net unrealized losses arising during the period

 

 

(7)

 

 

 

(16)

 

Losses reclassified into earnings

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net change

       

 

(6)

 

 

 

(16)

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     (1)   

 

(2)

 

 

 

(2)

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other comprehensive income, net of tax

      

Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

(32)

 

 

 

(18)

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income

  780    253   

 $

972 

 

 $

1,994 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

 

(US Dollars in millions) Note   30 June
      2017      
 1 July
      2016      
  

 

 

Note

 

 

3 July
2020

 

 

 

28 June
2019

 

 
ASSETS      

Fixed assets:

      

Goodwill

  4   $1,238    $1,237    3   $1,237   $1,237 

Intangible assets

  4   281    448    3   58   111 

Right of use assets

  6   103   —  

Tangible assets

  2   1,950    2,160    2   2,129   1,890 

Financial assets

  9   125    113    9   153   121 
  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 
   3,594    3,958    

 

3,680 

 

 

3,359 

Current assets:

      

Inventories

  2   982    868   

 

2

 

 

 

1,142 

 

 

970 

Trade debtors

  2   1,199    1,318   

 

2

 

 

 

1,115 

 

 

989 

Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year

  2   246    216   

 

2

 

 

 

135 

 

 

163 

Investments

  2   —     

Cash and cash equivalents

  2   2,539    1,125   

 

2

 

 

 

1,722 

 

 

2,220 

  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 
   4,966    3,533    

 

4,114 

 

 

4,342 

Other debtors - amounts falling due after one year

  2   708    722    2   1,136   1,184 
  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total Assets

   $9,268    $8,213    

 $

8,930 

 

 $

8,885 

  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY      

Capital and reserves:

      

Share capital

  10   $—    $—   

 

10

 

 

 $

— 

 

 $

— 

Share premium

  10   5,595    5,509   

 

10

 

 

 

3,991 

 

 

3,888 

Other reserves

  10   540    395   

 

10

 

 

 

811 

 

 

734 

Profit and loss account

  10   (4,771)    (4,311)   

 

10

 

 

 

(3,015)

 

 

 

(2,460)

 

  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 
   1,364    1,593    

 

1,787 

 

 

2,162 

Provisions for liabilities:

      

Taxation

  7   30    31   

 

5

 

 

 

35 

 

 

50 

Other provisions

  2   276    269   

 

2

 

 

 

199 

 

 

225 

  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 
   306    300    

 

234 

 

 

275 

Creditors - amounts falling due within one year:

      

Debt

 

 

4

 

 

 

19 

 

 

— 

 

Trade creditors

   1,626    1,517    

 

1,808 

 

 

1,420 

Other creditors

  2   840    560   

 

2

 

 

 

769 

 

 

679 

  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 
   2,466    2,077    

 

2,596 

 

 

2,099 

Creditors - amounts falling due after one year:

      

Debt

  9   5,021    4,091   

 

4

 

 

 

4,156 

 

 

4,253 

Other creditors

   111    152    

 

157 

 

 

96 

  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total Liabilities

  $        9,268    $        8,213    

 $

      8,930 

 

 $

      8,885 

  

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

Approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 2521 August 20172020.

 

/s/ STEPHEN J. LUCZODR. WILLIAM D. MOSLEY

  

/s/ CHONG SUP PARKJUDY BRUNER

Stephen J. Luczo

Dr. William D. Mosley

  Dr. Chong Sup Park

Judy Bruner

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 

  Fiscal Years Ended  Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June
      2017       
 1 July
    2016    
  3 July
2020
 28 June
2019
 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

     

Net income

   $772    $248    $    1,004   $    2,012 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

  

Depreciation and amortization

   749    815    379   541 

Share-based compensation

   137    120    109   99 

Loss (gain) on redemption and repurchase of debt

      (3)  

Loss on redemption and repurchase of debt

  58   —  

Impairment of other long-lived assets

   42    26    —    

Deferred income taxes

      (2)    (6)   (690) 

Othernon-cash operating activities, net

   20    12    52   (97) 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

     

Trade debtors

   122    464    (127)   204 

Inventories

   (114)    145    (166)   80 

Trade creditors

   121    (24)    394   (268) 

Accrued employee compensation

   53    (78)    55   (84) 

Accrued expenses, income taxes and warranty

   47    (42)    (39)   (81) 

Other assets and liabilities

   (43)    (1)      42 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   1,916    1,680    1,714   1,761 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

     

Acquisition of tangible assets

   (434)    (587)    (585)   (602) 

Proceeds from the sale of assets

    144 

Proceeds from settlement of foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  —    29 

Proceeds from redemption of debt security

  —    1,283 

Purchases of investments

   (37)    —    (58)   (18) 

Maturities of investments

      —  

Cash used in acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired

   —    (634)  

Other investing activities, net

      10  

Proceeds from sale of strategic investments

    10 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (459)    (1,211)  

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

  (635)   846 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

     

Redemption and repurchase of debt

  (1,137)   (819) 

Dividends to shareholders

  (673)   (713) 

Repurchases of ordinary shares

  (850)   (963) 

Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards

  (40)   (31) 

Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   1,232    —    994   245 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (316)    (22)  

Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards

   (27)    (56)  

Repurchases of ordinary shares

   (460)    (1,090)  

Dividends to shareholders

   (561)    (727)  

Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares under employee stock plans

   86    79    103   69 

Other financing activities, net

   —    (4)    (2)   —  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (46)    (1,820)    (1,605)   (2,212) 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   —    (3)    (1)   (1) 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   1,411    (1,354)  

(Decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

  (527)   394 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the year

   1,132    2,486    2,251   1,857 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the year

   $      2,543    $      1,132    $    1,724   $    2,251 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

     

Cash paid for interest

   $172    $200    $226   $223 

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds

   $33    $40  

Cash (received) paid for income taxes, net of refunds

  $(51)   $39 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Seagate Technology plc became the parent company in the Seagate group following a reorganization that took place in 2010.

This transaction was accounted for in these consolidated financial statements as a merger between entities under common control; accordingly, the historical consolidated financial statements of Seagate Technology for periods prior to this transaction are considered to be the historical consolidated financial statements of Seagate Technology plc. No changes in consolidated assets or liabilities resulted from this transaction, other than Seagate Technology plc has provided a guarantee of amounts due under certain borrowing arrangements as described in Note 6.4. See Note 10 for a discussion of the capital structure of Seagate Technology plc.

The Company is incorporated in Ireland. The Company’s registration number is 480010 and its registered address is 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, Ireland D02 NX53.

Accounting convention and basis of preparation of financial statements

In the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, unless the context indicates otherwise, as used herein, the terms “Seagate” and the “Company” refer to the Seagate Group.group.

The directors have elected to prepare the consolidated financial statements of Seagate Technology plc (the “Company”) in accordance with Section 279 of the Companies Act 2014, which provides that a true and fair view of the state of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss may be given by preparing the financial statements in accordance with US accounting standards, as such term is defined in Section 279(1) of the Companies Act 2014 (“US GAAP”), to the extent that the use of those principles in the preparation of the financial statements does not contravene any provision of Part 6 of the Companies Act 2014. In producing consolidated financial statements at this level, the Company has taken advantage of the audit exemption for certain of its UK subsidiaries by virtue of s479A of UK Companies Act 2006, see Note 20“Note 21. Subsidiary Undertakings for further detail.

These financial statements therefore wereare prepared in accordance with Irish Company Law, to present to the shareholders of the Company and file with the Companies Registration Office in Ireland. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements include presentation and additional disclosures required by the Companies Act 2014 in addition to those disclosures required under US GAAP.

In addition, in these financial statements, terminology typically utilized in a set of US GAAP financial statements has been retained for the benefit of those users of these financial statements who also access the Company’s US GAAP financial statements as filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on Form10-K, rather than utilizing the terminology set out under Irish Company Law. Accordingly, references to revenue, cost of revenue, interest income, interest expense, income tax expense and net income havinghave the same meaning as references to turnover, cost of sales, other interest receivable and similar income, interest payable and similar charges, tax on profit on ordinary activities and profit on ordinary activities after taxation under Irish Company Law. Additionally, references to Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) refer to a component of Other Reserves.reserves.

Going Concern

Given the impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s business, operating results, and financial condition, the Directors have placed a particular focus on the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis in the preparation of the financial statements for the year ended 3 July 2020.

The Company’s going concern assessment considers its Risk Factors, including those specific to the COVID-19 pandemic (Refer to Page A-19 for details.) and is dependent on a number of factors including financial performance and maintenance of

supply chain operations. The going concern assessment has been performed for a period of at least 12 months from the approval of the financial statements. The following factors were considered in the Company’s going concern assessment:

Based on the results of our forecasting procedures and assessment of its liquidity requirements, the Company believes its sources of cash, including the undrawn revolving credit facility of $1.5 billion, have been and will continue to be sufficient to meet our cash needs for at least the next 12 months.

The Company believes that its cash equivalents are liquid and accessible.

The Company was in compliance with the covenants as of 3 July 2020 and expects to be in compliance for the next 12 months.

While there is a high level of uncertainty concerning the challenges posted by COVID-19 to our industry, the Company believes that its financial resources, along with controlling its costs, will allow the Company to manage the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on its business operations for the foreseeable future

Taking into account the financial resources available to the Company, it is management’s view, to the best of their current knowledge, that COVID-19 will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the Directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, after elimination of intercompany transactions and balances.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with USthe United States (“US”) generally accepted accounting principles also requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the

Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions include the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The methods, estimates and judgments the Company uses in applying its most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its consolidated financial statements. Certain prior years amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

The Company operates and reports financial results on a fiscal year of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to 30 June. Accordingly, fiscal years 2017year 2020 was comprised of 53 weeks and 2016 wereended on 3 July 2020. Fiscal year 2019 was comprised of 52 weeks and ended on 3028 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, respectively.2019. All references to years in these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements represent fiscal years unless otherwise noted. Fiscal year 20182026 will also be 52comprised of 53 weeks and will end on 29 June 2018.3 July 2026.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments.Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company’s highly liquid investments are primarily comprised of money market funds, time deposits and certificates of deposits. The Company has classified its marketable securities asavailable-for-sale and they are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a component of Other Reserves.Shareholders’ Equity. The Company evaluates theavailable-for sale securities in an unrealized loss position for other-than-temporary impairment. Realized gains and losses are included in Other income and charges, net.net on the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Other cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Restricted Cash and Investments.Cash Equivalents. Restricted cash and investmentscash equivalents represent cash and cash equivalents and investments that are restricted as to withdrawal or use for other than current operations.

Allowances for Doubtful Accounts. The Company maintains an allowanceallowances for uncollectible trade debtorsaccounts receivable based upon expected collectability. This reserve is established based upon historical trends, global macroeconomic conditions and an analysis of specific exposures. The provision for doubtful accounts is recorded as a charge to Marketing and administrative expense.expense on the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

Inventory.Inventories. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (using thefirst-in,first-out method) or market. Marketand net realizable value. Net realizable value is based upon anthe estimated average selling price reduced by estimatedprices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs

of completion, disposal and transportation. Adjustments to reduce cost of completion and disposal.inventories to its net realizable value are made, if required, for estimated excess or obsolescence determined primarily by future demand forecasts.

Tangible Assets. Tangible assets are stated at cost. Equipment and buildings are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease. The costs of additions and substantial improvements to tangible assets, which extend the economic life of the underlying assets, are capitalized. The cost of maintenance and repairs to tangible assets are expensed as incurred.

Assessment of Goodwill and Other Long-lived Assets for Impairment.Goodwill. Irish Company law requires that goodwill is written off over a period of time which does not exceed its useful economic life. However, the Company does not believe this gives a true and fair view because not all goodwill declines in value. In addition, since goodwill that does decline in value rarely does so on a straight-line basis, straight-line amortization of goodwill over an arbitrary period does not reflect the economic reality. Consistent with US GAAP, Seagatethe Company considers goodwill an indefinite-lived intangible asset that is not amortized over an arbitrary period. Rather, the Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350 (“ASC 350”),Intangibles - Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. Therefore, in order to present a true and fair view of the economic

reality under US GAAP, goodwill is considered indefinite-lived and is not amortized. The Company is not able to reliably estimate the impact on the financial statements of the true and fair override on the basis that the useful economic life of goodwill cannot be predicted with a satisfactory level of reliability nor can the pattern in which goodwill diminishes be known. During fiscal year 2017, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”)No. 2017-04,Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The Company performs a qualitative assessment in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist, to determine if any events or circumstances exist, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry that would indicate that it would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, including goodwill. If it is determined in the qualitative assessment that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not below its carrying amount, including goodwill, then the Company will perform a quantitative impairment test. The quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Any excess in the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwillunit over its fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

Other Long-lived Assets.The Company tests other tangiblelong-lived assets, including tangible assets and other intangible assets subject to amortization, for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. The Company performs a recoverability test to assess the recoverability of an asset group. If the recoverability test indicates that the carrying value of the asset group is not recoverable, the Company will estimate the fair value of the asset group and the excess of the carrying value over the fair value is allocated pro rata to derive the adjusted carrying value of assets in the asset group. The adjusted carrying value of each asset in the asset group is not reduced below its fair value.

In accordance with its policy, the Company reviews the estimated useful lives of its tangible assets on an ongoing basis. This review indicated that the actual lives of certain manufacturing equipment at its manufacturing facilities were longer than the estimated useful lives used for depreciation purposes in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As a result, effective 29 June 2019, the Company changed its estimate of the useful lives of its manufacturing equipment from a range of three to five years to a range of three to seven years. The effect of this change in estimate increased the net income by $134 million for the fiscal year ended 3 July 2020 and increased the diluted earnings per share by $0.51 for the fiscal year ended 3 July 2020.

The Company tests other intangible assets not subject to amortization whenever events occur or circumstances change, such as declining financial performance, deterioration in the environment in which the entity operates or deteriorating macroeconomic conditions that have a negative effect on future expected earnings and cash flows that could affect significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset.

Leases. Effective 29 June 2019, the Company adopted a new accounting policy for leases in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 842, Leases, using the modified retrospective approach. Accordingly, the Company applied the new lease accounting standard prospectively to leases existing or commencing on or after 29 June 2019. The Company elected to apply the practical expedients which allow for not reassessing whether existing contracts contain leases, the classification of existing leases and whether the existing initial direct costs meet the new definition. In addition, the Company elected to

combine lease and non-lease components for facility leases and to not recognize right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less on the balance sheet.

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease at inception. ROU assets are presented on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as Right of use assets. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and the corresponding lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease.

Lease liabilities are measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments and ROU assets are based on the lease liability, adjusted for lease prepayments, lease incentives received and the lessee’s initial direct costs. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the net present value of future minimum lease payments is determined using the Company’s estimated incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date. Additionally, the Company’s lease term may include options to extend or terminate the lease. These options are reflected in the ROU asset and lease liability when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise the option. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees.

The Company recognizes lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments not dependent on an index or a rate primarily consist of common area maintenance charges, are expensed as incurred, and are not included in the ROU asset and lease liability calculation. The total operating and variable lease costs were included in operating expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

Payment-in-Kind (“PIK”) Income. The Company had a debt investment in non-convertible preferred stock of Toshiba Memory Holdings Corporation (TMHC), now known as Kioxia, that was fully redeemed by TMHC in June 2019. Transaction costs incurred by the Company to acquire this investment were capitalized and amortized as a reduction of interest income on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account over the respective term of the investment. The investment contained a PIK income provision, which represented contractual interest that was due upon redemption, and was accrued and recorded as Interest income each reporting period and added to the carrying value of the Investment in debt security.

Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company applies the requirements of ASC Topic 815 (“ASC 815”),Derivatives and Hedging. ASC 815 requires thatrecords all derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for designation and effectiveness of hedging relationships (see note 8).relationships. The Company continues to exclude the change in forward points from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and recognizes the excluded component in Other income and charges, net in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. Foreign currency forward exchange contracts not designated as hedge instruments are used to economically hedge the foreign currency exposure on forecasted expenditures in currencies other than US dollar. The Company recognizes the unrealized gains and losses due to the changes in the fair value of these contracts, as well as the related costs in Other income and charges, net in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

Establishment of Warranty Accruals.Warranty. The Company estimates probable product warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized. The Company generally warrantsprovides warranty on its products for a period of 1 to 5 years. The Company’s warranty provision considers estimated product failure rates and trends (including the timing of product returns during the warranty periods), and estimated repair or replacement costs related to product quality issues, if any. The Company also exercises judgment in estimating its ability to sell certain repairedrefurbished products. Should actualThe Company’s judgment is subject to a greater degree of subjectivity with respect to newly introduced products because of limited experience in any future period differ significantly from its estimates, the Company’s future results of operations could be materially affected.with those products upon which to base our warranty estimates.

Revenue Recognition Sales Returns and Allowances, and Sales Incentive Programs.    The Company’sEffective 30 June, 2018, the Company adopted a new revenue recognition policy compliesin accordance with ASC Topic606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified retrospective transition approach. Prior to fiscal year 2019, the revenue recognition policy was in accordance with ASC 605, (“ASC 605”),Revenue Recognition. The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps: (1) identification of the contract with a customer; (2) identification of the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determination of the transaction price; (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation.

Revenue from sales of products including sales to distribution customers, is generally recognized when title and riskupon transfer of loss has passedcontrol to customers in an amount that reflects the buyer, whichconsideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those products, net of sales taxes. This typically occurs upon shipment from the Company. When applicable, the Company or third party’s warehouse facilities, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, including a fixed or determinable price to the buyer, and when collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from sales of products to certain direct retail customers andincludes shipping charges billed to customers in certain indirect retail channels is recognizedRevenue and includes the related shipping costs in Cost of revenue on a sell-through basis.the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

The Company records estimated product returnsvariable consideration at the time of shipment. The Company also estimates reductionsrevenue recognition as a reduction to revenue forrevenue. Variable consideration generally consists of sales incentive programs, such as price protection and volume incentives and

records such reductions when revenue is recorded. The Company establishes certain distributor and OEM sales programs aimed at increasing customer demand. For OEM sales, rebates are typically established by estimating the most likely amount of consideration expected to be received based on an OEM customer’s volume of purchases from Seagatethe Company or other agreed upon rebate programs. For the distribution and retail channel, these programs typically involve estimating the most likely amount of rebates related to a distributor’scustomer’s level of sales, order size, advertising or point of sale activity andas well as the expected value of price protection adjustments. The Company provides for these obligations at the time that revenue is recordedadjustments based on estimated requirements.historical analysis and forecasted pricing environment. Marketing development programsprogram costs are accrued and recorded as a reduction to revenue.revenue at the same time that the related revenue is recognized.

The Company expenses sales commissions as incurred because the amortization period would have been one year or less. These costs are recorded as Marketing and administrative on the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

Product Development Costs.Product development costs, which includesinclude both research and development costs, are recognized as expense.

Distribution Costs.The Company includes distribution costs, which includesinclude shipping and handling, in Cost of revenue in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for all periods presented. These costs amount to $116$162 million and $132$128 million in fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

Restructuring Costs.    The Company records restructuring activities including costs forone-time termination benefits in accordance with ASC Topic 420 (“ASC 420”),Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.The timing of recognition for severance costs accounted for under ASC 420 depends on whether employees are required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits. If employees are required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits, a liability is recognized ratably over the future service period. Otherwise, a liability is recognized when management has committed to a restructuring plan and has communicated those actions to employees. Employee termination benefitsbenefit costs covered by existing benefit arrangements are recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 712,Non-retirement Postemployment Benefits. These costs are recognized when management has committed to a restructuring plan and the severance costs are probable and estimable.

Advertising Expense.The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising costs were approximately $16$19 million and $31$22 million in fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

Share-Based Compensation.    The Company accounts for share-based compensation under the provisions of ASC Topic 718 (ASC 718),Compensation-Stock Compensation. The Company has elected to apply thewith-and-without method to assess the realization of related excess tax benefits. The Company also elected to continue to account for share-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures. Refer to Note 11. Share-based Compensation for details.

Accounting for Income Taxes.Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to ASC Topic 740 (“ASC 740”), Income Taxes.In applying ASC 740, the Company makes certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits, recognition of income and deductions and calculation of specific tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for income tax and financial statement purposes, as well as tax liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions. The calculation of tax liabilities involves uncertainties in the application of complex tax rules and the potential for future adjustment of the Company’s uncertain tax positions by the Internal Revenue Service or other tax jurisdictions.various taxing authorities. If estimates of these tax liabilities are greater or less than actual results, an additional tax benefitprovision or provisionbenefit will result. The deferred tax assets the Company records each period depend primarily on the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income in the United States and certainnon-US jurisdictions. Each period, the Company evaluates the need for a valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets and, if necessary, adjusts the valuation allowance so that net deferred tax assets are recorded only to the extent the Company concludes it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized. If the Company’s outlook for future taxable income changes significantly, the Company’s assessment of the need for, and the amount of, a valuation allowance may also change.

Financial Instruments Remeasurement. The Company’s equity investments in privately-held companies without readily determinable fair values are measured using the measurement alternative method as cost, less impairments, and adjusted up or down based on observable price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer. Any adjustments resulting from impairments and/or observable price changes are recorded as Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

Comprehensive Income. The Company presents comprehensive income in a separate statement. Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other gains and losses affecting equity that are excluded from net income.

Foreign Currency Remeasurement and Translation.The US dollar is the functional currency for the majority of the Company’s foreign operations. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured into the functional currency of the subsidiary at the balance sheet date. The gains and losses from the remeasurement of foreign currency denominated balances into the functional currency of the subsidiary are included in Other income and charges, net on the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The Company had $4 millionCompany’s subsidiaries that use the US dollar as their functional currency remeasure monetary assets and $0 millionliabilities at exchange rates in remeasurement losses in fiscal years 2017effect at the end of each period, and 2016, respectively.nonmonetary assets and liabilities at historical rates.

The Company translates the assets and liabilities of itsnon-US dollar functional currency subsidiaries into US dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period. Revenue and expenses for these subsidiaries are translated using rates that approximate those in effect during the period. Gains and losses from these translations are recognized in foreign currency translation included in Other reserves,Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a component of shareholders’ equity. The Company’s subsidiaries that use the US dollar as their functional currency remeasure monetary assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the end of each period, and inventories, property, and nonmonetary assets and liabilities at historical rates. Gains and losses from these remeasurements were not significant and have been included in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.Other reserves.

Concentrations

Concentration of Credit Risk. The Company’s customer base for disk drive products is concentrated with a small number of OEMs and distributors.customers. The Company does not generally require collateral or other security to support trade debtors.accounts receivable. To reduce credit risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations on its customers’ financial condition. The Company establishes an allowanceallowances for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers, historical trends and other information. Arrow Electronics Inc. and Dell Inc. each accounted for more than10%than 10% of the Company’s trade debtors as of 303 July 2020 and Dell Inc. accounted for more than10% of the Company’s trade debtors as of 28 June 2017.2019.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments and foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The Company further mitigates concentrations of credit risk in its investmentsfinancial instruments through diversification, by limiting its investments in the debt securities of a single issuer, and investing in highly-rated securities.securities and/or major multinational companies.

In entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts, the Company assumes the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The counterparties to these contracts are major multinational commercial and investment banks, and the Company has not incurred and does not expect any losses as a result of counterparty defaults.

Supplier Concentration.Certain of the raw materials, components and equipment used by the Company in the manufacture of its products are available from single-sourced direct and indirect vendors. Shortages could occur in these essential materials and components due to an interruption of supply or increased demand in the industry. If the Company were unable to procure certain materials, components or equipment at all or acceptable prices, it would be required to reduce its manufacturing operations, which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. In addition, the Company may make prepayments to certain suppliers or enter into minimum volume commitment agreements. Should these suppliers be unable to deliver on their obligations or experience financial difficulty, the Company may not be able to recover these prepayments.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, August 2015, April 2016, May 2016 and DecemberJune 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASUAccounting Standards Update 2014-09(“ASU”) 2016-13 (ASC Topic 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers,ASU2015-14 (ASC

Topic 606)326),Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Deferral Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU amends the Effective Date,ASU2016-10 (ASC Topic 606)Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligationsrequirement on the measurement and Licensing, ASU2016-12 (ASC Topic 606)Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,and ASU2016-20 (ASC Topic 606)Technical Corrections and Improvementsrecognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,respectively.ASC Topic 606 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to useinclude future conditions in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. It also requires entities to disclose both quantitative and qualitative information that enable financial statements users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertaintyits estimate of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.expected credit losses. The Company is required to adopt thethis guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. This standard may be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or retrospectively with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings, which is a component of the Profityear 2021. The Company will adopt this ASU on 4 July 2020 and Loss Account on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, in the year of adoption (“modified retrospective transition approach”). Based on its assessment, the Company plans to adopt the new revenue standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, utilizing the modified retrospective method of transition.

While management hasdoes not yet completed its assessment of the impact of adopting this new standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company expectsexpect the adoption of the new standard will result in the recognition of revenues generally upon shipment(sell-in basis) for sales of products to certain direct retail customers and customers in certain indirect retail channels which are currently being recognized on a sell-through basis. Accordingly, the Company will need to estimate variable consideration (e.g. rebates) related to customer incentives on these arrangements. These changes are not expected to have a material impacteffect on the Company’sits consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU2015-112018-15 (ASC Topic 330)Subtopic 350-40),Inventory: Simplifying Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software—Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. This ASU aligns the Measurement of Inventory.accounting for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the accounting for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The amendments in this ASU require inventory measurement at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The

Company is required and intends to adopt thethis guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.year 2021. The Company will adopt this ASU on 4 July 2020 and does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU2016-012019-12 (ASC Subtopic825-10)Topic 740),Financial Instruments - Overall Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.The amendments in this This ASU require entities to measure all investments in equity securities at fair value with changes recognized through net income. This requirement does not apply to investments that qualifysimplifies accounting for the equity method of accounting, to those that result in consolidation of the investee, or for which the entity meets a practicability exception to fair value measurement. Additionally, the amendments eliminateincome taxes by removing certain disclosure requirements related to financial instruments measured at amortized cost and add disclosures relatedexceptions to the measurement categories of financial assetsgeneral principles and financial liabilities.amending existing guidance to improve consistent application. The Company is required to adopt thethis guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted for only certain portions of the ASU. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02 (ASC Topic 842),Leases. The ASU amends a number of aspects of lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize operating leases with a term greater than one year on their balance sheet as aright-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability, measured at the present value of the lease payments. The Company is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2020.2022. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016,2020, the FASB issued ASU2016-092020-04 (ASC Topic 718)848), Stock Compensation - ImprovementsReference Rate Reform. This ASU provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in this ASUcontracts, hedging relationships and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are intended to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the income tax consequences, classification on the consolidated statement of cash flows and treatment of forfeitures. The Company is

required and intends to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Upon adoption, the Company anticipates that this ASU will result in an increase in deferred tax assets relating to net operating losses of approximately $0.5 billion, offset by an equivalent increase in the valuation allowance. This guidance, however, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, Statements of Profit and Loss or Cash Flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-16 (ASC Topic 740),Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendments in this ASU require the recognitionmet. Adoption of the income tax consequences for intra-entity transfersexpedients and exceptions is permitted upon issuance of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Under current GAAP, current and deferred income taxes for intra-entity asset transfers are not recognized until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The Company is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted.this update through 31 December 2022. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-01 (ASC Topic 805),Business Combination: Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The amendments in this ASU change the definition of a business to assist with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The Company is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-09 (ASC Topic 718),Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in this ASU provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The Company is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015 and August 2015,February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2015-032016-02 (ASC Subtopic835-30)Topic 842), Interest-ImputationLeases, and subsequently issued certain interpretive clarifications on this new guidance which amend a number of Interest: Simplifyingaspects of lease accounting, including requiring a lessee to recognize an ROU asset and corresponding lease liability for operating leases and enhanced disclosures. As of 29 June 2019, adoption of the Presentationstandard resulted in the recognition of Debt Issuance CostsROU assets and corresponding current and non-current lease liabilities of $115 million, $17 million and $57 million, respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, primarily relating to real estate operating leases. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s other consolidated financial statements. For information regarding the impact of ASC 842 adoption, see Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Leases above and Note 6. Leases.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2015-152018-02 (ASC Subtopic835-30)Topic 220),PresentationIncome Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU was issued following the enactment of the US Tax Cuts and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated withLine-of-Credit Arrangements- AmendmentsJobs Act 2017 (“Tax Act”) and permits entities to SEC Paragraphs Pursuantelect a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting, respectively. The ASUs require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability, with the exception of those related toline-of-credit arrangements, be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deductionretained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the carrying amount of that debt liability.Tax Act. This ASU2015-03 became effective and was adopted by the Company inadopted the September 2016 quarterguidance on a retrospective basis.29 June 2019. The Company has elected not to reclassify the stranded amounts. The adoption of this guidance resulted indid not have a reduction to Other debtors-due after one year, and Debt due to creditors after one year by $39 million, within the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 1 July 2016. ASU2015-15 became effective and was adopted by the Company in the September 2016 quarter on a retrospective basis with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-16 (ASC Topic 805),Business Combinations Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. The amendments in this update require that an acquirer recognize measurement period adjustments in the period in which the adjustments are determined. The income effects of such measurement period adjustments are to be recorded in the same period’s financial statements but calculated as if the accounting had been completed as of the acquisition date. The impact of measurement period adjustments to earnings that relate to prior period financial statements are to be presented separately on the income statement or disclosed by line item. The amendments in this update are for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after 15 December 2015. This ASU became effective and was adopted by the Company in the September 2016 quarter on a prospective basis with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-18 (ASC Topic 230),Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash. The amendments in this update provide guidance on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. The ASU requires amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the total beginning and ending balances for the periods presented on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after 15 December 2017. The Company elected to adopt this ASU in the December 2016 quarter on a retrospective basis with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The Company classifies restricted cash within Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year in the consolidated balance sheet.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-04 (ASC Topic 350),Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amendments in this ASU eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test, which requires entities to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, determined in step 1. The Company elected to adopt this ASU in the March 2017 quarter on a prospective basis with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-15 (ASC Topic 230), Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in this ASU are intended to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash payment are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to adopt this ASU in the June 2017 quarter on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

2. Balance Sheet Information

InvestmentsAvailable-for-sale Debt Securities

The following table summarizes, by major type, the fair value and amortized cost of the Company’s investments as of 30 June 2017:3 July 2020:

 

(US Dollars in millions) Amortized
Cost
  Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
  Fair
Value(2)
 

Available-for-sale securities:

   

Money market funds

  $594   $—    $594  

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

  584    —    584  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $        1,178   $            —    $1,178  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Included in Cash and cash equivalents(1)

    $1,174  

Included in Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year

     
   

 

 

 

Total

    $        1,178  
   

 

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

  Amortized Cost   Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
   Fair
Value(2)
 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

      

Money market funds

   $            495    $            —    $            495 

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

   56    —     56 

Other debt securities

   18    —     18 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $569    $—    $569 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

Included in Cash and cash equivalents(1)

       $549 

Included in Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year

       

Included in Other debtors—amounts falling due after one year

       18 
      

 

 

 

Total

       $569 
      

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amount does not include $1,365$1,173 million of cash held in banks.

(2)

Represents the Company’s investments that are listed with the exception of Time deposits and certificates of deposit.

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the Company’s Other debtors - debtors—amounts falling due within one year included $4$2 million in restricted cash and investmentsequivalents held as collateral at banks for various performance obligations.

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the Company had no materialavailable-for-sale debt securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for a period greater than 12 months. The Company determined noavailable-for-sale debt securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of 30 June 2017.3 July 2020.

The fair value and amortized cost of the Company’s investments classified asavailable-for-sale debt securities at 30 June 20173 July 2020 by remaining contractual maturity waswere as follows:

 

 (US Dollars in millions)

 Amortized
Cost
  Fair
Value
 

 Due in less than 1 year

 $1,178   $1,178  

 Due in 1 to 5 years

  —    —  

 Due in 6 to 10 years

  —    —  

 Thereafter

  —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Total

 $      1,178   $      1,178  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Equity securities which do not have a contractual maturity date are not included in the above table.

(US Dollars in millions)

 Amortized Cost  Fair
Value
 

Due in less than 1 year

  $            551   $            551 

Due in 1 to 5 years

  10   10 

Due in 6 to 10 years

  —    —  

Thereafter

    
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $569   $569 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company reclassified demand deposits from certificates of deposit and money market funds to cash as of 1 July 2016 in the table below to conform to the current year’s presentation. This reclassification did not result in any change to the cash and cash equivalents balance as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows for all periods presented.

The following table summarizes, by major type, the fair value and amortized cost of the Company’s investments as of 1 July 2016:28 June 2019:

 

(US Dollars in millions) Amortized
Cost
  Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
  Fair
Value (2)
 

Available-for-sale securities:

   

Money market funds

  $232    $—    $232  

Corporate bonds

     —     

Certificates of deposit

     —     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $            243    $                —    $          243  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Included in Cash and cash equivalents(1)

    $230  

Included in Investments

     

Included in Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year

     
   

 

 

 

Total

    $243  
   

 

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 

  Amortized Cost

 

   Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)

 

   Fair
Value(2)

 

 

Available-for-sale securities:

      

Money market funds

  

 $

            417 

  

 $

            — 

  

 $

            417 

Time deposits and certificates of deposits

  

 

133 

  

 

— 

 

  

 

133 

Other debt securities

  

 

  

 

— 

 

  

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $557    $—    $557 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

Included in Cash and cash equivalents(1)

      

 $

548 

Included in Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year

      

 

Included in Other debtors—amounts falling due after one year

      

 

      

 

 

 

Total

       $557 
      

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amount does not include $895$1,672 million of cash held in banks.

(2)

Represents the Company’s investments that are listed with the exception of CertificatesTime deposits and certificates of deposit.

As of 1 July 2016,28 June 2019, the Company’s Other debtors - debtors—amounts falling due within one year included of $7$2 million in restricted cash and investments held as collateral at banks for various performance obligations.

As of 1 July 2016,28 June 2019, the Company had noavailable-for-sale debt securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for a period greater than 12 months. The Company determined noavailable-for-sale debt securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of 1 July 2016.

28 June 2019.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

The following table provides a summary of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheet that reconciles to the corresponding amount in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows:

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 

  3 July
2020

 

   28 June
2019

 

   29 June
2018

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  

 $

    1,722 

  

 $

    2,220 

  

 $

    1,853 

Restricted cash included in Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year

  

 

  

 

31 

  

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the Statements of Cash Flows

  

 $

    1,724 

  

 $

2,251 

  

 $

1,857 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of 28 June 2019, the Company’s Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year included $31 million in restricted cash and cash equivalents in an escrow account for the sale of certain properties and cash equivalents held as collateral at banks for various performance obligations

(Dollars in millions) June 30
2017
  1 July
2016
  3 July
2015
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $  2,539    $    1,125    $        2,479  

Restricted cash included in Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year

         
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the Statements of Cash Flows

  2,543    $1,132    2,486  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Trade Debtors

The following table provides details of the trade debtors balance sheet item:

 

(US Dollars in millions) 30 June
2017
 1 July
2016
   3 July 2020

 

   28 June 2019

 

 

Trade Debtors

  $1,204    $1,327    

 $

          1,120 

  

 $

           993 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  (5)   (9)   

 

(5)

 

  

 

(4)

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Trade Debtors, net

  

 $

1,115 

  

 $

989 

  $      1,199    $    1,318    

 

   

 

 
 

 

  

 

 

Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:

 

(US Dollars in millions) Balance at
Beginning of
Period
  Charges to
Profit and Loss
  Deductions(1)  Balance at
End of
Period
 

Fiscal year ended 1 July 2016

  $   $   $(1)   $ 

Fiscal year ended 30 June 2017

  $                  9    $                (4)   $                  —    $                5  

(US Dollars in millions)

  Balance at
Beginning of
Period
   Charges to
Profit and
Loss
   Deductions(1)   Balance at
End of Period
 

Fiscal year ended 28 June 2019

   $            4                —                 —     $            4 

Fiscal year ended 3 July 2020

   $            4           $            5 

 

 

(1)

Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.

In connection with an existing factoring agreement, the Company sells trade receivables to a third party for cash proceeds less a discount. During fiscal year 2020, the Company sold trade receivables without recourse for cash proceeds of $89 million of which $10 million remained subject to servicing by the Company as of 3 July 2020. The discounts on trade receivables sold were not material for fiscal year 2020.

Inventories

The following table provides details of the inventory balance sheet item:

 

(US Dollars in millions) 30 June 2017  1 July 2016 

Raw materials and components

  $350    $307  

Work-in-process

  257    297  

Finished goods

  375    264  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $          982    $        868  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

  3 July 2020   28 June 2019 

Raw materials and components

   $            451    $            336 

Work-in-process

   313    217 

Finished goods

   378    417 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total inventories

   $1,142    $970 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Debtors - Debtors—amounts falling due within one year

The following table provides details of the other debtors—amounts falling due within one year balance sheet item:

 

(US Dollars in millions) 30 June 2017 1 July 2016   3 July 2020   28 June 2019 

Vendornon-trade debtors

  $96    $66     $              33    $             12 

Prepaid expenses

   35    38 

Other

  150    150     67    113 
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $          246    $        216     $135    $163 
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Other Debtors - Debtors—amounts falling due after one year

The following table provides details of the other debtors - debtors—amounts falling due after one year balance sheet item:

 

(US Dollars in millions) 30 June 2017 1 July 2016   3 July 2020   28 June 2019 

Deferred income taxes

  $609    $616     $         1,120    $        1,114 

Other

  99    106     16    70 
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $          708    $        722     $1,136    $1,184 
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Tangible Assets

The following table provides details of the tangible assets balance sheet item:

 

(US Dollars in millions) Land (a) Equipment Buildings and
Leasehold
Improvements(a)
 Construction in
Progress (CIP)
 Total  Land(2)

 

 Equipment

 

 Buildings and
Leasehold
Improvements(2)

 

 Construction in
Progress (CIP)

 

 Total

 

 

Useful lives (years)(1)

   3 - 5   Up to 30      3 - 7       Up to 30       

Cost:

          

At 3 July 2015

  $48    $7,440    $1,595    $547    $9,630  

At 29 June 2018

  $55   $7,475   $1,906   $193   $9,629 

Additions

     117    34    414    567    —    81   10   478   569 

Disposals

  —    (261)   (26)   —    (287)   (7)   (200)   (52)   —    (259) 

Reclassifications

  —          (31)   (26) 

CIP Reclassifications

  19    381    296    (696)   —    —    373   32   (405)   —  

Impairments

  —    —    —    —    —    —    —    (3)   —    (3) 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At 1 July 2016

  $69    $7,681    $1,900    $234    $9,884  

At 28 June 2019

  $48   $7,729   $1,893   $266   $9,936 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions

  —    49    13    360    422    —    94   10   481   585 

Disposals

  (10)   (484)   (49)   (1)   (544)   —    (207)   (102)   —    (309) 

Reclassifications

  10       16    (12)   20    —    —      (1)   —  

CIP Reclassifications

  —    290    142    (432)   —    —    417  ��46   (463)   —  

Impairments

  (4)   (6)   (31)   —    (41) 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At 30 June 2017

  $65    $7,536    $1,991    $149    $9,741  

At 3 July 2020

  $48   $8,033   $1,848   $283   $10,212 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
     

Accumulated Depreciation:

          

At 3 July 2015

  $(6)   $(6,483)   $(863)   $—    $(7,352) 

At 29 June 2018

  $(6)   $(6,758)   $(1,049)   $—   $(7,813) 

Additions

  —    (531)   (110)   —    (641)   —    (373)   (91)   —    (464) 

Disposals

  —    245    24    —    269    —    200   31   —    231 

Reclassifications

  —    —    —    —    —  

Impairments

  —    —    —    —    —  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At 1 July 2016(a)

  $(6)   $(6,769)   $(949)   $—    $(7,724) 

At 28 June 2019

  $(6)   $(6,931)   $(1,109)   $—   $(8,046) 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions

  —    (456)   (125)   —    (581)   (1)   (238)   (86)   —    (325) 

Disposals

  —    483    49    —    532    —    206   82   —    288 

Reclassifications

  —    (9)   (9)   —    (18)   —      (1)   —    —  

Impairments

  —    —    —    —    —  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At 30 June 2017

  $(6)   $(6,751)   $(1,034)   $—    $(7,791) 

At 3 July 2020

  $(7)   $(6,962)   $(1,114)   $—   $(8,083) 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
     

Net Book Value:

          

At 1 July 2016

  $63    $912    $951    $234    $2,160  

At 28 June 2019

  $42   $798   $784   $266   $1,890 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At 30 June 2017

  $            59    $             785    $                 957    $                  149    $      1,950  

At 3 July 2020

  $41   $1,071   $734   $283   $    2,129 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

(a) The Company classified certain land and buildings with a net book value of $75 million as assets held for sale in fiscal year 2017.

(1)

Effective 29 June 2019, the Company changed its estimate of the useful lives of its manufacturing equipment from a range of three to five years to a range of three to seven years. Please refer to Note 1.Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for more details.

(2)

As of 3 July 2020, the company had no land and buildings classified as assets held for sale. As of 28 June 2019, the net book value of land and building classified as assets held for sale was $21 million.

Interest on borrowings related to eligible capital expenditures is capitalized as part of the cost of the qualified assets and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets. During fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company capitalized interest of $4$6 million and $13$3 million, respectively.

In fiscal years 2017 and 2016,year 2020, the Company determined it would discontinuerecognized a charge of $3 million for the use of certain manufacturing property and equipment in the short-term, and that certain other buildings, land and manufacturing property and equipment were permanently impaired. As a result, the company recognized charges of $72 million and $53 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively, from thewrite-off and accelerated depreciation of thesecertain fixed assets, including $35 million impairment on land and buildings in fiscal year 2017, classified as held for sale under tangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Please refer to Note 9.FairValuefor more details. In fiscal year 2017, total charges of $35 million, $35 million and $2 millionwhich was recorded to Cost of revenue Product development and Marketing and administrative, respectively, in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. In fiscal year 2016,2019, the entire amount was recorded in costCompany did not have any material write-offs or accelerated depreciation of revenue in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.fixed assets.

Other Provisions

The following table provides details of the other provisions balance sheet item:

 

(US Dollars in millions)     Note     30 June 2017 1 July 2016    Note     3 July  
2020
   28 June  
2019
 

Accrued warranty

  16   $233    $206    12    $  151   $195 

Accrued restructuring

  5   43    63       48   30 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Other provisions

   $199   $225 
   $          276    $          269    

 

  

 

 
  

 

  

 

 

Other Creditors - Creditors—amounts due within one year

The following table provides details of the other creditors - creditors—amounts falling due within one year balance sheet item:

 

(US Dollars in millions)  30 June 2017   1 July 2016 

Accrued expenses

   $364     $358  

Dividend payable

   184     —  

Deferred income

   55     18  

Accrued employee compensation

   237     184  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $          840     $          560  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

   3 July  
2020
    28 June  
2019
 

Accrued expenses

  $  353   $328 

Dividend payable

  167   170 

Lease liabilities

  14   —  

Deferred income

  11   12 

Accrued employee compensation

  224   169 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other creditors—amounts due within one year

  $769   $679 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Loss (“AOCI”AOCL”), a component of Other Reserves

The components of AOCI,AOCL, net of tax, were as follows:

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Cash Flow
Hedges
  Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Marketable
Securities(1)
  Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on post-
retirement plans
  Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
  Total 

Balance at July 3, 2015

  $   $—    $(15  $(16  $(30

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

  (4)   —       (1)    

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

     —    —    —     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  (2)   —       (1)    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at July 1, 2016

  (1  —    (7  (17  (25

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

  (3)   —    —        

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

     —       —     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

     —           
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at June 30, 2017

  $              —    $                 —    $                  (5  $              (12  $        (17
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Cash Flow
Hedges
  Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Post-
Retirement Plans
   Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
  Total 

Balance at 29 June 2018

  $—   $(4)    $(12)   $(16) 

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

  —    (16)    (2)   (18) 

Amounts reclassified from AOCL

  —    —     —    —  

Other comprehensive loss

  —    (16)    (2)   (18) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 28 June 2019

  —    (20)    (14)   (34) 

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

  (27)   (7)    (2)   (36) 

Amounts reclassified from AOCL

       —    

Other comprehensive loss

  (24)   (6)    (2)   (32) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 3 July 2020

  $(24)   $(26)    $(16)   $            (66) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The cost of a security sold or the amount reclassified out of AOCI into earnings was determined using the specific identification method.

3.  Acquisitions

Dot Hill Systems Corp.

On 6 October 2015, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Dot Hill Systems Corp. (“Dot Hill”), a supplier of software and hardware storage systems. The Company paid $9.75 per share, or $674 million, in cash for the acquisition. The acquisition of Dot Hill further expands the Company’sOEM-focused cloud storage systems business and advances the Company’s strategic efforts.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

(Dollars in millions)

Amount

Cash and cash equivalents

 $                40 

Trade debtors

48 

Inventories

21 

Other current andnon-current assets

Tangible Assets

10 

Intangible assets

252 

Goodwill

364 

Total assets

742 

Trade creditors

(42)

Other creditors

(26)

Total liabilities

(68)

Total

 $674 

The following table shows the fair value of the separately identifiable intangible assets at the time of acquisition and the period over which each intangible asset will be amortized:

(Dollars in millions)

Fair ValueWeighted-
Average
Amortization
Period

Existing technology

 $164           5.0 years 

Customer relationships

71 7.0 years 

Trade names

5.0 years 

Total amortizable intangible assets acquired

238 5.5 years 

In-process research and development

14 

Total acquired identifiable intangible assets

 $              252 

The recognized goodwill, which is not deductible for income tax purposes, is primarily attributable to cost synergies expected to arise after the acquisition and the benefits the Company expects to derive from enhanced market opportunities.

The expenses related to the acquisition of Dot Hill for the fiscal year ended 1 July 2016, which are included within Marketing and administrative expense in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account, are not significant.

The amounts of revenue and earnings of Dot Hill included in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account from the acquisition date were not significant.

4. Goodwill and Other Long-lived Assets

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill arewas $1,237 million as follows:of 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019. There were no additions to, disposals of, impairments of or translation adjustments to goodwill in fiscal years 2020 and 2019.

(US dollars in millions)

Amount

Balance as of 3 July 2015

 $874 

Goodwill acquired

364 

Goodwill disposed

(1)

Balance as of 1 July 2016

1,237 

Goodwill acquired

— 

Goodwill disposed

— 

Foreign currency translation effect

Balance as of June 30 2017

 $        1,238 

Other Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets consist primarily of existing technology, customer relationships and trade names acquired in business combinations. During fiscal year 2017, thein-process research and development (“IPR&D”) of $14 million was completed and reclassified to existing technology. Intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the respective estimated useful lives of the assets. Amortization is charged to Operating expenses in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

The carrying value of other intangible assets subject to amortization, excluding fully amortized intangible assets, as of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, is set forth in the following table:

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Gross Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Carrying
Amount
 Weighted Average
Remaining Useful Life
  Gross Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Carrying
Amount
 Weighted Average
Remaining Useful Life
 

Existing technology

  $280    $(112)   $168    3.6 years    $199   $(179)   $20   1.5 years 

Customer relationships

  487    (395)   92    3.4 years    71   (48)   23   2.2 years 

Trade name

  27    (19)      2.1 years      (2)   —    0.2 years 

Other intangible assets

  29    (16)   13    2.6 years    19   (4)   15   2.9 years 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total amortizable other intangible assets

  $              823    $          (542)   $            281                      3.4 years    $291   $(233)   $58   2.1 years 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

The carrying value of other intangible assets subject to amortization, excluding fully amortized intangible assets, as of 1 July 201628 June 2019 is set forth in the following table:

 

 (US Dollars in millions)

 Gross Carrying
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Carrying
Amount
  Weighted Average
Remaining Useful Life
 

 Existing technology

  $297    $(79)   $218    4.1 years  

 Customer relationships

  510    (328)   182    3.2 years  

 Trade name

  29    (14)   15    2.6 years  

 Other intangible assets

  29    (10)   19    3.2 years  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total amortizable other intangible assets

  $              865    $          (431)   $            434                      3.6 years  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

The carrying value of IPR&D not subject to amortization was $14 million on 1 July 2016.

(US Dollars in millions)

 Gross Carrying
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Carrying
Amount
  Weighted Average
Remaining Useful Life
 

Existing technology

  $201   $(143)   $58   1.9 years 

Customer relationships

  71   (38)   33   3.3 years 

Trade name

    (2)     1.2 years 

Other intangible assets

  41   (22)   19   2.9 years 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total amortizable other intangible assets

  $316   $(205)   $111   2.5 years 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, expected amortization expense for other intangible assets for each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows:

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Amount  Amount 

2018

   $108  

2019

  71  

2020

  53  

2021

  25    $28 

2022

  17    20 

2023

  10 

2024

  —  

2025

  —  

Thereafter

     —  
 

 

  

 

 
   $            281    $        58 
 

 

  

 

 

The carrying values of intangible assets were $281$58 million and $448$111 million as of 303 July 2020 and 28 June 2017 and 1 July 2016,2019, respectively. In fiscal year 20172020, amortization expense for other intangible assets was $168$53 million, of which $64$39 million was included in Cost of revenue and $104$14 million was included in Amortization of intangibles in the Consolidated Profit and Loss account. In fiscal year 2016,2019, amortization expense for other intangible assets was $174$77 million, of which $51$54 million was included in Cost of revenue and $123$23 million was included in Amortization of intangibles in the Consolidated Profit and Loss account.

 

(US dollars in millions) Existing
Technology
  Customer
Relationships
  Trade
Names
  In-process
Research and
Development
  Other
Intangible
Assets
  Total (a) 

Cost:

      

At 3 July 2015

  $354    $499    $30    $—    $35    $918  

Additions

  164    71       14       253  

Disposals/Retirements

  (181)   (47)   —    —    —    (228) 

Reclassifications

  —    —    —    —    —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 1 July 2016

  $337    $523    $33    $14    $36    $943  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  —    —    —    —        

Disposals/Retirements

  (2)   (2)   —    —    —    (4) 

Reclassifications

  14    —    —    (14)   —    —  

Impairments

  —    —    —    —    —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 30 June 2017

  $349    $521    $33    $—    $37    $940  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated Amortization:

      

At 3 July 2015

  $(232)  $(294)   $(10)   $—    $(12)   $(548) 

Additions

  (68)   (94)   (8)   —    (5)   (175) 

Disposals/Retirements

  181    47    —    —    —    228  

Reclassifications

  —    —    —    —    —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 1 July 2016

  $(119)   $(341)   $(18)   $—    $(17)   $(495) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  (64)   (90)   (7)   —    (7)   (168) 

Disposals/Retirements

        —    —    —     

Reclassifications

  —    —    —    —    —    —  

Impairments

  —    —    —    —    —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 30 June 2017

  $(181)   $(429)   $(25)   $—    $(24)   $(659) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Book Value:

      

At 1 July 2016

  $218    $182    $15    $14    $19    $448  
 

 

 

 

At 30 June 2017

  $            168    $              92    $          8    $            —    $          13    $      281  
 

 

 

 

(US dollars in millions)

 Existing
Technology
  Customer
Relationships
  Trade
Names
  Other
Intangible
Assets
  Total(1) 

Cost:

     

At 29 June 2018

  $322   $509   $30   $55   $916 

Disposals/Retirements

  (22)   (10)   —    —    (32) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 28 June 2019

  $300   $499   $30   $55   $884 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Disposals/Retirements

  —    —    —    —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 3 July 2020

  300   499   30   55   884 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
     

Accumulated Amortization:

     

At 29 June 2018

  $(211)   $(462)   $(26)   $(29)   $(728) 

Additions

  (53)   (14)   (3)   (7)   (77) 

Disposals/Retirements

  22   10   —    —    32 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 28 June 2019

  $(242)   $(466)   $(29)   $(36)   $(773) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  (38)   (10)   (1)   (4)   (53) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 3 July 2020

  (280)   (476)   (30)   (40)   (826) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
     

Net Book Value:

     

At 28 June 2019

  $58   $33   $  $19   $111 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 3 July 2020

  $            20   $            23   $            —   $            15   $            58 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(a)(1)

The carrying value of intangible assets subject to amortization includes fully amortized intangible assets for the period presented.

5. Restructuring and Exit Costs

During fiscal years 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $178 million and $175 million, respectively, comprised primarily of charges related to workforce reduction costs and facility exit costs associated with restructuring of its workforce during each fiscal year. The Company’s significant restructuring plans are described below. All restructuring charges are reported in Restructuring and Other net on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

March 2017 Plan - On 9 March 2017, the Company committed to an additional restructuring plan (the “March 2017 Plan”) in connection with the continued consolidation of its global footprint. The Company closed its design center in Korea, resulting in the reduction of the Company’s headcount by approximately 300 employees. The March 2017 Plan was largely completed by the end of fiscal year 2017. In addition, the Company committed to sell its land and building in Korea as part of the plan. This land and building met the criteria to be classified as assets held for sale and were included in Tangible assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at 30 June 2017. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $26 million as part of the fair value measurement to reduce the carrying amount of its land and building to its estimated fair value less costs to sell, which is included in Operating expenses in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

July 2016 Plan- On 11 July 2016, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (the “July 2016 Plan”) for continued consolidation of its global footprint across Asia, EMEA and the Americas. The July 2016 Plan included reducing worldwide headcount by approximately 6,500 employees. The July 2016 Plan, was largely completed by the end of fiscal year 2017.

June 2016 Plan- On 27 June 2016, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (the “June 2016 Plan”) as part of the Company’s efforts to reduce its cost structure to align with the then current macroeconomic conditions. The June 2016 Plan included reducing worldwide headcount by approximately 1,600 employees. The June 2016 Plan was largely completed by the fiscal quarter ended 30 December 2016 with no material future costs expected to be incurred.

The following table summarizes the Company’s restructuring activities under all of the Company’s active restructuring plans for fiscal years 2017 and 2016:

  March 2017 Plan  July 2016 Plan  June 2016 Plan  Other Plans  Total 
(Dollars in millions) Workforce
Reduction
Costs
  Facilities
and Other
Exit Costs
  Workforce
Reduction
Costs
  Facilities
and  Other
Exit Costs
  Workforce
Reduction
Costs
  Facilities
and  Other
Exit Costs
  Workforce
Reduction
Costs
  Facilities
and  Other
Exit Costs
  

All Restructuring Activities

         
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrual balances at 3 July 2015

  —    —    —    —    —    —    11       19  

Restructuring charges

  —    —    —    —    69    —    82    24    $175  

Cash payments

  —    —    —    —    (24)   —    (89)   (18)   $(131) 

Adjustments

  —    —    —    —    —    —       (1)   $—  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrual balances at 1 July 2016

  —    —    —    —    45    —       13    63  

Restructuring charges

  28       72    20    —       31    12    $167  

Cash payments

  (29)   (3)   (57)   (18)   (41)   (1)   (33)   (16)   $(198) 

Adjustments

         —    (1)   —    —       $11  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrual balances at 30 June 2017

  $—    $—    $22    $   $   $—    $   $13    $43  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Total costs incurred to date as of 30 June 2017  $29    $   $79    $20    $68    $   $158    $49    $407  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Total expected costs to be incurred as of 30 June 2017  $        1    $        3    $        1    $          13    $        —    $        —    $        —    $        3    $        21  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accrued restructuring balance is included in Other provisions in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for fiscal years 2017 and 2016.

6.4. Debentures and Bank Loans

Short-Term BorrowingsCredit Agreement

The credit agreement entered into by the Company and itsCompany’s subsidiary, Seagate HDD Cayman, entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) on 18 January 2011 and subsequently20 February 2019, which was most recently amended (the “Revolvingon 16 September 2019. The Credit Agreement provides an up to $1.5 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) provides the Company withand a $700term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $500 million

senior secured revolving credit facility. (“Term Loan”). The term of the Revolving Credit Facility is through 15 January 2020, provided that ifhas a final maturity of 20 February 2024 and the Company does not have Investment Grade Ratings (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) on 15 August 2018, then theTerm Loan has a final maturity date will beof 16 August 2018 unless certain extension conditions have been satisfied.September 2025. The loans made under the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan will bear interest at a rate of LIBORthe London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a variable margin for each facility that will be determined based on the corporate credit rating of the Company. The CompanySTX and certain of its material subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guarantee both the Revolving Credit Facility.Facility and Term Loan. The Revolving Credit Facility also allows such facility to increase by an additional $100 million, provided that (i) there has been, and will be after giving effect to such increase, no default, (ii) the increase is at least $25 million and (iii) the existing commitments under the facility receive 0.50% most favored nation protection. An aggregate amount of up to $75 million of the Revolving Credit Facility is available for cash borrowings, subject to compliance with certain covenants and other customary conditions to borrowing, and for the issuance of letters of credit, and an aggregate amount of up to asub-limit$50 million of $75 million.such facility is also available for swing line loans.

On 17 September 2019, Seagate HDD Cayman borrowed the $500 million principal amount under the Term Loan and the proceeds were used to repurchase a portion of its outstanding senior notes. The Term Loan is repayable in quarterly installments of 1.25% of the original principal amount beginning on 31 December 2020, with the remaining balance payable upon maturity.

The Revolving Credit Facility, as amended,Agreement includes three financial covenants: (1) minimum cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities;interest coverage ratio, (2) a fixed charge coverage ratio;total leverage ratio and (3) a net leverage ratio. On 27 April 2016, the Revolving Credit Agreement was amended in order to increase the allowable net leverage ratio to allow for higher net leverage levels.minimum liquidity amount. The Company was in compliance with the modified covenants as of 30 June 20173 July 2020 and expects to be in compliance for the next 12 months.

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, no borrowings had beenwere drawn orand no letters of credit or swing line loans have been utilized under the Revolving Credit Facility.

Long-Term Debt

$800 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 3.75% Senior Notes due November 2018 (the “2018 Notes”).On 5 November 2013, Seagate HDD Cayman, issued $800 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Senior Notes. The obligations under the 2018 Notes which maturewere fully and unconditionally guaranteed on 15 November 2018, in a private placement.senior unsecured basis by STX. The interest on the Notes iswas payable semi-annually on 15 May and 15 November of each year. The Notes are redeemable at the option of Seagate HDD Cayman in whole or in part, on not less than 30, nor more than 60 days’ notice, at a “make-whole” premium redemption price. The “make-whole” premium redemption price will be equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining schedule payments of principal and interest on the Notes being redeemed, discounted at the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury rate plus 50 basis points. Accrued and unpaid interest, if any will be paid to, but excluding, the redemption date. The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company on a senior unsecured basis. During fiscal year 2017, the Company repurchased $902018, $211 million aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Notes were repurchased for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a loss on the repurchase of approximately $3 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

$600 millionAggregate Principal Amount of7.00%Senior Notes due November 2021 (the “2021 Notes”).On18May 2011, the Company’s subsidiary, Seagate HDD Cayman, completed the sale of $600 million aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes, in a private placement exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The obligations under the 2021 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. The interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 January and 1 July of each year. The 2021 Notes are redeemable any time prior to 1 May 2016 at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus an “applicable premium” and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. The “applicable premium” will be equal to the greater of (1) 1% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes, or (2) the excess, if any, of (a) the present value of the redemption price on 1 May 2016 plus interest payments due through 1 May 2016, discounted at the applicable Treasury rate as of the redemption date plus 50 basis points; over (b) the principal amount of such note. The 2021 Notes are redeemable at any time on or after 1 May 2016 at various prices expressed as a percentage of principal amount, as set forth in the indentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. In addition, any time before 1 May 2014, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the principal amount with the net cash proceeds from permitted sales of the Company’s stock at a

redemption price of 107% of the principal amount plus accrued interest to the redemption date. The issuer under the 2021 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman and the obligations under the 2021 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. During fiscal years 2016 and 2015, the Company repurchased $1 million and $93 million, respectively, aggregate principal amount of its 2021 Notes for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. For fiscal year 2016, the loss recorded on the repurchase was immaterial and for fiscal year 2015,2018, the Company recorded a loss on the repurchase of approximately $13 million, which were included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2017, the 2021 Notes were fully extinguished through redemption for cash at a premium to their principal amount of $158 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. For fiscal year 2017, the Company recorded a loss on the redemption of approximately $5$4 million which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. On 15 November 2018, the 2018 Notes matured and the entire outstanding principal amount of $499 million was repaid, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

$750 million Aggregate Principal Amount of4.25% Senior Notes due March 2022 (the “2022 Notes”).On 3 February, 2017, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $750 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.25% Senior Notes which will mature on 1 March 2022. The obligations under the 2022 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by STX. The interest on the 2022 Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 March and 1 September of each year, commencing on 1 September 2017. At any time before 1 February 2022, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes at a ‘make whole’“make whole” redemption price, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The ‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2022 Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate (as defined in the relevant Indenture) plus 40 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2022 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (b) the principal amount of the 2022 Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2022 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. The issuer underDuring fiscal year 2020, $521 million aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, $250 million and $248 million principal amount of which were repurchased pursuant to cash tender offers for certain senior notes on 18 September 2019 and 18 June 2020 (the “Tender Offers”), respectively. The Company recorded a loss of $29 million on repurchases during fiscal year 2020 which is Seagate HDD Cayman,included in Other income and charges, net in the obligations under the 2022 Notes are fullyCompany’s Consolidated Profit and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company.Loss Account.

$1 billionAggregate Principal Amount of 4.75%4.75% Senior Notes due June 2023 (the “2023 Notes”).On 22 May 2013, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $1 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.75% Senior Notes, which will mature on 1 June 2023, in a private placement.2023. The obligations under the 2023 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company.STX. The interest on the 2023 Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 June and 1 December of each year. TheSeagate HDD Cayman may redeem the 2023 Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company in whole or in part, on not less than 30, nor more than 60 days’ notice, at a “make-whole” premium redemption price. The “make-whole” redemption price will be equal to the greater of (1)100% of the principal amount of the notes2023 Notes being redeemed, or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2023 Notes being redeemed, discounted at the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury rateRate plus 50 basis points. Accrued and unpaid interest, if any, will be paid to, but excluding, the redemption date. During fiscal year 2016,2020, $395 million aggregate principal amount of the Company2023 Notes were repurchased for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, $200 million and $178 million

principal amount of which was repurchased pursuant to the Tender Offers on 18 September 2019 and 18 June 2020, respectively. During fiscal year 2019, $10 million aggregate principal amount of its 2023 Notes were repurchased for cash at a discountpremium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a loss recorded on the repurchase was immaterial,of $20 million for fiscal year 2020, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2017, the Company repurchased $39 million aggregate principal amount of its 2023 Notes for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The loss recorded on the repurchaserepurchases in fiscal year 2019 was immaterial, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.immaterial.

$500 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024 (the “2024 Notes”). On 3 February 2017, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes which will mature on 1 March 2024. The obligations under the 2024 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis by STX. The interest on the 2024 Notes is payable semi-annually on March and and September 1 of each year, commencing on 1 September 2017. At any time

before 1 January 2024, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2024 Notes at a ‘make whole’“make-whole” redemption price, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The ‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2024 Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2024 Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 45 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2024 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (b) the principal amount of the 2024 Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2024 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. The issuer under the 2024 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2024 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company.

$1 billion Aggregate principalPrincipal amount of 4.75% Senior Notes due January 2025 (the “2025 Notes”). On 28 May 2014, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $1 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.75% Senior Notes due 2025, which will mature on 1 January 2025. The obligations under the 2025 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by STX. The interest on the 2025 Notes will beis payable in cash semiannually on January and and July 1 of each year, commencing on 1 January 2015. At any time, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, Seagate HDD may redeem some or all of the 2025 Notes at a ‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price. The ‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2025 Notes redeemed, and (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2025 Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points. Accrued and unpaid interest, if any, will be paid to, but excluding, the redemption date. The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed byOn 18 September 2019, the Company onprincipal amount of $170 million was repurchased at a senior unsecured basis.premium pursuant to the Tender Offers. During fiscal year 2016, the Company repurchased $52019, $55 million aggregate principal amount of itsthe 2025 Notes were repurchased for cash at a discount to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. TheFor fiscal years 2020 and 2019 the Company recorded a loss of $8 million and a gain recordedof approximately $1 million on the repurchase was immaterial,repurchases respectively, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2017,On 18 June 2020, Seagate HDD Cayman completed an exchange offer in which the Company repurchased $20 million aggregate principal amount of $271 million of the 2025 Notes was exchanged for cash at a discount to theirthe principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.of $297 million of the 2029 Notes (as defined below). The Company recordedexchange was accounted for as a debt modification with no gain on the repurchase of approximately $1 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.or loss recognized.

$700 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due June, 2027 (the “2027 Notes”). On 14 May 2015, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $700 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes, which will mature on 1 June 2027. The obligations under the 2027 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by STX. The interest on the 2027 Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 June and 1 December of each year, commencing on 1 December 2015. At any time before 1 March 2027, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2027 Notes at a “make-whole” redemption price. The ‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2027 Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any of (x) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2027 Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 40 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2027 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (y) the principal amount of the 2027 Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2027 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. At any time on or after 1 March 2027, the CompanySeagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2027 Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2027 Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the

redemption date. The issuer under the 2027 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2027 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. During fiscal year 2017, the Company repurchased $42019, $6 million aggregate principal amount of the 2027 Notes were repurchased for cash at a discount to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. TheFor fiscal year 2019, the Company recorded an immaterial gain on the repurchase, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

On 18 June 2020, Seagate HDD Cayman completed an exchange offer in which the principal amount of $185 million of the 2027 Notes was exchanged for the principal amount of $203 million of the 2029 Notes (as defined below). The exchange was accounted for as a debt modification with no gain or loss recognized.

$500 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 4.091% Senior Notes due June, 2029 (the “2029 Notes”). On 18 June 2020, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $500 million in aggregate principal amount of4.091% Senior Notes in connection with Seagate HDD Cayman’s exchange offers to certain eligible holders of Seagate HDD Cayman’s outstanding 2025 Notes and 2027 Notes (the “Exchange Offers”). The obligations under the 2029 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by STX. The 2029 Notes will mature on 1 June 2029. Interest on the 2029 Notes will be payable in cash semiannually on 1 June and 1 December of each year, commencing on 1 December 2020. At any time before 1 March 2029, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem any or all of the 2029 Notes at a “make-whole” redemption price. The “make-whole” redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2029 Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any, of (x) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2029 Notes being redeemed (as if the 2029 Notes matured on the Notes Par Call Date, as defined below), discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2029 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (y) the principal amount of the 2029 Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2029 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. At any time on or after 1 March 2029, (the “Notes Par Call Date”), Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2029 Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2029 Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date.

$500 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 4.125% Senior Notes due January, 2031 (the “2031 Notes”). On 10 June 2020, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement,$500 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.125% Senior Notes, which will mature on 15 January 2031. The obligations under the 2031 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by STX. Interest on the Notes will be payable in cash semiannually on 15 January and 15 July of each year, commencing on 15 January 2021. At any time before 15 October 2030, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem any or all of the Notes at a “make-whole” redemption price. The “make-whole” redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2031 Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any, of (x) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2031 Notes being redeemed (as if the 2031 Notes matured on the 2031 Notes Par Call Date, as defined below), discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2031 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (y) the principal amount of the 2031 Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2031 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. At any time on or after 15 October 2030 (the “2031 Notes Par Call Date”), Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2031 Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2031 Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date.

$500 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due December, 2034 (the “2034 Notes”). On 2 December 2014, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes, which will mature on 1 December 2034. The obligations under the 2034 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by STX. The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 June and 1 December of each year, commencing on 1 June 2015. At any time before 1 June 2034, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2034 Notes at a “make-whole” redemption price. The ‘‘make-whole’’make-whole redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2034 Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any of (x) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2034 Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2034 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (y) the principal amount of the 2034 Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2034 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. At any time

on or after 1 June 2034, the CompanySeagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2034 Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2034 Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. The issuer under the 2034 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2034 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. During fiscal year 2016, the Company repurchased $10 million aggregate principal amount of its 2034 Notes for cash at a discount to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a gain on the repurchase of approximately $3 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

Interest charges shown in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account are related to the Company’s debentures.

At 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, future principal payments on long-term debt were as follows (in millions):

 

Fiscal Year

 Amount  Amount 

2018

  $—  

2019

  710  

2020

  —  

2021

  —    $            19 

2022

  750    254 

2023

  571 

2024

  525 

2025

  504 

Thereafter

  3,613    2,376 
 

 

  

 

 

Total

  $            4,249 
  $        5,073   

 

 
 

 

 

7.5. Income Taxes

Income before income taxes consisted of the following:

  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
2020
  28 June
2019
 

US

  $121   $275 

Non-US

  911   1,097 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $    1,032   $    1,372 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

The provision for liabilities and charges related to taxation as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet consisted of the following:

 

 Fiscal Years Ended  Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions) 30 June 2017 1 July 2016  3 July 2020 28 June 2019 

Accrued income taxes falling due within one year

  $   $   $12   $         26 

Deferred income tax liabilities due within one year

  —    —    —    —  

Accrued income taxes falling due after one year

  15    14      

Deferred income tax liabilities due after one year

     10    21   20 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $            30    $            31    $         35   $50 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions) 30 June 2017  1 July 2016 

Current tax expense (benefit):

  

US Federal

  $—    $ 

US State

      

Non-US

  39    25  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Current

  40    28  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred tax expense (benefit):

  

US Federal

  (5)   —  

US State

  —    —  

Non-US

     (2) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Deferred

     (2) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  $            43    $            26  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes consisted of the following:
  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July 2020  28 June
2019
 

Current income tax expense:

  

US Federal

  $        —   $        — 

US State

  —    —  

Non-US

  36   45 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Current

  36   45 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred income tax benefit:

  

US Federal

  (16)   (690) 

US State

  (2)   12 

Non-US

  10  (7) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Deferred

  (8)   (685) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  $28   $(640) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions) 30 June 2017  1 July 2016 

US

  $(22)   $—  

Non-US

  837    274  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $            815    $            274  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company recorded no excess tax benefits associated with stock option deductions in fiscal year 2017. The Company recorded $0.6 million of excess tax benefits associated with stock option deductions in fiscal year 2016.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions) 30 June 2017  1 July 2016 

Deferred tax assets

  

Accrued warranty

  $85    $74  

Inventory valuation accounts

  43    32  

Debtor reserve

  19    11  

Accrued compensation and benefits

  99    85  

Depreciation

  109    173  

Restructuring accruals

  (1)   14  

Other accruals and deferred items

  51    50  

Net operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards

  1,224    1,252  

Other assets

  11     
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

  1,640    1,693  

Valuation allowance

  (966)   (984) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

  674    709  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

  

Unremitted earnings of certainnon-US entities

  (7)   (11) 

Acquisition-related items

  (65)   (92) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Deferred tax liabilities

  (72  (103
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred taxes on intra-entity transactions

  $   $—  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Net Deferred tax assets

  $604    $606  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

As Reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

  

Deferred income taxes - included in Other debtors falling due after one year

  609    616  

Deferred income taxes liabilities - included in Provision for taxation

  (5)   (10) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Net Deferred income taxes

  $            604    $            606  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

The deferred tax asset valuation allowance decreased by $18 million in fiscal year 2017 and increased by $55 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively.

  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July 2020  28 June 2019 
Deferred tax assets  

Accrued warranty

  $        35   $        46 

Inventory valuation accounts

  30   34 

Debtor reserve

  11   10 

Accrued compensation and benefits

  55   53 

Depreciation

  59   89 

Restructuring accruals

    

Other accruals and deferred items

  22   15 

Net operating losses

  735   743 

Tax credit carryforwards

  603   582 

Other assets

    
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross: Deferred tax assets

  1,566   1,583 

Less: Valuation allowance

  (438)   (460) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net: Deferred tax assets

  1,128   1,123 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
Deferred tax liabilities  

Unremitted earnings of certain non-US entities

  (16)   (16) 

Acquisition-related items

  (8)   (13) 

Other liabilities

  (5)   —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net: Deferred tax liabilities

  (29)   (29) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net deferred tax assets

  $1,099   $1,094 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

At 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the Company recorded $602 million$1.1 billion of net deferred tax assets, excluding $2 million of deferred taxes on intra-entity transactions.assets. The realization of most of these deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient US and certainnon-USnon-Irish taxable income in future periods. Although realization is not assured, the Company’s management believes it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, may increase or decrease in subsequent periods when the Company reevaluatesre-evaluates the underlying basis for its estimates of future US.US and certainnon-US.non-Irish taxable income.

The deferred tax asset valuation allowance decreased by $22 million in fiscal year 2020 primarily driven by the Company’s profitability outlook in the US.

At 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the Company had US federal, US state andnon-US tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3.4$3.0 billion, $2.0$1.7 billion and $173$113 million, respectively, which will expire at various dates beginning in fiscal year 2018,2021, if not utilized. Net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $68$6 million are scheduled to expire in fiscal year 2018.2021. At 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the Company had US.US federal and state tax credit

carryforwards of $444$554 million and $105$148 million, respectively, which will expire at various dates beginning in fiscal year 2018,2021 if not utilized.

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, approximately $560$371 million and $101$114 million of the Company’s total US net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, respectively, are subject to annual limitations ranging from $1 million to $45 million pursuant to US.US tax law.

For purposes of the reconciliation between the income tax expensesexpense (benefit) at the statutory rate and the effective tax rate, applicable to the Company in Ireland, theIrish statutory rate applicable to the Company of 25% was applied as follows:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended 
(US Dollars in millions) 30 June 2017  1 July 2016 

Income tax expense at statutory rate applicable to the Company in Ireland

  $204    $69  

Net US. federal and state income taxes

      

Permanent differences

  19    10  

Valuation allowance

  (11)   (1) 

Non-US. losses with no tax benefits

  17     

Non-US. earnings taxed at less than statutory rate applicable to the Company in Ireland

  (186)   (37) 

Reversal of previously recorded taxes

  (4)   (19) 

Other individually immaterial items

     —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense

  $            43    $            26  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Fiscal Years Ended

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

3 July 2020

 

  

 

28 June 2019

 

 

Income tax expense at the statutory rate applicable to the Company in Ireland

 

 $

    258 

 

 

343 

 

Permanent differences

 

 

(1)

 

 

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(16)

 

 

 

(742)

 

Earnings taxed at less than statutory rate applicable to the Company in Ireland

 

 

(193)

 

 

 

(234)

 

Research Credit

 

 

(27)

 

 

 

(38)

 

Tax expense related to intercompany transactions

 

 

— 

 

 

 

23 

Other individually immaterial items

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

28 

 

 

(640)

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

A substantial portion of the Company’s operations in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand operate under various tax holidayincentive programs, which expire in whole or in part at various dates through 2024.2025. Certain tax holidaysincentives may be extended if specific conditions are met. The net impact of these tax holidayincentive programs was to increase the Company’s net income by approximately $163$206 million in fiscal year 20172020 ($0.540.78 per share, diluted) and to increase the Company’s net income by approximately $67$194 million in fiscal year 20162019 ($0.220.68 per share, diluted).

The Company consists of an Irish tax resident parent holding company with various US andnon-US subsidiaries that operate in multiplenon-Irish taxing jurisdictions. The amount of temporary differences (including undistributed earnings) related to outside basis differences in the stock ofnon-Irish resident subsidiaries considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland for which Irish income taxes have not been provided as of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, was approximately $1.5$1.9 billion. If such amountamounts were remitted to Ireland as a dividend, it is likely that tax at 25%, or approximately $375$475 million would result.

As of 303 July 2020 and 28 June 2017 and 1 July 2016,2019, the Company had approximately $74$89 million and $76$83 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits excluding interest and penalties. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that,These amounts, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate is $74 million and $76 million as of 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, respectively, subject to certain future valuation allowance offsets.

The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended  Fiscal Years Ended

 

 
(US Dollars in millions)  30 June 2017   1 July 2016  

 

3 July 2020

 

 

 

28 June 2019

 

 

Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year

   $76     $89   

 $

83 

 

 

 

60 

Gross increase for tax positions of prior years

       12    —    22 

Gross decrease for tax positions of prior years

   (7)    (8)   (1)   (9) 

Gross increase for tax positions of current year

   16     11      16 

Gross decrease for tax positions of current year

   —     —    —    —  

Settlements

   —     —    (1)   —  

Lapse of statutes of limitation

   (13)    (27)   —    (6) 

Non-US. exchange gain

   —     (1) 

Non-US exchange gain

  —    —  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of the year

   $              74     $              76  

 $

            89 

 

$

            83 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

It is the Company’s policy to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the income tax expense on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2017,2020 the Company recognized net income tax benefit for

interest and penalties of less than $1 million, as compared to net income tax expensebenefit of $8$2 million during fiscal year 2016.2019. As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the Company had $4less than $1 million of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits compared to $6$1 million in fiscal year 2016.2019.

During the 12 months beginning 14 July 2017,2020, the Company expects that its unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by approximately $14less than $1 million as a result of the expiration of certain statutes of limitation.

The Company is required to file US federal, US state andnon-US income tax returns. The Company is no longer subject to examination of its US federal income tax returns for years prior to fiscal year 2014. With respect to US state andnon-US income tax returns, the2017. The Company is generally no longer subject to tax examination for years ending prior to fiscal year 2006.2008 for US state income tax returns and prior to fiscal year 2009 for non-US income tax returns.

The following table shows the activity in the deferred tax liability balance for fiscal year 2017:2020:

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Amount

 

Balance at 1 July 201628 June 2019

 

 $

10 

20 

Unremitted earnings of certainnon-US entities

 

(4)

 

 

 

 

Balance at 30 June 20173 July 2020

 

 $

            6 

            21 

 

 

 

 

6. Leases

The Company is a lessee in several operating leases related to real estate facilities for warehouse and office space.

The Company’s lease arrangements comprise operating leases with various expiration dates through 2082. The lease term includes the non-cancelable period of the lease, adjusted for options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that an option will be exercised.

Operating lease costs include short-term lease costs and are shown net of immaterial sublease income. The components of lease costs and other information related to leases were as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended

(US Dollars in millions)

3 July 2020

Operating lease cost

 $

22 

Variable lease cost

Total lease cost

 $

26 

Operating cash outflows from operating leases

 $

            18 

3 July 2020

Weighted-average remaining lease term

 13.2 years 

Weighted-average discount rate

6.53

ROU assets and lease liabilities are included on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:

(US Dollars in millions)

Balance Sheet Location

3 July 2020

ROU assets

Right of use assets

 $

            103 

Current lease liabilities

Other creditors–amounts due within one year

 $

14 

Non-current lease liabilities

Other creditors–amounts due after one year

 $

49 

The following table provides details of the ROU assets:

(US Dollars in millions)

3 July 2020

Balance at 29 June 2019

 $

115 

Assets recognized for new leases

Amortization

(19)

Other (interest accretion and other adjustments)

Balance at 3 July 2020

 $

            103 

At 3 July 2020, future lease payments included in the measurement of lease liabilities were as follows (in millions):

Fiscal Year

 Amount 

2021

  $15 

2022

  15 

2023

  10 

2024

  

Thereafter

  103 
 

 

 

 

Total lease payments

  148 

Less: imputed interest

  (85) 
 

 

 

 

Present value of lease liabilities

  $            63 
 

 

 

 

Prior to fiscal year 2020, the Company recognized rent expense for operating leases under the legacy guidance ASC 840. For fiscal year 2019, total rent expense for all land, facility and equipment operating leases, net of sublease income, was $18 million.

7. Restructuring and Exit Costs

During fiscal years 2020, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $82 million comprised primarily of charges related to workforce reduction costs and facilities and other exit costs associated with the restructuring of its workforce. During fiscal year 2019, the Company recorded a net gain of $22 million that included a gain from the sale of a certain property. The Company’s significant restructuring plans are described below. All restructuring charges are reported in Restructuring and other, net on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

June 2020 Plan - On 1 June 2020, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (the “June 2020 Plan”) consistent with its long-term strategy to drive operational efficiencies, reduce its cost structure and invest in future opportunities. The June 2020 Plan included consolidating the Company’s Minnesota facilities into one location and reducing its headcount worldwide by approximately 500 employees. The June 2020 Plan is expected to be substantially completed during the first quarter of fiscal year 2021.

The following table summarizes the Company’s restructuring activities under all of the Company’s active restructuring plans for fiscal years 2020 and 2019:

  June 2020 Plan  Other Plans    

(US Dollars in millions)

 Workforce
Reduction
Costs
  Facilities and
Other Exit
Costs
  Workforce
Reduction
Costs
  Facilities and
Other Exit
Costs
  Total 

Accrual balances at 29 June 2018

  $            —   $            —   $            19  $            23   $            42 

Restructuring charges

  $—   $—   $41  $13   $54 

Cash payments

  $—   $—   $(48)  $(17)   $(65) 

Adjustments

  $—   $—   $ $(2)   $(1) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrual balances at 28 June 2019

  $—   $—   $13  $17   $30 

Lease Adoption Adjustment

  $—   $—   $—  $(11)   $(11) 

Restructuring charges

  $56   $  $26  $  $86 

Cash payments

  $(18)   $—   $(30)  $(5)   $(53) 

Adjustments

  $—   $—   $(4)  $—   $(4) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrual balances at 3 July 2020

  $38   $  $ $  $48 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total costs incurred to date as of 3 July 2020

  $56   $  $176  $53   $287 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total expected cost to be incurred as of 3 July 2020

  $—   $  $—  $—   $
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accrued restructuring balance is included in Other provisions in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for fiscal years 2020 and 2019.

During fiscal year 2019, the Company sold a certain property, which was previously classified as assets held for sale and recognized a gain of approximately $78 million. The Company also recorded an impairment charge of $3 million on its held for sale land and building during fiscal year 2019. The gain and impairment charge were included in Restructuring and other, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

8. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate, interest rate and to a lesser extent, equity market risks relating to its ongoing business operations. TheFrom time to time, the Company enters into cash flow hedges in the form of foreign currency forward exchange contracts in order to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk on forecasted expenses and investments denominated in foreign currencies.

In the quarter ended 4 October 2019, the Company entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $500 million to convert the variable interest rate on its Term Loan to fixed interest rates. The contracts will mature on 16 September 2025. The objective of the interest rate swap agreements is to eliminate the variability of interest payment cash flows associated with the variable interest rates under the Term Loan. The Company designated the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges.

The Company’s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are classified as designated ornon-designated hedging hedging instruments. The Company records all derivatives in theon its Consolidated Balance SheetSheets at fair value. The changes in the fair value of thehighly effective portions of designated cash flow hedges are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss which is a component of Other Reserves, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments and the ineffective portions of cash flow hedgesor are not assessed to be highly effective are adjusted to fair value through earnings. The Company has no outstanding cash flow hedges as of 30 June 2017. The amount of net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges was $2$24 million as of 13 July 2016.2020 and the amount of net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges was not material as of 28 June 2019. As of 3 July 2020, the amount of existing net losses related to cash flow hedges recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss included $3 million that is expected to be reclassified to earnings within twelve months.

The Companyde-designates its cash flow hedges when the forecasted hedged transactions are realizedaffects earnings or it is probable the forecasted hedged transactions will not occur in the initially identified time period. At such time, the associated gains and losses deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive loss which is a component of Other Reserves,on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets are reclassified immediately into earnings and any subsequent changes in the fair value of such derivative instruments are immediately reflected in earnings. The Company did not recognize anyrecognized a net gains or lossesloss of $3 million in Other income and charges, net related to the loss of hedge designation on discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal year 2017 and2020. The Company did not recognize any material amounts related to the loss of hedge designation on discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal year 2016.2019.

AsOther derivatives not designated as hedging instruments consist of 30 June 2017, the Company does not have outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts. contracts that the Company uses to hedge the foreign currency exposure on forecasted expenditures denominated in currencies other than the US dollar. The Company recognizes gains and losses on these contracts, as well as the related costs in Other income and charges, net on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

The following tables show the total notional value of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts as of 13 July 2016:2020 and 28 June 2019. All of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts mature within 12 months.

 

  As of 1 July 2016  As of 3 July 2020 

(US Dollars in millions)

      Contracts Designated as Hedges           Contracts Not Designated as Hedges      Contracts Designated as Hedges Contracts Not Designated as Hedges 

Thai Baht

  $157   $42 

Singapore Dollar

  187   56 

Chinese Renminbi

  81   25 

British Pound Sterling

   $47     $10    64   20 
 

 

  

 

 
  $489   $143 
 

 

  

 

 

  As of 28 June 2019 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Contracts Designated as Hedges  Contracts Not Designated as Hedges 

Singapore Dollar

  $60   $40 

Chinese Renminbi

  79   20 

British Pound Sterling

    12 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $145   $72 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company is subject to equity market risks due to changes in the fair value of the notional investments selected by its employees as part of itsNon-qualifiednon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan—deferred compensation plan: the Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan (the “SDCP”). In fiscal year 2014, the Company entered into a Total Return Swap (“TRS”) in order to manage the equity market risks associated with the SDCPSDCP’s liabilities. The Company pays a floating rate, based on LIBOR plus an interest rate spread, on the notional amount of the TRS. The TRS is designed to substantially offset changes in the SDCP liabilitySDCP’s liabilities due to changes in the value of the investment options made by employees. As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the notional investments underlying the TRS amounted to $105 million. The contract term of the TRS is through January 20182021 and is settled on a monthly basis, therefore limiting counterparty performance risk. The Company did not designate the TRS as a hedge. Rather, the Company records all changes in the fair value of the TRS to earnings to offset the market value changes of the SDCPSDCP’s liabilities.

As of 30 June 2017, the Company has no outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts and the gross fair value of the TRS reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is immaterial.

The following tables show the Company’s derivative instruments measured at gross fair value as reflected in the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets as of 13 July 2016:2020 and 28 June 2019:

 

   As of 1 July 2016 
   Derivatives Asset   Derivatives Liability 

(US Dollars in millions)

  Balance Sheet
        Location         
   Fair Value   Balance Sheet
        Location         
   Fair Value 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

        

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

   Other debtors    $—     Other creditors   $(2)  

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

        

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

   Other debtors    —     Other creditors    (1)  

Total return swap

   Other debtors        Other creditors    —   
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total derivatives

     $            3       $            (3)  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

  As of 3 July 2020 
  Derivative Assets  Derivative Liabilities 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Balance Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
  Balance Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:    

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  Other debtors   $            3   Other creditors   $            — 

Interest rate swap

  Other debtors   $—   Other creditors   $(27) 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:    

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  Other debtors     Other creditors   (2) 

Total return swap

  Other debtors     Other creditors   —  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total derivatives

   $   $(29) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  As of 28 June 2019 
  Derivative Assets  Derivative Liabilities 
(US Dollars in millions)  
Balance Sheet
Location

 
  
Fair
Value

 
  
Balance Sheet
Location

 
  
Fair
Value

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:    

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  Other debtors   $—   Other creditors   $— 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:    

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  Other debtors     Other creditors   (1) 

Total return swap

  Other debtors   —    Other creditors   —  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total derivatives

   $   $(1) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following tables show the effect of the Company’s derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2017:3 July 2020:

(US Dollars in millions)

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

 Amount of
Gain or

(Loss)
Recognized

in OCI on
Derivatives
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified

from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount Excluded
from

Effectiveness
Testing)
  Amount of
Gain

or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)(a)
 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

 $            (3) Cost of revenue $            (4)  Cost of revenue  $            —  

 

(US Dollars in millions)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in

Income on Derivatives

 LocationAmount of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivatives
 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

 Other income and
charges, net
  $

Total return swap

Operating expenses $10 

(a)The amounts of gain or (loss) recognized in income related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and to the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness were less than $1 million for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2017.

The following tables show the effect of the Company’s derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the fiscal year ended 1 July 2016:

(US Dollars in millions)

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

 Amount of
Gain or

(Loss)
Recognized

in OCI on
Derivatives
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified

from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 Amount of
Gain or

(Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount Excluded
from

Effectiveness
Testing)
 Amount of
Gain

or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing) (a)
 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  $            (4) Cost of revenue  $            (2) Cost of revenue  $—  

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivatives

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

Other income and
charges, net
$                    (5)(2)  

Total return swap

 Operating expenses  $                    (1)2  

(US Dollars in millions)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

 Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in
OCI on
Derivatives
(Effective
Portion)
  

Location of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective
Portion)

 Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective
Portion)
  

Location of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)

 Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized  in
Income
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  $2   Other income and charges, net  $(3)   Other income and charges, net  $(1)  

Interest rate swap

  (29)   Other income and charges, net  —    Other income and charges, net  —   

The following table shows the effect of the Company’s derivative instruments on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the fiscal year ended 28 June 2019:

 

(a)The amounts of gain or (loss) recognized in income related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and to the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness were less than $1 million for the fiscal year ended 1 July 2016.

(US Dollars in millions)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

 Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
  Amount of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
 

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts

  
Other income and
charges, net
 
 
 $20

Total return swap

  Operating expenses   3

The amount of gain or loss recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges was not material for fiscal year 2019. The amount of gain or loss recognized in income related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and to the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge ineffectiveness was not material for the fiscal year 2019.

9. Fair Value

Measurement of Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.

Fair Value Hierarchy

A fair value hierarchy is based on whether the market participant assumptions used in determining fair value are obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) or reflects the Company’s own assumptions of market participant valuation (unobservable inputs). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:value are:

Level 1—1 - Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2—2 - Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are inactive; quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; or

Level 3—3 - Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company considers an active market to be one in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis, and views an inactive market as one in which there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers. Where appropriate, the Company’s or the counterparty’snon-performance risk is considered in determining the fair values of liabilities and assets, respectively.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, as of 30 June 2017:

   Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 

(US Dollars in millions)

  Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Total
Balance
 

Assets:

        

Money market funds

   $592     $—     $—     $592  

Time deposits

   —     582     —     582  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cash equivalents and investments

   592     582     —     1,174  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Restricted cash and investments:

        

Money market funds

       —     —      

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

   —         —      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $        593     $        585     $—     $        1,178  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 

(US Dollars in millions)

  Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Total
Balance
 

Assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

   $592     $582     $—     $1,174  

Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year

           —      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $        593     $        585     $—     $        1,178  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company reclassified demand deposits from certificates of deposit and money market funds to cash as of 1 July 2016 in the table below to conform to the current year’s presentation. This reclassification did not result in any change to the cash and cash equivalents balance as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows for all periods presented.

The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities, by financial instrument type and balance sheet line item that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, as of 13 July 2016:2020:

 

  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 

(US Dollars in millions)

  Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Total
Balance
  Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
    Instruments    
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
    Observable    
Inputs
(Level  2)
 Significant
  Unobservable  
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
    Balance    
 

Assets:

            

Money market funds

   $230     $—     $—     $230    $494   $—   $—   $494 

Corporate bonds

   —         —      

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

  —    55   —    55 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total cash equivalents and investments

   230         —     236  

Total cash equivalents

  494   55   —    549 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Restricted Cash and Investments:

        

Restricted cash and investments:

    

Money market funds

       —     —          —    —    

Certificates of deposit

   —         —      

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

  —      —    

Other debt securities

  —    —    18   18 

Derivative assets

   —         —        —      —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

   $232     $        14     $—     $        246    $495   $62   $18   $575 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Liabilities:

            

Derivative liabilities

   $—     $(3)    $—     $(3)   $—   $29   $—   $29 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   $        —     $(3)    $—     $(3)   $—   $29   $—   $29 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
    Instruments    
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
  Observable  
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
    Unobservable    
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total
    Balance    
 

Assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $494   $55   $—   $549 

Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year

      —    

Financial assets

  —    —    18   18 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $495   $62   $18   $575 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities:

    

Other creditors—amounts falling due within one year

  $—   $29   $—   $29 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $—   $29   $—   $29 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities, by financial instrument type and balance sheet line item that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, as of 28 June 2019:

 

  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 

(US Dollars in millions)

  Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Total
Balance
  Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
    Instruments    
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
    Observable    
Inputs
(Level  2)
 Significant
  Unobservable  
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
    Balance    
 

Assets:

            

Cash and cash equivalents

   $230     $—     $—     $230  

Investments

   —         —      

Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year

           —     10  

Money market funds

  $416   $—   $—   $416 

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

  —    132   —    132 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total cash equivalents

  416   132   —    548 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Restricted cash and investments:

    

Money market funds

    —    —    

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

  —      —    

Other debt Securities

  —    —      

Derivative assets

  —      —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

   $        232     $        14     $        —     $        246    $417   $134   $  $558 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Liabilities:

            

Other creditors - amounts falling due within one year

   $—     $(3)    $—     $(3) 

Derivative liabilities

  $—   $  $—   $
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   $—     $(3)    $—     $(3)   $—   $  $—   $
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
    Instruments    
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
  Observable  
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
    Unobservable    
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total
    Balance    
 

Assets:

       

Cash and cash equivalents

  $416   $132   $—   $548 

Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year

      —    

Financial assets

  —    —      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $417   $134   $  $558 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities:

             

Other creditors—amounts falling due within one year

  $—   $  $—   $
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $—   $  $—   $
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company classifies items in Level 1 if the financial assets consist of securities for which quoted prices are available in an active market.

The Company classifies items in Level 2 if the financial asset or liability is valued using observable inputs. The Company uses observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets include: agency bonds, corporate bonds, commercial paper, municipal bonds, US Treasuries, time deposits and certificates of deposit. These debt investments are priced using observable inputs and valuation models which vary by asset class. The Company uses a pricing service to assist in determining the fair valuesvalue of

all of its cash equivalents and investments.equivalents. For the cash equivalents and investments in the Company’s portfolio, multiple pricing sources are generally available. The pricing service uses inputs from multiple industry standard data providers or other third party sources and various methodologies, such as weighting and models, to determine the appropriate price at the measurement date. The Company corroborates the prices obtained from the pricing service against other independent sources and, as of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, has not found it necessary to make any adjustments to the prices obtained. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are also classified within Level 2. The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of foreign currency forward exchange contracts, interest rate swaps and the TRS. The Company recognizes derivative financial instruments in its consolidated financial statements at fair value. The Company determines the fair value of these instruments by considering the estimated amount it would pay or receive to terminate these agreements at the reporting date.

As of 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, the Company had no Level 3 assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Items Measured at Fair Value on aNon-Recurring Basis

From time to time, the Company enters into certain strategic investments for the promotion of business and strategic objectives. These strategic investments primarily include cost basis investments representing those where the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence as well as equity method investments representing those where the Company does have the ability to exercise significant influence but does not have control.influence. These investments are included in Financial assets, net in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet,Sheets and are periodically analyzed to determine whether or not there are indicators of impairment. The

As of 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019, the carrying value of the Company’s strategic investments at 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016 totaled $125was $135 million and $113$114 million, respectively, and consisted primarily of privately held equity securities without a readily determinablerespectively. The Company’s strategic investments are recorded at fair value.

Duringvalue only if an impairment or observable price adjustment is recognized in the fiscal years 2017 and 2016,current period. If an observable price adjustment or impairment is recognized on the Company’s strategic investments during the period, the Company determined that certainclassifies these assets as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of its equity investments accounted for under the cost method were other-than-temporarily impaired, and recognized chargesfair value inputs. For fiscal year 2020, the Company recorded downward adjustments of $25$18 million and $13 million, respectively, in order to write down the carrying amount of thecertain investments to its estimatedtheir fair value. Since there was no active market for the equity securities of the investee, the Company estimated fair value of the investee by analyzing the underlying cash flows and future prospects of the investee. These amounts were recorded in Other income and charges, net in the Company’sits Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.

In connection with the Company’s manufacturing footprint reduction, the Company has $75 million and $2 million held for sale assets included in Tangible assets and Other debtors, respectively, For fiscal year 2019, there were no upward or downward adjustments on the Consolidated Balance Sheetequity investments as a result of 30 June 2017. These assets primarily consisted of $37 million of land and building in Korea and $26 million of land and building in China, with the remainderadoption of the balance comprised of property at other locations (collectively, the “properties”). The respective properties to be sold met the criteria to be classified as held for sale during the June 2017 and March 2017 quarters. Depreciation related to the properties ceased as of the date these were determined to be held for sale. During fiscal year 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges of $35 million in order to write down the carrying amount of such properties to their estimated fair values less costs to sell. The impairment charges were recorded in the Operating expenses in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The fair values were measured with the assistance of third-party valuation models which used inputs such as market comparable data for similar land sale transactions adjusted for difference to indicate value of the subject properties and the cost approach valuation techniques for buildings as part of the analysis. The fair value measurement was categorized as Level 3 as significant unobservable inputs were used in the valuation analysis.alternative.

The following table shows the activity in the Financial assets for fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively:

 

(US Dollars in millions)  Strategic
    Investments    
       Total     

Balance at 3 July 2015

   $120     $120  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Additional investments

        

Impairments

   (13)    (13) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at 1 July 2016

   $113     $113  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Additional investments

   37     37  

Impairments

   (25)    (25) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at 30 June 2017

   $125     $            125  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

Total

Balance at 29 June 2018

 $118 

Additional investments

Balance at 28 June 2019

 $121 

Additional investments

58 

Sales and settlements

(5)

Downward adjustments

(18)

Other adjustments

(3)

Balance at 3 July 2020

 $153 

Other Fair Value Disclosures

The Company’s debt is carried at amortized cost. The estimated fair value of the Company’s debt is derived using the closing price of the same debt instruments as of the date of valuation, which takes into account the yield curve, interest rates and other observable inputs. Accordingly, these fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2. The following table presents the fair value and amortized cost of the Company’s debt in order of maturity:

 

   30 June 2017   1 July 2016 

 (Dollars in millions)

  Carrying
    Amount    
   Estimated
    Fair Value    
   Carrying
    Amount    
   Estimated
    Fair Value    
 

 3.75% Senior Notes due November 2018

  $710    $726    $800    $804  

 7.00% Senior Notes due November 2021

   —     —     158     164  

 4.250% Senior Notes due March 2022

   748     765     —     —  

 4.75% Senior Notes due June 2023

   951     987     990     857  

 4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024

   497     511     —     —  

 4.75% Senior Notes due January 2025

   975     984     995     795  

 4.875% Senior Notes due June 2027

   695     698     698     514  

 5.75% Senior Notes due December 2034

   489     488     489     357  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
       5,065     5,159     4,130     3,491  

 Less: debt issuance costs

   (44)    —     (39)    —  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs

   $5,021     $    5,159     $    4,091     $    3,491  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  3 July 2020  28 June 2019 

(US Dollars in millions)

     Carrying    
Amount
      Estimated    
Fair Value
      Carrying    
Amount
      Estimated    
Fair Value
 

4.250% Senior Notes due March 2022

  $229   $237   $749   $763 

4.750% Senior Notes due June 2023

  546   576   941   973 

4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024

  498   541   498   514 

4.750% Senior Notes due January 2025

  479   517   920    929 

4.875% Senior Notes due June 2027

  504   549   689   688 

4.091% Senior Notes due June 2029

  456   523   —    —  

4.125% Senior Notes due January 2031

  499   524   —    —  

5.750% Senior Notes due December 2034

  489   543   489   482 

LIBOR Based Term Loan due September 2025

  500   490   —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $4,200   $4,500   $4,286   $4,349 

Less: debt issuance costs

  (25)   —    (33)   —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Debt, net of debt issuance costs

  $4,175   $4,500   $4,253   $4,349 

Less: current portion of debt, net of debt issuance costs

  (19)   (19)   —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Long-term debt, less current portion, net of debt issuance costs

  $4,156   $4,481   $4,253   $4,349 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

10. Capital and Reserves

Share Capital

The Company’s authorized share capital is40,000 and $13,500 and consists of 1,250,000,000 ordinary shares, par value $0.00001, of which 291,799,561256,718,840 shares were outstanding as of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, and 100,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.00001,

$0.00001, of which none were issued or outstanding as of 30 June 20173 July 2020 and 40,000 deferred shares of par value1 of which 40,00039,994 shares were outstanding as of 30 June 2017.3 July 2020.

Ordinary shares- Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors”). Upon any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, after required payments are made to holders of preferred shares, any remaining assets of the Company will be distributed ratably to holders of the preferred and ordinary shares. Holders of shares are entitled to one vote per share on all matters upon which the ordinary shares are entitled to vote, including the election of directors.

Preferred shares- The Company may issue preferred shares in one or more series, up to the authorized amount, without shareholder approval. The Board of Directors is authorized to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each series, and to fix the rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any of its qualifications, limitations or restrictions. The Board of Directors can also increase or decrease the number of shares of a series, but not below the number of shares of that series then outstanding, without any further vote or action by the shareholders.

The Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of preferred shares with voting or conversion rights that could harm the voting power or other rights of the holders of the ordinary shares. The issuance of preferred shares, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company and might harm the market price of its ordinary shares and the voting and other rights of the holders of ordinary shares.

Repurchases of Equity Securities

On 22 April 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase an additional $2.5 billion of its outstanding ordinary shares.

All repurchases are effected as redemptions in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association.Constitution.

As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, $1.3 billion remained available for repurchase under the existing repurchase authorization limit.

The following table sets forth information with respect to repurchases of the Company’s ordinary shares during fiscal years 20172020 and 2016:2019:

 

(US Dollars in millions)  Number of
Shares
    Repurchased    
   Dollar Value of
Shares
    Repurchased    
 

Cumulative repurchased through 3 July 2015

   304    $8,485  

Repurchased in fiscal year 2016(a)

   24     1,146  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cumulative repurchased through 1 July 2016

   328     9,631  

Repurchased in fiscal year 2017(a)

   13     487  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cumulative repurchased through 30 June 2017

               341     $    10,118  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 

 Number of
Shares
  Repurchased  

 

  Dollar Value of
Shares
  Repurchased  

 

 

Cumulative repurchased through 29 June 2018

 

 

352  

 

 $

10,502  

Repurchased in fiscal year 2019(1)

 

 

22  

 

 

997  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cumulative repurchased through 28 June 2019

 

 

374  

 

 $

11,499  

Repurchased in fiscal year 2020(1)

 

 

18  

 

 

887  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cumulative repurchased through 3 July 2020

 

 

392  

 

 $

12,386  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(a)(1)

For fiscal years 20172020 and 2016, including2019, includes net share settlementsettlements of $27$40 million and $56$31 million, for 1 million and 1 million shares in connection with tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units, respectively.

Reserves

 

    Number of  
Ordinary
Shares
   Share
  Premium  
   Profit and
  Loss Account  
   Other
  Reserves  
     Total Equity        Number of    
Ordinary
Shares

 

 Share
    Premium    

 

 

 Profit
    and Loss    
Account

 

 Other
    Reserves    

 

   Total Equity  

 

 
   (In millions)           (US Dollars in millions)  

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 

 

Balance at 3 July 2015

   315    $    5,430    $(2,686)   $274    $3,018  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at 29 June 2018

 

 

287 

 

 $

5,708 

 

$

(4,696)

 

 

 $

653 

 

 $

1,665 

Income for the period

       248       248     

 

2,012 

  

 

2,012 

Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares

   (23)      (1,090)      (1,090)  

 

(21)

 

  

 

(966)

 

  

 

(966)

 

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units

   (1)      (56)      (56)  

 

(1)

 

  

 

(31)

 

  

 

(31)

 

Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans

       79         79   

 

 

 

69 

   

 

69 

Dividends to shareholders

       (727)      (727)    

 

(702)

 

  

 

(702)

 

Share-based compensation

         120     120      

 

99 

 

 

99

Other comprehensive income

              

Other

         (4)    (4) 

Cumulative effect of adoption of new revenue standard

   

 

34 

  

 

34 

Other comprehensive loss

    

 

(18)

 

 

 

(18)

 

Reduction in share premium

  

 

(1,889)

 

 

 

1,889 

  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 1 July 2016

   299    $5,509    $    (4,311)   $    395    $    1,593  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at 28 June 2019

 

 

269 

 

 $

3,888 

 

 $

(2,460)

 

 

 $

734 

 

 $

2,162 

Impact of adoption of new lease standard

   

 

(2)

 

  

 

(2)

 

Income for the period

       772       772     

 

1,004 

  

 

1,004 

Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares

   (12)      (460)      (460)  

 

(17)

 

  

 

(847)

 

  

 

(847)

 

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units

   (1)      (27)      (27)  

 

(1)

 

  

 

(40)

 

  

 

(40)

 

Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans

       86         86   

 

 

 

103 

   

 

103 

Dividends to shareholders

       (745)      (745)    

 

(670)

 

  

 

(670)

 

Share-based compensation

         137     137      

 

109 

 

 

109 

Other comprehensive income

              

Other comprehensive loss

    

 

(32)

 

 

 

(32)

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 30 June 2017

           292     $5,595     $(4,771)    $540     $1,364  

Balance at 3 July 2020

 

 

257 

 

 $

3,991 

 

 $

(3,015)

 

 

 $

811 

 

 $

1,787 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

On 25 April 2019, the Company’s shareholders approved the reduction of its share premium account to create distributable reserves at the extraordinary general meeting. On 26 April 2019, the Company filed a petition with the High Court of Ireland to approve the creation of distributable reserves through the reduction of the share premium account by approximately $1.9 billion. The High Court of Ireland approved the petition on 30 May 2019.

Capital Redemption Reserve Fund

Other reserves includesinclude an amount of $3,090$3,600 and $2,960$3,420 for fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019 respectively, representing a Capital Redemption Reserve Fund.

11. Share-based Compensation

Share-Based Compensation Plans

The Company’s share-based compensation plans have been established to promote the Company’s long-term growth and financial success by providing incentives to its employees, directors and consultants through grants of share-based awards. The provisions of the Company’s share-based benefit plans, which allow for the grant of various types of equity-based awards, are also intended to provide greater flexibility to maintain the Company’s competitive ability to attract, retain and motivate participants for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders.

Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “EIP”). On 26 October 2011, the shareholders approved the EIP and authorized the issuance of up to a total of approximately 27.0 million ordinary shares, par value $0.0001$0.00001 per share, plus any shares remaining available for grant under the Seagate Technology plc 2004 Share

Compensation Plan (the “SCP”) as of the

effective date of the EIP (which was equal to approximately 11.0 million ordinary shares as of the effective date of the EIP and which will increase by such additional number of shares as will be returned to the share reserve in respect of awards previously granted under the SCP) (together, the “Share Reserve”). On 22 October 2014, the shareholders authorized the issuance fromunder the EIP of an additional 2525.0 million ordinary shares, par value $0.0001$0.00001 per share. On 19 October 2016, the shareholders authorized the issuance under the EIP of an additional 7.5 million ordinary shares, par value $0.00001 per share. On 29 October 2019, the shareholders authorized the issuance under the EIP of an additional 12.1 million ordinary shares, par value $0.00001 per share. ordinary shares, par value $0.00001 per share. Any shares that are subject to options or share appreciation rights granted under the EIP will be counted against the Share Reserve as one share for every one share granted, and any shares that are subject to restricted share bonus awards, restrictedunits (“RSUs”) or performance-based share units performance share bonus awards or performance share awards(“PSU”) (collectively, “Full-Value Share Awards”) will generally be counted, after 29 October 2019, against the Share Reserve as two and five-tenths2.25 shares for every one share granted. On 19 October 2016, the shareholders authorized the issuance from the EIP of an additional 7.5 million ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share. As of 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, there were approximately 30.827.0 million ordinary shares available for issuance of Full-Value Share Awards under the EIP.

Dot Hill Systems 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “DHEIP”). Seagate Technology plc acquired the Dot Hill Systems 2009 Equity Incentive Plan effective 6 October 2015. The Company assumed the remaining authorized but unused share reserve of approximately 22.0 million shares, based on the conversion ratio, from the DHEIP on the acquisition date. Any shares that are subject to options or share appreciation rightsEffective 24 April 2019, the Company terminated the DHEIP and thus, no further grants will be made under the DHEIP. Outstanding awards granted under the DHEIP will be counted against the Share Reserve as one share for every one share granted, and any shares that areremain subject to restricted share bonus awards, restricted share units, performance share bonus awards or performance share awards (collectively, “Full-Value Share Awards”) will generally be counted against the Share Reserve as one and five-tenths shares for every one share granted. Asterms of 30 June 2017, there were approximately 1 million ordinary shares available for issuance under the DHEIP.

Seagate Technology plc Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). There are 50.060 million ordinary shares authorized to be issued under the ESPP. The ESPP consists of asix-month offering period with a maximum issuance of 1.5 million ordinary shares per offering period. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase ordinary shares through payroll deductions generally at 85% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares. As of 30 June 20173 July 2020, there were approximately 4.89.9 million ordinary shares available for issuance under the ESPP.

Equity Awards

Full-Value Share Awards (e.g. restricted share units, “RSU”)RSUs generally vest over a period of three to four years, with cliff vesting of a portion of each award occurring annually, subject to continuous employment with the Company through the vesting date. Options generally vest as follows: 25% of the options will vest on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and the remaining 75% will vest ratably each month thereafter over the next 36 months. Options granted under the EIP and SCP have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s ordinary shares on the grant date. Fair market value is defined as the closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares on NASDAQ on the grant date.

The Company granted awards of performance-based share units (“PSU”)PSUs to its senior executive officers under the SCP and the EIP where vesting is subject to both the continued employment of the participant by the Company and the achievement of certain financial and operational performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, including market-based performance goals.Directors. A single PSU represents the right to receive a single ordinary share of the Company. During fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company granted 0.60.3 million and 0.4 million PSUs, respectively, where performance is measured based on a three-year average return on invested capital (“ROIC”) goal and a relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) goal, which is based on the Company’s ordinary shares measured against a benchmark TSR of a peer group over the same three-year period (the “TSR/ROIC” awards). These awards vest after the end of the performance period of three years from the grant date. A percentage of these units may vest only if at least the minimum ROIC goal is met regardless of whether the TSR goal is met. The number of share units to vest will range from 0% to 200% of the targeted units. In evaluating the fair value of these units, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation on the

grant date, taking the market-based TSR goal into consideration. Compensation expense related to these units is only recorded in a period if it is probable that the ROIC goal will be met, and it is to be recorded at the expected level of achievement.

The Company also granted 0.20.1 million and 0.20.1 million PSUs during fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, to its senior executive officers which are subject to a performance goal related to the Company’s adjusted earnings per share (the “AEPS” awards)(“AEPS”). These awards have a maximum seven-year vesting period, with 25% annual vesting starting on the first anniversary of the grant date. If the performanceAEPS goal is not achieved, vesting is delayed to a following year in which the AEPS goal is achieved. Any unvested awards from prior years may vest cumulatively in a future year within the seven-year vesting period if the annual AEPS goal is

achieved during a subsequent year. If the AEPS goal has not been met by the end of the seven year period, any unvested shares will be forfeited.

Determining Fair Value of Seagate Technology StockShare Plans

Valuation and amortization method- The Company estimates the fair value of stockgranted share options, RSURSUs and performance awardsPSUs subject to an AEPS condition granted using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model and a single share award approach. This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period or the remaining service (vesting) period.

Expected Term- Expected term represents the period that the Company’s share-based awards are expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the share-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior as influenced by changes to the terms of its share-based awards.

Expected Volatility- The Company uses a combination of the implied volatility of its traded options and historical volatility of its share price.

Expected Dividend- The Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model calls for a single expected dividend yield as an input. The dividend yield is determined by dividing the expected per share dividend during the coming year by the grant date share price. The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s current expectations about its anticipated dividend policy. Also, because the expected dividend yield should reflect marketplace participants’ expectations, the Company does not incorporate changes in dividends anticipated by management unless those changes have been communicated to or otherwise are anticipated by marketplace participants.

Risk-Free Interest Rate- The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model on the implied yield currently available on US Treasuryzero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term. Where the expected term of the Company’s share-based awards do not correspond with the terms for which interest rates are quoted, the Company performed a straight-line interpolation to determine the rate from the available term maturities.

The fair value of the Company’s shares related to options and RSURSUs granted to employees, shares issued from the ESPP and PSUPSUs subject to TSR/ROIC or AEPS conditions for fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, were estimated using the following assumptions:

 

  Fiscal Years

 

  

 

        2020        

 

 

 

        2019        

 

Options

  

Expected term (in years)

 

 

4.2 

 

 

 

4.2 

 

Volatility

 

 

39%

 

 

 

39 - 40%

 

Weighted-average volatility

 

 

39%

 

 

 

39%

 

Expected dividend rate

 

 

4.2%

 

 

 

4.6 - 5.0%

 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

 

 

4.2%

 

 

 

4.7%

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.4%

 

 

 

2.5 - 2.8%

 

Weighted-average fair value

 

 $

12.41

 

 $

11.49

RSUs

  

Expected term (in years)

 

 

1.0 - 2.5

 

 

 

1.0 - 2.5

 

Expected dividend rate

 

 

  3.9 - 5.8%

 

 

 

  4.1 - 6.4%

 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

 

 

4.25%

 

 

 

4.68%

 

Weighted-average fair value

 

 $

49.49

 

 $

44.37

ESPP

  

Expected term (in years)

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

Volatility

 

 

32 - 35%

 

 

 

34 - 42%

 

Weighted-average volatility

 

 

33%

 

 

 

38%

 

Expected dividend rate

 

 

4.3 - 5.4%

 

 

 

4.8 - 5.6%

 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

 

 

4.9%

 

 

 

5.2%

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.6 - 2.0%

 

 

 

2.2 - 2.4%

 

Weighted-average fair value

 

 $

12.23

 

 $

12.18

PSUs subject to TSR/ROIC conditions

  

Expected term (in years)

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

3.0

 

Volatility

 

 

37%

 

 

 

46%

 

Weighted-average volatility

 

 

37%

 

 

 

46%

 

Expected dividend rate

 

 

4.6%

 

 

 

5.0%

 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

 

 

4.6%

 

 

 

5.0%

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.5%

 

 

 

2.8%

 

Weighted-average fair value

 

 $

52.39

 

 $

46.38

PSUs subject to an AEPS condition

  

Expected term (in years)

 

 

1.0 - 2.5

 

 

 

1.0 - 2.5

 

Expected dividend rate

 

 

4.2%

 

 

 

4.6 - 5.0%

 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

 

 

4.2%

 

 

 

4.7%

 

Weighted-average fair value

 

 $

49.27

 

 $

43.92

   Fiscal Years 
   2017   2016 

Options

    

Expected term (in years)

   4.2    2.1 - 4.2 

Volatility

   38 - 42%    33 - 48% 

Weighted-average volatility

   39%    36%

Expected dividend rate

   4.9 - 6.4%      4.6 - 11.0% 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

   6.3%   5.6% 

Risk-free interest rate

   1.1 - 1.8%    0.6 - 1.5% 

Weighted-average fair value

   $6.83      $12.28   

RSU

    

Expected term (in years)

   4.2   4.2

Expected dividend rate

   4.6 - 7.7%    4.6 - 11.0% 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

   6.4%    5.16% 

Weighted-average fair value

   $30.85      $41.47   

ESPP

    

Expected term (in years)

   0.5    0.5 

Volatility

   36 - 49%    28 - 46% 

Weighted-average volatility

   43%   39% 

Expected dividend rate

   5.6 - 7.8%    4.6 - 8.3% 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

   6.8%   6.9% 

Risk-free interest rate

   0.4 - 0.6%    0.2 - 0.5% 

Weighted-average fair value

   $9.78      $9.08   

PSUs subject to market condition

    

Expected term (in years)

   3.0    3.0 

Volatility

   41 - 42%    30% 

Weighted-average volatility

   41%    30% 

Expected dividend rate

   6.3 - 7.0%    4.3% 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

   7.0%   4.3% 

Risk-free interest rate

   0.9 - 1.3%    1.1% 

Weighted-average fair value

   $32.41      $47.34   

PSUs subject to an AEPS condition

    

Expected term (in years)

   4.2    4.2 

Expected dividend rate

     5.9 - 6.4%    4.6 - 7.3% 

Weighted-average expected dividend rate

   6.2%    5.9% 

Weighted-average fair value

  $31.61     $42.09   

Share-based Compensation Expense

The Company recorded $137$109 million and $120$99 million of share-based compensation during fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Management has made an estimate of expected forfeitures and is recognizing compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to vest. When estimating forfeitures, the Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as the historical analysis of actual forfeited awards.

StockShare Option Activity

The Company issues new ordinary shares upon exercise of stockshare options. The following is a summary of option activities:

 

Options

 Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise

Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  Number of
      Shares      

(In millions)
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
      Price      
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
        Term         

(In years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(US Dollars in millions)
 
 (In millions)   (In years) (US Dollars in millions) 

Outstanding at 1 July 2016

              5.4   $        34.91    4.6   $14  

Outstanding at 28 June 2019

  3.5   $41.04   4.2    $29 

Granted

  2.3   $36.78      0.2   $54.78   

Exercised

  (1.6)  $19.87      (1.2)   $37.30   

Forfeitures

  (0.3)  $41.07      (0.1)   $37.73   

Expirations

  (0.1)  $47.66      —    $—   
 

 

     

 

    

Outstanding at 30 June 2017

  5.7   $39.24    5.0   $22  

Outstanding at 3 July 2020

  2.4   $44.18   3.7    $15 
 

 

     

 

    

Vested and expected to vest at 30 June 2017

  5.5   $39.28    5.0   $21  

Vested and expected to vest at 3 July 2020

  2.4   $44.14   3.7    $15 
 

 

     

 

    

Exercisable at 30 June 2017

  2.1   $39.82    3.6   $12  

Exercisable at 3 July 2020

  1.6   $44.05   3.0    $11 
 

 

     

 

    

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s ordinary shares for the options that werein-the-money at 30 June 2017.3 July 2020. During fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under the Company’s stockshare option plans was $29$22 million and $44$5 million, respectively, determined as of the date of option exercise. The aggregate fair value of options vested during fiscal years 20172020 and 2016 were2019 was approximately $15$6 million and $18$9 million, respectively.

At 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the total compensation cost related to options granted to employees but not yet recognized was approximately $25$7 million, net of an immaterial amount of estimated forfeitures. This cost is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining term of approximately 2.0 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures.

Unvested Awards Activity

The following is a summary of unvested award activities which do not contain a performance condition:

Unvested Awards

 Number of
      Shares      

(In millions)
  Weighted-
Average
Grant-

Date
    Fair Value    
 

Unvested at 28 June 2019

  5.4   $36.01 

Granted

  2.2   $49.49 

Forfeitures

  (0.8)   $39.86 

Vested

  (2.0)   $35.33 
 

 

 

  

Unvested at 3 July 2020

  4.8   $41.77 
 

 

 

  

At 3 July 2020, the total compensation cost related to unvested awards granted to employees but not yet recognized was approximately $134 million, net of estimated forfeitures of approximately $1$18 million. This cost is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining term of approximately 2.5 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures.

Nonvested Awards Activity

The following is a summary of nonvested award activities which do not contain a performance condition:

Nonvested Awards

 Number of
Shares
  Weighted-
Average

Grant-
Date
Fair Value
 
  (In millions)    

Nonvested at 1 July 2016

  4.8   $        39.95  

Granted

  3.1   $30.85  

Forfeitures

  (0.7)  $39.72  

Vested

  (2.0)  $37.02  
 

 

 

  

Nonvested at 30 June 2017

              5.2   $35.75  
 

 

 

  

At 30 June 2017, the total compensation cost related to nonvested awards granted to employees but not yet recognized was approximately $135 million, net of estimated forfeitures of approximately $8 million. This

cost is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining term of 2.62.2 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. The aggregate fair value of nonvestedunvested awards vested during fiscal years 20172020 and 2016 were2019, was approximately $73$71 million and $102$57 million, respectively.

Performance Awards

The following is a summary of nonvestedunvested award activities which contain a performance condition:

 

Performance Awards

 Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average

Grant-
Date
Fair Value
  Number of
Shares

(In millions)
 Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date

     Fair Value    
 
 (In millions)   

Performance units at 1 July 2016

  1.4   $47.41  

Performance units at 28 June 2019

  1.0   $43.81 

Granted

  0.8   $32.16    0.5   $44.75 

Forfeitures

  (0.3)  $41.06    (0.1)   $38.39 

Vested

  (0.4)  $41.91    (0.5)   $33.20 
 

 

   

 

  

Performance units at 30 June 2017

              1.5   $        41.88  

Performance units at 3 July 2020

  0.9   $42.77 
 

 

   

 

  

At 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the total compensation cost related to performance awards granted to employees but not yet recognized was approximately $36$16 million, net of estimated forfeitures of approximately $2 million. This cost is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining term of 3.291.9 years. The aggregate fair value of performance awards vested during fiscal years 2020 and 2019, was approximately $12 million.

ESPP

During fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, the aggregate intrinsic value of shares purchased under the Company’s ESPP was approximately $24$19 million and $12$10 million, respectively. At 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the total compensation cost related to options to purchase the Company’s ordinary shares under the ESPP but not yet recognized was approximately $1.7$1.3 million. This cost will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of approximately one month. During fiscal year 2017,2020, the Company issued 2.01.5 million ordinary shares with a weighted-average purchaseexercise price of $26.68$38.90 per share.

Tax-Deferred Savings Plan

The Company has atax-deferred savings plan, the Seagate 401(k) Plan (the “40l(k)“401(k) plan”), for the benefit of qualified employees. The 40l(k)401(k) plan is designed to provide employees with an accumulation of funds at retirement. Qualified employees may elect to make contributions to the 401(k) plan on abi-weekly basis. Pursuant to the 401(k) plan, the Company matches 50% of employee contributions, up to 6% of compensation, subject to maximum annual contributions of $4,500$6,000 per participating employee. During fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company made matching contributions of $18$15 million and $19$16 million, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Plan

On 1 January 2001, theThe Company has adopted the SDCP for the benefit of eligible employees. ThisThe plan is designed to permit certain discretionary employer contributions, in excess of the tax limits applicable to the 401(k) plan, and to permit employee deferrals in excess of certain tax limits. During fiscal year 2014, the Company entered into a TRS in order to manage the equity market risks associated with the SDCP liabilities. See “Note 8.8. Derivative Financial Instruments”Instruments contained in this report for additional information about the TRS.

Directors’ Emolument

During fiscal year 2017,2020, the Company paid $4.8$13.4 million to its directors in respect of duties relating to Seagate Technology plc, including $2.4$8.3 million paid in AEPS and ROIC awards to Dr. Mosley and $2.8 million paid in restricted stock units.share units to other directors. Gains on exercise of vested options were approximately $0.2$1.7 million in fiscal year 2017.2020.

During fiscal year 2016,2019, the Company paid $11.3$8.7 million to its directors in respect of duties relating to Seagate Technology plc, including $7.3$4.4 million paid in AEPS and ROIC awards to Mr. LuczoDr. Mosley and $1.6$1.7 million paid in restricted stockshare units to other directors. GainsThere were no gains on exercise of vested options were approximately $1.6 million in fiscal year 2016.2019

12. Guarantees

Indemnifications of Officers and Directors

Seagate Technology, an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands (“Seagate-Cayman”) and wholly-owned subsidiary of STX, from time to time enters into indemnification agreements with the directors, officers, employees and agents of STX or any of its subsidiaries (each, an “Indemnitee”). The indemnification agreements provide indemnification in addition to any of Indemnitee’s indemnification rights under any relevant Articles of Association (or similar constitutional document), applicable law or otherwise, and indemnifies an Indemnitee for certain expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and settlement amounts actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in any action or proceeding, including any action by or in the right of STX or any of its subsidiaries, arising out of his or her service as a director, officer, employee or agent of STX or any of its subsidiaries or of any other entity to which he or she provides services at the Company’s request. However, Indemnitees are not indemnified under the indemnification agreements for (i) any fraud or dishonesty in the performance of Indemnitee’s duty to STX or the applicable subsidiary or (ii) Indemnitee’s conscious, intentional or willful failure to act honestly, lawfully and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. In addition, the indemnification agreements provide that Seagate-Cayman will advance expenses incurred by an Indemnitee in connection with enforcement of the indemnification agreement or with the investigation, settlement or appeal of any action or proceeding against him or her as to which he or she could be indemnified.

The nature of these indemnification obligations prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay on behalf of its officers and directors. Historically, the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements and no amount has been accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification obligations.

Indemnification Obligations

The Company from time to time enters into agreements with customers, suppliers, partners and others in the ordinary course of business that provide indemnification for certain matters including, but not limited to, intellectual property infringement claims, environmental claims and breach of agreement claims. The nature of the Company’s indemnification obligations prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay. Historically, the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements and no amount has been accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification obligations.

Product Warranty

The Company estimates probable product warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized. The Company generally warrants its products for a period of 1 to 5 years. The Company uses estimated repair or replacement costs and uses statistical modeling to estimate product return rates in order to determine its warranty obligation. As of 3 July 2020, the Company’s reserve for product warranty was $151 million as compared to $195 million as of 28 June 2019. This decrease of $44 million was primarily driven by a continued decline in cost to repair and a decrease in the Company’s warranty return rate as compared to prior year.

Changes in the Company’s product warranty liability during the fiscal years ended 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019 were as follows:

  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
      2020       
  28 June
      2019       
 

Balance, beginning of period

  $195   $237 

Warranties issued

  86   112 

Repairs and replacements

  (85)   (99) 

Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties, including expirations

  (45)   (55) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

  $151   $195 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

13. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period and the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding options, unvested RSUs and PSUs and shares to be purchased under the ESPP. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in fair market value of the Company’s share price can result in a greater dilutive effect from potentially dilutive securities. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:share attributable to the shareholders of the Company:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended  Fiscal Years Ended 
(In millions, except per share data)   30 June 2017     1 July 2016  

(US dollars in millions, except per share data)

 3 July
      2020      
 28 June
      2019      
 

Numerator:

      

Net income

   $772     $248    $1,004   $2,012 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Number of shares used in per share calculations:

      

Total shares for purposes of calculating basic net income per share

   296     299    262   282 

Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities:

      

Employee equity award plans

            
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total shares for purpose of calculating diluted net income per share

   299     302  

Total shares for purposes of calculating diluted net income per share

  265   285 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income per share

      

Basic

   $2.61     $0.83    $3.83   $7.13 

Diluted

   $2.58     $0.82    3.79   7.06 

The following potential shares from Employee equity award plans that were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

   Fiscal Years Ended 
(In millions)   30 June 2017     1 July 2016  

Employee equity award plans

        

13. Business Segment and Geographic Information

The Company has concluded that its manufacture and distribution of storage solutions constitutes one reporting segment. The Company’s manufacturing operations are based on technology platforms that are used to produce various storage and systems solutions that serve multiple applications and markets. The Company’s main technology platforms are primarily focused around areal density of media and read/write head technologies. In addition, the Company also invests in certain other technology platforms including motors, servo formatting read/write channels, solid state and other technologies. The Company has determined that its Chief Executive Officer is the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) as he is responsibleanti-dilutive were immaterial for reviewing and approving investments in the Company’s technology platforms and manufacturing infrastructure.

In fiscal years 20172020 and 2016, Dell Inc. accounted for approximately 10%2019.

14. Legal, Environmental and 12% of consolidated revenue, respectively. In fiscal year 2016, HP Inc., formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, completed its separation with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, and each company accounted for less than 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenue in both fiscal years 2017 and 2016. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated revenue in any year presented.

Other long-lived assets consist of tangible assets, other intangible assets, capital leases, financial assets and certain other debtors as recorded by the Company’s operations in each area.Contingencies

The following table summarizes the Company’s operations by geographic area:

   Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in millions)

   30 June 2017     1 July 2016  

Revenue from external customers(a):

    

Singapore

   $5,070     $5,354  

United States

   3,535     3,376  

The Netherlands

   1,501     1,813  

Other

   665     617  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated

   $10,771     $    11,160  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Long-lived assets:

    

United States

   $920     $1,029  

Singapore

   683     726  

Thailand

   414     349  

Malaysia

   100     201  

China

   61     115  

Other

   202     444  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated

   $2,380     $2,864  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(a)Revenue is attributed to countries based on the shipping location.

14.Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies

The Company assesses the probability of an unfavorable outcome of all its material litigation, claims or assessments to determine whether a liability had been incurred and whether it is probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of the loss. In the event that an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the amount of the loss can be

reasonably estimated, the Company establishes an accrual for the litigation, claim or assessment. In addition, in the event an unfavorable outcome is determined to be less than probable, but reasonably possible, the Company will disclose an estimate of the possible loss or range of such loss; however, when a reasonable estimate cannot be made, the Company will provide disclosure to that effect. Litigation is inherently uncertain and may result in adverse rulings or decisions. Additionally, the Company may enter into settlements or be subject to judgments that may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Convolve, Inc. (“Convolve”) and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) v. Seagate Technology LLC, et al.On 13 July 2000, Convolve and MIT filed suit against Compaq Computer Corporation and Seagate Technology LLC in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging infringement of US Patent No. 4,916,635 (the “‘635 patent”) and US Patent No. 5,638,267 (the “‘267 patent”), misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract and other claimsclaims. On 16 January 2002, Convolve filed an amended complaint, alleging defendants infringewere infringing US Patent No. 6,314,473 (the “‘473 patent”). The district court ruled in 2010 that the ‘267 patent was out of the case.

On 16 August 2011, the district court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment. On 1 July 2013, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 1) affirmed the district

court’s summary judgment rulings that Seagatethe Company did not misappropriate any of the alleged trade secrets and that the asserted claims of the ‘635 patent are invalid; 2) reversed and vacated the district court’s summary judgment ofnon-infringement with respect to the ‘473 patent; and 3) remanded the case for further proceedings on the ‘473 patentpatent.. On 11 July 2014, the district court granted the Company’s further summary judgment motion regarding the ‘473 patent. On 10 February 2016, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 1) affirmed the district court’s summary judgment of no direct infringement by Seagatethe Company because Seagate’sthe Company’s ATA/SCSI disk drives do not meet the “user interface” limitation of the asserted claims of the ‘473 patent; 2) affirmed the district court’s summary judgment ofnon-infringement by Compaq’s products as to claims 1, 3, and 5 of the ‘473 patent because Compaq’s F10 BIOS interface does not meet the “commands” limitation of those claims; 3) vacated the district court’s summary judgment ofnon-infringement by Compaq’s accused products as to claims7-15 of the ‘473 patent; 4) reversed the district court’s summary judgment ofnon-infringement based on intervening rights; and 5) remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings on the ‘473 patent. In view of the rulings made by the district court and the Court of Appeals and the uncertainty regarding the amount of damages, if any, that could be awarded Convolve in this matter, the Company does not believe that it is currently possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the possible range of loss related to this matter.

Alexander Shukh v. Seagate Technology—On 12 February 2010, Alexander Shukh filed a complaint against the Company in the US District Court for the District of Minnesota, alleging, among other things, employment discrimination and wrongful failure to name him as an inventor on certain Seagate patents. On 31 March 2014, the district court granted Seagate’s summary judgment motion. Mr. Shukh filed a notice of appeal on 7 April 2014. On 2 October 2015 the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Mr. Shukh’s claim for correction of inventorship and affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to all other claims. On 29 October 2015, Mr. Shukh filed a petition for rehearing en banc with the court of appeals; the petition was denied on 17 December 2015. On 16 March 2016, Shukh filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US Supreme Court; the petition was denied on 27 June 2016. On 30 March 2017, the parties entered into a confidential settlement to resolve this matter. This settlement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Enova Technology Corporation v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al.—On 5 June 2013, Enova Technology Corporation (“Enova”) filed a complaint against Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. and Seagate Technology LLC in the US. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of US Patent No. 7,136,995 (the “‘995 patent”), “Cryptographic Device,” and US Patent No. 7,900,057 (the “‘057 patent”), “Cryptographic Serial ATA Apparatus and Method.” The Company believes the claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this case. On 27 April 2015, the district court ordered a stay of the case, in view of proceedings regarding the ‘995 and ‘057 patents before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the US Patent and Trademark Office. On 2 September 2015, PTAB issued its final written decision that claims1-15 of the ‘995 patent are held unpatentable. On 18 December 2015, PTAB issued its final written decisions that claims1-32 and40-53 of the ‘057 patent are held unpatentable. On 4 February 2016 PTAB issued its final written decision that claims33-39 of the ‘057 patent are held unpatentable. Enova has appealed PTAB’s decisions on the ‘995 patent and the ‘057 patent to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Oral argument for the appeal from PTAB’s decision on the ‘995 patent was held on 13 March 2017, at the court of appeals. On 20 March 2017, the court of appeals issued its judgment affirming PTAB’s decision on the ‘995 patent. Oral argument before the court of appeals for the appeal from PTAB’s decision on the ‘057 patent is scheduled for 11 August 2017. In view of the uncertainty regarding the amount of damages, if any, that could be awarded in this matter, the Company does not believe that it is currently possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the possible range of loss related to this matter.

Lambeth Magnetic Structures LLC v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al.On 29 April 2016, Lambeth Magnetic Structures LLC filed a complaint against Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. and Seagate Technology LLC in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging infringement of US

Patent No. 7,128,988, “Magnetic Material Structures, Devices and Methods.” The Company believes the claims asserted in the complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this case. In view of the uncertainty regarding the amount of damages, if any, that could be awarded in this matter, the Company does not believe that itThe court issued its claim construction ruling on 18 October 2017. The trial is currently possiblescheduled to determine a reasonable estimate ofbegin on 30 November, 2020. While the possible range of loss relatedfor this matter remains uncertain, the Company estimates the amount of loss to this matter.be immaterial to the financial statements.

Seagate Technology LLC, et al. v. NHK Spring Co. Ltd. and TDK Corporation, et al. On 18 February 2020, Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology (Thailand) Ltd., Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd., and Seagate Technology International filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against defendant suppliers of HDD suspension assemblies. Defendants include NHK Spring Co. Ltd., TDK Corporation, Hutchinson Technology Inc., and several of their subsidiaries and affiliates. The complaint includes federal and state antitrust law claims, as well as a breach of contract claim. The complaint alleges that defendants and their co-conspirators knowingly conspired for more than twelve years not to compete in the supply of suspension assemblies; that defendants misused confidential information that the Company had provided pursuant to nondisclosure agreements, in breach of their contractual obligations; and that the Company paid artificially high prices on its purchases of suspension assemblies. The Company seeks to recover the overcharges it paid for suspension assemblies, as well as additional relief permitted by law.

Environmental MattersProduct Warranty

The Company’s operations are subject to US and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Some of the Company’s operations require environmental permits and controls to prevent and reduce air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities.

The Company has established environmental management systems and continually updates its environmental policies and standard operating procedures for its operations worldwide. The Company believes that its operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and permits. The Company budgets for operating and capitalestimates probable product warranty costs on an ongoing basis to comply with environmental laws. If additional or more stringent requirements are imposed on the Company in the future, it could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures.

Some environmental laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (as amended, the “Superfund” law) and its state equivalents, can impose liability for the cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former site owners or operators or upon parties who sent waste to these sites, regardless of whether the owner or operator owned the site at the time of the release of hazardous substances or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity.revenue is recognized. The Company has been identifiedgenerally warrants its products for a period of 1 to 5 years. The Company uses estimated repair or replacement costs and uses statistical modeling to estimate product return rates in order to determine its warranty obligation. As of 3 July 2020, the Company’s reserve for product warranty was $151 million as compared to $195 million as of 28 June 2019. This decrease of $44 million was primarily driven by a potentially responsible party at several sites. At eachcontinued decline in cost to repair and a decrease in the Company’s warranty return rate as compared to prior year.

Changes in the Company’s product warranty liability during the fiscal years ended 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019 were as follows:

  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
      2020       
  28 June
      2019       
 

Balance, beginning of period

  $195   $237 

Warranties issued

  86   112 

Repairs and replacements

  (85)   (99) 

Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties, including expirations

  (45)   (55) 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

  $151   $195 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

13. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to shareholders by the weighted-average number of these sites,shares outstanding during the Company has an assigned portionperiod. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the financial liability based on the type and amount of hazardous substances disposed of by each party at the siteperiod and the number of financially viable parties.additional shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding options, unvested RSUs and PSUs and shares to be purchased under the ESPP. The Company has fulfilled its responsibilities at somedilutive effect of these sites and remains involvedpotentially dilutive securities is reflected in only a few at this time.

Whilediluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in fair market value of the Company’s ultimate costsshare price can result in connection with these sites is difficulta greater dilutive effect from potentially dilutive securities. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share attributable to predict with complete accuracy, based on its current estimatesthe shareholders of cleanup coststhe Company:

  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US dollars in millions, except per share data)

 3 July
      2020      
  28 June
      2019      
 
Numerator:  

Net income

  $1,004   $2,012 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
Number of shares used in per share calculations:  

Total shares for purposes of calculating basic net income per share

  262   282 

Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities:

  

Employee equity award plans

    
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shares for purposes of calculating diluted net income per share

  265   285 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
Net income per share  

Basic

  $3.83   $7.13 

Diluted

  3.79   7.06 

The potential shares from Employee equity award plans that were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive were immaterial for fiscal years 2020 and its expected allocation of these costs, the Company does not expect costs in connection with these sites to be material.2019.

14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies

The Company assesses the probability of an unfavorable outcome of all its material litigation, claims or assessments to determine whether a liability had been incurred and whether it is probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of the loss. In the event that an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the amount of the loss can be

reasonably estimated, the Company establishes an accrual for the litigation, claim or assessment. In addition, in the event an unfavorable outcome is determined to be less than probable, but reasonably possible, the Company will disclose an estimate of the possible loss or range of such loss; however, when a reasonable estimate cannot be made, the Company will provide disclosure to that effect. Litigation is inherently uncertain and may result in adverse rulings or decisions. Additionally, the Company may enter into settlements or be subject to various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing the environment, including those restricting the presence of certain substances in electronic products. For example, the European Union (“EU”) enacted the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, which prohibits the use of certain substances, including lead, in certain products, including disk drives and server storage products, put on the market after 1 July 2006. Similar legislation has beenjudgments that may, individually or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, China, Japan and others. The European Union REACH Directive (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals, EC 1907/2006) also restricts substances of very high concern (“SVHCs”) in products. If the Company or its suppliers fails to comply with the substance restrictions, recycle requirements or other environmental requirements as they are enacted worldwide, it could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Other Matters

The Company is involved in a number of other judicial and administrative proceedings incidental to its business, and the Company may be involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its

business in the future. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters will notaggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially.

Litigation

15.Commitments

Leases.Convolve, Inc. (“Convolve”) and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) v. Seagate Technology LLC, et al. On 13 July 2000, Convolve and MIT filed suit against Compaq Computer Corporation and Seagate Technology LLC in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging infringement of US Patent No. 4,916,635 (the “‘635 patent”) and US Patent No. 5,638,267 (the “‘267 patent”), misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract and other claims. On 16 January 2002, Convolve filed an amended complaint, alleging defendants were infringing US Patent No. 6,314,473 (the “‘473 patent”). The district court ruled in 2010 that the ‘267 patent was out of the case.

On 16 August 2011, the district court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment. On 1 July 2013, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 1) affirmed the district court’s summary judgment rulings that the Company leases certain property, facilitiesdid not misappropriate any of the alleged trade secrets and equipment underthat the asserted claims of the ‘635 patent are invalid; 2) reversed and vacated the district court’s summary non-cancelablejudgment of non-infringement with respect lease agreements. Landto the ‘473 patent; and facility leases expire at various dates through 20823) remanded the case for further proceedings on the ‘473 patent.. On 11 July 2014, the district court granted the Company’s further summary judgment motion regarding the ‘473 patent. On 10 February 2016, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 1) affirmed the district court’s summary judgment of no direct infringement by the Company because the Company’s ATA/SCSI disk drives do not meet the “user interface” limitation of the asserted claims of the ‘473 patent; 2) affirmed the district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement by Compaq’s products as to claims 1, 3, and contain various provisions for rental adjustments including, in certain cases, a provision5 of the ‘473 patent because Compaq’s F10 BIOS interface does not meet the “commands” limitation of those claims; 3) vacated the district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement by Compaq’s accused products as to claims 7-15 of the ‘473 patent; 4) reversed the district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement based on increases inintervening rights; and 5) remanded the Consumer Price Index. Also, certain leases providecase to the district court for renewalfurther proceedings on the ‘473 patent. In view of the lease atrulings made by the Company’s option at expirationdistrict court and the Court of Appeals and the lease. The lease term begins onuncertainty regarding the dateamount of initial possession ofdamages, if any, that could be awarded Convolve in this matter, the leased property for purposes of recognizing lease expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company does not assume renewals in its determination of the lease term unless the renewals are deemed to be reasonably assured at lease inception. All of the leases require the Company to pay property taxes, insurance and normal maintenance costs which are expensed as incurred.

Future minimum lease payments for operating leases substantially all of which relates to land and buildings, (including accrued lease payments relating to restructuring plans) with initial or remaining terms of one year or more were as follows at 30 June 2017 (lease payments are shown net of sublease income):

 Fiscal Years Ending

 Operating Leases 
      (US Dollars in millions)     

2018

  $19  

2019

  15  

2020

  11  

2021

   

2022

   

Thereafter

  75  
 

 

 

 
  $135  
 

 

 

 

Total rent expense for all land, facility and equipment operating leases, net of sublease income, was $29 million and $43 million for fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total sublease rental income for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 was $2 million and $3 million, respectively. The Company subleases a portion of its facilitiesbelieve that it considersis currently possible to be in excess of current requirements. As of 30 June 2017, total future lease income to be recognized for the Company’s existing subleases is approximately $9 million.

Capital Expenditures.    The Company’snon-cancelable commitments for construction of manufacturing and product development facilities and purchases of equipment approximated $107 million at 30 June 2017, and included $15 million related to research and development projects.

Unconditional Purchase Obligations.During fiscal year 2017, the Company had unconditional long-term purchase obligations of approximately $1.1 billion in the aggregate, of which $900 million in the aggregate remains outstanding as of 30 June 2017, to purchase minimum quarterly amounts of inventory components at fixed and variable prices. The Company expects the commitment to total $375 million, $350 million, and $175 million for fiscal years 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively with no remaining commitment thereafter.

16.Guarantees

Indemnifications to Officers and Directors

On 4 May 2009, Seagate Technology, an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands (“Seagate-Cayman”), then the parent company, entered into a new form of

indemnification agreement (the “Revised Indemnification Agreement”) with its officers and directors of Seagate-Cayman and its subsidiaries (each, an “Indemnitee”). The Revised Indemnification Agreement provides indemnification in addition to any of Indemnitee’s indemnification rights under Seagate-Cayman’s Articles of Association, applicable law or otherwise, and indemnifies an Indemnitee for certain expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and settlement amounts actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in any action or proceeding, including any action by or in the right of Seagate-Cayman or any of its subsidiaries, arising out of his or her service as a director, officer, employee or agent of Seagate-Cayman or any of its subsidiaries or of any other entity to which he or she provides services at Seagate-Cayman’s request. However, an Indemnitee shall not be indemnified under the Revised Indemnification Agreement for (i) any fraud or dishonesty in the performance of Indemnitee’s duty to Seagate-Cayman or the applicable subsidiary of Seagate-Cayman or (ii) Indemnitee’s conscious, intentional or willful failure to act honestly, lawfully and in good faith with a view to the best interests of Seagate-Cayman or the applicable subsidiary of Seagate-Cayman. In addition, the Revised Indemnification Agreement provides that Seagate-Cayman will advance expenses incurred by an Indemnitee in connection with enforcement of the Revised Indemnification Agreement or with the investigation, settlement or appeal of any action or proceeding against him or her as to which he or she could be indemnified.

On 3 July 2010, pursuant to a corporate reorganization, the common shareholders of Seagate-Cayman became ordinary shareholders of Seagate Technology plc (the “Company”) and Seagate-Cayman became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, as described more fully in the Current Report on Form8-K filed by the Company on 6 July 2010 (the “Redomestication”). On 27 July 2010, in connection with the Redomestication, the Company, as sole shareholder of Seagate-Cayman, approved a form of deed of indemnity (the “Deed of Indemnity”), which provides for the indemnification by Seagate-Cayman of any director, officer, employee or agent of the Company, Seagate-Cayman or any subsidiary of the Company (each, a “Deed Indemnitee”), in addition to any of a Deed Indemnitee’s indemnification rights under the Company’s Articles of Association, applicable law or otherwise, with a similar scope to the Revised Indemnification Agreement. Seagate-Cayman entered into the Deed of Indemnity with certain Deed Indemnitees effective as of 3 July 2010 and continues to enter into the Deed of Indemnity with additional Deed Indemnitees from time to time.

The nature of these indemnification obligations prevents the Company from makingdetermine a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be requiredpossible range of loss related to paythis matter.

Lambeth Magnetic Structures LLC v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al. On 29 April 2016, Lambeth Magnetic Structures LLC filed a complaint against Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. and Seagate Technology LLC in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging infringement of US Patent No. 7,128,988, “Magnetic Material Structures, Devices and Methods.” The Company believes the claims asserted in the complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this case. The court issued its claim construction ruling on behalf18 October 2017. The trial is scheduled to begin on 30 November, 2020. While the possible range of its officers and directors. Historically,loss for this matter remains uncertain, the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreementsestimates the amount of loss to be immaterial to the financial statements.

Seagate Technology LLC, et al. v. NHK Spring Co. Ltd. and no amount has been accruedTDK Corporation, et al. On 18 February 2020, Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology (Thailand) Ltd., Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd., and Seagate Technology International filed a complaint in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respectUnited States District Court for the Northern District of California against defendant suppliers of HDD suspension assemblies. Defendants include NHK Spring Co. Ltd., TDK Corporation, Hutchinson Technology Inc., and several of their subsidiaries and affiliates. The complaint includes federal and state antitrust law claims, as well as a breach of contract claim. The complaint alleges that defendants and their co-conspirators knowingly conspired for more than twelve years not to these indemnification obligations.

Intellectual Property Indemnification Obligations

compete in the supply of suspension assemblies; that defendants misused confidential information that the Company had provided pursuant to nondisclosure agreements, in breach of their contractual obligations; and that the Company paid artificially high prices on its purchases of suspension assemblies. The Company has entered into agreements with customers and suppliers that include limited intellectual property indemnification obligations that are customary inseeks to recover the industry. These guarantees generally require the Company to compensate the other partyovercharges it paid for certain damages and costs incurredsuspension assemblies, as a result of third party intellectual property claims arising from these transactions. The nature of the intellectual property indemnification obligations prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to its customers and suppliers. Historically, the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification obligations.well as additional relief permitted by law.

Product Warranty

The Company estimates probable product warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized. The Company generally warrants its products for a period of 1 to 5 years. The Company uses estimated repair or replacement costs and uses statistical modeling to estimate product return rates in order to determine its warranty obligation. As of 3 July 2020, the Company’s reserve for product warranty was $151 million as compared to $195 million as of 28 June 2019. This decrease of $44 million was primarily driven by a continued decline in cost to repair and a decrease in the Company’s warranty return rate as compared to prior year.

obligation. Changes in the Company’s product warranty liability during the fiscal years ended 303 July 2020 and 28 June 2017 and 1 July 20162019 were as follows:

 

 Fiscal Years Ended  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in millions)

 

 

30 June 2017

 

 

1 July 2016

  3 July
      2020       
 28 June
      2019       
 

Balance, beginning of period

  $206    $248    $195   $237 

Warranties issued

  131    125    86   112 

Repairs and replacements

  (114)     (152)     (85)   (99) 

Changes in liability forpre-existing warranties, including expirations

  10    (17)     (45)   (55) 

Warranty liability assumed from acquisitions

  —     
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance, end of period

  $            233    $            206    $151   $195 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

13. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period and the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding options, unvested RSUs and PSUs and shares to be purchased under the ESPP. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in fair market value of the Company’s share price can result in a greater dilutive effect from potentially dilutive securities. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share attributable to the shareholders of the Company:

  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US dollars in millions, except per share data)

 3 July
      2020      
  28 June
      2019      
 
Numerator:  

Net income

  $1,004   $2,012 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
Number of shares used in per share calculations:  

Total shares for purposes of calculating basic net income per share

  262   282 

Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities:

  

Employee equity award plans

    
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shares for purposes of calculating diluted net income per share

  265   285 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
Net income per share  

Basic

  $3.83   $7.13 

Diluted

  3.79   7.06 

The potential shares from Employee equity award plans that were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive were immaterial for fiscal years 2020 and 2019.

14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies

The Company assesses the probability of an unfavorable outcome of all its material litigation, claims or assessments to determine whether a liability had been incurred and whether it is probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of the loss. In the event that an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the amount of the loss can be

reasonably estimated, the Company establishes an accrual for the litigation, claim or assessment. In addition, in the event an unfavorable outcome is determined to be less than probable, but reasonably possible, the Company will disclose an estimate of the possible loss or range of such loss; however, when a reasonable estimate cannot be made, the Company will provide disclosure to that effect. Litigation is inherently uncertain and may result in adverse rulings or decisions. Additionally, the Company may enter into settlements or be subject to judgments that may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially.

Litigation

Convolve, Inc. (“Convolve”) and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) v. Seagate Technology LLC, et al. On 13 July 2000, Convolve and MIT filed suit against Compaq Computer Corporation and Seagate Technology LLC in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging infringement of US Patent No. 4,916,635 (the “‘635 patent”) and US Patent No. 5,638,267 (the “‘267 patent”), misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract and other claims. On 16 January 2002, Convolve filed an amended complaint, alleging defendants were infringing US Patent No. 6,314,473 (the “‘473 patent”). The district court ruled in 2010 that the ‘267 patent was out of the case.

On 16 August 2011, the district court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment. On 1 July 2013, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 1) affirmed the district court’s summary judgment rulings that the Company did not misappropriate any of the alleged trade secrets and that the asserted claims of the ‘635 patent are invalid; 2) reversed and vacated the district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement with respect to the ‘473 patent; and 3) remanded the case for further proceedings on the ‘473 patent.. On 11 July 2014, the district court granted the Company’s further summary judgment motion regarding the ‘473 patent. On 10 February 2016, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 1) affirmed the district court’s summary judgment of no direct infringement by the Company because the Company’s ATA/SCSI disk drives do not meet the “user interface” limitation of the asserted claims of the ‘473 patent; 2) affirmed the district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement by Compaq’s products as to claims 1, 3, and 5 of the ‘473 patent because Compaq’s F10 BIOS interface does not meet the “commands” limitation of those claims; 3) vacated the district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement by Compaq’s accused products as to claims 7-15 of the ‘473 patent; 4) reversed the district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement based on intervening rights; and 5) remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings on the ‘473 patent. In view of the rulings made by the district court and the Court of Appeals and the uncertainty regarding the amount of damages, if any, that could be awarded Convolve in this matter, the Company does not believe that it is currently possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the possible range of loss related to this matter.

Lambeth Magnetic Structures LLC v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al. On 29 April 2016, Lambeth Magnetic Structures LLC filed a complaint against Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. and Seagate Technology LLC in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging infringement of US Patent No. 7,128,988, “Magnetic Material Structures, Devices and Methods.” The Company believes the claims asserted in the complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this case. The court issued its claim construction ruling on 18 October 2017. The trial is scheduled to begin on 30 November, 2020. While the possible range of loss for this matter remains uncertain, the Company estimates the amount of loss to be immaterial to the financial statements.

Seagate Technology LLC, et al. v. NHK Spring Co. Ltd. and TDK Corporation, et al. On 18 February 2020, Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Technology (Thailand) Ltd., Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd., and Seagate Technology International filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against defendant suppliers of HDD suspension assemblies. Defendants include NHK Spring Co. Ltd., TDK Corporation, Hutchinson Technology Inc., and several of their subsidiaries and affiliates. The complaint includes federal and state antitrust law claims, as well as a breach of contract claim. The complaint alleges that defendants and their co-conspirators knowingly conspired for more than twelve years not to compete in the supply of suspension assemblies; that defendants misused confidential information that the Company had provided pursuant to nondisclosure agreements, in breach of their contractual obligations; and that the Company paid artificially high prices on its purchases of suspension assemblies. The Company seeks to recover the overcharges it paid for suspension assemblies, as well as additional relief permitted by law.

Environmental Matters

The Company’s operations are subject to US and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Some of the Company’s operations require environmental permits and controls to prevent and reduce air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities.

The Company has established environmental management systems and continually updates its environmental policies and standard operating procedures for its operations worldwide. The Company believes that its operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and permits. The Company budgets for operating and capital costs on an ongoing basis to comply with environmental laws. If additional or more stringent requirements are imposed on the Company in the future, it could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures.

Some environmental laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (as amended, the “Superfund” law) and its state equivalents, can impose liability for the cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former site owners or operators or upon parties who sent waste to these sites, regardless of whether the owner or operator owned the site at the time of the release of hazardous substances or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. The Company has been identified as a responsible or potentially responsible party at several sites. At each of these sites, the Company has an assigned portion of the financial liability based on the type and amount of hazardous substances disposed of by each party at the site and the number of financially viable parties. The Company has fulfilled its responsibilities at some of these sites and remains involved in only a few at this time.

While the Company’s ultimate costs in connection with these sites is difficult to predict with complete accuracy, based on its current estimates of cleanup costs and its expected allocation of these costs, the Company does not expect costs in connection with these sites to be material.

The Company may be subject to various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing the environment, including those restricting the presence of certain substances in electronic products. For example, the European Union (“EU”) enacted the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (2011/65/EU), which prohibits the use of certain substances, including lead, in certain products, including disk drives and server storage products, put on the market after1 July 2006. Similar legislation has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the US, Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, China, Japan and others. The EU REACH Directive (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals, EC 1907/2006) also restricts substances of very high concern in products. If the Company or its suppliers fails to comply with the substance restrictions, recycle requirements or other environmental requirements as they are enacted worldwide, it could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Other Matters

The Company is involved in a number of other judicial, regulatory or administrative proceedings and investigations incidental to its business, and the Company may be involved in such proceedings and investigations arising in the normal course of its business in the future. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

15. Commitments

Unconditional Long-Term Purchase Obligations. As of 3 July 2020, the Company had unconditional long-term purchase obligations of approximately $163 million, primarily related to purchases of minimum quarterly amounts of inventory components at fixed contractual prices. The Company expects the commitment to total $33 million, $35 million, $32 million, and $63 million for fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025, respectively with no remaining commitment thereafter.

Unconditional Long-term Capital Expenditures. As of 3 July 2020, the Company had $52 million unconditional long-term commitment primarily related to purchases of equipment. Additionally, the Company had $10 million unconditional commitment related to purchases of equipment for research and development projects primarily due in fiscal year 2021.

16. Business Segment and Geographic Information

The Company’s manufacturing operations are based on technology platforms that are used to produce various data storage and systems solutions that serve multiple applications and markets. The Company has determined that its Chief Operating Decision Maker, the Chief Executive Officer, evaluates performance of the Company and makes decisions regarding investments in the Company’s technology platforms and manufacturing infrastructure based on the Company’s consolidated results. As a result, the Company has concluded that its manufacture and distribution of storage solutions constitutes one reporting segment.

In fiscal years 2020 and 2019, no customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated revenue.

The following table summarizes the Company’s operations by geographic area:

  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
      2020     
  28 June
      2019      
 

Revenue from external customers (1):

  

 Singapore

  $5,032   $5,085 

 United States

  3,583   3,310 

 The Netherlands

  1,572   1,630 

 Other

  322   365 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Consolidated

  $    10,509   $    10,390 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Long-lived assets:

  

 Thailand

  $681   $558 

 Singapore

  601   556 

 United States

  567   523 

 Other

  376   286 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Consolidated

  $2,225   $1,923 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

17.(1)Employees and Remuneration

Revenue is attributed to countries based on the bill from location.

17. Revenue

The following table provides information about disaggregated revenue by sales channel and geographical region for the Company’s single reportable segment:

  Fiscal Years Ended 

(US Dollars in million)

 3 July       2020        28 June
      2019      
 

Revenue by Channel

  

OEMs

  $7,504   $7,261 

Distributors

  1,738   1,780 

Retailers

  1,267   1,349 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $        10,509   $        10,390 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenue by Geography (1)

  

Asia Pacific

  $5,060   $5,115 

Americas

  $3,583   $3,310 

EMEA

  1,866   1,965 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $        10,509   $        10,390 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Revenue is attributed to countries based on the bill from location.

18. Post Balance Sheet Events

Dividend Declared

On 22 July 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.65 per share, which will be payable on 7 October 2020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 23 September 2020.

19. Employees and Remuneration

The average number of persons employed by the Company during each year was as follows:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended  Fiscal Years Ended 
  

 

30 June 2017

   

 

1 July 2016

  3 July
2020
 28 June
2019
 
  (in thousands)  (in thousands) 

Manufacturing

   34     38    34   35 

Product development

            

Sales, marketing, general & administrative

            
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
                       43                         48                41               42 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Employee costs during each year consist of the following:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended  Fiscal Years Ended 
  

 

30 June 2017

   

 

1 July 2016

 
  (US Dollars in millions) 

(US Dollars in millions)

 3 July
2020
 28 June
2019
 

Salaries and wages

   $1,477     $1,458    $        1,390   $        1,265 

Social security costs(1)

   324     346  

Social insurance costs

  119   116 

Other employee benefits

  182   176 

Share-based compensation

   137     120    109   99 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
   $                    1,938     $                    1,924    $        1,800   $        1,656 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

20. Auditor’s Remuneration

(1)Social security costs includes social security costs, employer paid payroll taxes and other employee benefits paid by the Company.

18.Auditor’s Remuneration

The fees paid to Ernst & Young Ireland in respect of the audit of the group accounts was $0.1were $0.14 million for both thefiscal years ended 303 July 2020 and 28 June 2017 and 1 July 2016.2019. In addition, Ernst & Young Ireland received fees of $0.04 million$0.11 and $0.09$0.04 million for other assurance services for fiscal years ended 3 July 2020 and 28 June 2019, respectively. Ernst & Young Ireland received nil for both tax and othernon-audit services for both fiscal years ended 303 July 2020 and 28 June 2017 and 12019.

For fiscal year ended 3 July 2016, respectively.

Total2020, total auditor’s remuneration was $5.9$6.7 million, of which $6.1 million, $0.5 million and $6.2$0.1 million for the years ended 30 June 2017were related to audit fees, audit-related fees and 1 July 2016,tax and all other fees, respectively. These amounts reflect fees for all professional services rendered by Ernst & Young and its affiliated firms.

19.Post Balance Sheet Events

Dividends

On 25 July 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63 per share, which will be payable on 4 October 2017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 20 September 2017.

July 2017 Restructuring Plan

On 25 July 2017, the Company committed to an additional restructuring plan (the “July 2017 Plan”) to reduce its cost structure. The July 2017 Plan included reducing the Company’s global headcount by approximately 600 employees. The July 2017 Plan, which the Company expects to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter ofFor fiscal year 2018, is expectedended 28 June 2019, total auditor’s remuneration was $6.4 million, of which $6.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million were related to result in totalpre-tax charges of approximately $50 million, primarily in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. These charges are expected to be comprised of cash expenditures on severanceaudit fees, audit-related fees and employee-related costs.tax and all other fees, respectively.

Planned Leadership Transition21. Subsidiary Undertakings

On 25 July 2017 the Company’s Board of Directors appointed William D. Mosley to serve as Chief Executive Officer, of the Company effective 1 October 2017. The Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Mosley to serve as a director of the Company, effective 25 July 2017. Mr. Mosley will serve as a director until the Company’s next annual general meeting of shareholders when he is expected to stand for election by a vote of the Company’s shareholders. On 25 July 2017, the Company also announced that Stephen J. Luczo will step down from his position as Chief Executive Officer, effective 1 October 2017. Mr. Luczo will remain with the Company in the role of Executive Chairman effective 1 October 2017 and will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors.

As previously announced on 2 June 2017, Philip G. Brace, President of Cloud Systems and Silicon group, will be leaving the Company. On 20 July 2017, the Company and Mr. Brace agreed that the effective date of his departure will be 2 October 2017.

20.Subsidiary Undertakings

The subsidiary undertakings of Seagate Technology plc which have a substantial effect on the financial position of the Company are listed below. Unless noted herein, all subsidiary undertakings are ultimately wholly owned by Seagate Technology plc and their financial results are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Company

��Jurisdiction 

Jurisdiction

Registered Address

 

Nature of Business

 

Percent

Owned

Seagate HDD Cayman

 Cayman Islands c/o Maples and Calder,Corporate Services Limited P. O. Box 309, Ugland House, South Church Street, George Town
Grand CaymanKY1-1104
Cayman Islands
 Holding Company 100%

Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc.

 Delaware The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington,
Delaware, 19801, USA
 Holding Company 100%

Company

 

Jurisdiction

 

Registered Address

 

Nature of Business

 

Percent

Owned

Seagate Technology International

 Cayman Islands c/o Maples and Calder,Corporate Services Limited P. O. Box 309, Ugland House, South Church Street, George Town
Grand CaymanKY1-1104
Cayman Islands
 Designs, manufactures, markets and sells computer disk drives.Holding Company 100%

Seagate Technology (Ireland)

Cayman Islandsc/o Maples Corporate Services Limited P. O. Box 309, Ugland House, South Church Street, George Town
Grand Cayman KY1-1104 
Cayman Islands
Manufacture equipment for export100%

Penang Seagate Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd.

 Malaysia 1st Floor (Rm. 102), 42 Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah,170-09-01, Livingston Tower, Janal Argyll, 10050 George Town Pulau Pinang Penang 10050 Malaysia Manufacture, market and deal in all kinds of electronics data products. 100%

Seagate Technology (Ireland) – Springtown Branch

 Northern IrelandUnited Kingdom c/o Maples and Calder,Corporate Services Limited P. O. Box 309, Ugland House, South Church Street, George Town
Grand CaymanKY1-1104
Cayman Islands
 ManufacturesManufacture equipment for export 100%

Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd – Netherlands branch

The NetherlandsKoolhovenlaan 1, 1119 NB, Schiphol-Rijk, NetherlandsNetherlands branch office of Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd100%
Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd

 Singapore 50 Raffles Place#06-00,90 Woodlands Avenue 7
737911 
Singapore Land Tower, 48623, Singapore
 Exports products manufactured in Asia 100%

Seagate Technology International (Wuxi) Co. Ltd

 China Export Processing Zone, B, No. 2, Xing Chuang Er Lu,
Wuxi,
Jiangsu,
Peoples Republic of China
 Design, manufacture, service, market data storage products 100%

Seagate Technology LLC

 Delaware The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center,
1209 Orange Street,
Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, USA
 Dual member limited liability company – HDD operating business 100%

Seagate Technology (Thailand) Limited

 Thailand 1627 Moo 7, Teparuk Road, Tambol Teparuk,
Amphur Muang,
Samutprakarn 10270,
Thailand
 Manufacturer of disk drives and related peripherals 100%
Seagate Systems (Mexico) SA de CVMexico1A-102 Av Circunvalacion Agustin Yanez No 2613 Col. Arcos Vallarta Sur in Guadalajara Jalisco, MexicoMexican operations100%

Company

 

Jurisdiction

 

Registered Address

 

Nature of Business

 

Percent

Owned

Seagate Technology (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.ChinaNo. 1 Wu Xiang Road Zone A, Export Processing Zone 200 Suhong Zhong Road Suzhou Industrial Park 215021 People’s Republic of ChinaFactory100%

Seagate International (Johor) Sdn. Bhd

 Malaysia B-11-8, Level 11 Megan Avenue II Jalan Yap Kwan Seng
Kuala Lumpur 50450,
Malaysia
 Manufacturer of substrates 100%
Seagate Systems (US) Inc.California10200 South DeAnza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014, USAUS trading activities of Seagate Systems100%
Seagate Systems (Malaysia) Sdn. BhdMalaysia10th Floor Wisma Havela Thakardas No.1 Jalan Tiong Nam Off Jalan Raja Laut 50350, MalaysiaMalaysia operations100%
Seagate Systems (UK) LimitedUnited KingdomLangstone Road Havant Hampshire PO9 1SA, United KingdomUK trading operations of Seagate Systems100%

Seagate Cloud Systems, Inc.

 Delaware The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center,
1209 Orange Street,
Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, USA
 US trading activities of Seagate Cloud SystemsManufacturing, selling, servicing computer peripherals 100%

Seagate technology international (Singapore branch)Technology Netherlands B.V.

 SingaporeNetherlands 90 Woodlands Avenue 7 Singapore 737911Tupolevlaan 105
1119 PA Schiphol-Rijk
Netherlands
 Manufacture of computers and data processing equipment except computer peripheral equipment.Recovery Services; Holding Company 100%

Exemption From Statutory Audit

As detailed in Note 1 “Basis“Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, in producing consolidated financial statements the UK subsidiaries of the Company are eligible to take advantage of the audit exemption available to them under s479A of the UK Companies Act 2006 relating to subsidiary companies. The subsidiaries which have taken an exemption from an audit for the year ended 30 June 20173 July 2020 by virtue of s479A of the UK Companies Act 2006 are:

 

Seagate Business Centre (UK) Ltd. (registration number 7859662)

Seagate Technology UK Ltd. (registration number 3453431)

Seagate Systems (UK) Limited (registration number 03134912)

LaCie Ltd. (registration number 02475546)

EVault UK Ltd. (registration number 6364013)

Dot Hill Systems Europe Ltd. (registration number 3123600)

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

PARENT COMPANY STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

for the period ended 30 June 20173 July 2020

 

(US Dollars in millions)  2 July 2016 to
30 June 2017
   4 July 2015 to 1 July
2016
  29 June 2019 to
3 July 2020
 30 June 2018 to
28 June 2019
 

Profit for the period

   $                    645     $                    1,693    $2,093   $1,193 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the period

   $645     $1,693    $2,093   $1,193 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

PARENT COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

at 30 June 20173 July 2020

 

(US Dollars in millions)    Note     30 June 2017   1 July 2016  Note

 

 3 July
2020

 

 28 June
2019

 

 
ASSETS         

Fixed assets:

         

Financial assets – investment in subsidiary

   3    $6,925     $6,792  

Financial assets—investment in subsidiary

 

 

3

 

 

 $

7,226 

 

 $

7,124 

   

Current assets:

         

Debtors

     —        

 

— 

 

 

 

Cash

            

 

 

 

— 

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total Assets

     $            6,928     $            6,794     $7,230   $7,125 
    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 
LIABILITIES      

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

   

Capital and reserves:

         

Share capital

   5    $—     $—   

 

5

 

 

 $

— 

 

 $

— 

Share premium

     1,745     1,659   

 

5

 

 

 

141 

 

 

38 

Other reserves

     728     593   

 

5

 

 

 

1,039 

 

 

933 

Profit and loss account

     1,591     2,178    

 

3,197 

 

 

2,661 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 
     4,064     4,430    

 

4,377 

 

 

3,632 

Creditors – Amounts falling due within one year:

         

Amounts due to subsidiaries

   4    2,680     2,364   

 

4

 

 

 

2,684 

 

 

3,319 

Creditors

     184     —    

 

169 

 

 

174 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 
     2,864     2,364    

 

2,853 

 

 

3,493 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total Liabilities

     $6,928     $6,794  

Total Liabilities and Equity

  

 $

      7,230 

 

 $

      7,125 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

The Company’s profit for the year amounted to $2,093 million (fiscal year 2019: $1,193 million).

Approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 2521 August 20172020.

 

/s/ STEPHEN J. LUCZO DR. WILLIAM D. MOSLEY

  

/s/ DR.CHONG SUP PARK JUDY BRUNER

Stephen J. LuczoDr. William D. Mosley

  

Dr. Chong Sup ParkJudy Bruner

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

PARENT COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

as at 30 June 20173 July 2020

 

(US Dollars in millions)   Share Capital   Share
Premium
 Other
Reserves
 Profit and
Loss Account
 Total  Share
    Capital    

 

 Share
    Premium  

 

 Other
  Reserves  

 

 

 

Profit and

Loss
    Account    

 

     Total    

 

 
     

Balance at 3 July 2015

  $    —    $1,580    $477    $2,358    $4,415  

Balance at 29 June 2018

 

 $

— 

 

 $

1,858 

 

 $

833 

 

$

1,278 

 

 $

3,969 

Profit for the period

     1,693    1,693      

 

1,193 

 

 

1,193 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  —    1,580    477    4,051    6,108  

Total comprehensive income for the period

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

1,193 

 

 

1,193 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity:

          

Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares

  —    —    —    (1,090)   (1,090)  

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

(966)

 

 

 

(966)

 

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units

  —    —    —    (56)   (56) 

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted share units

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

(31)

 

 

 

(31)

 

Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans

  —    79    —    —    79   

 

— 

 

 

 

69 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

69 

Dividends to shareholders

  —    —    —    (727)   (727)  

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

(702)

 

 

 

(702)

 

Share-based compensation

  —    —    116    —    116   

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total transactions with owners

  —    79    116    (1,873)   (1,678)  

 

— 

 

 

 

69 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

(1,699)

 

 

 

(1,530)

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 1 July 2016

  $—    $1,659    $593    $2,178    $4,430  

Reduction in share premium

 

 

— 

 

 

 

(1,889)

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

1,889 

 

 

— 

 

Balance at 28 June 2019

 

 $

— 

 

 $

38 

 

 $

933 

 

$

2,661 

 

$

3,632 

Profit for the period

     645    645      

 

2,093 

 

 

2,093 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  —    1,659    593    2,823    5,075  

Total comprehensive income for the period

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

2,093 

 

 

2,093 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity:

          

Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares

  —    —    —    (460)   (460)  

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

(847)

 

 

 

(847)

 

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units

  —    —    —    (27)   (27) 

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted share units

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

(40)

 

 

 

(40)

 

Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans

  —    86    —    —    86   

 

— 

 

 

 

103 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

103 

Dividends to shareholders

  —    —    —    (745)   (745)  

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

(670)

 

 

 

(670)

 

Share-based compensation

  —    —    135    —    135   

 

— 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

106 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

106 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total transactions with owners

  —    86    135    (1,232)   (1,011)  

 

— 

 

 

 

103 

 

 

106 

 

 

(1,557)

 

 

 

(1,348)

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 30 June 2017

  $—    $    1,745    $    728    $    1,591    $    4,064  

Balance at 3 July 2020

 

 $

          — 

 

 $

          141 

 

 $

          1,039 

 

 $

      3,197 

 

 $

        4,377 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

NOTES TO THE PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Accounting Policies

Accounting Convention and Basis of Preparation of Financial StatementsStatements. .  The financial statements of Seagate Technology plc present the statement of comprehensive income, statement of financial position and statement of changes in equity on a stand-alone basis, including related party transactions.significant accounting policies. The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention except for share basedshare-based payments which are stated at their fair value and in accordance with Irish law and Financial Reporting Standard 102 (“FRS 102”, The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland) issued by the Financial Reporting Council and promulgated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in Ireland). The financial statements are presented in United States dollars, which is the Company’s functional and presentational currency and are rounded to the nearest million.

Reduced Disclosure Framework Exemptions AdoptedAdopted.. In accordance towith FRS102, the Company has taken advantage of the following disclosure exemptions as equivalent disclosures are available in the publicly filed financial statements of the Group,group, Seagate Technology plc, which consolidates the results of the Company: 1) The requirements of Section 7 Statement of Cash Flows paragraph 3.17 (d);3.17; 2) requirements of Section 33 Related Party Disclosures paragraph 33.7 and 3) Section 26 Share based payment paragraph 26.18 (b), 26.19 to 26.21 and 26.23.

In accordance with Sections 304 (1) and 304 (2) of the Companies Act 2014, the Company is availing of the exemption from presenting the individual profit and loss account. For fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company’s net profit was $645$2,093 million and $1,693$1,193 million, respectively.

Related Party Transactions. The Company has availed itself of the exemption provided in FRS 102, Related Party Disclosures, which exempts disclosure of transactions entered into between two or more members of a group, provided that any subsidiary undertaking which is a party to the transaction is wholly owned by a member of that group.

Investment in Subsidiary.The Company’s investment in Seagate Technology (“Seagate-Cayman”), a wholly owned subsidiary, was recorded at cost which equaled fair value on 3 July 2010, the date that the Company became the parent of Seagate-Cayman, based on the Company’s market capitalization at that time. This initial valuation is the Company’s cost basis for its investment in Seagate-Cayman. The investment is tested for impairment if circumstances or indicators suggest that impairment may exist.

Amounts due to subsidiaries.subsidiaries. Intercompany notes payable which are basic financial instrumentsrepayable on demand and hence are initially recorded at the present value of future payments discounted at a market rate of interest for a similar loan. Subsequently, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.transaction price.

Guarantees and Contingencies.The Company has guaranteed certain liabilities and credit arrangements of group entities. The Company reviews the status of these guarantees at each reporting date and considers whether it is required to make a provision for payment on those guarantees based on the probability of the commitment being called.

The Company concluded that as the likelihood of the guarantees being called upon is remote, no provisions for any guarantees have been booked to these financial statements.

Dividend Income.Dividend income is recognized when the right to receive payment is established, the amount of which can be reliably measured and it is probable that collectability is reasonably assured.

Share-based Payments.The Seagate Technology group operates several share-based payment plans. The share-based payment expense associated with the share plans is recognized as an expense by the entity which

receives services in exchange for the share-based compensation. On an individual undertaking basis, the profit and loss accountstatement of comprehensive income is charged with the expense related to the services received by Seagate Technology plc. The remaining portion of the share-based payments represents a contribution to group entities and is added to the carrying amount of those investments.

Taxation.Corporation tax is provided on taxable profits at the current rates.

Deferred taxation is accounted for in respect of all timing differences at expected tax rates. Timing differences arise from the inclusion of items of income and expenditure in tax computations in periods different from those in which they are included

in the financial statements. A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that they will be recovered against the reversal of deferred tax liabilities or other future taxable profits.

Foreign Currency.Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in the Company’s functional currency by applying the spot rate as at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are retranslated at the rate of exchange ruling at the statement of financial position date. All differences are taken to the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty. Preparation of the financial statements requires management to make significant judgments and estimates. The following judgments and estimates have the most significant effect on the amounts included in the financial statement. Financial Assets: Investments in subsidiaries, are stated at cost less any accumulated impairment and are reviewed for impairment if there are indicators that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment assessment is considered as part of the group’s overall impairment assessment.

2. History and Description of the Company

Seagate Technology plc is a public limited company incorporated in and domiciled in the Republic of Ireland. It became the parent company in the Seagate Technology group following a reorganization that took place in 2010.

The principal activity of Seagate Technology plc is an investment holding company. Seagate Technology plc is the parent company of subsidiaries that design, manufacture, market and sell data storage products.

The Company which is publicly listed was incorporated in Irelandon the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The Company’s registration number is 480010 and its registered address is 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.Ireland D02 NX53.

3. Financial Assets – Investment in Subsidiary

 

(US Dollars in millions)

 Amount 

At 3 July 201529 June 2018

  $6,6777,028 

Capital contribution in respect of share-based payment plans

  11596 
 

 

 

 

At 1 July 201628 June 2019

  $6,7927,124 

Capital contribution in respect of share-based payment plans

  133102 
 

 

 

 

At 30 June 20173 July 2020

  $                6,9257,226 
 

 

 

 

At 30 June 2017,3 July 2020, the Company had the following subsidiary:

 

Company name

  

Registered office

  

Nature of business

Seagate Technology

  

Cayman Islands

  

Investment holding

The above subsidiary holding represents 100% of the common shares of the subsidiary, which is unlisted.

4. Amounts Due to Subsidiaries

The balance is primarily comprised of notes due to Seagate-Cayman with no stated interest rate and that are payable on demand. During fiscal year 2017,2020, the Company borrowed $964$1,465 million and repaid $650$2,100 million by way of applying dividends declared by Seagate-Cayman. The remaining balance outstanding as of 30 June

20173 July 2020 of $2.7 billion$2,684 million is unsecured, interest free and due on demand. During fiscal year 2016,2019, the Company borrowed $1.8 billion$1,615 million and repaid $1.7 billion$1,200 million by way of applying dividends declared by Seagate-Cayman. The remaining balance outstanding as of 1 July 201628 June 2019 of $2.4 billion$3,319 million was unsecured, interest free and due on demand.

5. Equity

Share Capital

 

  30 June 20173 July 2020  1 July 201628 June 2019 
  (US Dollars in millions) 

Authorized:

  

40,00039,994 deferred shares of1 par value per share

  $—    $—  

1,250,000,000 ordinary shares of $.00001$0.00001 par value per share

  —    —  

100,000,000 undesignated preferred shares of $.00001$0.00001 par value per share

  —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $                —    $                —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  30 June 20173 July 2020  1 July 201628 June 2019 
  (US Dollars in millions) 

Allotted, Called Up, and Fully Paid:

  

40,00039,994 deferred shares of1 par value per share

  $—    $—  

291,799,561 (2016: 298,572,217 )256,718,840 (2019: 269,097,971) ordinary shares of $.00001$0.00001 par value per share

  —    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $                —    $                —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  Number of Ordinary
Shares
  Share Capital 
  (In millions)  (US Dollars in millions) 

Balance at 3 July 201529 June 2018

  315287   $—  

Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares

  (23)(21)   —  

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stockshare units

  (1)(1  — 

Issuance of ordinary shares in respect of share-based payment plans

  84   —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 1 July 201628 June 2019

  299269   $—  

Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares

  (12)(17)   —  

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stockshare units

  (1)(1)   —  

Issuance of ordinary shares in respect of share-based payment plans

    —  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 30 June 20173 July 2020

                      292257   $—  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Share Premium

This reserve records the amount above the nominal value received for shares sold, less transaction costs. On 25 April 2019, the Company’s shareholders approved the reduction of its share premium account to create distributable reserves at the extraordinary general meeting. On 26 April 2019, the Company filed a petition with the High Court of Ireland to approve the creation of distributable reserves through the reduction of the share premium account by approximately $1.9 billion. The High Court of Ireland approved the petition on 30 May 2019.

Other Reserves

Other reserves include an amount of $3,090$3,600 and $2,960$3,420 for fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019 respectively, representing a Capital Redemption Reserve Fund.

Share Repurchase

From time to time, the Company may repurchase any of its outstanding ordinary shares through private, open market, or broker assisted purchases, tender offers, or other means. During fiscal years 2020 and 2019, the Company repurchased approximately 18 million and 22 million of its ordinary shares including shares withheld for statutory tax withholdings related to vesting of employee equity awards, respectively. As of 3 July 2020, $1.3 billion remained available for repurchase under the existing repurchase authorization limits. All repurchases are effected as redemptions in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association. There is no expiration date on the Company’s repurchase authorizations.

Dividends

During fiscal year 2017,2020, the Company paid cash dividends of $2.52$2.58 per share of its ordinary shares, aggregating $561$673 million. On 2522 July 2017,2020, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend

of $0.63$0.65 per share, which will be payable on 47 October 20172020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 2023 September 2017.2020. During fiscal year 2016,2019, the Company declared and paid cash dividends of $2.43$2.52 per share of its ordinary shares and paid cash dividend aggregating $727$713 million. Dividends approved but not paid at year end of $167 million and $170 million are presented in “Creditors” in the Company’s Statement of Financial Position for fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively.

6. Share-Based Payments

Total share-based payment expense in respect of share-based payment plans was $135$106 million and $116$100 million for fiscal years 20172020 and 2016,2019, of which $133$102 million and $115$96 million, respectively, was included as a capital contribution in Investment in subsidiary (Note 3). The share-based payment charge in the parent company balance sheet is calculated and recognized on a graded basis as opposed to a straight line basis in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The Company has applied the requirements of Section 26 of FRS 102. Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contains relevant disclosures on the Company’s share-based payment plans.

7. Auditor’s Remuneration

The fees paid to Ernst & Young Ireland in respect of the audit of the Company individual accounts waswere $0.04 million for both fiscal years ended 3 July 2020 and $0.03 million for periods ended 3028 June 2017 and 1 July 2016,2019, respectively. In addition, Ernst & Young Ireland received fees of $0.12$0.21 million and $0.17$0.14 million for other assurance services in those periods, respectively. Ernst & Young Ireland did not receive any fees for tax or othernon-audit services in 20172020 or 2016.2019. Note 1820 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides additional information regarding auditor’s remuneration.

8. SubsequentDirectors’ Emoluments

Director’s emoluments and interests are presented on page A-49 and page A-103of this Annual Report.

9. Post Balance Sheet Events

DividendsDividend Declared

On 2522 July 2017,2020, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63$0.65 per share, which will be payable on 47 October 20172020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 2023 September 2017.2020.

July 2017 Restructuring Plan

On 25 July 2017, the Company committed to an additional restructuring plan (the “July 2017 Plan”) to reduce its cost structure. The July 2017 Plan included reducing the Company’s global headcount by approximately 600 employees. The July 2017 Plan, which the Company expects to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, is expected to result in totalpre-tax charges of approximately $50 million, primarily in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. These charges are expected to be comprised of cash expenditures on severance and employee-related costs.

Planned Leadership Transition

On 25 July 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed William D. Mosley to serve as Chief Executive Officer, of the Company effective 1 October 2017. The Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Mosley to serve as a director of the Company, effective 25 July 2017. Mr. Mosley will serve as a director until the Company’s next annual general meeting of shareholders when he is expected to stand for election by a vote of the Company’s shareholders. On 25 July 2017, the Company also announced that Stephen J. Luczo will step down from his position as Chief Executive Officer, effective 1 October 2017. Mr. Luczo will remain with the Company in the role of Executive Chairman effective 1 October 2017 and will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors.

As previously announced on 2 June 2017, Philip G. Brace, President of Cloud Systems and Silicon group, will be leaving the Company. On 20 July 2017, the Company and Mr. Brace agreed that the effective date of his departure will be 2 October 2017.

9.10. Approval of Financial Statements

The directors approved the financial statements and authorized them for issue on 2521 August 2017.2020.

Appendix BLOGO

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY D22751-P42447 For Against Abstain SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

1.PURPOSE

PLC 38/39 FITZWILLIAM SQUARE DUBLIN 2, D02 NX53, IRELAND SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC (the “Company”) Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. 1. Election of Directors Nominees: The purposeBoard of this Plan is to provide an opportunity for Employees of Seagate Technology plc, an Irish company and its Designated Subsidiaries to purchase Ordinary Shares and thereby to have an additional incentive to contribute to the prosperityDirectors (the “Board”) recommends you vote FOR each of the Corporation. It isnominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4. 1a. Mark W. Adams 1c. Michael R. Cannon 1b. Judy Bruner 1d. William T. Coleman 1e. Jay L. Geldmacher 1f. Dylan G. Haggart 1g. Stephen J. Luczo 1h. William D. Mosley 1i. Stephanie Tilenius 1j. Edward J. Zander 2. Approve, in an advisory, non binding vote, the intentioncompensation of the Corporation thatCompany’s named executive officers (“Say-on-Pay”). 3. Ratify, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the Plan qualifyappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423the independent auditors of the CodeCompany for fiscal year 2021, and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Plan shallAudit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to set the auditors’ remuneration. 4. In accordance with Irish law, determine the price range at which the Company can re-allot shares that it holds as treasury shares. For Against Abstain Any shareholder entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders may appoint one or more proxies, who need not be administereda shareholder(s) of the Company. A proxy is required to vote in accordance with this intent(the “423 Plan”). In addition, the Plan authorizes the grantany instructions given to him/her. Completion of options pursuant to sub-plans or special rules adopted by the Committee designed to achieve desired tax or other objectives in particular locations outsidea form of the United States, which sub-plans (together such sub-plans and special rules are referred to herein as “Non-423 Sub-Plans”), which Non-423 Sub-plans shall not be required to comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code or all of the specific provisions of the Plan, including but not limited to terms relating to eligibility, Offering Periods, Purchase Periods or Purchase Price.

2.DEFINITIONS

2.12.1        “Applicable Law” shall mean the legal requirements relating to the administration of an employee stock purchase plan under applicable Irish corporate laws, U.S. federal and applicable state laws (including the Code) and any stock exchange rules or regulations and the applicable laws governing the grant of options and the issuance of shares under an employee stock purchase plan in any country or jurisdiction where the Plan will be offered, as such laws, rules, regulations and requirements shall be in place from time to time.

2.2“Beneficial Owner” means the definition given in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

2.3“Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

2.4“Change of Control” shall mean the consummation or effectiveness of any of the following events:

(i)The sale, exchange, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation to a person or group of related persons, as such terms are defined or described in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act;

B-1

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


(ii)A merger, reorganization, recapitalization, consolidation or other similar transaction involving the Corporation in which the voting securities of the Corporation owned by the shareholders of the Corporation immediately prior to such transaction do not represent more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving controlling entity outstanding immediately after such transaction;

(iii)Any person or group of related persons, as such terms are defined or described in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting securities of the Corporation (including by way of merger, takeover (including an acquisition by means of a scheme of arrangement), consolidation or otherwise); or

(iv)During any period of two (2) consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board (together with any new directors whose election by such Board or whose nomination for election by the shareholders of the Corporation was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors of the Corporation then still in office, who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board then in office.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a restructuring of the Corporation for the purpose of changing the domicile of the Corporation (including, but not limited to, any change in the structure of the Corporation resulting from the process of moving its domicile between jurisdictions), reincorporation of the Corporation or other similar transaction involving the Corporation (a “Restructuring Transaction”)proxy will not constitutepreclude a Change of Control if, immediately aftermember from attending and voting at the Restructuring Transaction,meeting in person. In their discretion, the shareholders of the Corporation immediately priorproxies are authorized to such Restructuring Transaction represent, directly or indirectly, more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving entity.

2.5“Code” shall mean the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Any referenceherein to a section of the Codeherein shall beor United States Treasury Regulation thereunder shall include a reference to any successor or amended section of the Code or Treasury Regulations.

2.6“Committee” shall mean the committee appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 15 of the Plan.

2.7“Companies Act” shall mean the Companies Act 2014 of Ireland.

B-2

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


2.8“Compensation” shall mean an Employee’s base cash compensation and commissions, but shall exclude such items as allowances, differentials, bonuses or premiums such as those for working shifts or overtime, payments for incentive compensation, incentive payments, bonuses, income from the exercise, vesting and/or the sale, exchange or other disposition of a compensatory share award granted to the Employee by the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary, and other forms of extraordinary compensation. The Committee shall have the authority to determine and approve all forms of pay to be included in the definition of Compensation and may change the definition on a prospective basis.

2.9“Corporation” shall mean Seagate Technology plc, a public company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Ireland with limited liability under registered number 480010, or any successor thereto.

2.10“Designated Subsidiary” shall mean a Subsidiary that has been designated by the Committee in its sole discretion as eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to its Employees.

2.11“Effective Date” shall mean the date on which the registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act for the initial public offering of Seagate Technology common stock (the “Registration Statement”) became effective.

2.12“Employee” shall mean an individual classified as an employee (within the meaning of Code Section 3401(c) and the regulations thereunder) by the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary on the Corporation’s or such Designated Subsidiary’s payroll records. Individuals classified as independent contractors, consultants, advisers, or members of the Board or the board of directors of a Designated Subsidiary are not considered “Employees” by virtue of such station.

2.13“Exchange Act” shall mean the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2.14

“Fair Market Value” shall mean, as of any date of determination (i.e., an Offering Date or Purchase Date, as appropriate), the value of a Share determined as follows: (i) if the Ordinary Shares are listed on any established stock exchange (including the New York Stock Exchange) or traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be the closing per-share sales price of such Shares as reported on such date on the Composite Tape of the principal national securities exchange on which such Shares are listed or admitted to trading or, if no Composite Tape exists for

B-3

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


such national securities exchange on such date, then on the principal national securities exchange on which such Shares are listed or admitted to trading; or (ii) if the Shares are not listed or admitted to trading on a national securities exchange, then the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be determined in good faith by the Board, and, to the extent appropriate, based on the application of a reasonable valuation method. For purposes of the Offering Date under the first Offering Period, the Fair Market Value of a share of Seagate Technology common stock shall be the initial price to the public as set forth in the final prospectus included with the Registration Statement.

2.15“Offering Date” shall mean the first Trading Day of an Offering Period under the Plan; provided that the Offering Date of the first Offering Period will be the Effective Date.

2.16“Offering Period” shall mean a period of approximately twelve (12) monthsduring whichan optionoptions to purchase Ordinary Shares may be granted pursuant to the Planand may beexercised; provided, however, that effective for Offering Periods commencing on or after February 1, 2006, the term “Offering Period” shall mean a period of approximately six (6) months during which an option granted pursuant to the Plan may be exercised. For Offering Periods that commence prior to February 1, 2006, the Plan shall be implemented by a series of Offering Periods of approximately twelve (12) months duration, with new Offering Periods commencingon the first Trading Dayon or after February 1 and August 1 of each year and ending on the last Trading Day in the twelve month period ending on January 31 and July 31 of the subsequent year; provided that the first Offering Period shall commence on the Effective Date and shall end on the last Trading Day on or before January 31, 2004. Effective for Offering Periods that commence on or after February 1, 2006, the Plan shall be implemented by a series of Offering Periods of approximately six (6) months duration, with new Offering Periods commencingon the first Trading Dayon or after February 1 and August 1 of each year and ending on the last Trading Day in the six-month period ending on the next July 31 and January 31, respectivelypurchased on one or more Purchase Dates. The duration and timing of Offering Periods may be changed or modified by the Committee from time to time in accordance with Section 4.3.

2.17“Offering Price” shall mean the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Offering Date of an Offering Period.

2.18“Officer” shall mean a person who is an officer of the Corporation within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

B-4

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


2.19“Ordinary Share” or“Share” means an ordinary share of the Corporation, nominal value US$0.00001.

2.20“Participant” shall mean a participant in the Plan as described in Section 5 of the Plan.

2.21“Plan” shall mean this Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated.

2.22“Purchase Date” shall mean the last Trading Day of each Purchase Period.

2.23“Purchase Period” shall mean, with respect to Offering Periods that commence on prior to February 1, 2006, the period of approximately six (6) months commencing after one Purchase Date and ending with the next Purchase Date, with new Purchase Periods commencing on the first Trading Day on or after February 1 and August 1 of each year and ending on the last Trading Day in the six-month period ending on the next July 31 and January 31, respectively; provided that the first Purchase Period shall commence on the Effective Date and shall end at the completion of the seventh complete calendar month following the Effective Date unless otherwise determined by the Committee. The second Purchase Period of the first Offering Period shall begin on the first Trading Day following the end of the first Purchase Period and shall end on the last Trading Day on or before January 31, 2004. Subsequent Purchase Periods, if any, shall run consecutively after the termination of the preceding Purchase Period. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, effective for Offering Periods that commence on or after February 1, 2006, “Purchase Period” shall have the same meaning as the term “Offering Period.” The duration and timing of Purchase Periods may be changed or modified by the Committee from time to time. one or more periods within an Offering Period as may be specified by the Committee in accordance with Section 4.3.

2.24“Purchase Price” shall have the meaning set out in Section 8.2.

2.25“Securities Act” shall mean the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

2.26“Shareowner” shall mean a record holder of Ordinary Shares entitled to vote such Shares under the Corporation’s by-laws.

2.27“Subsidiary” shall mean any entity treated as a corporation (other than the Corporation) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Corporation, within the meaning of Code Section 424(f), whether or not such corporation now exists or is hereafter organized or acquired by the Corporation or a Subsidiary, which is also a subsidiary within the meaning of Section 155 of the Companies Act.

B-5

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


2.28“Trading Day” shall mean a day on which U.S. national stock exchanges and the national market system are open for trading and the Ordinary Shares are being publicly traded on one or more of such exchanges or markets.

3.ELIGIBILITY

3.1        Any individual who is an Employee on an Offering Date shall be eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to the Offering Period commencing on such Offering Date. The Committee may establish administrative rules requiring that an individual be an Employee for some minimum period (not to exceed 30 days) prior to an Offering Date to be eligible to participate with respect to the Offering Period beginning on that Offering Date.

3.2        The Committee may determine that a designated group of highly compensated Employees is ineligible to participate in the Plan so long as the excluded category fits within the definition of “highly compensated employee” in Code Section 414(q).

3.3        No Employee may participate in the Plan if immediately after an option is granted the Employee owns or is considered to own (within the meaning of Code Section 424(d)) Ordinary Shares, including Shares which the Employee may purchase by conversion of convertible securities or under outstanding options granted by the Corporation, possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of securities of the Corporation or of any of its Subsidiaries.

3.4        Employees who are citizens or residents of a non-U.S. jurisdiction (without regard to whether they also are citizens or residents of the United States or resident aliens within the meaning of Section 7701(b)(1)(A) of the Code) may be excluded from participation in the Plan if the participation of such Employees is prohibited under the laws of the applicable jurisdiction or if complying with the laws of the applicable jurisdiction would cause the Plan to violate Code Section 423 (or to the extent permitted under Code Section 423). In the case of anysub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan adopted pursuant to Section 16 which is not designed to qualify under Code Section 423, Employees may be excluded from participation in the Plan if the Committee has determined that participation of such Employees is not advisable or practicable.

3.5        All Employees who participate in the Planor in any separate offering thereunder shall have the same rights and privileges under the Plan or offering, except for differences that may be mandated bylocal lawApplicable Law and that are consistent with Code Section 423(b)(5); provided that individuals participating in asub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan adopted pursuant to Section 16which is not designed to

B-6

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


qualify under Code Section 423need not have the same rights and privileges as Employees participating in theCode Section 423 Plan.

3.6        Employees may not participate in more than one Offering Period at a time.

4.OFFERING PERIODS AND PURCHASE PERIODS

4.1       Offering Periods. With respect to Offering Periods commencing prior to February 1, 2006, the Plan shall generally be implemented by a series of twelve (12) month Offering Periods with new Offering Periods commencing on the first Trading Day on or after February 1 and August 1 and ending on the last Trading Day in the twelve month periods ending on January 31 and July 31 of the next calendar year, respectively, or on such other datebusiness as may properly come before the Committee shall determine. The first Offering Period shall commencemeeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. You can instruct your proxy not to vote on the Effective Date and shall end on the last Trading Day on or before January 31, 2004. With respect to Offering Periods commencing on or after February 1, 2006, the Plan shall generally be implementeda resolution by a series of six (6) month Offering Periods with new Offering Periods commencing on the first Trading Day on or after February 1 and August 1 and ending on the last Trading Dayinserting an”x” in the six-month periods ending onbox under “Abstain”. Please note that an abstention is not a vote in law and will not be counted in the next July 31 and January 31, respectively, or on such other date as the Committee shall determine, and continuing thereafter until the Plan is terminated pursuant to Section 14 hereof. The Committee shall have the authority to change the frequency and/or duration of Offering Periods (including the commencement dates thereof)with respect to future offeringsif such change is announced at least five (5) days prior to the scheduled beginningcalculation of the first Offering Period to be affected thereafterin accordance with Section 4.3.

4.2       Purchase Periods. With respect to Offering Periods commencing prior to February 1, 2006, each Offering Period shall generally consist of two (2) consecutive Purchase Periods of six (6) months’ duration, with new Purchase Periods commencing on the first Trading Day on or after February 1 and August 1 of each year and ending on the last Trading Day in the six-month period endingon the next July 31 and January 31, respectively. With respect to Offering Periods commencing on or after February 1, 2006, each Offering Period shall generally consist of one(1) Purchase Period that runs concurrently with the Offering Period. The last Trading Day of each Purchase Period shall be the “Purchase Date” for such Purchase Period; provided that the first Purchase Period shall commence on the Effective Date and shall end at the completionproportion of the seventh complete calendar month following the Effective Date unless otherwise determined by the Committee. The second Purchase Period of the first Offering Period shall begin on the first Trading Day following the end of the first Purchase Period and shall end on the last Trading Day on or before January 31, 2004. Subsequent Purchase Periods, if any, shall run consecutively after the termination of the preceding Purchase Period. The Committee shall have the power to change the

B-7

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


duration and/or frequency of Purchase Periods with respect to future purchasesinaccordance with Section 4.3.

4.3Changes to Offering Periods and Purchase Periods.   The Committee will have the authority to establish additional or alternative sequential or overlapping Offering Periods than specified under Section 4.1, a different number of Purchase Periods within an Offering Period than specified under Section 4.2, a different durationvotes for one or more Offering Periods or Purchase Periods or different commencement or ending dates for such Offering Periodswith respect to future offeringswithout shareholder approval if such change is announced at least five (5) days prior to the scheduled beginning of the firstPurchaseOffering Period to be affected.thereafter, provided, however, that no Offering Period may have a duration exceeding twenty-seven (27) months. In addition, to the extent that the Committee establishes overlapping Offering Periods with more than one Purchase Period in each Offering Period, the Committee will have discretion to structure an Offering Period so that if the Fair Market Value of the Ordinary Shares on any Purchase Date within an Offering Period is less than or equal to the Fair Market Value of the Ordinary Shareson the first Trading Dayof that Offering Period, then (i) that Offering Period will terminate immediately as of that first Trading Day, and (ii) the Participants in such terminated Offering Period will be automatically enrolled in a new Offering Period beginningon the first Trading Dayof such new Purchase Period.

5.PARTICIPATION

4.4Separate Offerings.  Unless otherwise specified by the Committee, each offering of the Plan to Employees of the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary shall be deemed a separate offering for purposes of Section 423 of the Code, even if the dates and other terms of the applicable Offering Periods of each such offering are identical, and the provisions of the Plan will separately apply to each such separate offering. With respect to the 423 Plan, the terms of separate offerings need not be identical provided that the terms of the Plan and each separate offering together satisfy Section 423 of the Code.

5.PARTICIPATION

5.1        AnEmployee who is eligible to participate inthe Plan in accordance withits terms at the beginning of an Offering Period shall automatically receive an option in accordance with Section 8.1 and may become a Participant by completing and submitting, on or before the date prescribed by the Committee with respect to a given Offering Period, a completed payroll deduction authorization and Plan enrollment form provided by the Corporation or by following an electronic or other enrollment process as prescribed by the Committee. Aneligible Employee may authorize payroll deductions at the rate of any whole percentage of the Employee’s Compensation, not to exceed ten percent (10%) (or such other percentage as the

B-8

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


Committee may establish from time to time before an Offering Date) of such Employee’s Compensation on each payday during the Offering Period. All payroll deductions will be held in a general corporate account or a trust account, unless otherwise required bylocal lawApplicable Law. No interest shall be paid or credited to the Participant with respect to such payroll deductions, unless otherwise required bylocal lawApplicable Law. The Corporation shall maintain a separate bookkeeping account for each Participant under the Plan and the amount of each Participant’s payroll deductions shall be credited to such account. A Participant may not make any additional payments into such account, unless payroll deductions are prohibited underlocal lawApplicable Law, in which case the provisions of Section 5.25.3 of the Plan shall apply.

5.2Once an Employee becomes a Participant in an Offering Period, then such Participant will automatically participate in each subsequent Offering Period commencing immediately following the last day of such prior Offering Period at the same contribution level unless the Participant withdraws from the Offering Period asset forth in Section 5.4 below or otherwise changes his or her rate of contribution as set forth in Section 5.5 below. A Participant that is automatically enrolled in a subsequent Offering Period pursuant to this Section 5.2 is (i) not required to file any additional enrollment form in order to continue participation in the Plan and (ii) will be deemed to have accepted the terms and conditions of the Plan, any Non-423 Sub-Plan and enrollment form in effect at the time each subsequent Offering Period begins, subject to Participant’s right to withdraw fromthe Plan in accordance withthe withdrawal procedures in effect at the time.

5.25.3    Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan to the contrary, in locations wherelocal lawApplicable Law prohibits payroll deductions, an eligible Employee may elect to participate through contributions to his or her account under the Plan in a form acceptable to the Committee. In such event, any such Employees shall be deemed to be participating in asub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan, unless the Committee otherwise expressly provides that such Employees shall be treated as participating in the Plan or a separate offering thereunder.

5.35.4   Under procedures and at times established by the Committee, a Participant may withdraw from the Plan during a Purchase Period, by completing and filing a new payroll deduction authorization and Plan enrollment form with the Corporation or by following electronic or other procedures prescribed by the Committee. If a Participant withdraws from the Plan during a Purchase Period, his or her accumulated payroll deductions will be refunded to the Participant without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law), his or her right to participate in the current Offering Period will be automatically terminated and no further payroll deductions for the purchase of Ordinary Shares will be made during the Offering Period. The Committee may establish rules pertaining to the timing of withdrawals,

B-9

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


limiting the frequency with which Participants may withdraw and re-enroll in the Plan and may impose a waiting period on Participants wishing to re-enroll following withdrawal.

5.45.5    A Participant may change his or her rate of contribution through payroll deductions only during an open enrollment period or such other times specified by the Committee by filing a new payroll deduction authorization and Plan enrollment form or by following electronic or other procedures prescribed by the Committee. If a Participant has not followed such procedures to change the rate of contribution, the rate of contribution shall continue at the originally elected rate throughout the Purchase Period and future Purchase Periods (including Purchase Periods of subsequent Offering Periods). Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 423(b)(8) of the Code, the Committee may reduce a Participant’s payroll deductions to zero percent (0%) at any time during a Purchase Period scheduled to end during the current calendar year. Payroll deductions shall re-commence at the rate provided in such Participant’s enrollment form at the beginning of the first Purchase Period which is scheduled to end in the following calendar year, unless terminated by the Participant as provided in Section 5.35.4.

6.TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT; CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT

6.1       Termination.  In the event any Participant terminates employment with the Corporation and its Designated Subsidiaries for any reason (including death) prior to the expiration of a Purchase Period, the Participant’s participation in the Plan shall terminate and all amounts credited to the Participant’s account shall be paid to the Participant or, in the case of death, to theParticipant’sParticipant’s heirs or estate, without interest. Whether a termination of employment has occurred shall be determined by the Committee.IfNotwithstanding the foregoing, if a Participant’s termination of employment occurs within a certain period of time as specified by the Committee (not to exceed 30 days) prior to the Purchase Date of the Purchase Period then in progress, his or her option for the purchase of Ordinary Shares will be exercised on such Purchase Date in accordance with Section 9 as if such Participant were still employed by the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary. Following the purchase of Shares on such Purchase Date, the Participant’s participation in the Plan shall terminate and all remaining amounts credited to the Participant’s account shall be paid to the Participant or, in the case of death, to theParticipant’sParticipant’s heirs or estate, without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law).

6.2       Leaves of Absence.  The Committee may also establish rules regarding when leaves of absence or changes of employment status will be considered to be a termination of employment, and the Committee may establish termination of employment procedures for this Plan that are independent of similar rules

B-10

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


established under other benefit plans of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries, provided, however, that such procedures are not in conflict with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code.

6.3       Transfers.  If a Participant transfers employment between the Corporation and a Designated Subsidiary participating in the 423 Plan (as set forth in Appendix A to the Plan) or between Designated Subsidiaries participating in the 423 Plan, his or her participation in the Plan shall continue unless and until otherwise terminated in accordance with the Plan. Similarly, if a Participant transfers employment between Designated Subsidiaries participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan (as set forth in Appendix A to the Plan), his or her participation in the Plan shall continue unless and until otherwise terminated in accordance with the Plan.

If a Participant transfers employment from the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary participating in the 423 Plan to a Designated Subsidiary participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan, his or her participation in the Plan shall continue, provided, however, that such participation will be under the applicable Non-423 Sub-Plan as of the date of such transfer and all of the Participant’s accumulated payroll deductions (whether taken while the Participant was employed by the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary participating in the 423 Plan or while the Participant is employed by a Designated Subsidiary participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan) shall be used to purchase Shares under the applicable Non-423 Sub-Plan, subject to the Participant’s right to withdraw from the Plan in accordance with the withdrawal procedures in effect at such time.

If a Participant transfers employment from a Designated Subsidiary participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan to the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary participating in the 423 Plan, any accumulated payroll deductions taken while the Participant was employed by a Designated Subsidiary participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan shall be used to purchase Shares under the applicable Non-423 Sub-Plan on the next Purchase Date following such transfer; however, no new payroll deductions shall be taken for the remainder of the Purchase Period in which the transfer occurs, and as of the next Offering Date following such transfer, the Participant shall participate in the 423 Plan and payroll deductions shall automatically resume and be used to purchase Shares under the 423 Plan, subject to the Participant’s right to withdraw from the Plan in accordance with the withdrawal procedures in effect at such time.

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 6.3, the Committee may establish additional and/or different rules to govern transfers of employment among the Corporation and any Designated Subsidiary, consistent with any applicable requirements of Code Section 423 and the terms of the Plan.

B-11

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


7.SHARES

Subject to adjustment as set forth in Section 11, the maximum number of Ordinary Shares, which may be issued pursuant to the Plan shall be fifty million (50,000,000) Shares. Subject to adjustment as set forth in Section 11, the maximum number of Shares that may be granted collectively to all Participants within any given Purchase Period is one and one-half million (1,500,000) Shares, unless and until the Board determines otherwise with respect to a Purchase Period. If, on a given Purchase Date, the number of Shares with respect to which options are to be exercised exceeds either maximum, the Corporation shall make pro rata allocation of the Shares remaining available for purchase in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall determine to be equitable. The Shares subject to the Plan may be unissued Shares or reacquired Shares, bought on the market or otherwise. For avoidance of doubt, up to the maximum number of Ordinary Shares reserved under this Section 7 may be used to satisfy purchases of Ordinary Shares under the 423 Plan and any remaining portion of such maximum number of Ordinary Shares may be used to satisfy purchases of Ordinary Shares under any Non-423 Sub-Plans.

8.OFFERING

8.1        On the Offering Date of each Offering Period, each eligible Employee, whether or not such Employee has elected to participate as provided in Section 5.1, participating in the Plan shall be granted an option to purchase that number of whole Shares, not to exceed one thousand (1,000) Shares (or such other number of Shares as determined by the Committee and subject to adjustmentas set forth in Section 11), which may be purchased with the payroll deductions accumulated on behalf of such Employee during each Purchase Period at the purchase price specified in Section 8.2 below, subject to the additional limitation that no Employee participating in the Section 423 Plan shall be granted an option to purchase Shares under the Plan if such option would permit his or her rights to purchase Shares under all employee stock purchase plans (described in Section 423 of the Code) of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries to accrue at a rate which exceeds U.S. twenty-five thousand dollars (U.S. $25,000) of the Fair Market Value of such Shares (determined at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time. For purposes of the Plan, an option is “granted” on a Participant’s Offering Date. An option will expire upon the earlier to occur of (i) the termination of a Participant’s participation in the Plan or such Offering Period, (ii) the grant of an option to such Participant on a subsequent Offering Date, or (iii) the termination of the Offering Period. This Section 8.1 shall be interpreted so as to comply with Code Section 423(b)(8).

8.2        The Purchase Price under each option shall be with respect to a Purchase Period the lower of (i) a percentage (not less than eighty-five percent (85%))

B-12

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


established by the Committee (Designated Percentage) of the Offering Price, or (ii) the Designated Percentage of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Purchase Date on which the Shares are purchased; provided that the Purchase Price may be adjusted by the Committee pursuant to Sections 11 or 12 in accordance with Section 424(a) of the Code. The Committee may change the Designated Percentage with respect to any future Offering Period, but not to below eighty-five percent (85%), and the Committee may determine with respect to any prospective Offering Period that the purchase price shall be the Designated Percentage of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Purchase Date.

9.PURCHASE OF SHARES

Unless a Participant withdraws from the Plan as provided in Section 5.35.4 or except as provided in Sections 12 or 14 hereof, on the last Trading Day of each Purchase Period, a Participant’s option shall be exercised automatically for the purchase of that number of whole Shares which the accumulated payroll deductions credited to the Participant’s account at that time shall purchase at the applicable price specified in Section 8.2.

At the time the Shares are purchased or at the time some or all of the Shares issued under the Plan are disposed of (or at any other time that a taxable event related to the Plan occurs), the Participant must make adequate provision for any withholding obligation of the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary with respect to federal, state, local and foreign income tax, social insurance, payroll tax, fringe benefits tax, payment on account or other tax-related items related to participation in the Plan and legally applicable to the Participant (including any amount deemed by the Committee, in its sole discretion, to be an appropriate charge to Participant even if legally applicable to the Corporation or the Participant’s employer). At any time, the Corporation or the Participant’s employer may withhold from the Participant’s wages or other cash compensation the amount necessary for the Corporation or the Participant’s employer to meet applicable withholding obligations, including any withholding required to make available to the Corporation or the Participant’s employer any tax deductions or benefits attributable to the sale or early disposition of the Shares by the Participant. In addition or in the alternative, the Corporation or the Participant’s employer may withhold from the proceeds of the sale of Shares or by any other method of withholding the Corporation or the Participant’s employer deems appropriate.

10.PAYMENT AND DELIVERY

As soon as practicable after the exercise of an option, the Corporation shall deliver to the Participant a record of the Ordinary Shares purchased and the balance of any amount of payroll deductions credited to the Participant’s account not used for the

B-13

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


purchase, except as specified below. The Committee may permit or require that Shares be deposited directly with a broker designated by the Committee or to a designated agent of the Corporation, and the Committee may utilize electronic or automated methods of share transfer. The Committee may require that Shares be retained with such broker or agent for a designated period of time and/or may establish other procedures to permit tracking of the disposition of such Shares. The Corporation shall retain the amount of payroll deductions used to purchase Shares as full payment for the Shares and the Shares shall then be fully paid and non-assessable. No Participant shall have any voting, dividend or other Shareowner rights with respect to Shares subject to any option granted under the Plan until the Shares subject to the option have been purchased and delivered to the Participant as provided in this Section 10. The Committee may in its discretion direct the Corporation to retain in a Participant’s account for the subsequent Purchase Period or Offering Period any payroll deductions which are not sufficient to purchase a whole Share or return such amount to the Participant. Any other amounts that may be left over in a Participant’s account after a Purchase Date shall be returned to the Participant.

11.RECAPITALIZATION

Subject to any required action by the Shareowners of the Corporation, if there is any change in the outstanding Ordinary Shares because of a merger, consolidation, spin-off, reincorporation, reorganization, recapitalization, dividend in property other than cash, share split, reverse share split, share dividend, liquidating dividend, extraordinary dividend or distribution, combination, exchange or reclassification of the Ordinary Shares (including any such change in the number of Shares effected in connection with a change in domicile of the Corporation), change in corporate structure or any other increase or decrease in the number of Ordinary Shares, or other transaction effected without receipt of consideration by the Corporation, provided that conversion of any convertible securities of the Corporation shall not be deemed to have been “effected without consideration,” the number of securities covered by each option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised and the number of securities which have been authorized and remain available for issuance under the Plan, as well as the maximum number of securities which may be purchased by a single Participant and by all Participants in the aggregate in a given Purchase Period, and the price per share covered by each option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised, may be appropriately adjusted by the Board, and the Board shall take any further actions which, in the exercise of its discretion, may be necessary or appropriate under the circumstances. The Board’s determinations under this Section 11 shall be conclusive and binding on all parties.

B-14

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


12.LIQUIDATION AND CHANGE OF CONTROL

12.1      In the event of the proposed liquidation or dissolution of the Corporation, the Offering Period will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed transaction, unless otherwise provided by the Board in its sole discretion, and all outstanding options shall automatically terminate and the amounts of all payroll deductions will be refunded without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law) to the Participants.

12.2      In the event of a Change of Control, then in the sole discretion of the Board, (1) each option shall be assumed or an equivalent option shall be substituted by the successor corporation or parent or subsidiary of such successor entity, (2) a date established by the Board on or before the date of consummation of such Change of Control shall be treated as a Purchase Date, and all outstanding options shall be exercised on such date, (3) all outstanding options shall terminate and the accumulated payroll deductions will be refunded without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law) to the Participants, or (4) outstanding options shall continue unchanged.

13.TRANSFERABILITY

Neither payroll deductions credited to a Participant’s bookkeeping account nor any rights to exercise an option or to receive Shares under the Plan may be voluntarily or involuntarily assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise disposed of in any way, and any attempted assignment, transfer, pledge, or other disposition shall be null and void and without effect. If a Participant in any manner attempts to transfer, assign or otherwise encumber his or her rights or interests under the Plan, other than as permitted by the Code, such act shall be treated as an election by the Participant to discontinue participation in the Plan pursuant to Section 5.35.4.

14.AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN

14.1      The Plan shall continue until terminated in accordance with Section 14.2.

14.2      The Board may, in its sole discretion, insofar as permitted by Applicable Law, terminate or suspend the Plan, or revise or amend it in any respect whatsoever, except that, without approval of the Shareowners, no such revision or amendment shall increase the number of Shares subject to the Plan, other than an adjustment under Section 11 of the Plan, or make other changes for which Shareowner approval is required under Applicable Law. Upon a termination or suspension of the Plan, the Board may in its discretion (i) return, without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law), the payroll deductions credited to Participants’ accounts to such Participants, or (ii) set an earlier Purchase Date with respect to an Offering Period and Purchase Period then in progress.

B-15

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


15.ADMINISTRATION

15.1      The Board or the Compensation Committee shall appoint a committee of one or more individuals to administer the Plan (the “Committee”), which, unless otherwise specified by the Board, shall consist of the members of the Corporation’s BenefitsandAdministrative Committee, as constituted from time to time in accordance with its charter, and generally made up of senior members of management from the Corporation’s Legal, Finance and Human Resources functions. The Committee will serve for such period of time as the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board may specify and whom the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board may remove at any time. The Committee will have the authority and responsibility for the day-to-day administration of the Plan, the authority and responsibility specifically provided in this Plan and any additional duty, responsibility and authority delegated to the Committee by the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Committee shall have full power and authority to adopt, amend and rescind any rules and regulations which it deems desirable and appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan, to construe and interpret the provisions and supervise the administration of the Plan, todesignate separate offerings under the Plan, to make factual determinations relevant to Plan entitlements and to take all action in connection with administration of the Plan as it deems necessary or advisable, consistent with the delegation from the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Committee may delegate to one or more individuals the day-to-day administration of the Plan, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law. The Board, the Compensation Committee of the Board and the Committee reserve the right to administer the Plan, to the extent such right otherwise exists, regardless of any delegation of authority such body may have previously made. Decisions of the Board, the Compensation Committee of the Board and the Committee, as applicable, shall be final and binding upon all participants. The Corporation shall pay all expenses incurred in the administration of the Plan.

15.2      In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or officers or employees of the Corporation and subject to section 200 of the Companies Act, members of the Board and of the Committee shall be indemnified by the Corporation against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan, or any right granted under the Plan, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Corporation) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct in duties;

B-16

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


provided, however, that within sixty (60) days after the institution of such action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Corporation, in writing, the opportunity at its own expense to handle and defend the same.

16.COMMITTEE RULES FOR FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS

The Committee may adopt rules or procedures relating to the operation and administration of the Plan to accommodate the specific requirements oflocal lawsApplicable Laws and procedures. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee is specifically authorized to adopt rules and procedures regarding handling of payroll deductions or other contributions by Participants, establishment of bank or trust accounts to hold payroll deductions or other contributions, payment of interest, conversion of local currency, payroll tax, withholding procedures and handling of share certificates which vary with local requirements; however, if such varying provisions are not in accordance with the provisions of Section 423(b) of the Code, including but not limited to the requirement of Section 423(b)(5) of the Code that all options granted under the Plan shall have the same rights and privileges unless otherwise provided under the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, then the individuals affected by such varying provisions shall be deemed to be participating under asub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan and not the423 Plan. The Committee mayalsoadoptsub-plansNon-423 Sub-Plans applicable to particular Subsidiaries or locations,which sub-plans may be designed to be outside thescope of Code Section 423. Thethe rules ofsuch sub-planswhich may take precedence over other provisions of this Plan, with the exception of Section 7, but unless otherwise superseded by the terms of such sub-plan, the provisions of this Plan shall govern the operation of suchsub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan.

17.SECURITIES LAWS REQUIREMENTS

17.1      No option granted under the Plan may be exercised to any extent unless the Shares to be issued upon such exercise under the Plan are covered by an effective registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act and the Plan is in material compliance with all applicable provisions of law, domestic or foreign, including, without limitation, the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, applicable state and foreign securities laws and the requirements of any stock exchange upon which the Shares may then be listed, subject to the approval of counsel for the Corporation with respect to such compliance. If on a Purchase Date in any Offering Period hereunder, the Plan is not so registered or in such compliance, options granted under the Plan which are not in compliance shall not be exercised on such Purchase Date, and the Purchase Date shall be delayed until the Plan is subject to such an effective registration statement and such compliance, except that the Purchase Date shall not be delayed more than twelve (12) months and the Purchase Date shall in no event be more than twenty-

B-17

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


seven (27) months from the Offering Date. If, on the Purchase Date of any offering hereunder, as delayed to the maximum extent permissible, the Plan is not registered and in such compliance, options granted under the Plan which are not in compliance shall not be exercised and all payroll deductions accumulated during the Offering Period (reduced to the extent, if any, that such deductions have been used to acquire Shares) shall be returned to the Participants, without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law). The provisions of this Section 17 shall comply with the requirements of Section 423(b)(5) of the Code to the extent applicable.

17.2      As a condition to the exercise of an option, the Corporation may require the person exercising such option to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the Shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Corporation, such a representation is required by any of the aforementioned provisions of Applicable Law.

18.GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS

This Plan and theCorporation’sCorporation’s obligation to sell and deliver Ordinary Shares under the Plan shall be subject to the approval of any governmental authority required in connection with the Plan or the authorization, issuance, sale, or delivery of Shares hereunder.

19.NO ENLARGEMENT OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS

Nothing contained in this Plan shall be deemed to give any Employee or other individual the right to be retained in the employ or service of the Corporation or any Designated Subsidiary or to interfere with the right of the Corporation or Designated Subsidiary to discharge any Employee or other individual at any time, for any reason or no reason, with or without notice.

20.GOVERNING LAW

This Plan shall be governed by applicable laws of the State of California, without regard to such state’s conflict of laws rules.

21.EFFECTIVE DATE

This Planshall bebecame effective on the Effective Date, subject to approval of the Shareowners of the Corporation within twelve (12) months before or after its date of adoption by the Board., which approval was obtained on December 3, 2002. The Plan, as most recently amended and restated, was adopted by the Board on July 25, 2017, subject to approval of the Shareowners of the Corporation within twelve (12) months after such date.

B-18

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


22.REPORTS

Individual accounts shall be maintained for each Participant in the Plan. Statements of account shall be given or made available to Participants at least annually.

23.DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY FOR OWNED SHARES

With respect to Ordinary Shares purchased by the Participant pursuant to the Plan and held in an account maintained by the Corporation or its assignee on theParticipant’sParticipant’s behalf, the Participant may be permitted to file a written designation of beneficiary, who is to receive any Shares and cash, if any, from the Participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such Participant’s death subsequent to the end of a Purchase Period but prior to delivery to him or her of such Shares and cash. In addition, a Participant may be permitted to file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any cash from the Participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such Participant’s death prior to the Purchase Date of an Offering Period. If a Participant is married and the designated beneficiary is not the spouse, spousal consent shall be required for such designation to be effective, to the extent required bylocal lawApplicable Law. The Participant (and if required under the preceding sentence, his or her spouse) may change such designation of beneficiary at any time by written notice. Subject tolocal legal requirementsApplicable Law (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion), in the event of a Participant’s death, the Corporation or its assignee shall deliver any Shares and/or cash to the designated beneficiary. Subject tolocal lawApplicable Law (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion), in the event of the death of a Participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated who is living at the time of such Participant’s death, the Corporation shall deliver such Shares and/or cash to the executor or administrator of the estate of the Participant, or if no such executor or administrator has been appointed (to the knowledge of the Corporation), the Corporation in its sole discretion, may deliver (or cause its assignee to deliver) such Shares and/or cash to the spouse, or to any one or more dependents or relatives of the Participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known to the Corporation, then to such other person as the Corporation may determine. The provisions of this Section 23 shall in no event require the Corporation to violatelocal lawApplicable Law, and the Corporation shall be entitled to take whatever action it reasonably concludes is desirable or appropriate in order to transfer the assets allocated to a deceased Participant’s account in compliance withlocal lawApplicable Law.

24.ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS OFRULE 16b-3

The terms and conditions of options granted hereunder to, and the purchase of Ordinary Shares by, persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act shall comply with the applicable provisions of Rule16b-3. This Plan shall be deemed to contain,

B-19

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


and such options shall contain, and the Shares issued upon exercise thereof shall be subject to, such additional conditions and restrictions, if any, as may be required by Rule16b-3 to qualify for the maximum exemption from Section 16 of the Exchange Act with respect to Plan transactions.

25.NOTICES

All notices or other communications by a Participant to the Corporation under or in connection with the Plan shall be deemed to have been duly given when received in the form specified by the Corporation at the location, or by the person, designated by the Corporation for the receipt thereof.

26.CODE SECTION 409A AND 457A; TAX QUALIFICATION

26.1Code Sections 409A and 457A. Options granted under the 423 Plan are exempt from the application of Section 409A and Section 457A of the Code. In furtherance of the foregoing and notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, if the Committee determines that an option granted under the Plan may be subject to Section 409A or Section 457A of the Code or that any provision in the Plan would cause an option under the Plan to be subject to Section 409A or Section 457A of the Code, the Committee may amend the terms of the Plan and/or of an outstanding option granted under the Plan, or take such other action the Committee determines is necessary or appropriate, in each case, without the Participant’s consent, to exempt any outstanding option or future option that may be granted under the Plan from or to allow any such options to comply with Section 409A or Section 457A of the Code, but only to the extent any such amendments or action by the Committee would not violate Section 409A or Section 457A of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation shall not have any obligation to indemnify or otherwise protect the Participant from any obligation to pay any taxes, interest or penalties pursuant to Section 409A or 457A of the Code. The Corporation makes no representation that any option to purchase Ordinary Shares under the Plan is compliant with Section 409A or Section 457A of the Code.

26.2Tax Qualification.  Although the Corporation may endeavor to (i) qualify an option for favorable tax treatment under the laws of the United States or jurisdictions outside of the United States or (ii) avoid adverse tax treatment (e.g., under Section 409A of the Code), the Corporation makes no representation to that effect and expressly disavows any covenant to maintain favorable or avoid unfavorable tax treatment, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, including Section 27.1 hereof. The Corporation shall be unconstrained in its corporate activities without regard to the potential negative tax impact on Participants under the Plan.

B-20

(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)


APPENDIX A

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS

423 Plan

Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc.

Seagate US LLC

Seagate Cloud Systems, Inc.

Lyve Minds, Inc.

Seagate Federal, Inc.

Seagate Systems (US) Inc. (US employees)

Countries Covered by Non-423 Sub-Plan for Contractors (See Appendix B)

Turkey

Non-423 Sub-Plan (See Appendix C)

Seagate Technology Australia Pty. Limited

Seagate Technology Canada Inc.

Seagate Technology SAS

Seagate Technology GmbH

Seagate Technology HDD (India) Private Limited

Seagate Technology (Hong Kong) Limited

Seagate Technology Manufacturing (Hong Kong) Limited

Seagate Technology (Ireland)

Nippon Seagate Inc.

Seagate Technology (Netherlands) B.V.

Seagate Technology AB

Seagate Technology Taiwan Ltd.

Seagate Technology UK Ltd. (including Dublin branch)

Seagate Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.

Seagate Technology International (Wuxi) Co. Ltd.

Penang Seagate Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd.

Seagate International (Johor) Sdn. Bhd.

Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd.

Seagate Technology International, Singapore Branch

Seagate Technology (Thailand) Limited

Seagate Technology Services (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Seagate Global Business Services (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

Dot Hill Singapore Pte. Ltd.

Dot Hill Systems Services (Foshan) Limited

Seagate Cloud Systems Japan Ltd.

Dot Hill Systems Germany GmbH

LaCie SPRL

LaCie Group S.A.S.

LaCie SAS

LaCie AB

LaCie GmbH

LaCie Electronique D2, S.A.

LaCie AG

LaCie Ltd. (UK employees)

Seagate Systems (Canada) Limited

Seagate Systems (Mexico) S.A. de C.V.

Seagate Systems (UK) Limited

Seagate Systems (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.

Seagate Systems (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

APPENDIX B

SUBPLAN UNDER THE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

1.Purpose.   The purpose of this subplan under the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Subplan”) is to permit eligible contract workers who perform work for the Corporation (any one such individual a “Contractor,” and collectively, “Contractors”) in the countries designated from time to time by the Committee in its sole discretion and listed on Appendix A to the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) to participate in the Plan.

2.Terms of the Subplan.   The terms and conditions of the Subplan shall in all respects be identical to those set forth in the Plan except as set forth in this Subplan; provided, however, that the Subplan shall not be subject to the requirements of Section 423(b)(5) of the Code. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Subplan shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Plan.

3.Definition of Employee.   For purposes of the Subplan, references to Employees in the Plan shall include Contractors.

4.Subplan Countries.   The Committee shall have the authority in its sole discretion to amend the list of countries designated by the Committee and listed on Appendix A to the Plan as necessary and desirable and for such amendments to take effect as shall be determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion.

5.Terms of the Plan.   Except as set forth above, Contractors who participate under the Plan shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan.

APPENDIX C

SUBPLAN UNDER THE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES

1.Purpose.   The purpose of this subplan under the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Subplan”) is to set forth requirements with respect to the participation by eligible Employees employed outside of the United States at Seagate Technology Australia Pty. Limited, Seagate Technology Canada Inc., Seagate Technology SAS, Seagate Technology GmbH, Seagate Technology HDD (India) Private Limited, Seagate Technology(Hong Kong) Limited, Seagate TechnologyManufacturing (Hong Kong) Limited, Seagate Technology (Ireland), Nippon Seagate Inc., Seagate Technology (Netherlands) B.V., Seagate Technology AB, Seagate Technology Taiwan Ltd., Seagate Technology UK Ltd. (including the Dublin branch), Seagate Technology (Suzhou) Co. Ltd., Seagate Technology International (Wuxi) Co. Ltd., Penang Seagate Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd., Seagate International (Johor) Sdn. Bhd., Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd., Seagate TechnologyInternational (Singapore Branch), Seagate Technology(Thailand) Limited, Seagate Technology Services (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Seagate Global Business Services (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Dot Hill Singapore Pte. Ltd., DotHill Systems Services (Foshan) Limited, DotSeagate Cloud Systems Japan Ltd., Dot Hill Systems Germany GmbH, LaCie SPRL, LaCie Group S.A.S., LaCie SAS, LaCie AB, LaCie GmbH, LaCie Electronique D2, S.A., LaCie AG, LaCie Ltd. (UK employees), Seagate Systems (Canada) Limited, Seagate Systems (Mexico) S.A. de C.V., Seagate Systems (UK) Limited, Seagate Systems (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd. and Seagate Systems (Singapore) Pte Ltd., in the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”).

2.Terms of the Subplan.   Except as set forth in this Subplan, the terms and conditions of the Subplan shall in all respects be identical to those set forth in the Plan; provided, however, that the Subplan shall not be subject to the requirements of Section 423(b)(5) of the Code. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Subplan shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Plan.

3.Eligibility.   Employees of Seagate Technology UK Ltd. (“Seagate UK”) or any branch office of Seagate UK who are located in Russia shall not be eligible to participate in the Plan.

LOGO

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

38/39 FITZWILLIAM SQUARE

DUBLIN 2, IRELAND

resolution. VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 6:59 PM Eastern Time on October 17, 2017.21, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web sitewebsite and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials, including notices of shareholder meetings, electronically in future years.

SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 6:59 PM Eastern Time on October 17, 2017.21, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, which must be received by October 17, 2017.21, 2020.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E31920-P96669KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC (the “Company”)  Any shareholder entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders may appoint one or more proxies, who need not be a shareholder(s) of the Company. A proxy is required to vote in accordance with any instructions given to him. Completion of a form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending and voting at the meeting in person.          
    The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:              
    1.      Election of Directors:                      
      Nominees:  For  Against  Abstain                
      

1a.    

 

1b.

 

1c.

 

1d.

 

1e.

 

1f.

 

1g.

 

1h.

 

1i.

 

1j.

 

  

Stephen J. Luczo

 

Mark W. Adams

 

Michael R. Cannon

 

Mei-Wei Cheng

 

William T. Coleman

 

Jay L. Geldmacher

 

William D. Mosley

 

Dr. Chong Sup Park

 

Stephanie Tilenius

 

Edward J. Zander

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR 1 year on the following proposal:  1 Year  2 Years  3 Years  Abstain
                

 

3.

  

 

Approve, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes.

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

                

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:

 

    

For

 

  

Against

 

  

Abstain

 

                4.  

Approve an amendment and restatement of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance.

 

      
                5.  

Ratify, in a non-binding vote, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) to set the auditors’ remuneration.

 

      
                6.  

Grant the Board the authority to allot and/or issue shares under Irish law.

 

      
                7.  

Grant the Board the authority to opt-out of statutory pre-emption rights under Irish law.

 

      
    2.      Approve, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (“Say-on-Pay”).        8.  Determine the price range at which the Company can re-allot shares that it acquires as treasury shares under Irish law.      
              

 

You can instruct your proxy not to vote on a resolution by inserting an “x” in the box under “Abstain”. Please note that an abstention is not a vote in law and will not be counted in the calculation of the proportion of the votes for and against a resolution.

        
                

 

In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

  Yes  No    
                

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

 

          

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

                              
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date
Signature (Joint Owners)Date

V.1.1


LOGO

D22752-P42447 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC Annual General Meeting of Shareholders October 22, 2020 5:00 PM Irish Standard Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Michael R. Cannon and Katherine E. Schuelke, or each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The undersigned hereby further authorize(s) such proxies to vote in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before such Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. In the event of a vote on a show of hands on any proposal or other matter properly coming before the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, Michael R. Cannon and Katherine E. Schuelke, or each of them, shall be entitled to vote the undersigned’s shares, as designated on the reverse side hereof. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED AND DELIVERED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF THIS PROXY IS DULY EXECUTED AND RETURNED, BUT NO VOTING DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN HEREIN, THEN THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1, AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4, AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE 2020 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE The signer hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and accompanying Proxy Statement. Continued and to be signed on reverse side

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — —

E31921-P96669        

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC

Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

October 18, 2017 9:30 AM Local Time

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Michael R. Cannon and Katherine E. Schuelke, or each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The undersigned hereby further authorizes such proxies to vote in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before such Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. In the event of a vote on a show of hands on any proposal or other matter properly coming before the 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, Michael R. Cannon and Katherine E. Schuelke, or each of them, shall be entitled to vote the undersigned’s shares, as designated on the reverse side hereof.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED AND DELIVERED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF THIS PROXY IS DULY EXECUTED AND RETURNED, BUT NO VOTING DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN HEREIN, THEN THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1, “FOR” PROPOSAL 2, FOR “ONE YEAR” FOR PROPOSAL 3, AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE 2017 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE

The signer(s) hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of the 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and accompanying Proxy Statement.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side